Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
154 lines (132 loc) · 15.3 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

154 lines (132 loc) · 15.3 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of the Facebook Android SDK based on the provided design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of the key components of the facebook-android-sdk, identifying potential vulnerabilities, weaknesses, and areas for improvement. The analysis will focus on how the SDK's design and implementation impact the security of applications that integrate it, and the privacy of users who interact with those applications. We aim to provide actionable recommendations to mitigate identified risks.

  • Scope: The analysis will cover the following key components as identified in the C4 Container diagram and the Security Posture section:

    • Login Component: OAuth 2.0 flow, token handling, and user authentication.
    • Sharing Component: Data sharing mechanisms, content validation, and potential injection vulnerabilities.
    • Graph API Component: API request construction, response parsing, and data handling.
    • Authentication Manager: Secure storage and management of access tokens, refresh tokens, and user sessions.
    • Network Client: HTTPS communication, certificate validation, and potential network-based attacks.
    • Third-party library usage: Dependencies and their associated vulnerabilities.
    • Data flow between the components, the third-party app, the Android OS, and Facebook's servers.

  • Methodology:

    1. Architecture and Data Flow Inference: Based on the provided C4 diagrams, documentation snippets, and general knowledge of the Facebook platform, we will infer the likely architecture, data flow, and interactions between components.
    2. Threat Modeling: For each component and interaction, we will identify potential threats using a combination of STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) and consideration of common mobile application vulnerabilities.
    3. Codebase Review (Hypothetical): While we don't have direct access to the SDK's source code, we will hypothesize about likely implementation details and potential vulnerabilities based on best practices, common security pitfalls, and the SDK's public API. This will be informed by the security controls mentioned in the design review.
    4. Mitigation Strategy Recommendation: For each identified threat, we will propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to the facebook-android-sdk and the context of Android application development.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of each component:

  • Login Component (OAuth 2.0)

    • Architecture: The component likely initiates a web view or custom tab to Facebook's authorization endpoint. The user authenticates with Facebook, grants permissions, and an authorization code is returned to the app via a redirect URI. The SDK then exchanges this code for an access token.
    • Threats:
      • Phishing: A malicious app could mimic the Facebook login screen to steal user credentials. The SDK itself is not vulnerable to this, but apps using the SDK could be.
      • Authorization Code Interception: If the redirect URI is not properly secured (e.g., using a custom scheme without proper intent filters), another app on the device could intercept the authorization code.
      • Token Leakage: If the access token is logged, stored insecurely, or transmitted over an insecure channel, it could be compromised.
      • CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery): If the OAuth flow doesn't include a state parameter (or it's not properly validated), an attacker could trick a user into authorizing a malicious application.
      • Open Redirect: If Facebook's authorization endpoint has an open redirect vulnerability, an attacker could use it to redirect the user to a malicious site after authentication. This is a Facebook server-side issue, but the SDK should be aware of the possibility.
      • Session Fixation: If a new session is not established after successful login, an attacker might be able to hijack the user's session.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • SDK-Level:
        • Enforce HTTPS for all redirect URIs. The SDK should refuse to process redirects over HTTP.
        • Validate the state parameter rigorously. The SDK should generate a cryptographically secure random state value and verify it upon receiving the authorization code.
        • Provide clear guidance and warnings to developers about secure token storage. The SDK documentation should emphasize the importance of using the Android Keystore System or EncryptedSharedPreferences.
        • Implement a robust error handling mechanism that does not leak sensitive information. Error messages should be generic and not reveal details about the internal state of the SDK.
      • Developer-Level (Guidance from SDK):
        • Use HTTPS for custom scheme redirect URIs. This is critical to prevent interception. Developers should use App Links (Android) to associate their app with a specific domain.
        • Avoid storing access tokens in SharedPreferences (use EncryptedSharedPreferences instead).
        • Regularly refresh access tokens and handle token expiration gracefully.
        • Implement robust input validation to prevent injection attacks.

  • Sharing Component

    • Architecture: This component likely provides APIs to construct share dialogs (native or web-based) and post content to Facebook on behalf of the user.
    • Threats:
      • Content Spoofing: A malicious app could inject malicious content (e.g., phishing links, spam) into the share dialog.
      • Data Leakage: Sensitive information from the app could be unintentionally shared if the sharing component doesn't properly sanitize the content.
      • XSS (Cross-Site Scripting): If the share dialog uses a web view and doesn't properly sanitize user input, an attacker could inject malicious JavaScript.
      • Denial of Service: A malicious app could repeatedly trigger the sharing component, potentially overwhelming Facebook's servers or disrupting the user experience.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • SDK-Level:
        • Implement strict input validation and sanitization for all content shared through the SDK. This should include URL validation, HTML escaping, and checks for malicious patterns.
        • Provide options for developers to customize the share dialog and restrict the type of content that can be shared.
        • Rate-limit the sharing functionality to prevent abuse.
      • Developer-Level (Guidance from SDK):
        • Validate all user input before passing it to the sharing component.
        • Use the SDK's built-in sanitization functions to ensure that content is safe to share.
        • Be mindful of the privacy implications of sharing user data.

  • Graph API Component

    • Architecture: This component handles constructing and sending API requests to Facebook's Graph API, parsing the responses, and handling errors.
    • Threats:
      • Injection Attacks: If the SDK doesn't properly escape user input when constructing API requests, an attacker could inject malicious parameters or queries.
      • Data Leakage: Sensitive information could be leaked if API responses are not properly handled or if error messages are too verbose.
      • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks: If HTTPS is not enforced or certificate validation is weak, an attacker could intercept and modify API requests and responses.
      • Excessive Data Retrieval: The app might request more data than it needs, increasing the risk of data exposure.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • SDK-Level:
        • Enforce HTTPS for all API requests.
        • Implement certificate pinning to prevent MitM attacks. This is crucial.
        • Use parameterized queries or a similar mechanism to prevent injection attacks. Never directly concatenate user input into API requests.
        • Validate and sanitize all API responses. Treat data received from Facebook servers as untrusted until validated.
        • Provide clear guidance to developers on how to request only the necessary data and permissions.
        • Implement robust error handling that does not leak sensitive information.
      • Developer-Level (Guidance from SDK):
        • Follow the principle of least privilege when requesting permissions. Only request the permissions that are absolutely necessary for the app's functionality.
        • Use the SDK's built-in functions for constructing API requests and handling responses.
        • Be mindful of the privacy implications of accessing user data.

  • Authentication Manager

    • Architecture: This component is responsible for securely storing and managing access tokens, refresh tokens, and user sessions.
    • Threats:
      • Token Theft: If tokens are stored insecurely (e.g., in plain text, in SharedPreferences without encryption), they could be stolen by a malicious app or attacker.
      • Token Expiration Issues: If the SDK doesn't handle token expiration gracefully, the app might lose access to Facebook's services.
      • Session Hijacking: If session management is weak, an attacker could hijack a user's session.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • SDK-Level:
        • Use the Android Keystore System to securely store access tokens and refresh tokens. This is the recommended approach for storing sensitive data on Android.
        • Alternatively, use EncryptedSharedPreferences with a strong key generated by the Android Keystore System.
        • Implement automatic token refresh before expiration.
        • Provide clear APIs for developers to handle token expiration and renewal.
        • Invalidate tokens on the server-side when the user logs out or changes their password.
      • Developer-Level (Guidance from SDK):
        • Never store tokens in plain text or in insecure locations.
        • Use the SDK's built-in functions for managing tokens and sessions.
        • Implement proper logout functionality that invalidates tokens on both the client and server sides.

  • Network Client

    • Architecture: This component handles all network communication with Facebook's servers.
    • Threats:
      • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks: If HTTPS is not enforced or certificate validation is weak, an attacker could intercept and modify network traffic.
      • Network Eavesdropping: If sensitive data is transmitted over an insecure channel, it could be intercepted by an attacker.
      • DNS Spoofing: An attacker could redirect the SDK to a malicious server by spoofing DNS responses.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • SDK-Level:
        • Enforce HTTPS for all communication with Facebook servers. This is non-negotiable.
        • Implement certificate pinning to prevent MitM attacks. This is critical. The SDK should pin the certificate of Facebook's API servers.
        • Use a secure HTTP client library (e.g., OkHttp) with proper configuration.
        • Validate the hostname of the server to prevent DNS spoofing.
      • Developer-Level (Guidance from SDK):
        • Ensure that the device's network settings are secure.
        • Be aware of the risks of using public Wi-Fi networks.

  • Third-Party Library Usage

    • Architecture: The SDK likely depends on various third-party libraries for tasks like networking, JSON parsing, and image loading.
    • Threats:
      • Vulnerable Dependencies: Third-party libraries may contain known vulnerabilities that could be exploited by attackers.
      • Supply Chain Attacks: A malicious actor could compromise a library's repository or distribution channel and inject malicious code.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • SDK-Level:
        • Regularly scan for vulnerabilities in third-party libraries using a dependency scanner (e.g., Snyk, OWASP Dependency-Check). This should be part of the build process.
        • Keep third-party libraries up to date. Apply security patches promptly.
        • Use only reputable and well-maintained libraries.
        • Consider vendoring critical libraries (copying the source code into the SDK's repository) to reduce the risk of supply chain attacks. This has trade-offs (maintenance burden), but increases control.
      • Developer-Level (Guidance from SDK):
        • Be aware of the dependencies used by the SDK and their potential vulnerabilities.
        • Use a dependency scanner to identify vulnerabilities in your own application's dependencies.

3. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Summary and Prioritization)

The most critical mitigation strategies, ranked by importance, are:

  1. Certificate Pinning (SDK-Level): This is the single most important mitigation to prevent MitM attacks. The SDK must pin the certificates of Facebook's API servers.
  2. Secure Token Storage (SDK-Level): Use the Android Keystore System or EncryptedSharedPreferences with a strong key. Never store tokens in plain text or SharedPreferences.
  3. Enforce HTTPS (SDK-Level): All communication with Facebook servers must use HTTPS. This should be enforced at the SDK level and not rely on developer configuration.
  4. Input Validation and Sanitization (SDK-Level and Developer-Level): Strict input validation and sanitization are crucial to prevent injection attacks and content spoofing. The SDK should provide helper functions for this.
  5. Dependency Scanning (SDK-Level): Regularly scan for vulnerabilities in third-party libraries and keep them up to date.
  6. OAuth 2.0 Best Practices (SDK-Level): Enforce HTTPS for redirect URIs, validate the state parameter, and provide clear guidance on secure token handling.
  7. Principle of Least Privilege (Developer-Level): Developers should only request the minimum necessary permissions. The SDK should provide guidance on this.
  8. Robust Error Handling (SDK-Level): Error messages should be generic and not leak sensitive information.
  9. Rate Limiting (SDK-Level): Implement rate limiting for sensitive operations (e.g., sharing) to prevent abuse.
  10. App Links for Redirect URIs (Developer-Level): Developers should use App Links to securely associate their app with a domain for redirect URIs.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for the Facebook Android SDK. By implementing these mitigation strategies, Facebook can significantly enhance the security of the SDK and protect the privacy of users who interact with applications that integrate it. The recommendations are tailored to the specific architecture and functionality of the SDK, and they address the most likely and impactful threats.