Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
75 lines (56 loc) · 7.38 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

75 lines (56 loc) · 7.38 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for google/accompanist

Mitigation Strategy: Migrate to Core Jetpack Compose Libraries

Description:

  1. Identify Accompanist Usage: Thoroughly audit your codebase to identify all instances where Accompanist components or APIs are used. Use your IDE's "Find Usages" feature or a text search.
  2. Prioritize High-Risk Components: Focus first on migrating components that handle sensitive operations, like permissions (Permissions), or those known to have had past issues.
  3. Find Compose Equivalents: For each identified Accompanist usage, determine the corresponding core Jetpack Compose API or library. Consult the official Accompanist and Compose documentation.
  4. Incremental Replacement: Replace Accompanist components one by one. Do not attempt a bulk replacement. This allows for focused testing and easier rollback if needed.
  5. Accompanist-Specific Testing: After each individual replacement, perform targeted testing that specifically exercises the functionality previously provided by the Accompanist component. This includes unit, UI, and integration tests.
  6. Remove Accompanist Dependency: Once all Accompanist usages are replaced and thoroughly tested, remove the google/accompanist dependency from your build.gradle file.
  7. Final Accompanist-Related Testing: After removing the dependency, perform a final round of regression testing, paying particular attention to areas that previously relied on Accompanist.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Dependency-Related Vulnerabilities in Accompanist (High Severity): Directly eliminates the risk of vulnerabilities within the Accompanist library itself and its dependencies.
  • Logic Errors in Accompanist Code (Medium to High Severity): Removes the risk of bugs or unexpected behavior stemming from Accompanist's internal implementation.
  • Supply Chain Attacks Targeting Accompanist (Medium Severity): Eliminates the attack vector of a compromised Accompanist library or its specific dependencies.
  • Incorrect Usage of Accompanist APIs (Variable Severity): Directly addresses the risk of misusing Accompanist-specific APIs.

Impact:

  • Dependency-Related Vulnerabilities in Accompanist: Risk reduced to near zero.
  • Logic Errors in Accompanist Code: Risk reduced to near zero.
  • Supply Chain Attacks Targeting Accompanist: Risk reduced to near zero.
  • Incorrect Usage of Accompanist APIs: Risk reduced to near zero.

Currently Implemented:

  • Example: Migration of Pager to HorizontalPager is complete (see ui/screens/home/HomeScreen.kt). Migration of rememberSystemUiController is in progress (see ui/components/SystemUi.kt).

Missing Implementation:

  • Example: Migration of Permissions is not yet started. This is a high priority due to the security implications of permission handling. FlowLayout usage in ui/screens/details/DetailsScreen.kt also needs migration.

Mitigation Strategy: Dependency Analysis Focused on Accompanist (Pre-Migration)

Description:

  1. Configure Tool for Accompanist: Configure your chosen dependency analysis tool (OWASP Dependency-Check, Snyk, etc.) to specifically monitor the google/accompanist library and all of its transitive dependencies.
  2. Prioritize Accompanist Alerts: Set up alerts or notifications to be triggered immediately whenever a new vulnerability is reported for any Accompanist-related dependency.
  3. Investigate Transitive Dependencies: Pay extra attention to vulnerabilities in Accompanist's transitive dependencies, as these are often overlooked.
  4. Force Version Overrides (Temporary, Accompanist-Specific): If a vulnerability is found in an Accompanist dependency, and Accompanist itself hasn't been updated, temporarily force a newer, patched version of the vulnerable dependency in your build.gradle file. This is a stopgap measure until you can fully migrate. Thoroughly test after applying this.
  5. Document Overrides: Clearly document any forced version overrides, including the reason (CVE number), the affected dependency, and the planned migration timeline.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Dependency-Related Vulnerabilities in Accompanist (High Severity): Provides early warning of known vulnerabilities specifically within Accompanist and its dependency tree.

Impact:

  • Dependency-Related Vulnerabilities in Accompanist: Risk moderately reduced. Allows for proactive response to known vulnerabilities, but doesn't prevent unknown ones.

Currently Implemented:

  • Example: OWASP Dependency-Check is integrated into the CI/CD pipeline (see .github/workflows/ci.yml). Reports are generated on every build.

Missing Implementation:

  • Example: Automated alerts specifically for Accompanist-related vulnerabilities are not yet configured. The current setup requires manual report review. We need to prioritize alerts for any dependency starting with com.google.accompanist.

Mitigation Strategy: Targeted Testing of Accompanist Components (Pre-Migration)

Description:

  1. Identify All Accompanist Usages: Create a comprehensive list of every location in your code where an Accompanist component or API is used.
  2. Prioritize Critical Components: Focus testing efforts on Accompanist components that handle sensitive data, permissions, or critical UI flows.
  3. Accompanist-Specific Unit Tests: Write unit tests that specifically target the interaction between your code and the Accompanist APIs. Test edge cases, boundary conditions, and error handling related to Accompanist's behavior.
  4. Accompanist-Specific UI Tests: Create UI tests (using Espresso or Compose Test) that exercise the UI elements and flows that rely on Accompanist. Focus on scenarios that are unique to Accompanist's functionality.
  5. (Optional) Accompanist-Specific Fuzz Testing: If feasible, consider fuzz testing specifically targeting Accompanist APIs. This involves providing random, unexpected inputs to the Accompanist components to try to trigger crashes or unexpected behavior.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Logic Errors in Accompanist Code (Medium to High Severity): Increases the chances of discovering bugs or unexpected behavior within the Accompanist library itself.
  • Incorrect Usage of Accompanist APIs (Variable Severity): Helps to identify and correct any misinterpretations or misuses of Accompanist's intended functionality.

Impact:

  • Logic Errors in Accompanist Code: Risk moderately reduced. Testing can uncover many issues, but it's not exhaustive.
  • Incorrect Usage of Accompanist APIs: Risk moderately reduced.

Currently Implemented:

  • Example: Unit tests exist for most components that use Accompanist (see src/test/java/com/example/app). UI tests are in place for the main screens (see src/androidTest/java/com/example/app).

Missing Implementation:

  • Example: UI tests are missing for edge cases related to the Permissions component, specifically around handling permission denials and rationale dialogs. Fuzz testing specifically for Accompanist is not implemented. We need dedicated tests for every Accompanist component, not just general UI tests.