Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
164 lines (136 loc) · 11 KB

File metadata and controls

164 lines (136 loc) · 11 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for jakewharton/timber

Objective: Compromise Application by Exploiting Timber Usage

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application using Timber [ROOT GOAL]
├─── Exploit Logging of Sensitive Data [CRITICAL_NODE] [HIGH_RISK_PATH]
│   ├─── Unintentional Logging of Sensitive Data [CRITICAL_NODE] [HIGH_RISK_PATH]
│   │   └─── Developer Mistake in Logging Code [CRITICAL_NODE] [HIGH_RISK_PATH]
│   │       ├─── Log PII (Personally Identifiable Information) [HIGH_RISK_PATH]
│   │       ├─── Log Secrets (API Keys, Passwords) [HIGH_RISK_PATH]
│   │       └─── Log Business Logic Secrets [HIGH_RISK_PATH]
│   └─── Intentional (but Misguided) Logging of Sensitive Data in Production [HIGH_RISK_PATH]
│       └─── Developer Intends to Debug Production Issues [HIGH_RISK_PATH]
│           └─── Enable verbose logging in production environment [HIGH_RISK_PATH]
├─── Exploit Custom Timber Trees [CRITICAL_NODE]
│   ├─── Malicious Custom Tree Implementation [CRITICAL_NODE]
│   │   ├─── Supply Chain Attack (Compromised Dependency) [CRITICAL_NODE]
│   │   └─── Insider Threat (Malicious Developer) [CRITICAL_NODE]
├─── Exploit Log Storage and Access [CRITICAL_NODE] [HIGH_RISK_PATH]
│   ├─── Insecure Log Storage Location [CRITICAL_NODE] [HIGH_RISK_PATH]
│   │   └─── Logs are Stored in Accessible Location [HIGH_RISK_PATH]
│   │       ├─── Logs Stored in Publicly Accessible Directory [HIGH_RISK_PATH]
│   │       ├─── Logs Stored in Unprotected Cloud Storage [HIGH_RISK_PATH]
│   │       └─── Logs Stored on Shared File System with Weak Permissions [HIGH_RISK_PATH]
│   └─── Inadequate Access Control to Logs [CRITICAL_NODE]
│       ├─── Weak Authentication/Authorization for Log Access [CRITICAL_NODE]
│       └─── Lack of Auditing of Log Access [CRITICAL_NODE]
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Unintentional Logging:
      • Developer Mistake in Logging Code:
        • Developers inadvertently include sensitive data (PII, secrets, business logic) in log messages during development or debugging.
        • Examples:
          • Logging request or response bodies without sanitization.
          • Logging user input directly.
          • Using verbose logging levels in production that expose internal variables.
      • Intentional (but Misguided) Logging in Production:
        • Developers enable verbose logging in production environments to troubleshoot issues.
        • They forget to disable verbose logging after debugging, leaving sensitive data exposed in production logs.
        • Example:
          • Temporarily enabling DebugTree in production to capture detailed logs for error analysis.
  • Why Critical:
    • This is the primary attack vector related to Timber's core functionality - logging.
    • Successful exploitation can lead to direct exposure of sensitive information.
    • It is a root cause for multiple high-risk paths.
  • Associated Attack Vectors:
    • All vectors listed under "High-Risk Path: Exploit Logging of Sensitive Data" are directly associated with this critical node.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Developer Mistake in Logging Code (Detailed):
      • Lack of Awareness: Developers may not be fully aware of what constitutes sensitive data or the risks of logging it.
      • Copy-Paste Errors: Copying and pasting code snippets from debugging sessions into production code without removing verbose logging statements.
      • Insufficient Code Review: Code reviews may not specifically focus on identifying and removing sensitive data from log messages.
      • Dynamic Logging Configurations: Complex or poorly understood logging configurations can lead to unintended logging of sensitive data in certain scenarios.
  • Why Critical:
    • This is the direct action that leads to unintentional logging of sensitive data.
    • It is a common human error and difficult to completely eliminate.
    • Mitigation strategies must focus on prevention, detection, and remediation of these mistakes.
  • Associated Attack Vectors:
    • All vectors listed under "High-Risk Path: Unintentional Logging of Sensitive Data" and its detailed breakdown are associated with this critical node.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Emergency Debugging: In urgent situations, developers may resort to quick and dirty debugging methods, including enabling verbose logging in production without proper planning or security considerations.
    • Lack of Process: Absence of clear procedures for production debugging and logging management.
    • Forgotten Configurations: Temporary logging configurations enabled for debugging are not properly disabled or reverted after the issue is resolved.
    • Insufficient Monitoring: Lack of monitoring to detect when verbose logging is enabled in production or when sensitive data is being logged.
  • Why Critical:
    • Custom Trees extend Timber's functionality but also introduce new attack surfaces.
    • Malicious or vulnerable custom Trees can bypass standard Timber security considerations.
    • Exploitation can lead to significant impact, including data exfiltration and system compromise.
  • Associated Attack Vectors:
    • Malicious Custom Tree Implementation:
      • Supply Chain Attack (Compromised Dependency):
        • Attacker compromises a dependency used by a custom Tree.
        • The compromised dependency contains malicious code that is executed when the custom Tree is used.
        • Example: A logging library used for formatting within a custom Tree is backdoored.
      • Insider Threat (Malicious Developer):
        • A rogue developer intentionally creates a custom Tree with malicious functionality.
        • The malicious Tree could exfiltrate logs to an attacker-controlled server, inject malicious code, or perform other harmful actions.
  • Why Critical:
    • Represents a deliberate attempt to subvert the logging mechanism for malicious purposes.
    • Can be very difficult to detect if the malicious Tree is well-disguised.
    • Can have severe consequences, including complete system compromise.
  • Associated Attack Vectors:
    • Supply Chain Attack (Compromised Dependency)
    • Insider Threat (Malicious Developer)
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Insecure Log Storage Location:
      • Logs Stored in Publicly Accessible Directory:
        • Logs are written to directories accessible via the web server (e.g., public_html, wwwroot).
        • Attackers can directly access log files by browsing to predictable URLs.
      • Logs Stored in Unprotected Cloud Storage:
        • Logs are sent to cloud storage services (e.g., AWS S3, Azure Blob Storage) with overly permissive access policies.
        • Attackers can enumerate and access these storage buckets if permissions are misconfigured.
      • Logs Stored on Shared File System with Weak Permissions:
        • Logs are written to network shares with weak access controls, allowing unauthorized users within the internal network to access them.
    • Inadequate Access Control to Logs:
      • Weak Authentication/Authorization for Log Access:
        • Log management systems or interfaces have weak passwords, default credentials, or easily bypassed authentication mechanisms.
        • Attackers can gain unauthorized access to the log management system and view all logs.
      • Lack of Auditing of Log Access:
        • No logging or monitoring of who accesses logs.
        • Makes it difficult to detect and investigate unauthorized log access or data breaches.
  • Why Critical:
    • Direct exposure of logs if storage is misconfigured.
    • Relatively easy to exploit if logs are in publicly accessible locations.
    • Negates any security efforts made in logging practices if the storage itself is insecure.
  • Associated Attack Vectors:
    • Logs Stored in Publicly Accessible Directory
    • Logs Stored in Unprotected Cloud Storage
    • Logs Stored on Shared File System with Weak Permissions
  • Why Critical:
    • Allows unauthorized access to logs even if storage location is somewhat secure.
    • Weak access controls are a common vulnerability in many systems.
    • Lack of auditing hinders detection and response to log-related security incidents.
  • Associated Attack Vectors:
    • Weak Authentication/Authorization for Log Access
    • Lack of Auditing of Log Access
  • Why Critical:
    • A common and easily exploitable vulnerability.
    • Provides attackers with broad access to potentially all logs.
    • Can be exploited with relatively low skill and effort.
  • Why Critical:
    • While not a direct attack vector itself, it significantly hinders security.
    • Makes it difficult to detect breaches, investigate incidents, and establish accountability.
    • Increases the overall risk by reducing visibility into log access activities.