Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
56 lines (38 loc) · 8.08 KB

File metadata and controls

56 lines (38 loc) · 8.08 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for jakewharton/rxbinding

Objective: Compromise Application Using RxBinding

Attack Tree Visualization

  • [2.0] Exploit Application Misuse of RxBinding (Critical Node, High-Risk Path)
    • [2.1] Unhandled Exceptions in RxJava Streams (Critical Node, High-Risk Path)
      • [2.1.1] Trigger UI events that lead to exceptions in subscribe blocks or operators (High-Risk Path)
        • [2.1.1.1] Input Injection & Data Processing Errors (Critical Node, High-Risk Path)
    • [2.2] Main Thread Blocking due to Long Operations in RxJava Streams (Critical Node, High-Risk Path)
      • [2.2.1] Trigger UI events that initiate long-running tasks on the main thread via RxBinding (High-Risk Path)
        • [2.2.1.1] Rapid Event Trigger & Main Thread Queue (Critical Node, High-Risk Path)

Attack Vector: This is a broad category encompassing vulnerabilities arising from developers incorrectly using RxBinding features, primarily in handling RxJava streams connected to UI events. It's not a specific attack itself, but rather a classification of attack vectors stemming from developer errors. Consequences: Wide range of consequences depending on the specific misuse, including application crashes, denial of service, resource exhaustion, logic flaws, and potentially information disclosure. Why High-Risk: Developer errors are a common source of vulnerabilities. RxBinding, while simplifying UI event handling, introduces complexities of reactive programming and threading that can be easily mishandled if developers are not careful. This path is considered high-risk because it is highly probable and can lead to significant impact.

Attack Vector: Attackers trigger UI events that feed into RxJava streams within the application. If the application's RxJava code (especially within subscribe blocks or operators) does not properly handle exceptions that may occur during data processing, these exceptions will propagate up the stream and potentially crash the application. Consequences: Application crashes, leading to Denial of Service (DoS). In some cases, unhandled exceptions can also lead to data corruption or expose unexpected application behavior. Why High-Risk: Unhandled exceptions are a common programming error, especially in reactive programming where error handling patterns might be less familiar to some developers. RxBinding makes it easy to connect UI events to RxJava, increasing the surface area where such errors can occur. This path is high-risk due to its high likelihood and moderate to significant impact (application crashes).

Attack Vector: This is the action an attacker takes to exploit unhandled exceptions. By interacting with the UI in specific ways (e.g., entering malformed input, triggering specific sequences of actions), the attacker aims to generate data or conditions that will cause an exception within the RxJava stream processing logic connected to those UI events. Consequences: Application crashes, as described in [2.1]. Why High-Risk: This path is high-risk because it is a direct way to trigger the vulnerability described in [2.1]. It is often relatively easy for an attacker (even with low skill) to manipulate UI inputs and observe application behavior to identify crash-inducing inputs.

Attack Vector: Attackers inject malicious or unexpected input through UI elements (e.g., text fields, spinners, etc.) that are bound to RxJava streams using RxBinding. This input is then processed by the application's RxJava logic. If this logic is not robust and lacks proper input validation or error handling, the injected input can cause data processing errors, leading to exceptions. Consequences: Application crashes, data corruption, potential logic bypass depending on the nature of the error and the application's error handling (or lack thereof). Why High-Risk: This is a critical node and high-risk path because it combines the ease of input injection (a common attack vector) with the potential for vulnerabilities in application logic exposed through RxBinding's reactive event handling. It has a high likelihood due to common input validation oversights and a moderate to significant impact due to potential crashes and logic errors.

Attack Vector: Developers, when using RxBinding to react to UI events with RxJava, might mistakenly perform long-running or blocking operations directly within the subscribe block or operators of the RxJava stream, without properly offloading these operations to background threads. This blocks the main thread, which is responsible for UI rendering and event handling. Consequences: Application freezes, Application Not Responding (ANR) dialogs, and effectively a temporary Denial of Service (DoS) for the user. In severe cases, repeated blocking can lead to application termination by the Android system. Why High-Risk: Main thread blocking is a common performance and stability issue in Android development, and RxBinding, while simplifying event handling, doesn't inherently prevent this. If developers are not mindful of threading in their RxJava pipelines, this vulnerability is highly likely. The impact is moderate (DoS, poor user experience).

Attack Vector: This describes the attacker's action to trigger main thread blocking. By interacting with UI elements that are connected to RxJava streams (via RxBinding) and are designed (or mistakenly designed) to initiate long-running tasks on the main thread, the attacker can induce the blocking condition. Consequences: Application freezes, ANR, temporary DoS, as described in [2.2]. Why High-Risk: This path is high-risk because it directly leads to the main thread blocking vulnerability. It is often easy for an attacker to identify UI interactions that trigger noticeable delays or freezes, indicating potential main thread blocking issues.

Attack Vector: Attackers rapidly trigger UI events that are connected to RxJava streams which, in turn, initiate long-running tasks on the main thread. By generating a high volume of these events in quick succession, the attacker can queue up multiple long-running tasks on the main thread, overwhelming it and causing severe blocking and ANR. Consequences: Severe application freezes, prolonged ANR, effective Denial of Service (DoS). Why High-Risk: This is a critical node and high-risk path because it is a straightforward and effective way to exploit main thread blocking vulnerabilities. Rapid UI interaction is easily achievable, and if the application is vulnerable to main thread blocking, this attack is highly likely to succeed in causing a DoS. The impact is moderate (DoS).