Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
63 lines (56 loc) · 8.56 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

63 lines (56 loc) · 8.56 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for ethereum-lists/chains

Mitigation Strategy: Data Schema Validation for Chains Data

  • Description:
    1. Define a strict schema (e.g., using JSON Schema, TypeScript interfaces, or similar) that accurately represents the expected structure and data types of the chains data specifically. This schema should detail the expected fields for each chain object (chainId, name, rpc, etc.) and their data types.
    2. Implement validation logic within the application to check every piece of chains data fetched from ethereum-lists/chains against this defined schema before using it. This validation should occur immediately after fetching and parsing the data.
    3. If validation fails for any chain data entry, log the error, and implement a fallback mechanism specifically for handling invalid chain data (e.g., exclude the invalid chain from available options, use a default chain configuration if critical, alert administrators).
    • Threats Mitigated:
      • Data Integrity Issues in Chains Data (High Severity): Malicious or accidental modifications to the chains data in ethereum-lists/chains could lead to incorrect chain configurations in the application, potentially causing users to interact with the wrong networks, leading to financial losses or security vulnerabilities.
      • Data Type Mismatches in Chains Data (Medium Severity): Unexpected data types within the chains data (e.g., a string where a number is expected for chainId) can cause application errors, crashes, or unexpected behavior when processing chain configurations.
    • Impact:
      • Data Integrity Issues in Chains Data: Significantly reduces the risk by ensuring only chains data conforming to the expected structure is processed, preventing the application from using potentially corrupted or malicious chain configurations.
      • Data Type Mismatches in Chains Data: Significantly reduces the risk by enforcing data type consistency within the chains data, preventing type-related errors and ensuring reliable processing of chain configurations.
    • Currently Implemented: Backend data processing module partially implements schema validation using basic type checks in Python, focusing on ensuring chainId and rpc URLs are present and of expected types.
    • Missing Implementation:
      • Frontend data handling lacks validation of chains data before using it to populate chain selection menus or configure network interactions.
      • Schema for chains data is not formally defined using a schema language like JSON Schema, relying on ad-hoc checks which may not cover all fields and potential issues.
      • Error handling for chains data validation failures is limited to logging; no robust fallback mechanism is in place to handle situations where critical chain data is invalid.

Mitigation Strategy: Curated Local Subset of Chains Data

  • Description:
    1. Instead of using the entire ethereum-lists/chains dataset, create and maintain a local, curated subset of chains data that includes only the blockchain networks your application explicitly needs to support.
    2. Manually review and select the relevant chain entries from ethereum-lists/chains and store them in a local data file (e.g., JSON file within the application repository).
    3. Update this local curated dataset periodically by manually checking for updates in ethereum-lists/chains for the selected networks and incorporating necessary changes.
    4. Configure the application to load and use chain data exclusively from this local curated subset, instead of directly fetching or processing the entire ethereum-lists/chains dataset.
    • Threats Mitigated:
      • Supply Chain Risks related to Chains Data (Medium Severity): Reduces the attack surface by limiting reliance on the entire external ethereum-lists/chains dataset. If a malicious actor were to compromise a less frequently used chain entry in the full dataset, it would not impact the application if it only uses a curated subset.
      • Data Integrity Issues from Less Relevant Chains (Low Severity): By focusing on a curated set, the application reduces the risk of being affected by data inaccuracies or inconsistencies in less critical or less vetted chain entries within the larger ethereum-lists/chains repository.
      • Data Overload and Processing Complexity (Low Severity): Processing only a curated subset of chains data simplifies data handling and reduces potential performance overhead compared to processing the entire dataset.
    • Impact:
      • Supply Chain Risks related to Chains Data: Partially reduces the risk by limiting the scope of external data dependency to only necessary chains.
      • Data Integrity Issues from Less Relevant Chains: Partially reduces the risk by focusing on a smaller, more manageable dataset that can be more easily reviewed and validated.
      • Data Overload and Processing Complexity: Partially reduces the risk by simplifying data handling and potentially improving performance.
    • Currently Implemented: The application currently uses the entire ethereum-lists/chains dataset. No curated subset is implemented.
    • Missing Implementation:
      • Need to create a process for manually curating a subset of relevant chains data.
      • Implement logic to load and use chain data exclusively from this curated local subset.
      • Establish a workflow for periodically reviewing and updating the curated subset based on changes in application requirements and updates in ethereum-lists/chains.

Mitigation Strategy: Redundancy and Cross-Validation of Critical Chain Data

  • Description:
    1. Identify the most critical chain data fields for your application's functionality (e.g., chainId, rpcUrls, nativeCurrency).
    2. For these critical fields, implement a cross-validation mechanism that compares the data obtained from ethereum-lists/chains with data from other reputable and independent sources of blockchain network information (e.g., official blockchain documentation, well-known blockchain explorers' APIs, other community-maintained lists).
    3. If discrepancies are detected between ethereum-lists/chains data and the cross-validation sources for critical fields, implement a strategy to handle these inconsistencies. This could involve:
      • Logging the discrepancy for manual review.
      • Prioritizing data from the more trusted cross-validation source.
      • Alerting administrators to investigate the potential data integrity issue.
      • Gracefully degrading functionality that relies on the potentially inconsistent data.
    • Threats Mitigated:
      • Data Integrity Issues in Critical Chain Data (High Severity): Reduces the risk of relying on potentially inaccurate or manipulated critical chain data from a single source (ethereum-lists/chains). Cross-validation provides a mechanism to detect and mitigate data integrity problems in essential chain configurations.
      • Single Source of Truth Vulnerability for Chain Data (Medium Severity): Mitigates the risk of relying solely on ethereum-lists/chains as the single source of truth for chain information. Diversifying data sources improves resilience against data inaccuracies or availability issues in one source.
    • Impact:
      • Data Integrity Issues in Critical Chain Data: Significantly reduces the risk by providing a mechanism to detect and potentially correct or mitigate the impact of inaccurate or malicious data in critical chain configurations.
      • Single Source of Truth Vulnerability for Chain Data: Partially reduces the risk by diversifying data sources and reducing over-reliance on ethereum-lists/chains.
    • Currently Implemented: No redundancy or cross-validation of chain data is currently implemented. The application relies solely on ethereum-lists/chains for all chain information.
    • Missing Implementation:
      • Need to identify suitable alternative data sources for cross-validating critical chain data fields.
      • Implement logic to fetch and compare chain data from ethereum-lists/chains and the alternative sources.
      • Develop a discrepancy handling strategy to address situations where data from different sources conflicts, especially for critical chain fields.