Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
28 lines (23 loc) · 5.01 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

28 lines (23 loc) · 5.01 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for google/flexbox-layout

Attack Surface: Algorithmic Complexity Exploitation (Layout Denial of Service)

  • Description: Attackers craft specific, complex layout structures or property combinations that trigger worst-case performance scenarios in the flexbox layout algorithm. This leads to excessive CPU usage and potentially memory exhaustion, causing a Denial of Service.
  • Flexbox-layout Contribution: The flexbox-layout library's implementation of the flexbox algorithm is directly responsible for the layout calculations. Inherent algorithmic complexity can be exploited.
  • Example: An attacker provides input that results in rendering a deeply nested layout with thousands of flex items, using properties like flex-wrap: wrap and complex combinations of flex-basis, flex-grow, and flex-shrink. Rendering this layout could consume excessive CPU time, freezing the application and making it unresponsive. This is especially impactful if layout calculations are performed on the main UI thread.
  • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS), application unresponsiveness, complete freeze of UI, potentially leading to application crashes due to resource exhaustion. In critical systems, this can disrupt essential services.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Layout Complexity Limits: Implement limits on the allowed complexity of layouts, especially if layouts are dynamically generated or user-defined. This could include restrictions on nesting depth, the number of flex items per container, or the total number of flex items in a layout.
    • Performance Testing and Benchmarking: Thoroughly test application performance with a wide range of layout complexities, including deliberately complex and large layouts, under stress conditions. Benchmark performance on target devices to identify potential bottlenecks.
    • Background Layout Calculation: Offload layout calculations to a background thread or worker thread whenever possible. This prevents blocking the main UI thread and maintains application responsiveness even during computationally intensive layout operations.
    • Resource Monitoring and Throttling: Implement resource monitoring to detect excessive CPU or memory usage during layout calculations. If resource usage exceeds predefined thresholds, implement throttling or rate limiting on layout operations to prevent complete DoS.

Attack Surface: Memory Leaks in Repeated Layout Operations (Memory Exhaustion DoS)

  • Description: Repeated layout operations, particularly with dynamically changing layouts or specific sequences of property updates, can trigger memory leaks within the flexbox-layout library or its integration with the underlying platform. Over time, this leads to memory exhaustion and Denial of Service.
  • Flexbox-layout Contribution: If the flexbox-layout library (especially its native components, if any) has memory management flaws, repeated use can expose these leaks. Dynamic layout updates and specific property change patterns might exacerbate these leaks.
  • Example: An application continuously updates layout properties based on real-time data streams or animations. If flexbox-layout fails to properly release allocated memory after each layout update cycle, memory consumption will gradually increase. Eventually, this can lead to out-of-memory errors, application crashes, or system-wide instability.
  • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS) due to memory exhaustion, application crashes, system instability, potential for exploitation if memory corruption vulnerabilities are associated with the leaks (less likely but theoretically possible).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Rigorous Memory Profiling and Leak Detection: Implement comprehensive memory profiling and leak detection strategies during development and testing. Use platform-specific memory analysis tools to identify and diagnose memory leaks related to layout operations. Focus on scenarios involving dynamic layout updates and property changes.
    • Automated Memory Leak Testing: Incorporate automated memory leak testing into the CI/CD pipeline. Create test cases that simulate long-running applications with dynamic layouts and property updates to proactively detect memory leaks.
    • Library Updates and Patching: Stay vigilant for updates and patches to the flexbox-layout library. Memory leak fixes are often addressed in library updates. Promptly apply updates to benefit from these fixes.
    • Code Reviews Focused on Memory Management: Conduct code reviews specifically focused on memory management practices in the application code that interacts with flexbox-layout. Pay close attention to object lifecycle, resource allocation and deallocation, and potential for circular references or dangling pointers.