Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
138 lines (114 loc) · 15.6 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

138 lines (114 loc) · 15.6 KB

Okay, here's a deep analysis of the security considerations for Korge, based on the provided security design review and my expertise as a cybersecurity expert working with a development team.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of the Korge game engine, focusing on identifying potential vulnerabilities, assessing risks, and providing actionable mitigation strategies. The analysis will cover key components, including rendering, input handling, asset management, networking (if applicable), and platform-specific integrations. The goal is to improve the overall security posture of Korge and the games built with it.
  • Scope: The analysis will cover the core Korge engine, Korlibs libraries (as they are integral to Korge), and the interaction with target platforms (JVM, JS, Native, Android, iOS). It will not cover the security of individual games built with Korge, except to provide guidance on how Korge's features can be used securely. It will also consider the build and deployment processes. The analysis will be limited to information available in the provided design review, public documentation, and reasonable inferences from the GitHub repository structure.
  • Methodology:
    1. Architecture Review: Analyze the provided C4 diagrams and design documentation to understand the system's architecture, components, data flow, and trust boundaries.
    2. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats based on the architecture, business risks, and known vulnerabilities in similar technologies. We'll use a combination of STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) and attack trees.
    3. Code Review (Inferred): Since we don't have direct access to the full codebase, we'll infer potential vulnerabilities based on the described functionality and common security issues in game engines and Kotlin/multiplatform development.
    4. Dependency Analysis: Examine the use of third-party libraries (Korlibs and others managed by Gradle) and assess their potential security implications.
    5. Mitigation Recommendations: Provide specific, actionable recommendations to address identified vulnerabilities and improve the overall security posture.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of the key components identified in the C4 diagrams and design review:

  • Korge Core (Scene Management, Rendering, Utilities):

    • Threats:
      • Rendering vulnerabilities: Exploiting vulnerabilities in the rendering pipeline could lead to arbitrary code execution (e.g., through crafted shaders or textures). This is a high severity threat.
      • Resource exhaustion: Maliciously crafted scenes or assets could consume excessive resources (memory, CPU), leading to denial of service.
      • Logic flaws: Bugs in scene management or core utilities could be exploited to bypass game logic or gain unauthorized access to game data.
    • Mitigation:
      • Strict input validation: Thoroughly validate all data used in rendering, including textures, models, shaders, and scene descriptions. Use a whitelist approach where possible.
      • Resource limits: Implement limits on resource usage (e.g., maximum texture size, number of draw calls) to prevent denial-of-service attacks.
      • Fuzz testing: Use fuzz testing techniques to identify vulnerabilities in the rendering pipeline.
      • Code review: Regularly review the core code for potential security flaws.

  • Korge Modules (Audio, Input, Graphics):

    • Threats:
      • Input handling vulnerabilities: Failure to properly sanitize user input (keyboard, mouse, gamepad, touch) could lead to injection attacks or other vulnerabilities. This is particularly critical for cross-platform input handling.
      • Audio vulnerabilities: Exploiting vulnerabilities in audio codecs or playback libraries could lead to arbitrary code execution.
      • Graphics vulnerabilities: (Covered in Korge Core, but also applies to specialized graphics modules).
    • Mitigation:
      • Input sanitization: Implement robust input sanitization for all input sources. Consider using a dedicated input library that handles platform-specific differences securely.
      • Safe audio handling: Use well-vetted audio libraries and keep them up-to-date. Validate audio file formats and metadata before processing.
      • Regular updates: Keep all modules up-to-date to address security vulnerabilities.

  • Korlibs Libraries:

    • Threats: Vulnerabilities in Korlibs could be exploited to compromise Korge and games built with it. Since Korlibs provides low-level functionalities, vulnerabilities here could have a wide impact.
    • Mitigation:
      • Dependency monitoring: Closely monitor Korlibs for security updates and apply them promptly.
      • SCA: Use Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools to identify known vulnerabilities in Korlibs and its dependencies.
      • Contribute to Korlibs security: If possible, contribute to the security review and testing of Korlibs.

  • Target Platforms (JVM, JS, Native, Android, iOS):

    • Threats:
      • Platform-specific vulnerabilities: Each platform has its own set of potential vulnerabilities that could be exploited.
      • Insecure inter-process communication (IPC): If Korge uses IPC to communicate with other processes on the platform, this communication must be secured.
      • File system access: Careless file system access could lead to data leaks or unauthorized modification of game files.
    • Mitigation:
      • Follow platform-specific security best practices: Adhere to the security guidelines for each target platform (e.g., Android security model, iOS sandboxing).
      • Secure IPC: Use secure IPC mechanisms (e.g., encrypted sockets, named pipes with proper permissions).
      • Principle of least privilege: Access only the necessary files and resources on the platform. Use platform-specific APIs for secure file storage (e.g., Android's internal storage).
      • Regular platform updates: Keep the target platforms up-to-date with the latest security patches.

  • Networking (Inferred - Not Explicitly Mentioned, but Likely):

    • Threats:
      • Man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks: If the game communicates with a server, attackers could intercept and modify network traffic.
      • Data breaches: Sensitive data transmitted over the network could be stolen.
      • Denial-of-service attacks: Attackers could flood the game server with requests, making it unavailable to legitimate players.
      • Insecure protocols: Using unencrypted or outdated protocols (e.g., plain HTTP, old versions of TLS) can expose data to eavesdropping.
    • Mitigation:
      • Use HTTPS/TLS: Always use HTTPS (TLS) for all network communication. Ensure the TLS configuration is secure (strong ciphers, up-to-date protocols).
      • Validate server certificates: Verify the server's certificate to prevent MitM attacks.
      • Implement robust input validation on the server-side: Treat all data received from clients as untrusted.
      • Rate limiting and other DoS protection measures: Implement mechanisms to prevent denial-of-service attacks.
      • Consider WebSockets Secure (wss://) for real-time communication: If using WebSockets, use the secure wss:// protocol.

  • Asset Management:

    • Threats:
      • Loading malicious assets: Attackers could create malicious asset files (e.g., images, audio, models) that exploit vulnerabilities in the asset loading and processing code.
      • Asset integrity: Ensuring that assets haven't been tampered with during loading or storage.
    • Mitigation:
      • Validate asset file formats: Thoroughly validate the format and contents of all asset files before processing them.
      • Use secure asset loaders: Use well-vetted asset loading libraries and keep them up-to-date.
      • Consider digital signatures or checksums: Use digital signatures or checksums to verify the integrity of assets.
      • Sandboxing (if possible): Load and process assets in a sandboxed environment to limit the impact of potential vulnerabilities.

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow (Inferences)

Based on the C4 diagrams and the nature of a game engine, we can infer the following:

  • Data Flow:

    • User input flows from the input devices (keyboard, mouse, etc.) through the Korge Input module, to the game logic.
    • Game logic updates the game state and sends rendering commands to the Korge Core and Graphics modules.
    • The rendering modules interact with the underlying platform (JVM, JS, Native, etc.) to display the game on the screen.
    • Assets are loaded from the file system (or network) by the Asset Management module and used by the rendering and game logic.
    • Audio data flows from the Audio module to the platform's audio output.
    • If networking is involved, data flows between the game client and server, likely through a dedicated networking module.

  • Trust Boundaries:

    • The boundary between the game engine and the underlying platform is a critical trust boundary. Korge must trust the platform to provide a secure environment, but it should also be defensive against potential platform vulnerabilities.
    • The boundary between the game engine and user-provided input (including assets) is another important trust boundary. Korge must assume that all user input is potentially malicious.
    • If networking is involved, the boundary between the game client and server is a trust boundary.

4. Specific Security Considerations for Korge

  • Multi-Platform Nature: The fact that Korge targets multiple platforms introduces significant security challenges. Vulnerabilities in platform-specific code could affect only a subset of users, making them harder to detect and fix. Consistent security across all platforms is crucial.
  • Kotlin's Security Features: Kotlin's null safety and other language features can help prevent some common vulnerabilities, but they are not a silver bullet. Developers still need to follow secure coding practices.
  • Open-Source Nature: While open-source allows for community review, it also means that vulnerabilities are publicly visible. A clear vulnerability disclosure and response process is essential.
  • Reliance on Korlibs: Korge's dependence on Korlibs means that Korlibs' security is critical to Korge's security.
  • Game Engine Specifics: Game engines often have unique security challenges due to their complex interactions with hardware and operating systems, and their need to handle a wide variety of user-provided data.

5. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Tailored to Korge)

These recommendations are prioritized based on their potential impact and feasibility:

  • High Priority:

    • Implement SCA (Software Composition Analysis): Integrate an SCA tool (e.g., Snyk, OWASP Dependency-Check, GitHub's built-in dependency scanning) into the CI/CD pipeline. This is the single most important step to address vulnerabilities in Korlibs and other dependencies. Configure the tool to fail builds if vulnerabilities above a certain severity threshold are found.
    • Implement SAST (Static Application Security Testing): Integrate a SAST tool (e.g., SonarQube, SpotBugs with FindSecBugs plugin, Qodana) into the CI/CD pipeline. This will help identify vulnerabilities in the Korge codebase itself. Focus on rules related to input validation, resource management, and platform-specific security.
    • Establish a Vulnerability Disclosure and Response Process: Create a clear process for security researchers to report vulnerabilities (e.g., a SECURITY.md file in the GitHub repository, a dedicated email address). Define a timeline for acknowledging and addressing reported vulnerabilities.
    • Input Validation and Sanitization Review: Conduct a thorough review of all input handling code (keyboard, mouse, gamepad, touch, network, file loading) and ensure that robust input validation and sanitization are in place. Prioritize areas that handle user-provided data or interact with the underlying platform.
    • Asset Validation: Implement strict validation of all loaded assets (textures, models, audio files, etc.). Use a whitelist approach where possible, only allowing known-good file formats and data structures.

  • Medium Priority:

    • Security Training for Contributors: Provide security training materials for Korge contributors, covering topics such as secure coding practices, common vulnerabilities, and the Korge security model.
    • Fuzz Testing: Implement fuzz testing for critical components, particularly the rendering pipeline and asset loading code.
    • Resource Limits: Implement resource limits (e.g., maximum texture size, memory usage) to prevent denial-of-service attacks.
    • Review Platform-Specific Code: Conduct a security review of the platform-specific code (JVM, JS, Native, Android, iOS integrations) to identify potential vulnerabilities.
    • Secrets Management (If Applicable): If Korge or related services use API keys or other secrets, implement a secrets management solution (e.g., environment variables, a dedicated secrets vault). Never store secrets directly in the codebase.

  • Low Priority (But Still Important):

    • Penetration Testing: Consider conducting periodic penetration testing by external security experts. This is a more expensive option, but it can help identify vulnerabilities that might be missed by other methods.
    • DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing): If Korge has any web-based components (e.g., a web-based editor or asset store), implement DAST to scan for vulnerabilities in those components.
    • Code Signing: Consider code signing for released builds (JAR files, native executables) to ensure their integrity and authenticity.

Addressing the Questions:

  • Dedicated Security Review/Audit: This is highly recommended. Even a small, focused security review by an external expert can be very valuable.
  • Vulnerability Handling Process: This must be established. See the "High Priority" mitigation strategies above.
  • Multi-Platform Security Concerns: The biggest concern is ensuring consistent security across all platforms. Platform-specific vulnerabilities are also a major concern.
  • Monetization Impact: If monetization involves handling user data or financial transactions, this will significantly increase the security requirements.
  • Security Testing Level: Beyond unit tests, fuzz testing and SAST are strongly recommended.
  • Sensitive Data Handling: If Korge handles telemetry or crash reports, this data should be anonymized and transmitted securely.
  • User Authentication/Authorization: If this is planned, it must be implemented using industry-standard security practices (e.g., OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect).

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for Korge. By implementing the recommended mitigation strategies, the Korge development team can significantly improve the security posture of the engine and protect the games built with it. The most crucial steps are implementing SCA and SAST, establishing a vulnerability disclosure process, and conducting a thorough review of input validation and asset handling.