Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
36 lines (29 loc) · 4.73 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

36 lines (29 loc) · 4.73 KB

Threat Model Analysis for jakewharton/timber

Threat: Threat: Sensitive Data Exposure in Logs

  • Description: An attacker gains access to log files and extracts sensitive information that was inadvertently logged by the application through Timber. This assumes the attacker has already gained access to the logs; the threat here is the presence of sensitive data because of how Timber was used. The attacker might exploit a separate vulnerability to get the logs, but the core issue is that Timber was used to record the sensitive data.
  • Impact: Data breach, privacy violations (GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, etc.), reputational damage, financial loss, potential for further attacks (credential stuffing, identity theft).
  • Timber Component Affected: Primarily Timber.Tree implementations (especially the default DebugTree if used in production), and any custom Tree implementations that don't properly handle sensitive data. The log() method and its variants across all Tree implementations are the points of entry for data.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Data Minimization: Log only the absolute minimum necessary information via Timber. Avoid logging entire objects or data structures.
    • Data Masking/Sanitization: Implement a custom Timber.Tree that intercepts log messages before they are written and redacts or masks sensitive data. This is a Timber-specific mitigation.
    • Log Level Discipline: Strictly adhere to log levels. Never use DEBUG or VERBOSE in production unless absolutely necessary, and ensure any planted DebugTree instances are removed or appropriately configured for production.
    • Code Reviews: Enforce mandatory code reviews with a focus on identifying potential sensitive data logging calls to Timber.
    • Training: Educate developers on secure logging practices specifically related to Timber's API.

Threat: Threat: Log Injection (Log Forging) - If Timber is used to log unsanitized input

  • Description: An attacker injects malicious content into log messages by manipulating input that is directly passed to Timber's logging methods. This is only a direct Timber threat if the application fails to sanitize input before passing it to Timber. If sanitization happens before the Timber call, this becomes a general application security issue, not a Timber-specific one.
  • Impact: Compromised log integrity, making incident response unreliable. Potential for XSS or other injection attacks if the log viewer is vulnerable (but that's a separate threat related to the viewer, not Timber itself).
  • Timber Component Affected: Any Timber.Tree implementation that logs user-supplied input without prior sanitization. The log() method and its variants are the entry points.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Input Validation & Sanitization (Prior to Timber): Crucially, validate and sanitize all user-supplied input before it is passed to any Timber.log() call. This is the primary defense and shifts the responsibility away from Timber itself.
    • Parameterized Logging (Workaround): While Timber doesn't have built-in parameterized logging, construct log messages carefully to avoid direct concatenation of unsanitized input with the logged string. For example, instead of Timber.d("User input: " + userInput), use separate log statements or carefully format the message.

Threat: Threat: Dependency Vulnerabilities (Directly in Timber)

  • Description: A vulnerability is discovered within the Timber library itself. This is distinct from vulnerabilities in other application dependencies. An attacker exploits this Timber-specific vulnerability.
  • Impact: Varies depending on the vulnerability, but could range from information disclosure to, in a worst-case scenario, remote code execution (though less likely given Timber's purpose).
  • Timber Component Affected: The entire Timber library or specific modules within it.
  • Risk Severity: Potentially Critical (depending on the specific vulnerability)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regular Updates: Keep Timber updated to the latest version. This is the most direct mitigation for vulnerabilities within Timber.
    • Software Composition Analysis (SCA): Use SCA tools, but be aware that they primarily focus on identifying the vulnerability; updating Timber is the action to take.
    • Vulnerability Monitoring: Subscribe to security advisories specifically for Timber.