Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
82 lines (58 loc) · 6.42 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

82 lines (58 loc) · 6.42 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for google/flexbox-layout

Objective: Degrade Application Performance, Cause DoS, or Leak Layout Information via flexbox-layout

Attack Tree Visualization

Goal: Degrade Application Performance, Cause DoS, or Leak Layout Information via flexbox-layout
├── 1. Denial of Service (DoS) / Performance Degradation [HIGH RISK]
│   ├── 1.1.  Exploit Algorithmic Complexity
│   │   └── 1.1.1.  Craft Deeply Nested Flexbox Structures
│   │   │   └── 1.1.1.1.  Trigger Exponential Layout Calculation Time [HIGH RISK]
│   ├── 1.2.  Resource Exhaustion [HIGH RISK]
│   │   ├── 1.2.1.  Allocate Excessive Memory via Large Number of Flex Items [HIGH RISK]
│   │   └── 1.2.2.  Trigger Excessive CPU Usage (overlaps with 1.1)
│   └── 1.3. Leverage Archived Status (Lack of Updates) [CRITICAL] [HIGH RISK]
│       └── 1.3.1. Exploit Known (but unpatched) Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL] [HIGH RISK]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Denial of Service (DoS) / Performance Degradation [HIGH RISK]

  • Description: This category encompasses attacks that aim to make the application unusable or significantly slower by exploiting weaknesses in the flexbox layout engine or its interaction with the application.
    • Overall Risk: High. These attacks are relatively easy to execute and can have a significant impact on user experience and application availability.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1. Exploit Algorithmic Complexity

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.1. Craft Deeply Nested Flexbox Structures

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.1.1. Trigger Exponential Layout Calculation Time [HIGH RISK]

  • Description: An attacker crafts HTML/CSS with deeply nested flexbox containers. The complexity of calculating the layout for deeply nested structures can grow exponentially, leading to excessive CPU usage and potentially a denial-of-service. * Likelihood: Medium (Depends on application design and whether user input can influence nesting depth). * Impact: High (Potential for complete DoS). * Effort: Low (Relatively easy to create nested HTML). * Skill Level: Low (Basic HTML/CSS knowledge). * Detection Difficulty: Medium (Requires performance monitoring and analysis of layout structure). * Mitigation: Limit nesting depth, use Angular CDK, monitor performance.

Attack Tree Path: 1.2. Resource Exhaustion [HIGH RISK]

  • Description: This category focuses on attacks that consume excessive system resources (memory or CPU) by manipulating the flexbox layout. * Overall Risk: High. These attacks are often easy to execute and can lead to browser crashes or DoS.

Attack Tree Path: 1.2.1. Allocate Excessive Memory via Large Number of Flex Items [HIGH RISK]

  • Description: An attacker forces the application to render a very large number of flex items simultaneously. Each DOM element consumes memory, and a sufficiently large number can exhaust available memory, leading to a browser crash or DoS. * Likelihood: Medium (Depends on whether the application renders large datasets without virtualization or pagination). * Impact: High (Browser crash, DoS). * Effort: Low (Can be achieved by manipulating data input or URL parameters). * Skill Level: Low (Basic understanding of web applications). * Detection Difficulty: Medium (Requires memory monitoring and analysis of rendered content). * Mitigation: Implement pagination or virtualization, use Angular CDK.

Attack Tree Path: 1.2.2. Trigger Excessive CPU Usage (overlaps with 1.1)

  • Description: This attack is closely related to exploiting algorithmic complexity. By creating complex layouts or forcing frequent recalculations, an attacker can consume excessive CPU resources, leading to performance degradation or DoS. * Likelihood: Medium (See 1.1). * Impact: High (DoS). * Effort: Low. * Skill Level: Low. * Detection Difficulty: Medium (CPU monitoring). * Mitigation: See mitigations for 1.1.

Attack Tree Path: 1.3. Leverage Archived Status (Lack of Updates) [CRITICAL] [HIGH RISK]

  • Description: This is the most critical vulnerability. Because google/flexbox-layout is archived, it will not receive security updates. Any discovered vulnerabilities will remain unpatched, making the application a permanent target. * Overall Risk: Critical and High. This is a fundamental weakness that significantly increases the risk of all other attack vectors.

Attack Tree Path: 1.3.1. Exploit Known (but unpatched) Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL] [HIGH RISK]

  • Description: An attacker exploits publicly known vulnerabilities in google/flexbox-layout that have not been (and will not be) patched. * Likelihood: High (Archived library = no patches). * Impact: High (Potentially severe, depending on the specific vulnerability. Could range from DoS to information leakage or even code execution, although code execution is less likely with a layout library). * Effort: Medium (Requires finding and understanding known vulnerabilities). * Skill Level: Medium (Requires understanding of vulnerability reports and potentially exploit development). * Detection Difficulty: Low (Publicly known vulnerabilities are often documented). * Mitigation: Immediately migrate to a supported layout solution like Angular CDK Layout. This is the highest priority.