Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
162 lines (128 loc) · 13.4 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

162 lines (128 loc) · 13.4 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for google/filament

Objective: Compromise application using Filament by exploiting weaknesses or vulnerabilities within Filament itself.

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Goal: Compromise Application Using Filament [CRITICAL NODE] ├─── AND ─ Gain Initial Access to Application [CRITICAL NODE] │ └─── OR ─ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Exploit Filament Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ └─── OR ─ │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Rendering Engine Bugs [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ └─── OR ─ │ │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Memory Corruption [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ │ └─── AND ─ │ │ │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Trigger via Malicious Assets (Models, Textures, Scenes) │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Social Engineering (Less Filament-Specific, but possible entry point) [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ └─── AND ─ │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Phishing/Malware to compromise developer machines [CRITICAL NODE] ├─── AND ─ Maintain Access & Achieve Goal [CRITICAL NODE] └─── AND ─ Impact [CRITICAL NODE] └─── OR ─ ├─── Application Unavailability (DoS) [CRITICAL NODE] ├─── Data Breach (Information Disclosure) [CRITICAL NODE] ├─── Defacement/Malicious Content Display (Data Manipulation) [CRITICAL NODE] ├─── Reputational Damage [CRITICAL NODE] └─── Financial Loss [CRITICAL NODE]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Attack Goal: Compromise Application Using Filament [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: The ultimate objective of the attacker. Success means gaining unauthorized control or causing harm to the application utilizing Filament.
  • Impact: Critical - Represents the most severe outcome, encompassing various forms of damage.
  • Actionable Insights: All security efforts should be directed towards preventing the attacker from achieving this goal.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Gain Initial Access to Application [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: The necessary first step for the attacker. Without initial access, subsequent attack stages are impossible.
  • Impact: Critical - Enables all further attack vectors.
  • Actionable Insights: Focus on preventing any form of unauthorized entry into the application or its environment.

Attack Tree Path: 3. [HIGH-RISK PATH] Exploit Filament Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Directly targeting weaknesses within the Filament rendering engine itself.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Filament, being complex software, may contain undiscovered vulnerabilities.
  • Impact: High - Exploiting core engine vulnerabilities can lead to severe consequences like memory corruption, crashes, and information disclosure.
  • Effort: Medium to High - Requires reverse engineering skills and deep understanding of graphics rendering and engine internals.
  • Skill Level: Medium to High - Intermediate to Advanced attacker skills are needed.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium to High - Exploits might be subtle and difficult to detect without specialized security tools and deep engine knowledge.
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Prioritize security updates for Filament and its dependencies.
    • Conduct thorough security testing, including fuzzing, of Filament integration.
    • Implement robust error handling to prevent crashes from unexpected inputs.

Attack Tree Path: 4. [HIGH-RISK PATH] Rendering Engine Bugs [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Exploiting specific bugs within Filament's rendering engine code.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Rendering engines are complex and prone to bugs, especially in edge cases or when handling unusual inputs.
  • Impact: High - Bugs can lead to memory corruption, crashes, and potentially information disclosure.
  • Effort: Medium to High - Requires debugging skills and understanding of rendering engine architecture.
  • Skill Level: Medium to High - Intermediate to Advanced attacker skills are needed.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium to High - Bugs might be triggered by specific conditions and hard to reproduce or detect consistently.
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Stay updated with Filament bug fixes and security patches.
    • Implement robust error handling and crash reporting to identify potential bugs.
    • Conduct thorough testing with diverse and potentially malformed assets.

Attack Tree Path: 5. [HIGH-RISK PATH] Memory Corruption [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Triggering memory corruption vulnerabilities within Filament's memory management or data processing.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Memory corruption is a common class of vulnerabilities in C++ based software like Filament.
  • Impact: High - Memory corruption can lead to arbitrary code execution, data breaches, and denial of service.
  • Effort: Medium - Tools and techniques for exploiting memory corruption are well-known.
  • Skill Level: Medium - Intermediate attacker skills are sufficient to exploit common memory corruption vulnerabilities.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Memory corruption can be detected with memory sanitizers and debugging tools, but exploitation in the wild can be harder to pinpoint.
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Employ memory-safe coding practices.
    • Utilize memory sanitizers during development and testing.
    • Implement robust input validation to prevent buffer overflows and other memory-related issues.

Attack Tree Path: 6. [HIGH-RISK PATH] Trigger via Malicious Assets (Models, Textures, Scenes)

  • Description: Exploiting memory corruption vulnerabilities by providing maliciously crafted assets (models, textures, scenes) to the Filament application.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Applications often load external assets, making this a viable attack vector.
  • Impact: High - Malicious assets can trigger memory corruption, leading to code execution, data breaches, and denial of service.
  • Effort: Medium - Crafting malicious assets requires understanding of asset formats and potential vulnerabilities, but tools and examples are available.
  • Skill Level: Medium - Intermediate attacker skills are needed.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Input validation and anomaly detection can help, but sophisticated malicious assets might be harder to detect without deep asset analysis.
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Implement robust input validation on all loaded assets.
    • Use secure parsing libraries and perform format checks.
    • Sanitize and validate asset content beyond format checks.
    • Consider sandboxing asset loading and processing.

Attack Tree Path: 7. [HIGH-RISK PATH] Social Engineering (Less Filament-Specific, but possible entry point) [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Exploiting human behavior to gain access, rather than directly targeting Filament's technical vulnerabilities.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Social engineering attacks are common and often successful.
  • Impact: Critical - Can bypass technical security measures and lead to full system compromise.
  • Effort: Low - Social engineering attacks can be relatively low effort, especially phishing.
  • Skill Level: Low to Medium - Basic social engineering attacks can be carried out by low-skill attackers, while more sophisticated attacks require medium skill.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - User awareness training and technical controls can help, but social engineering is inherently difficult to fully prevent.
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Implement security awareness training for developers and staff, focusing on phishing and social engineering tactics.
    • Enforce strong password policies and multi-factor authentication.
    • Implement robust access control and least privilege principles.

Attack Tree Path: 8. [HIGH-RISK PATH] Phishing/Malware to compromise developer machines [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: A specific type of social engineering attack targeting developers through phishing emails or malware to compromise their development machines.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Developers are often targeted due to their access to sensitive systems and code.
  • Impact: Critical - Compromised developer machines can lead to code injection, supply chain attacks, and data breaches.
  • Effort: Low - Phishing and malware campaigns can be launched with relatively low effort using readily available tools.
  • Skill Level: Low - Basic phishing and malware attacks can be carried out by low-skill attackers.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - While security tools can detect some phishing and malware, sophisticated attacks can bypass defenses.
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Implement strong security practices for the development environment, including anti-phishing training and malware protection.
    • Use endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions on developer machines.
    • Isolate development environments from production environments.
    • Regularly scan developer machines for vulnerabilities and malware.

Attack Tree Path: 9. Maintain Access & Achieve Goal [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Actions taken by the attacker after gaining initial access to persist and further their objectives.
  • Impact: Critical - Necessary to realize the attacker's goals beyond initial entry.
  • Actionable Insights: Focus on limiting the attacker's ability to maintain access and escalate privileges after a potential breach. Implement intrusion detection and prevention systems.

Attack Tree Path: 10. Impact [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: The negative consequences resulting from a successful attack.
  • Impact: Critical - Represents the ultimate damage caused by the attack.
  • Actionable Insights: Understand the potential impact categories (DoS, Data Breach, Defacement, Reputational Damage, Financial Loss) and prioritize mitigations based on the most critical impacts for the application and organization.

Attack Tree Path: 11. Application Unavailability (DoS) [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Rendering the application unusable or significantly degraded for legitimate users.
  • Impact: Critical to High - Can disrupt business operations and user experience.
  • Actionable Insights: Implement DoS prevention measures, including resource limits, rate limiting, and robust infrastructure.

Attack Tree Path: 12. Data Breach (Information Disclosure) [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Unauthorized access and exfiltration of sensitive data.
  • Impact: Critical - Can lead to legal liabilities, reputational damage, and financial loss.
  • Actionable Insights: Implement strong data protection measures, including encryption, access control, and data loss prevention (DLP) strategies.

Attack Tree Path: 13. Defacement/Malicious Content Display (Data Manipulation) [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Altering the application's visual content to display malicious or unwanted information.
  • Impact: Medium to High - Can damage reputation and user trust.
  • Actionable Insights: Implement integrity checks for assets and content, and secure content management systems.

Attack Tree Path: 14. Reputational Damage [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Harm to the application's or organization's reputation due to a security incident.
  • Impact: Medium to High - Can lead to loss of customers and business opportunities.
  • Actionable Insights: Prioritize security to maintain user trust and protect reputation. Have incident response plans in place to minimize damage in case of a breach.

Attack Tree Path: 15. Financial Loss [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Direct or indirect financial losses resulting from a security incident.
  • Impact: Medium to Critical - Can range from minor expenses to significant financial hardship.
  • Actionable Insights: Quantify potential financial losses from different attack scenarios to justify security investments and prioritize mitigations based on cost-benefit analysis.