Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
170 lines (129 loc) · 15.2 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

170 lines (129 loc) · 15.2 KB

Okay, let's dive deep into the security analysis of Element Android, building upon the provided design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The primary objective is to conduct a thorough security analysis of the Element Android application, focusing on its key components, architecture, data flow, and interactions with the Matrix ecosystem. This analysis aims to identify potential vulnerabilities, assess their impact, and propose concrete mitigation strategies. The analysis will specifically target:

  • Confidentiality: Preventing unauthorized access to user data (messages, contacts, metadata, keys).
  • Integrity: Ensuring that data is not tampered with or corrupted.
  • Availability: Maintaining the application's functionality and responsiveness, even under attack.
  • Authentication & Authorization: Verifying user identities and enforcing access controls.
  • Compliance: Adhering to relevant security and privacy best practices.

Scope:

The scope of this analysis includes:

  • The Element Android application codebase (as inferred from the GitHub repository and documentation).
  • The Matrix Android SDK (as a critical dependency).
  • The interactions between Element Android and the Matrix homeserver, identity server, and push gateway.
  • The build and deployment process.
  • The identified security controls (both existing and recommended).
  • The stated business priorities, risks, and accepted risks.

The scope excludes a deep dive into the security of the Matrix homeserver itself, other Matrix clients, or the identity server. We will assume the homeserver is reasonably secure, but acknowledge it as a potential attack vector. We also exclude a full code audit, focusing instead on architectural and design-level vulnerabilities.

Methodology:

  1. Architecture and Component Analysis: We will analyze the provided C4 diagrams and descriptions to understand the application's architecture, components, and data flow. We will infer details from the element-android GitHub repository structure and documentation where necessary.
  2. Threat Modeling: We will use the STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) model to systematically identify potential threats to each component and data flow.
  3. Vulnerability Analysis: For each identified threat, we will assess the likelihood and impact of a successful exploit, considering existing security controls.
  4. Mitigation Strategy Recommendation: We will propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies to address the identified vulnerabilities, tailored to the Element Android context.
  5. Questions and Assumptions Review: We will revisit the initial questions and assumptions, refining them based on our analysis.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of each key component, applying STRIDE:

  • UI Components:

    • Threats:
      • Spoofing: An attacker could create a fake UI element to phish user credentials or trick the user into performing unintended actions.
      • Tampering: An attacker could modify the UI to display incorrect information or redirect the user to a malicious site.
      • Information Disclosure: Sensitive information (e.g., message previews, contact details) could be leaked through the UI due to improper handling of data.
      • Elevation of Privilege: A vulnerability in a UI component could allow an attacker to gain higher privileges within the application.
    • Mitigation:
      • Input Validation: Strictly validate all user inputs to prevent injection attacks.
      • Output Encoding: Properly encode all data displayed in the UI to prevent XSS vulnerabilities.
      • Secure Layout Management: Use secure layout techniques to prevent UI manipulation attacks.
      • Least Privilege: Ensure UI components only have the necessary permissions to perform their intended functions.
      • Regular UI Testing: Conduct thorough testing of the UI to identify and address potential vulnerabilities.

  • Matrix Android SDK:

    • Threats:
      • Spoofing: An attacker could impersonate the SDK or a legitimate Matrix server.
      • Tampering: An attacker could modify the SDK's code or data to alter its behavior.
      • Information Disclosure: Vulnerabilities in the SDK could lead to the leakage of sensitive data, including cryptographic keys or message content.
      • Denial of Service: An attacker could exploit vulnerabilities in the SDK to crash the application or disrupt communication with the homeserver.
      • Elevation of Privilege: A vulnerability in the SDK could allow an attacker to gain control over the application.
    • Mitigation:
      • Secure Coding Practices: Adhere to secure coding guidelines to prevent common vulnerabilities.
      • Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits of the SDK codebase.
      • Dependency Management: Keep all dependencies up-to-date and carefully vet any new dependencies.
      • Cryptography Review: Ensure the correct implementation and use of cryptographic algorithms and protocols.
      • Error Handling: Implement robust error handling to prevent unexpected behavior and potential vulnerabilities.

  • Networking Layer:

    • Threats:
      • Man-in-the-Middle (MITM): An attacker could intercept and modify communication between the client and the homeserver.
      • Information Disclosure: Unencrypted or weakly encrypted communication could expose sensitive data.
      • Denial of Service: An attacker could flood the network connection, preventing the application from communicating with the homeserver.
    • Mitigation:
      • HTTPS with Certificate Pinning: Enforce HTTPS for all communication and implement certificate pinning to prevent MITM attacks. This is critical.
      • Strong Ciphers: Use strong, up-to-date TLS cipher suites.
      • Network Monitoring: Monitor network traffic for suspicious activity.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting to mitigate DoS attacks.

  • Data Storage:

    • Threats:
      • Information Disclosure: Unauthorized access to locally stored data (messages, contacts, keys) due to insufficient encryption or vulnerabilities in the storage mechanism.
      • Tampering: An attacker could modify locally stored data to alter the application's behavior or corrupt user data.
    • Mitigation:
      • Application-Level Encryption: Implement application-level encryption for all sensitive data stored locally, in addition to Android's built-in storage encryption. This protects against attacks that bypass the OS-level encryption. Use a library like SQLCipher.
      • Secure Key Management: Store encryption keys securely, ideally using the Android Keystore system. Consider using the StrongBox backed KeyStore if available on the device.
      • Data Minimization: Store only the necessary data locally and delete it when it is no longer needed.
      • Regular Backups (with Encryption): If backups are implemented, ensure they are encrypted and stored securely.

  • Cryptography Module:

    • Threats:
      • Implementation Errors: Bugs in the implementation of Olm and Megolm could lead to weaknesses in the E2EE.
      • Key Compromise: If cryptographic keys are compromised, an attacker could decrypt past and future messages.
      • Side-Channel Attacks: An attacker could exploit side-channel information (e.g., timing, power consumption) to extract cryptographic keys.
    • Mitigation:
      • Formal Verification: Consider using formal verification techniques to prove the correctness of the cryptographic implementation.
      • Secure Key Generation and Storage: Use secure random number generators and store keys securely using the Android Keystore system.
      • Constant-Time Algorithms: Use constant-time cryptographic algorithms to mitigate timing attacks.
      • Regular Cryptographic Review: Have the cryptographic implementation reviewed by independent experts.
      • Key Rotation: Implement a mechanism for rotating cryptographic keys periodically.

  • Push Notification Handling:

    • Threats:
      • Spoofing: An attacker could send fake push notifications to the user.
      • Information Disclosure: Sensitive information could be leaked through push notifications (e.g., message previews).
      • Denial of Service: An attacker could flood the application with push notifications.
    • Mitigation:
      • Secure FCM Token Handling: Store the FCM registration token securely and prevent unauthorized access to it.
      • Notification Content Minimization: Minimize the amount of sensitive information included in push notifications. Ideally, notifications should only indicate that a new message has arrived, without revealing any content.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting on push notifications to prevent DoS attacks.
      • Verify Push Notification Source: Ensure that push notifications are coming from the legitimate homeserver.

3. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Specific to Element Android)

Based on the above analysis, here are the most critical and actionable mitigation strategies:

  1. Certificate Pinning (High Priority): Implement certificate pinning for all HTTPS connections to the homeserver and other critical services. This is the single most important mitigation against MITM attacks. Use a library like okhttp's CertificatePinner.

  2. Application-Level Encryption (High Priority): Implement application-level encryption for all sensitive data stored locally, using a library like SQLCipher. This protects against data breaches even if the device's full-disk encryption is compromised. Use the Android Keystore system for key management, preferably with StrongBox if available.

  3. Review and Harden Cryptography Module (High Priority):

    • Ensure the Olm and Megolm implementations are thoroughly reviewed and tested, ideally by independent cryptographic experts.
    • Verify the use of secure random number generators (e.g., SecureRandom).
    • Implement key rotation mechanisms.
    • Investigate and mitigate potential side-channel attacks.

  4. Secure Push Notification Handling (Medium Priority):

    • Minimize the content of push notifications to avoid leaking sensitive information. Use a "new message" indicator only.
    • Ensure the FCM token is stored securely and only accessible to the application.

  5. SAST and DAST Integration (Medium Priority):

    • Integrate SAST tools (e.g., FindBugs, PMD, SpotBugs, Android Lint, Detekt) into the build process to automatically detect vulnerabilities.
    • Use DAST tools (e.g., OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite) to test the running application for vulnerabilities, particularly those related to network communication and server-side interactions.

  6. Dependency Management and Supply Chain Security (Medium Priority):

    • Regularly update all dependencies to their latest secure versions.
    • Use dependency vulnerability scanners (e.g., OWASP Dependency-Check, Snyk).
    • Consider using checksums or signing to verify the integrity of downloaded artifacts.

  7. Bug Bounty Program (Medium Priority): Establish a bug bounty program to incentivize external security researchers to find and report vulnerabilities.

  8. Secure Coding Training (Ongoing): Provide regular security training to developers, covering topics such as secure coding practices, common Android vulnerabilities, and the Matrix protocol's security model.

  9. Input validation and sanitization (High Priority): All the data received from Homeserver should be treated as an untrusted input.

4. Refined Questions and Assumptions

Refined Questions:

  • Specific Audit Details: What were the specific findings and remediation steps from each past security audit and penetration test? Provide reports if possible.
  • Vulnerability Handling Process: Provide the documented process for handling security vulnerabilities, including reporting channels, response times, and disclosure policies.
  • Supply Chain Security Measures: What specific tools and procedures are used to verify the integrity of third-party libraries beyond Gradle? (e.g., checksum verification, signing, software bill of materials (SBOM)).
  • Certificate Pinning Implementation: Confirm whether certificate pinning is currently implemented. If not, prioritize its implementation immediately.
  • DAST Tooling: What specific DAST tools are used, and what is the scope and frequency of DAST testing?
  • Bug Bounty Program Status: Is a bug bounty program currently in place? If not, what are the plans for implementing one? If so, provide details on its scope and reward structure.
  • Key Rotation: What is the key rotation strategy for Olm/Megolm sessions? How frequently are keys rotated, and how is this managed?
  • Application-Level Encryption Details: Confirm if application-level encryption is used in addition to device encryption. If so, what library is used (SQLCipher recommended), and how are keys managed (Android Keystore recommended)?
  • Homeserver Interaction Validation: How does Element Android validate data received from the homeserver? Are there specific checks for malformed data or unexpected responses that could indicate a compromised homeserver?

Refined Assumptions:

  • BUSINESS POSTURE: The business prioritizes security and privacy and allocates sufficient resources to implement the recommended mitigation strategies.
  • SECURITY POSTURE: Developers follow secure coding practices consistently and are regularly trained on Android security best practices and the Matrix protocol. The Matrix Android SDK is actively maintained and undergoes regular security reviews.
  • DESIGN: The homeserver is configured securely according to best practices and implements appropriate security controls, including regular updates and vulnerability patching. Users are aware of basic security hygiene and are encouraged to report suspicious activity. The deployment via Google Play Store is the primary distribution method, and the project actively monitors for unauthorized distribution channels. The build process described is accurate and complete, and includes automated security checks.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for Element Android. The recommended mitigation strategies are prioritized and actionable, focusing on the most critical vulnerabilities. The refined questions and assumptions highlight areas where further information is needed to ensure a robust security posture. The key takeaway is the need for a multi-layered approach to security, combining secure coding practices, robust cryptographic implementations, strong network security, and proactive vulnerability management.