Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
135 lines (123 loc) · 8.01 KB

File metadata and controls

135 lines (123 loc) · 8.01 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for google/flexbox-layout

Objective: Compromise Application using flexbox-layout by exploiting vulnerabilities or weaknesses inherent in the library's design, implementation, or usage.

Attack Tree Visualization

  • [CRITICAL NODE] Compromise Application using flexbox-layout [CRITICAL NODE]
    • [AND] [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Vulnerabilities in flexbox-layout Library [CRITICAL NODE]
      • [OR] [HIGH RISK PATH] Denial of Service (DoS) Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK PATH]
        • [AND] [HIGH RISK PATH] Algorithmic Complexity Exploitation (Layout Calculation) [HIGH RISK PATH]
          • Craft highly complex layout structures (deep nesting, excessive flex items).
          • Force the layout engine to perform computationally expensive calculations, leading to CPU exhaustion.
        • [AND] [HIGH RISK PATH] Memory Exhaustion [HIGH RISK PATH]
          • Create layouts with extremely large numbers of flex items or complex structures.
          • Cause excessive memory allocation by the layout engine, leading to application crash or slowdown.
        • [AND] [HIGH RISK PATH] Resource Exhaustion via Repeated Layout Requests [HIGH RISK PATH]
          • Repeatedly trigger layout calculations with complex or resource-intensive layouts.
          • Overwhelm the application's resources (CPU, memory) by forcing excessive layout operations.
    • [AND] [HIGH RISK PATH] Abuse of Flexbox-layout Features/Misconfigurations [HIGH RISK PATH]
      • [OR] [HIGH RISK PATH] UI Redress/Clickjacking via Layout Manipulation [HIGH RISK PATH]
        • [AND] [HIGH RISK PATH] Overlap UI Elements via Negative Margins/Positioning [HIGH RISK PATH]
          • Craft layout configurations using negative margins or absolute positioning within flexbox.
          • Overlap legitimate UI elements with malicious, invisible elements to trick users into unintended actions.
        • [AND] [HIGH RISK PATH] Content Spoofing via Layout Distortion [HIGH RISK PATH]
          • Manipulate flexbox properties to distort or hide legitimate content.
          • Present misleading or spoofed content to the user by altering the intended layout.
      • [OR] [HIGH RISK PATH] Resource Intensive Layouts for Client-Side DoS [HIGH RISK PATH]
        • Deliver extremely complex layout specifications to the client.
        • Cause client-side browser or application to become unresponsive due to heavy layout processing.

This is the ultimate attacker goal. Success means the attacker has achieved their objective by exploiting flexbox-layout.

This node represents a direct attack on the flexbox-layout library itself. While code execution vulnerabilities are less likely in a mature library, DoS vulnerabilities are a more probable and impactful sub-path within this node.

  • Likelihood: High
  • Impact: Medium (Application slowdown, temporary unavailability)
  • Effort: Low to Medium
  • Skill Level: Low
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy
  • Attack Vectors:
    • [HIGH RISK PATH] Algorithmic Complexity Exploitation (Layout Calculation) [HIGH RISK PATH]
      • Craft highly complex layout structures (deep nesting, excessive flex items).
        • Likelihood: Medium to High
        • Impact: Medium
        • Effort: Low to Medium
        • Skill Level: Low
        • Detection Difficulty: Easy
      • Force the layout engine to perform computationally expensive calculations, leading to CPU exhaustion.
        • Likelihood: Medium to High
        • Impact: Medium
        • Effort: Low to Medium
        • Skill Level: Low
        • Detection Difficulty: Easy
    • [HIGH RISK PATH] Memory Exhaustion [HIGH RISK PATH]
      • Create layouts with extremely large numbers of flex items or complex structures.
        • Likelihood: Medium
        • Impact: Medium
        • Effort: Low to Medium
        • Skill Level: Low
        • Detection Difficulty: Easy
      • Cause excessive memory allocation by the layout engine, leading to application crash or slowdown.
        • Likelihood: Medium
        • Impact: Medium
        • Effort: Low to Medium
        • Skill Level: Low
        • Detection Difficulty: Easy
    • [HIGH RISK PATH] Resource Exhaustion via Repeated Layout Requests [HIGH RISK PATH]
      • Repeatedly trigger layout calculations with complex or resource-intensive layouts.
        • Likelihood: High
        • Impact: Medium
        • Effort: Low
        • Skill Level: Low
        • Detection Difficulty: Easy
      • Overwhelm the application's resources (CPU, memory) by forcing excessive layout operations.
        • Likelihood: High
        • Impact: Medium
        • Effort: Low to Medium
        • Skill Level: Low
        • Detection Difficulty: Easy
  • Likelihood: Medium to High
  • Impact: Medium to High (UI manipulation, content spoofing, client-side DoS)
  • Effort: Low to Medium
  • Skill Level: Low
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Attack Vectors:
    • [HIGH RISK PATH] UI Redress/Clickjacking via Layout Manipulation [HIGH RISK PATH]
      • [HIGH RISK PATH] Overlap UI Elements via Negative Margins/Positioning [HIGH RISK PATH]
        • Craft layout configurations using negative margins or absolute positioning within flexbox.
          • Likelihood: Medium to High
          • Impact: Medium to High
          • Effort: Low
          • Skill Level: Low
          • Detection Difficulty: Medium
        • Overlap legitimate UI elements with malicious, invisible elements to trick users into unintended actions.
          • Likelihood: Medium to High
          • Impact: Medium to High
          • Effort: Low
          • Skill Level: Low
          • Detection Difficulty: Medium
      • [HIGH RISK PATH] Content Spoofing via Layout Distortion [HIGH RISK PATH]
        • Manipulate flexbox properties to distort or hide legitimate content.
          • Likelihood: Medium
          • Impact: Medium
          • Effort: Low to Medium
          • Skill Level: Low
          • Detection Difficulty: Medium
        • Present misleading or spoofed content to the user by altering the intended layout.
          • Likelihood: Medium
          • Impact: Medium
          • Effort: Low to Medium
          • Skill Level: Low
          • Detection Difficulty: Medium
    • [HIGH RISK PATH] Resource Intensive Layouts for Client-Side DoS [HIGH RISK PATH]
      • Deliver extremely complex layout specifications to the client.
        • Likelihood: Medium to High
        • Impact: Medium
        • Effort: Low
        • Skill Level: Low
        • Detection Difficulty: Easy
      • Cause client-side browser or application to become unresponsive due to heavy layout processing.
        • Likelihood: Medium to High
        • Impact: Medium
        • Effort: Low to Medium
        • Skill Level: Low
        • Detection Difficulty: Easy