Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
108 lines (79 loc) · 13.7 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

108 lines (79 loc) · 13.7 KB

Okay, here's a deep security analysis of the Exposed ORM framework, following your instructions:

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: The primary objective is to conduct a thorough security analysis of the JetBrains Exposed ORM framework. This analysis aims to identify potential security vulnerabilities, assess their impact, and propose actionable mitigation strategies. The focus is on how Exposed itself handles database interactions and the security implications for applications using Exposed. We will examine key components like the Connection Manager, Query Builder, and Result Mapper, as well as the overall architecture and data flow.

  • Scope: The scope of this analysis is limited to the Exposed framework's codebase, documentation, and its interaction with underlying JDBC drivers. We will not analyze the security of specific database systems (e.g., PostgreSQL, MySQL) or the applications built using Exposed, except insofar as Exposed's design impacts their security posture. We will focus on the latest stable version of Exposed.

  • Methodology:

    1. Architecture and Data Flow Inference: Based on the provided C4 diagrams, codebase documentation (from the GitHub repository), and general knowledge of ORM frameworks, we will infer the architecture, components, and data flow within Exposed.
    2. Component-Specific Security Analysis: We will break down the security implications of each key component identified in the design review and inferred architecture. This will involve analyzing how each component handles data, interacts with other components, and contributes to the overall security of the framework.
    3. Threat Modeling: We will identify potential threats based on common database interaction vulnerabilities (e.g., SQL injection, data leakage, denial of service) and consider how Exposed's design mitigates or exacerbates these threats.
    4. Mitigation Strategy Recommendation: For each identified threat, we will propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to the Exposed framework and its usage. These recommendations will be practical and consider the framework's design and goals.
    5. Code Review (Hypothetical): While we don't have direct access to execute code, we will simulate a code review process by highlighting areas of the (hypothetical) codebase that would be of particular interest from a security perspective, based on the identified components and threats.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's analyze the key components identified in the C4 Container diagram:

  • Exposed API (Kotlin Code):

    • Security Implications: This is the primary entry point for developers. The design of this API dictates how developers interact with the database. A poorly designed API could lead to insecure coding practices. The API's handling of user-provided data is critical for preventing injection attacks.
    • Threats: SQL Injection (if the API allows raw SQL or insufficiently parameterized queries), insecure defaults (e.g., overly permissive permissions), denial of service (if the API allows unbounded queries).
    • Mitigation: Strongly enforce the use of parameterized queries throughout the API. Provide clear documentation and examples demonstrating secure usage. Consider incorporating a query builder API that prevents the construction of raw SQL strings. Implement input validation and sanitization where appropriate (e.g., for table and column names, if dynamically constructed). Offer options for limiting query results (e.g., limit clauses) to prevent resource exhaustion.

  • Connection Manager (Kotlin Code):

    • Security Implications: This component handles sensitive database credentials and manages connections. Improper handling of credentials could lead to unauthorized database access. Connection pool misconfiguration could lead to resource exhaustion or denial of service.
    • Threats: Credential leakage (if credentials are hardcoded, logged, or improperly stored), connection pool exhaustion, insecure connection configurations (e.g., not using TLS/SSL).
    • Mitigation: Never hardcode credentials. Provide a secure mechanism for configuring connection parameters (e.g., using environment variables, a secure configuration file, or a secrets management service). Enforce the use of TLS/SSL for database connections. Implement robust connection pool management with appropriate timeouts and limits to prevent resource exhaustion. Log connection errors and failures securely (without exposing sensitive information). Provide options for configuring connection-level security settings (e.g., certificate validation).

  • Query Builder (Kotlin Code):

    • Security Implications: This is the most critical component for preventing SQL injection. It must translate user-provided data and operations into safe SQL queries.
    • Threats: SQL Injection (if the query builder allows the construction of unsafe queries), denial of service (if the query builder allows the creation of overly complex or resource-intensive queries).
    • Mitigation: Exclusively use parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database interactions. The query builder should never concatenate user-provided data directly into SQL strings. Validate and sanitize table and column names if they are dynamically generated. Consider implementing a query complexity limit to prevent denial-of-service attacks. Thoroughly test the query builder with a wide range of inputs, including malicious payloads, to ensure its robustness against SQL injection.

  • Result Mapper (Kotlin Code):

    • Security Implications: This component handles data retrieved from the database. While less critical than the Query Builder, it could be vulnerable to data type conversion issues or potentially expose sensitive data if not handled carefully.
    • Threats: Data leakage (if the mapper exposes more data than intended), type confusion vulnerabilities (if data types are not handled correctly), potentially XSS if database data is later rendered in a web UI without proper escaping (though this is primarily an application-level concern).
    • Mitigation: Ensure that the mapper only exposes the necessary data to the application. Implement strict type checking and data validation during the mapping process. Provide clear documentation on how to handle sensitive data retrieved from the database. While not directly the mapper's responsibility, advise developers using Exposed to properly escape data when rendering it in a web UI to prevent XSS.

  • JDBC Driver:

    • Security Implications: Exposed relies on the security of the underlying JDBC driver. Vulnerabilities in the driver could compromise the entire system.
    • Threats: Vulnerabilities in the JDBC driver itself (e.g., SQL injection, buffer overflows), insecure communication between the driver and the database server.
    • Mitigation: This is largely an "accepted risk," as noted in the security posture. However, Exposed should:
      • Document clearly which JDBC drivers are officially supported and tested.
      • Recommend using the latest stable versions of JDBC drivers.
      • Provide guidance on configuring JDBC drivers securely (e.g., enabling TLS/SSL, using strong authentication).
      • Monitor for security advisories related to supported JDBC drivers and inform users of any necessary updates.

3. Architecture and Data Flow (Inferred and Security-Focused)

Based on the C4 diagrams and our understanding of ORMs, here's a refined view of the data flow with a security focus:

  1. User Input: The Kotlin developer uses the Exposed API to define a database operation (e.g., Users.select { Users.name eq "John Doe" }). This involves user-provided data ("John Doe").
  2. API Processing: The Exposed API receives the developer's request and passes it to the Query Builder.
  3. Query Construction (Critical): The Query Builder transforms the API call into a parameterized SQL query (e.g., SELECT * FROM Users WHERE name = ?). The user-provided data ("John Doe") is not directly inserted into the SQL string; instead, it's treated as a parameter.
  4. Connection Management: The Connection Manager obtains a database connection (potentially from a pool).
  5. Query Execution: The parameterized query and the parameter value are sent to the JDBC driver.
  6. JDBC Driver Interaction: The JDBC driver sends the query to the database server.
  7. Database Processing: The database server executes the query, using the parameter value safely.
  8. Result Retrieval: The database server returns the results to the JDBC driver.
  9. Result Mapping: The Result Mapper converts the database results into Kotlin objects.
  10. Data Return: The Kotlin objects are returned to the developer's code.

4. Specific, Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Tailored to Exposed)

These are reiterations and expansions of the mitigations mentioned above, presented as a cohesive set of recommendations:

  • Mandatory Parameterized Queries: The core of Exposed's security should be the absolute enforcement of parameterized queries. The Query Builder should be designed in a way that makes it impossible to construct queries using string concatenation with user-provided data. This should be a fundamental design principle, not an optional feature.

  • Input Validation (API Level): While parameterized queries handle the most critical aspect of SQL injection, the Exposed API should still validate user input where appropriate. For example, if the API allows dynamic construction of table or column names, these should be validated against a whitelist or a strict regular expression.

  • Secure Connection Management:

    • Provide a clear and secure way to configure database credentials without hardcoding them. Recommend and document best practices for using environment variables, secure configuration files, or secrets management services.
    • Enforce TLS/SSL for database connections by default. Make it difficult or impossible to disable TLS/SSL.
    • Implement robust connection pooling with appropriate timeouts, maximum connection limits, and connection validation to prevent resource exhaustion and ensure connection health.

  • Query Complexity Limits: Consider adding a mechanism to limit the complexity of queries generated by the Query Builder. This could involve limiting the number of joins, the depth of nested queries, or other factors that could lead to resource-intensive queries. This helps mitigate denial-of-service attacks.

  • JDBC Driver Guidance: Provide clear documentation on:

    • Officially supported JDBC drivers.
    • Recommended versions of those drivers.
    • Secure configuration options for each driver (especially regarding TLS/SSL and authentication).
    • A process for reporting and addressing vulnerabilities in supported drivers.

  • Security Audits and Testing:

    • Integrate SAST tools (like Detekt, SpotBugs with Find Security Bugs) into the build process.
    • Perform regular DAST scans (though this is more relevant to applications using Exposed).
    • Conduct regular security code reviews, focusing on the Query Builder, Connection Manager, and Result Mapper.
    • Implement a comprehensive suite of security-focused unit and integration tests, specifically targeting potential SQL injection vulnerabilities and other database-related threats.

  • Vulnerability Disclosure Program: Establish a clear and accessible vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting of security issues by the community.

  • Developer Education: Provide clear and concise security documentation for developers using Exposed. This documentation should emphasize secure coding practices, the importance of parameterized queries, and how to configure Exposed securely.

  • Dependency Management: Use dependency management tools and regularly update dependencies to address known vulnerabilities.

5. Hypothetical Code Review Focus Areas

If we were reviewing the Exposed codebase, we would pay particular attention to these areas:

  • QueryBuilder Implementation: Scrutinize every line of code related to SQL query generation. Ensure that no user-provided data is ever directly concatenated into a SQL string. Verify that parameterized queries are used consistently and correctly.
  • ConnectionManager Configuration: Examine how database credentials and connection parameters are handled. Look for any potential for hardcoded credentials, insecure storage of credentials, or insecure default settings.
  • API Input Handling: Review how the Exposed API handles user-provided data. Look for any places where user input is used without proper validation or sanitization.
  • ResultMapper Data Handling: Check how the Result Mapper handles data retrieved from the database. Ensure that data types are handled correctly and that sensitive data is not inadvertently exposed.
  • Error Handling: Examine how errors and exceptions are handled, particularly in the Connection Manager and Query Builder. Ensure that error messages do not leak sensitive information.
  • Test Suite: Review the test suite to ensure that it includes comprehensive security tests, particularly for SQL injection and other database-related vulnerabilities.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive security assessment of the Exposed ORM framework, highlighting potential vulnerabilities and offering concrete mitigation strategies. The most critical aspect is the absolute enforcement of parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection, along with secure connection management and robust testing.