Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
157 lines (127 loc) · 22.2 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

157 lines (127 loc) · 22.2 KB

Deep Security Analysis of Korge Game Engine

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

This deep security analysis aims to identify and evaluate potential security vulnerabilities within the Korge game engine (https://github.com/korlibs/korge). The objective is to provide actionable, Korge-specific security recommendations and mitigation strategies to enhance the engine's security posture and minimize risks for game developers and end-users. This analysis will focus on understanding the architecture, components, and data flow of Korge based on the provided security design review and inferring security implications from the codebase and documentation (where available publicly).

Scope:

The scope of this analysis encompasses the core components of the Korge game engine as outlined in the C4 Container diagram:

  • Core Engine Container: Game loop, scene management, entity-component system, engine orchestration.
  • Graphics Engine Container: Rendering, shaders, textures, graphics APIs (OpenGL, WebGL, AGSL).
  • Audio Engine Container: Audio playback, sound effects, music, audio APIs (OpenAL, WebAudio).
  • Input Handling Container: Keyboard, mouse, touch, gamepad input processing.
  • Resource Management Container: Loading, caching, and management of game assets (images, audio, fonts, etc.).
  • Tools & Libraries Container: Utility libraries and tools provided with Korge.
  • Build Process: From code changes to artifact publishing, including CI/CD pipeline.
  • Deployment Options: Desktop, Web, and Mobile deployment scenarios.

The analysis will primarily focus on the security of the Korge engine itself and its direct components. Security considerations for games built using Korge, while important, are secondary and will be addressed in the context of how engine vulnerabilities could impact those games. Server-side components or online game features are explicitly out of scope, as per the assumptions in the security design review.

Methodology:

This analysis will employ a combination of:

  1. Security Design Review Analysis: Leveraging the provided security design review document to understand the business and security posture, existing and recommended controls, security requirements, and architectural diagrams.
  2. Architecture and Data Flow Inference: Based on the C4 diagrams, component descriptions, and publicly available information about Korge (GitHub repository, documentation), we will infer the architecture, component interactions, and data flow within the engine.
  3. Threat Modeling: For each key component, we will identify potential security threats, considering common vulnerabilities in game engines and similar software systems. We will focus on threats relevant to the specific functionalities of each component.
  4. Vulnerability Analysis (Conceptual): Without performing actual code audits or penetration testing (as per the accepted risk), we will conceptually analyze potential vulnerabilities based on the inferred architecture and common security weaknesses in similar systems.
  5. Mitigation Strategy Development: For each identified threat, we will develop specific, actionable, and Korge-tailored mitigation strategies that can be implemented by the Korge development team. These strategies will align with the recommended security controls in the design review.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

2.1 Core Engine Container

  • Description: The central orchestrator of Korge, managing the game loop, scenes, and integrating other engine components.
  • Inferred Architecture & Data Flow: The Core Engine receives processed input from the Input Handling Container, requests resources from the Resource Management Container, and instructs the Graphics and Audio Engines to render and play audio. It also utilizes Tools & Libraries for various functionalities.
  • Security Implications:
    • Logic Flaws and State Management Issues: Bugs in the core engine logic could lead to unexpected game behavior, crashes, or exploitable states. While not directly a security vulnerability in the traditional sense, these can negatively impact user experience and potentially be leveraged in unintended ways.
    • Internal API Vulnerabilities: If the Core Engine exposes internal APIs to other containers or tools, vulnerabilities in these APIs (e.g., lack of input validation, insecure resource handling) could be exploited by malicious components or crafted assets.
    • Resource Exhaustion: The Core Engine's resource management (even if delegating to the Resource Management Container) could be vulnerable to resource exhaustion attacks if not properly handled, leading to denial of service.
  • Specific Recommendations:
    • Rigorous Logic Testing: Implement comprehensive unit and integration tests for core engine logic, focusing on edge cases, state transitions, and resource management scenarios.
    • Internal API Security Review: Conduct focused code reviews of internal APIs exposed by the Core Engine to ensure proper input validation, authorization (if applicable internally), and secure resource handling.
    • Resource Limits and Quotas: Implement mechanisms to limit resource consumption within the Core Engine to prevent resource exhaustion attacks. This might involve setting limits on scene complexity, entity counts, or resource loading rates.

2.2 Graphics Engine Container

  • Description: Responsible for rendering 2D and 3D graphics using platform-specific APIs like OpenGL, WebGL, and AGSL.
  • Inferred Architecture & Data Flow: Receives rendering commands and scene data from the Core Engine. Loads and manages graphical resources (textures, shaders) potentially via the Resource Management Container. Interacts directly with platform graphics APIs.
  • Security Implications:
    • Shader Vulnerabilities: Custom shaders, if supported, could contain vulnerabilities (e.g., buffer overflows, out-of-bounds access) that could lead to crashes or potentially arbitrary code execution in the graphics driver or even the application.
    • Graphics API Misuse: Incorrect usage of platform graphics APIs could lead to memory corruption, crashes, or unexpected behavior.
    • Resource Handling Vulnerabilities (Graphics Assets): Vulnerabilities in how the Graphics Engine handles textures and other graphical assets (e.g., format parsing, decompression) could be exploited by malicious assets to cause crashes or potentially more severe issues.
    • Denial of Service via Resource Exhaustion (Graphics): Maliciously crafted scenes or assets could be designed to exhaust graphics resources (VRAM, processing power), leading to denial of service or performance degradation.
  • Specific Recommendations:
    • Shader Security Best Practices: If Korge allows custom shaders, provide clear guidelines and best practices for developers to write secure shaders, emphasizing input validation and bounds checking within shaders. Consider using shader compilers with built-in security checks.
    • Graphics API Usage Review: Conduct thorough code reviews focusing on the Graphics Engine's interaction with platform graphics APIs to ensure correct and secure usage, paying attention to error handling and resource management.
    • Graphics Asset Validation: Implement robust validation of graphical asset formats and content during loading to prevent vulnerabilities related to malicious or malformed assets. Use well-vetted libraries for image and texture decoding.
    • Graphics Resource Limits: Implement limits on texture sizes, shader complexity, and other graphics resources to mitigate potential denial of service attacks through resource exhaustion.

2.3 Audio Engine Container

  • Description: Manages audio playback, sound effects, and music using platform-specific audio APIs like OpenAL and WebAudio.
  • Inferred Architecture & Data Flow: Receives audio commands from the Core Engine. Loads and manages audio resources (sound files, music) potentially via the Resource Management Container. Interacts directly with platform audio APIs.
  • Security Implications:
    • Audio Processing Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in audio processing logic or libraries used by the Audio Engine (e.g., in audio decoders or effects processing) could be exploited by malicious audio files to cause crashes or potentially arbitrary code execution.
    • Audio API Misuse: Incorrect usage of platform audio APIs could lead to memory corruption, crashes, or unexpected behavior.
    • Resource Handling Vulnerabilities (Audio Assets): Vulnerabilities in how the Audio Engine handles audio assets (e.g., format parsing, decompression) could be exploited by malicious assets.
    • Denial of Service via Resource Exhaustion (Audio): Maliciously crafted games could attempt to exhaust audio resources (e.g., playing excessive sounds simultaneously), leading to performance degradation or denial of service.
  • Specific Recommendations:
    • Secure Audio Processing Libraries: Utilize well-vetted and actively maintained audio processing libraries. Regularly update these libraries to patch known vulnerabilities.
    • Audio API Usage Review: Conduct code reviews focusing on the Audio Engine's interaction with platform audio APIs to ensure correct and secure usage, including proper error handling and resource management.
    • Audio Asset Validation: Implement robust validation of audio asset formats and content during loading to prevent vulnerabilities related to malicious or malformed audio files. Use secure and well-tested audio decoding libraries.
    • Audio Resource Limits: Implement limits on the number of concurrent audio sources, audio buffer sizes, and other audio resources to mitigate potential denial of service attacks through resource exhaustion.

2.4 Input Handling Container

  • Description: Captures and processes user input from various sources (keyboard, mouse, touch, gamepads).
  • Inferred Architecture & Data Flow: Receives raw input events from platform input systems. Processes and potentially maps these events. Provides processed input data to the Core Engine.
  • Security Implications:
    • Input Injection Vulnerabilities: While less likely in a typical game engine context compared to web applications, vulnerabilities in input processing could potentially be exploited if input is not properly sanitized or validated before being used by the Core Engine or game logic. This is especially relevant if input is used to construct commands or access resources dynamically.
    • Denial of Service via Input Flooding: Malicious input streams (e.g., rapid key presses, mouse movements) could potentially overwhelm the Input Handling Container or the Core Engine, leading to performance degradation or denial of service.
    • Unexpected Behavior due to Malformed Input: If the Input Handling Container is not robust in handling unexpected or malformed input events from different platforms or devices, it could lead to crashes or unpredictable game behavior.
  • Specific Recommendations:
    • Input Validation and Sanitization: Implement input validation and sanitization within the Input Handling Container to ensure that input data is within expected ranges and formats before being passed to the Core Engine. This is crucial if input is used for any dynamic operations or resource access within the game logic.
    • Input Rate Limiting/Debouncing: Implement mechanisms to limit the rate of input events processed by the Input Handling Container to mitigate potential denial of service attacks via input flooding. Debouncing techniques can also prevent unintended rapid input triggering.
    • Robust Input Handling and Error Handling: Ensure the Input Handling Container is designed to gracefully handle unexpected or malformed input events from various input sources without crashing or exhibiting undefined behavior. Implement proper error handling and logging for input processing.

2.5 Resource Management Container

  • Description: Manages loading, caching, and unloading of game resources (images, audio, fonts, etc.).
  • Inferred Architecture & Data Flow: Receives resource requests from other containers (Core Engine, Graphics Engine, Audio Engine). Loads resources from storage (file system, network - if applicable for dynamic loading). Caches resources for efficient access. Provides resources to requesting containers.
  • Security Implications:
    • Path Traversal Vulnerabilities: If resource loading paths are constructed dynamically based on user input or game data without proper sanitization, path traversal vulnerabilities could allow loading of arbitrary files from the file system, potentially leading to information disclosure or even code execution if executable files are loaded and run.
    • Malicious Asset Exploitation: If the Resource Management Container does not properly validate the format and content of loaded assets, malicious assets could be crafted to exploit vulnerabilities in asset parsing libraries or engine logic, leading to crashes, arbitrary code execution, or other security issues.
    • Resource Cache Poisoning: In scenarios involving dynamic resource loading or updates, vulnerabilities in the resource caching mechanism could potentially be exploited to inject malicious assets into the cache, which could then be served to the game.
    • Denial of Service via Resource Exhaustion (Loading): Maliciously crafted games could attempt to load an excessive number of large resources, leading to memory exhaustion or disk space exhaustion, causing denial of service.
  • Specific Recommendations:
    • Path Sanitization and Validation: Implement strict path sanitization and validation for all resource loading operations. Never construct file paths directly from user input or untrusted data without thorough validation. Use safe path manipulation functions provided by the operating system or programming language.
    • Asset Format Validation and Whitelisting: Implement robust validation of asset file formats and content during loading. Whitelist allowed asset file types and use well-vetted and secure libraries for asset parsing and decompression. Consider using checksums or digital signatures to verify asset integrity.
    • Secure Resource Caching: Implement secure resource caching mechanisms to prevent cache poisoning attacks. Ensure that cached resources are validated before being served and that cache updates are properly authorized and authenticated (if applicable).
    • Resource Loading Limits and Quotas: Implement limits on the number and size of resources that can be loaded concurrently or cached to mitigate potential denial of service attacks through resource exhaustion.

2.6 Tools & Libraries Container

  • Description: Collection of utility libraries and tools provided with Korge (UI components, math libraries, helper functions).
  • Inferred Architecture & Data Flow: These are libraries and tools used by game developers and potentially by the engine's core components. They don't have a direct data flow in the engine runtime but are part of the development and build process.
  • Security Implications:
    • Vulnerabilities in Utility Libraries: Security vulnerabilities in the provided utility libraries (e.g., buffer overflows in string manipulation functions, vulnerabilities in UI component logic) could be exploited by game developers unintentionally or maliciously, leading to vulnerabilities in games built with Korge.
    • Insecure Tooling: If the tools provided with Korge (e.g., asset pipeline tools, level editors) are not developed with security in mind, they could introduce vulnerabilities into the game development process or the generated game assets.
  • Specific Recommendations:
    • Secure Coding Practices for Libraries: Apply secure coding practices when developing and maintaining the utility libraries within the Tools & Libraries Container. Conduct code reviews and static analysis on these libraries to identify potential vulnerabilities.
    • Input Validation in Libraries: Ensure that utility libraries, especially those dealing with user input or data processing, implement proper input validation to prevent vulnerabilities like injection attacks or buffer overflows.
    • Security Review of Tooling: Conduct security reviews of any tools provided with Korge to identify and mitigate potential security risks in the game development workflow. Ensure tools handle user input and data securely.

3. Specific Recommendations and Actionable Mitigation Strategies

Based on the component-level analysis and the security design review, here are specific and actionable recommendations tailored to Korge:

General Recommendations:

  1. Implement Automated Security Scanning (SAST): As recommended, integrate SAST tools into the CI/CD pipeline. Focus SAST scans on critical components like Resource Management, Input Handling, Graphics Engine, and Audio Engine. Configure SAST tools to detect common vulnerabilities like buffer overflows, path traversal, and input validation issues in Kotlin code.
    • Actionable Mitigation: Integrate a SAST tool (e.g., SonarQube, Semgrep) into the GitHub Actions workflow. Configure it to scan Kotlin code on every pull request and commit to the main branch. Regularly review and remediate findings from SAST scans.
  2. Establish a Vulnerability Disclosure Policy: Create a clear and easily accessible vulnerability disclosure policy on the Korge GitHub repository. This policy should outline how security researchers and users can report vulnerabilities responsibly and what the Korge project's process for handling reports is.
    • Actionable Mitigation: Create a SECURITY.md file in the root of the Korge repository outlining the vulnerability disclosure process. Include contact information (e.g., security email alias) and expected response times.
  3. Periodic Security Code Reviews: Conduct focused security code reviews, especially for critical components and areas identified as high-risk in this analysis (Resource Management, Input Handling, Graphics/Audio API interactions). Prioritize reviews for code changes related to input processing, resource loading, and platform API interactions.
    • Actionable Mitigation: Schedule regular security-focused code review sessions (e.g., quarterly) involving experienced developers with security awareness. Focus reviews on areas identified in this analysis and new features or changes in critical components.
  4. Security Guidelines for Game Developers: Develop and publish security guidelines and best practices specifically for game developers using Korge. These guidelines should address common security pitfalls in game development, especially those relevant to Korge's architecture and features (e.g., secure asset handling, input validation in game logic, considerations for online features if added later).
    • Actionable Mitigation: Create a dedicated "Security Best Practices" section in the Korge documentation. Include guidance on secure asset loading, input validation in game code, and general secure coding principles for game development. Provide code examples demonstrating secure practices within the Korge context.

Component-Specific Recommendations & Actionable Mitigations:

  • Resource Management Container:
    • Recommendation: Implement robust asset validation and path sanitization.
    • Actionable Mitigation:
      • Path Sanitization: Use Kotlin's Path API and functions like Path.resolve() and Path.normalize() for safe path manipulation. Avoid string-based path concatenation that can be vulnerable to path traversal.
      • Asset Validation: Implement format validation using libraries that can reliably identify file types based on magic numbers and file structure, not just extensions. For image and audio decoding, use well-vetted libraries and configure them with security options if available. Consider integrating asset integrity checks using checksums or digital signatures in the build process.
  • Input Handling Container:
    • Recommendation: Implement input validation and rate limiting.
    • Actionable Mitigation:
      • Input Validation: Validate input data types and ranges within the Input Handling Container before passing it to the Core Engine. For example, ensure mouse coordinates are within screen bounds, and key codes are within expected ranges.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement a mechanism to limit the rate of input events processed per frame or per second to prevent input flooding denial of service. Use debouncing techniques for rapid input events.
  • Graphics and Audio Engine Containers:
    • Recommendation: Secure API usage and resource limits.
    • Actionable Mitigation:
      • API Usage Review: Conduct specific code reviews focusing on the usage of OpenGL, WebGL, OpenAL, and WebAudio APIs. Verify correct error handling, resource allocation/deallocation, and adherence to API best practices.
      • Resource Limits: Implement configuration options or engine-level limits for graphics and audio resources (e.g., max texture size, max audio sources) to prevent resource exhaustion attacks. Document these limits for game developers.
  • Tools & Libraries Container:
    • Recommendation: Secure coding practices and input validation in libraries.
    • Actionable Mitigation:
      • Secure Library Development: Enforce secure coding practices for all contributions to the Tools & Libraries Container. Conduct code reviews specifically for security aspects of these libraries.
      • Input Validation in Libraries: Ensure that any library function that processes user input or external data performs thorough input validation to prevent vulnerabilities.

By implementing these specific recommendations and actionable mitigation strategies, the Korge project can significantly enhance its security posture, reduce the risk of vulnerabilities in the engine, and provide a more secure platform for game developers. Continuous monitoring, regular security reviews, and community engagement are crucial for maintaining a strong security posture for Korge in the long term.