Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
187 lines (144 loc) · 21.8 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

187 lines (144 loc) · 21.8 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for jakewharton/rxbinding

Mitigation Strategy: Data Sanitization and Filtering of RxBinding Data

Description:

  1. Identify RxBinding Data Sources: Pinpoint the specific RxBinding Observables in your application that are used to capture user input or UI state changes (e.g., editText.textChanges(), button.clicks()).
  2. Implement Sanitization within Observable Chain: Immediately after the RxBinding Observable in your RxJava chain, use RxJava operators like map to transform the emitted data.
  3. Apply Sanitization Logic: Within the map operator, implement data sanitization logic tailored to the type of data being observed by RxBinding. This could involve:
    • Removing or masking sensitive information: For example, replacing password characters with asterisks before logging or further processing if the raw password is not needed.
    • Encoding special characters: Encoding HTML or XML special characters if the data might be used in a WebView or XML context later in the application.
    • Filtering invalid characters: Removing characters that are not expected or allowed for the specific input field.
  4. Use filter for Data Selection: If you only need to process data that meets certain criteria (e.g., non-empty text, valid email format), use the filter operator after the RxBinding Observable to selectively allow data to pass through.
  5. Test Sanitization: Write unit tests to verify that your sanitization logic within the RxJava chain correctly transforms and filters data obtained from RxBinding as intended.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Data Exposure through Logging (Medium Severity): Unintentionally logging sensitive user input obtained via RxBinding in plain text.
  • Data Exposure during Debugging (Medium Severity): Sensitive data from UI elements observed by RxBinding being visible in debug logs.
  • Accidental Data Transmission (Low to Medium Severity): Sensitive data captured by RxBinding being inadvertently sent to external services if not sanitized before processing in the Observable chain.

Impact:

  • Data Exposure through Logging: High reduction. Sanitization within the RxBinding Observable chain significantly reduces the risk of logging sensitive data in plain text.
  • Data Exposure during Debugging: Medium reduction. While debugging might still show raw data before sanitization, the risk of persistent exposure through logs is minimized.
  • Accidental Data Transmission: Medium reduction. Filtering and sanitization within the RxBinding chain reduce the chance of unintentionally transmitting sensitive data.

Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Sanitization is applied to password fields in login and registration flows using map operator after editText.textChanges() before logging error messages.

Missing Implementation:

  • Consistent sanitization is not applied to all text fields observed by RxBinding across the application, particularly in user profile update screens and feedback forms.
  • filter operator is not proactively used to limit data processing from RxBinding Observables in all relevant areas where only specific data conditions are needed.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Data Handling in RxBinding Observable Chains

Description:

  1. Review RxBinding Subscriptions: Examine all subscribe() calls or terminal operations on Observables that originate from RxBinding.
  2. Minimize Sensitive Data Handling in onNext: Avoid directly processing or logging sensitive data obtained from RxBinding within the onNext handler of subscriptions without implementing security measures.
  3. Implement Redaction or Encryption in onNext for Logging: If logging data from RxBinding Observables is necessary in onNext or doOnNext, ensure sensitive parts are redacted or encrypted before logging.
  4. Secure Data Persistence from RxBinding Streams: If data from RxBinding Observables is persisted (e.g., to local storage), encrypt it at rest. Ensure the encryption is applied within the Observable chain before persistence.
  5. Secure Data Transmission from RxBinding Streams: If data is transmitted over a network based on RxBinding events, use HTTPS and consider end-to-end encryption. Ensure secure transmission is initiated from within or after the RxBinding Observable chain.
  6. Secure Error Handling in RxBinding Chains: Review error handling (onError) in RxBinding-derived Observable chains. Prevent error messages from inadvertently exposing sensitive data obtained via RxBinding. Log errors securely, redacting sensitive information.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Data Exposure through Logging (Medium Severity): Sensitive data from RxBinding Observables being logged in plain text due to insecure onNext handling.
  • Data Breach through Data Storage (High Severity): Sensitive data obtained via RxBinding stored unencrypted locally.
  • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks (High Severity): Sensitive data transmitted over insecure network connections based on RxBinding events.
  • Information Disclosure through Error Messages (Low to Medium Severity): Sensitive data or system details revealed in error messages originating from RxBinding Observable processing.

Impact:

  • Data Exposure through Logging: High reduction. Redaction and encryption in onNext handlers significantly reduce the risk of sensitive data exposure in logs related to RxBinding data.
  • Data Breach through Data Storage: High reduction. Encryption at rest for data originating from RxBinding Observables effectively protects locally stored sensitive data.
  • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks: High reduction. HTTPS and end-to-end encryption mitigate the risk of eavesdropping on data transmitted based on RxBinding events.
  • Information Disclosure through Error Messages: Medium reduction. Secure error handling in RxBinding chains minimizes sensitive information leakage through error messages.

Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. HTTPS is used for network communication. Basic error logging exists, but redaction is not consistently applied in all error scenarios related to RxBinding data processing.

Missing Implementation:

  • Consistent redaction or encryption for sensitive data in all logging scenarios related to RxBinding data across the application.
  • Encryption at rest for sensitive data derived from RxBinding Observables and stored locally.
  • Detailed review and hardening of error handling specifically in RxBinding-related RxJava chains to prevent information disclosure.

Mitigation Strategy: Principle of Least Privilege for RxBinding UI Event Observation

Description:

  1. Audit RxBinding Usage: Review all instances where RxBinding is used to observe UI events in your application.
  2. Identify Essential Events: For each RxBinding observation, determine the minimum set of UI events and data actually needed for the intended functionality.
  3. Avoid Over-Observation with RxBinding: Refrain from using RxBinding to observe events or data from UI elements that are not strictly necessary, especially if those elements handle sensitive information.
  4. Specific RxBinding Event Selection: Utilize specific RxBinding methods to observe only the required events. For example, instead of observing all text changes with editText.textChanges(), if you only need to react when the text is set programmatically, explore if a more specific RxBinding method is available or if you can achieve the same result with less broad observation.
  5. Refactor for Minimal Observation: If you are observing more data or events than needed via RxBinding, refactor your code to observe only the essential UI events and data points using the most specific RxBinding methods possible.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Data Exposure through Unnecessary RxBinding Observation (Low to Medium Severity): Accidental exposure of sensitive data because RxBinding is used to observe more UI events or data than is actually required.
  • Performance Overhead (Low Severity): Unnecessary RxBinding event observation can lead to slight performance overhead, especially for high-frequency events.

Impact:

  • Data Exposure through Unnecessary RxBinding Observation: Medium reduction. By using RxBinding to observe only necessary events, the potential for accidental data exposure is reduced.
  • Performance Overhead: Low reduction. Minimizing unnecessary RxBinding observations can slightly improve performance, especially on resource-constrained devices.

Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. In some areas, specific RxBinding methods are used for targeted event observation, but instances of broader event observation exist without clear justification.

Missing Implementation:

  • Systematic review and refactoring of all RxBinding usages to strictly adhere to the principle of least privilege for UI event observation across the entire application.
  • Establish coding guidelines and code review processes to enforce this principle specifically for RxBinding usage in future development.

Mitigation Strategy: Debouncing and Throttling RxBinding High-Frequency Events

Description:

  1. Identify RxBinding High-Frequency Sources: Pinpoint RxBinding Observables that are connected to UI events known to occur rapidly and repeatedly (e.g., editText.textChanges(), recyclerView.scrollEvents()).
  2. Apply debounce() or throttleFirst() after RxBinding Observable: Immediately after the RxBinding Observable in your RxJava chain, insert either the debounce() or throttleFirst() operator.
  3. Choose Operator Based on Use Case:
    • debounce(): Use when you need to process the last event after a pause in events from RxBinding (e.g., for search auto-suggest after typing stops).
    • throttleFirst(): Use when you need to process the first event in a time window from RxBinding and ignore subsequent rapid events (e.g., to prevent rapid button clicks observed by RxBinding).
  4. Configure Time Window for RxBinding Events: Set an appropriate time window for debounce() or throttleFirst() that is suitable for the specific UI event observed by RxBinding and the application's responsiveness requirements.
  5. Performance Testing with RxBinding Events: Test application performance, especially in scenarios involving high-frequency UI events observed by RxBinding, to ensure debouncing or throttling effectively mitigates performance issues without impacting user experience.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Denial of Service (DoS) - Client-Side (Medium to High Severity): Excessive processing of high-frequency UI events observed by RxBinding leading to application slowdowns or crashes.
  • Performance Degradation (Medium Severity): Reduced application responsiveness and slower UI interactions due to overload from high-frequency RxBinding events.
  • Resource Exhaustion (Medium Severity): Excessive resource consumption (CPU, memory, battery) due to processing a large volume of UI events captured by RxBinding.

Impact:

  • Denial of Service (DoS) - Client-Side: High reduction. Debouncing and throttling applied to RxBinding event streams effectively prevent overwhelming the application with rapid UI events.
  • Performance Degradation: High reduction. Limiting the rate of event processing from RxBinding significantly improves application responsiveness.
  • Resource Exhaustion: Medium to High reduction. Reduced event processing from RxBinding leads to lower resource consumption.

Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. debounce() is used in search functionality after editText.textChanges(). throttleFirst() is used for certain button clicks observed by RxBinding to prevent double-clicks.

Missing Implementation:

  • Systematic review of all RxBinding usages to identify other high-frequency UI events that could benefit from debouncing or throttling (e.g., scroll events from recyclerView.scrollEvents(), rapid UI updates observed by RxBinding).
  • Consistent application of debouncing or throttling to all relevant high-frequency event streams originating from RxBinding across the application.

Mitigation Strategy: Backpressure Handling for RxBinding Generated Streams

Description:

  1. Identify RxBinding Backpressure Potential: Analyze RxJava streams originating from RxBinding, especially those that process UI events and then perform potentially slower downstream operations (e.g., network requests, database operations triggered by UI events observed by RxBinding).
  2. Choose Backpressure Strategy for RxBinding Stream: Select an appropriate RxJava backpressure strategy (e.g., BUFFER, DROP, LATEST) based on the application's needs and the nature of data flow from RxBinding.
  3. Apply Backpressure Operator after RxBinding Observable: Insert the chosen backpressure operator (e.g., .onBackpressureBuffer(), .onBackpressureDrop(), .onBackpressureLatest()) into the RxJava Observable chain immediately after the RxBinding Observable and before the potentially slower downstream operations.
  4. Consider sample or buffer for RxBinding Events: For scenarios where processing every single event from RxBinding is not essential, consider using operators like sample() or buffer() to process events in batches or at intervals, reducing processing load and mitigating backpressure issues from RxBinding streams.
  5. Monitor Resource Usage with RxBinding Streams: Monitor application resource usage (memory, CPU) in scenarios with high event rates from RxBinding to ensure backpressure handling is effective and prevents resource exhaustion when dealing with RxBinding generated streams.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Denial of Service (DoS) - Client-Side (High Severity): Uncontrolled event flow from RxBinding leading to OutOfMemoryError and crashes due to backpressure.
  • Resource Exhaustion (High Severity): Excessive memory consumption and CPU usage due to buffering or processing a large backlog of events originating from RxBinding.
  • Application Instability (Medium to High Severity): Application becoming unstable or unresponsive due to backpressure issues in RxBinding-derived streams.

Impact:

  • Denial of Service (DoS) - Client-Side: High reduction. Proper backpressure handling for RxBinding streams prevents OutOfMemoryError and crashes caused by uncontrolled event flow.
  • Resource Exhaustion: High reduction. Backpressure strategies limit resource consumption when processing events from RxBinding.
  • Application Instability: High reduction. Backpressure handling improves application stability when dealing with potentially high-volume event streams from RxBinding.

Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Backpressure handling is used in some data processing pipelines involving network requests triggered by UI events observed by RxBinding.

Missing Implementation:

  • Comprehensive review of all RxJava streams derived from RxBinding to identify potential backpressure scenarios that are not currently handled.
  • Consistent application of appropriate backpressure strategies across all relevant RxJava streams originating from RxBinding in the application.

Mitigation Strategy: Efficient and Non-Blocking Processing of RxBinding Events

Description:

  1. Profile RxBinding Observable Chains: Use profiling tools to identify performance bottlenecks within RxJava Observable chains that process events directly from RxBinding.
  2. Optimize onNext Handlers for RxBinding Events: Ensure code within onNext handlers of subscriptions to RxBinding Observables is efficient and performs minimal work on the main thread.
  3. Offload Blocking Operations from RxBinding Streams: Identify any blocking operations (e.g., I/O, network, database, heavy computations) within Observable chains processing RxBinding events.
  4. Use RxJava Schedulers for RxBinding Processing: Offload these blocking operations to background threads using RxJava Schedulers (e.g., Schedulers.io(), Schedulers.computation()). Use subscribeOn() and observeOn() to manage threading in RxBinding-derived streams.
  5. Avoid Main Thread Blocking with RxBinding: Never perform long-running or blocking operations directly on the main thread within Observable chains processing RxBinding events, as this can lead to UI freezes and ANR errors.
  6. Optimize Data Processing Logic for RxBinding Streams: Review and optimize algorithms and data structures used within Observable chains processing RxBinding events to minimize processing time and resource consumption.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Denial of Service (DoS) - Client-Side (Medium to High Severity): Blocking the main thread with long-running operations triggered by RxBinding events, leading to UI freezes and ANR errors.
  • Performance Degradation (High Severity): Significant application slowdowns and poor UI responsiveness due to inefficient event processing of RxBinding events on the main thread.
  • Battery Drain (Medium Severity): Increased battery consumption due to inefficient processing of RxBinding events and unnecessary CPU usage.

Impact:

  • Denial of Service (DoS) - Client-Side: High reduction. Offloading blocking operations from RxBinding event processing prevents UI freezes and ANR errors.
  • Performance Degradation: High reduction. Efficient and non-blocking event processing of RxBinding events ensures smooth UI interactions.
  • Battery Drain: Medium reduction. Optimized processing of RxBinding events and background thread usage can reduce battery consumption.

Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Network requests and database operations triggered by RxBinding events are generally performed on background threads using RxJava Schedulers.

Missing Implementation:

  • Systematic profiling and optimization of all RxJava chains derived from RxBinding to identify and address performance bottlenecks in RxBinding event processing.
  • Consistent application of background thread offloading for all potentially blocking operations within Observable chains processing RxBinding events across the application.

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Input Validation of RxBinding Data

Description:

  1. Identify RxBinding Input Points: Locate all RxBinding Observables that directly capture user input from UI elements (e.g., editText.textChanges(), spinner.selection()).
  2. Define Validation Rules for RxBinding Input: For each RxBinding input point, define strict validation rules based on expected data format, type, length, and allowed characters for the specific UI element observed by RxBinding.
  3. Implement Validation Logic in RxBinding Chain: Implement input validation logic immediately after obtaining data from RxBinding Observables, before using it in any further operations. Use RxJava operators like map, filter, or custom validation functions within the Observable chain right after the RxBinding source.
  4. Handle Invalid RxBinding Input: Implement proper error handling for invalid input obtained via RxBinding. Display informative error messages to the user (if applicable) and prevent further processing of invalid data originating from RxBinding.
  5. Regularly Update RxBinding Input Validation: Keep validation rules up-to-date with evolving security threats and application requirements, specifically considering the types of input being captured by RxBinding.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • SQL Injection (High Severity - Indirect): While RxBinding doesn't directly cause SQL injection, unvalidated input obtained via RxBinding can be a source of injection if used in database queries later.
  • Command Injection (High Severity - Indirect): Similar to SQL injection, unvalidated RxBinding input can lead to command injection if used to construct system commands.
  • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (Medium to High Severity - Indirect): Unvalidated input from RxBinding, if displayed without encoding, can lead to XSS.
  • Path Traversal (Medium Severity - Indirect): Unvalidated file paths obtained via RxBinding input can lead to path traversal vulnerabilities.

Impact:

  • SQL Injection: Medium reduction (indirect). Input validation of RxBinding data is a crucial first step in preventing SQL injection, but parameterized queries are the primary defense.
  • Command Injection: Medium reduction (indirect). Input validation of RxBinding data reduces the risk of command injection, but proper command construction and escaping are also essential.
  • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): Medium reduction (indirect). Input validation of RxBinding data helps reduce XSS risk, but output encoding is the primary defense.
  • Path Traversal: Medium reduction (indirect). Input validation of RxBinding data can prevent path traversal, but proper file access controls are also necessary.

Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Basic input validation is in place for login and registration forms using data obtained via RxBinding.

Missing Implementation:

  • Comprehensive and consistent input validation for all user input points across the application where RxBinding is used to capture data, including forms, search bars, and any UI elements providing user data through RxBinding.
  • Implementation of robust server-side validation as a secondary layer of defense for data originating from RxBinding.