Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
182 lines (139 loc) · 11.8 KB

File metadata and controls

182 lines (139 loc) · 11.8 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for element-hq/element-android

  • Description:

    1. Certificate Pinning: Implement certificate pinning within the element-android code to store and verify the expected homeserver certificate (or its hash). This involves modifying network connection logic to compare the presented certificate against the pinned value. A secure mechanism for updating the pinned certificate (e.g., a signed configuration file fetched over a separate, trusted channel) must also be implemented within the app.
    2. Federation Allow/Deny Lists (Client-Side): Add UI elements and underlying logic within element-android to allow users (or administrators, if applicable) to specify allowed and denied homeservers. This involves modifying settings screens and connection logic.
  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Malicious Homeserver (High Severity): Prevents a compromised or rogue homeserver from impersonating a legitimate one.
    • Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks (High Severity): Makes MITM attacks significantly harder.
    • Data Tampering (High Severity): Reduces the risk of data alteration by a malicious homeserver.
    • Eavesdropping (High Severity): Makes eavesdropping more difficult.
  • Impact:

    • Malicious Homeserver: Risk significantly reduced.
    • MITM Attacks: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Data Tampering: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Eavesdropping: Risk significantly reduced.
  • Currently Implemented:

    • Basic TLS Validation: element-android uses TLS.
    • Certificate Pinning: Likely partially implemented (needs verification), but not comprehensively.
    • Federation Allow/Deny Lists: Likely not implemented in the client.
  • Missing Implementation:

    • Comprehensive Certificate Pinning: Needs to be implemented for all homeserver connections, with a secure update mechanism, all within the element-android codebase.
    • Federation Allow/Deny Lists (Client-Side): Requires UI and logic changes within element-android.
  • Description:

    1. While element-android already verifies signatures, this focuses on strengthening the implementation.
    2. Ensure that all signature verification failures result in the event being completely discarded and never processed.
    3. Implement detailed logging within element-android to record every signature verification failure, including the event ID, homeserver, and any error details. This is crucial for debugging and identifying attacks.
  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Event Forgery (High Severity): Prevents forged events.
    • Data Tampering (High Severity): Ensures event integrity.
    • Replay Attacks (Medium Severity): Part of a broader replay prevention strategy.
  • Impact:

    • Event Forgery: Risk almost entirely eliminated.
    • Data Tampering: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Replay Attacks: Risk partially mitigated.
  • Currently Implemented:

    • element-android does verify signatures.
  • Missing Implementation:

    • Enhanced Logging and Auditing: The key improvement is to ensure comprehensive and detailed logging of all verification failures within the element-android code.
  • Description:

    1. Android Keystore Usage: Verify that element-android consistently uses the Android Keystore for all cryptographic key storage.
    2. Key Protection Flags: Review and potentially strengthen the key protection flags used when storing keys in the Keystore (e.g., requiring biometric authentication whenever possible). This involves code changes within element-android.
    3. Key Backup/Recovery (Review): Thoroughly review the implementation of the key backup and recovery system within element-android to ensure its security and robustness against attacks.
    4. Key Rotation: Implement key rotation logic within the element-android application.
  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Device Compromise (High Severity): Protects keys on compromised devices.
    • Key Theft (High Severity): Makes key theft much harder.
    • Data Loss (High Severity): Prevents data loss due to lost devices.
    • Brute-Force Attacks (Medium Severity): Makes brute-force attacks more difficult.
  • Impact:

    • Device Compromise: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Key Theft: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Data Loss: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Brute-Force Attacks: Risk significantly reduced.
  • Currently Implemented:

    • Android Keystore: element-android uses the Keystore.
    • Key Protection Flags: Likely implemented, but needs review.
    • Key Backup/Recovery: Implemented, but needs security review.
  • Missing Implementation:

    • Key Protection Flag Review: Ensure optimal flags are used consistently.
    • Key Backup/Recovery Security Audit: A thorough security audit of the implementation is needed.
    • Key Rotation: Implement key rotation.
  • Description:

    1. Within the element-android code, meticulously validate all data received from the Matrix Client-Server API before processing it.
    2. Implement both format and content validation.
    3. Use a whitelist approach whenever feasible.
    4. This involves modifying the code that interacts with the matrix-android-sdk2 and handles API responses.
  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Injection Attacks (High Severity): Prevents various injection attacks.
    • Buffer Overflows (High Severity): Prevents buffer overflows.
    • Denial-of-Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): Partially mitigates DoS.
    • Logic Flaws (Variable Severity): Reduces risk from unexpected input.
  • Impact:

    • Injection Attacks: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Buffer Overflows: Risk significantly reduced.
    • DoS: Risk partially mitigated.
    • Logic Flaws: Risk reduced.
  • Currently Implemented:

    • Likely some input validation exists, but needs to be comprehensive and consistent.
  • Missing Implementation:

    • Comprehensive and Systematic Input Validation: Needs to be applied to all API interactions within element-android.

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Deep Link Validation

  • Description:

    1. Modify the element-android code that handles deep links (usually in the AndroidManifest.xml and associated activity classes).
    2. Implement a strict whitelist that defines exactly which deep link formats and parameters are allowed.
    3. Reject any deep link that doesn't match the whitelist.
    4. Before performing any action triggered by a deep link, always check user permissions within the element-android code.
  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Privilege Escalation (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized access.
    • Data Modification (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized data changes.
    • Account Takeover (High Severity): Makes account takeover harder.
    • Phishing (Medium Severity): Reduces phishing effectiveness.
  • Impact:

    • Privilege Escalation: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Data Modification: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Account Takeover: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Phishing: Risk partially mitigated.
  • Currently Implemented:

    • element-android handles deep links, but the validation needs strengthening.
  • Missing Implementation:

    • Strict Whitelist Validation: Implement a comprehensive whitelist within the deep link handling code.
    • Comprehensive Permission Checks: Ensure all actions triggered by deep links have proper permission checks.
  • Description:

    1. Strict Content Type Validation: Within element-android, rigorously validate the content type of all downloaded attachments and media files. Do not rely on file extensions alone. Use a robust library for MIME type detection, and compare against a whitelist of allowed types.
    2. Sandboxing (If Feasible): Explore sandboxing the rendering or processing of media files within element-android to isolate potential vulnerabilities in media codecs. This might involve using separate processes or restricted contexts.
    3. Media URL verification: Verify that URLs for media are pointing to trusted sources.
  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Malware Delivery (High Severity): Reduces the risk of users downloading and executing malicious files disguised as attachments.
    • Exploitation of Media Codec Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Mitigates attacks that exploit vulnerabilities in media processing libraries.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (High Severity): Prevents XSS attacks if attachments are rendered in a web view.
  • Impact:

    • Malware Delivery: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Exploitation of Media Codec Vulnerabilities: Risk reduced (significantly if sandboxing is implemented).
    • XSS: Risk significantly reduced.
  • Currently Implemented:

    • element-android likely has some content type checks, but the rigor and use of a whitelist need verification.
    • Sandboxing is likely not fully implemented.
  • Missing Implementation:

    • Strict Content Type Validation (Whitelist): Implement a robust whitelist-based content type validation mechanism.
    • Sandboxing: Explore and implement sandboxing for media processing, if feasible.
    • Media URL verification: Implement media URL verification.
  • Description:

    1. Sensitive Data Masking in Logs: Modify the logging mechanisms within element-android to automatically mask or redact sensitive data, such as passwords, session tokens, and cryptographic keys. This involves careful review of all logging statements.
    2. Disable Debugging in Production: Ensure that all debugging features and verbose logging are completely disabled in production builds of element-android. This often involves build configuration changes.
  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Information Disclosure (Medium to High Severity): Prevents sensitive data from being leaked through logs or debugging output.
    • Reverse Engineering (Medium Severity): Makes it harder for attackers to reverse engineer the application and discover vulnerabilities.
  • Impact:

    • Information Disclosure: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Reverse Engineering: Risk partially mitigated.
  • Currently Implemented:

    • element-android likely has some measures in place, but needs a thorough review.
  • Missing Implementation:

    • Comprehensive Sensitive Data Masking: Ensure all logging statements are reviewed and sensitive data is masked.
    • Strict Enforcement of Production Build Configuration: Verify that debugging features are completely disabled in production.