Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
320 lines (229 loc) · 22.7 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

320 lines (229 loc) · 22.7 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for ktorio/ktor

Mitigation Strategy: Route Parameter Validation (Ktor Specific)

  • Description:

    1. Define Route Parameter Types in Ktor: Utilize Ktor's routing DSL to define explicit types for route parameters within route definitions (e.g., get("/{id:int}")).
    2. Implement Validation Logic in Route Handlers: Within Ktor route handlers, use Kotlin validation libraries or manual checks to validate extracted route parameters. Access parameters using call.parameters.
    3. Utilize Ktor's respond for Error Responses: Use Ktor's call.respond function to send appropriate HTTP error responses (e.g., HttpStatusCode.BadRequest) with informative messages when validation fails.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Injection Attacks (SQL, Command Injection, etc.) - Severity: High.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - Severity: Medium.
    • Business Logic Errors - Severity: Medium.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) - Severity: Low to Medium.

  • Impact:

    • Injection Attacks: High Risk Reduction.
    • XSS: Medium Risk Reduction.
    • Business Logic Errors: Medium Risk Reduction.
    • DoS: Low to Medium Risk Reduction.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Implemented in some route handlers using manual checks within Ktor routes.

  • Missing Implementation: Systematic validation across all route parameters in all Ktor route handlers. Lack of centralized validation logic within Ktor application structure.

Mitigation Strategy: Header Validation (Ktor Specific)

  • Description:

    1. Create Ktor Interceptors or Route Handlers: Implement header validation logic within Ktor interceptors or directly in route handlers.
    2. Access Headers using call.request.headers: In interceptors or handlers, access request headers using call.request.headers to retrieve header values.
    3. Validate Header Presence and Format: Check for the presence of required headers and validate their formats and expected values using Kotlin's string manipulation or validation libraries.
    4. Use Ktor's respond for Error Responses: Use call.respond to return error responses (e.g., HttpStatusCode.BadRequest, HttpStatusCode.NotAcceptable) for invalid headers.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Content-Type Mismatch Vulnerabilities - Severity: Medium.
    • Bypass of Security Controls - Severity: Medium.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) - Severity: Low.

  • Impact:

    • Content-Type Mismatch Vulnerabilities: Medium Risk Reduction.
    • Bypass of Security Controls: Medium Risk Reduction.
    • DoS: Low Risk Reduction.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Content-Type validation through Ktor content negotiation, but custom header validation in interceptors/handlers is inconsistent.

  • Missing Implementation: Systematic validation for custom headers and other critical headers using Ktor interceptors or handlers across all endpoints.

Mitigation Strategy: Request Body Validation based on Content Negotiation (Ktor Specific)

  • Description:

    1. Configure Content Negotiation in Ktor: Install and configure Ktor's ContentNegotiation feature, specifying supported content types and serializers (e.g., Jackson for JSON, Kotlinx.serialization).
    2. Define Data Classes for Request Bodies: Create Kotlin data classes to represent the expected structure of request bodies.
    3. Validate Deserialized Data in Route Handlers: After Ktor deserializes the request body into data classes, implement validation logic within route handlers on these data class instances.
    4. Use Ktor's respond for Validation Errors: Utilize call.respond to return error responses (e.g., HttpStatusCode.BadRequest) with validation error details.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Data Integrity Issues - Severity: Medium to High.
    • Business Logic Errors - Severity: Medium.
    • Injection Attacks (Indirect) - Severity: Medium.
    • Deserialization Vulnerabilities - Severity: Medium to High.

  • Impact:

    • Data Integrity Issues: High Risk Reduction.
    • Business Logic Errors: High Risk Reduction.
    • Injection Attacks (Indirect): Medium Risk Reduction.
    • Deserialization Vulnerabilities: Medium Risk Reduction.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Content negotiation is used for JSON, but validation of deserialized data classes within Ktor route handlers is not consistently applied.

  • Missing Implementation: Systematic validation of deserialized request bodies in Ktor route handlers for all endpoints accepting data.

Mitigation Strategy: Leverage Ktor Authentication Plugins

  • Description:

    1. Install Ktor Authentication Plugin: Install the appropriate Ktor authentication plugin (e.g., Authentication, JWT, OAuth) in your Ktor application module.
    2. Configure Authentication in Ktor: Configure the plugin with necessary settings like JWT verifier, OAuth providers, or basic auth realms within the install(Authentication) block in your Ktor module.
    3. Protect Routes with authenticate Block: Use the authenticate block in Ktor routing to protect specific routes or route groups, enforcing authentication based on the configured plugin.
    4. Access Principal using call.principal(): In authenticated routes, access the authenticated user's principal information using call.principal<UserPrincipal>() (or your custom principal class).

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized Access - Severity: High.
    • Session Hijacking (Indirectly) - Severity: Medium.
    • Brute-Force Attacks (Password Guessing) - Severity: Medium (depending on plugin configuration).

  • Impact:

    • Unauthorized Access: High Risk Reduction.
    • Session Hijacking (Indirectly): Medium Risk Reduction.
    • Brute-Force Attacks (Password Guessing): Medium Risk Reduction.

  • Currently Implemented: Yes - JWT plugin is implemented for API authentication in specific Ktor modules.

  • Missing Implementation: Consistent application of Ktor authentication across all relevant parts of the application, including potentially internal APIs and administrative interfaces.

Mitigation Strategy: Fine-grained Authorization with Ktor Features

  • Description:

    1. Implement Authorization Checks in Ktor Interceptors/Handlers: Within Ktor route handlers or interceptors, implement authorization logic to check user roles or permissions.
    2. Access Principal from call.principal(): Retrieve the authenticated user's principal information using call.principal<UserPrincipal>() within Ktor components.
    3. Use Ktor's respond for Authorization Failures: Use call.respond(HttpStatusCode.Forbidden) to return 403 Forbidden responses when authorization fails.
    4. Structure Authorization Logic with Ktor Context (Optional): Utilize Ktor's context features to pass authorization decisions or policies through interceptors for more structured authorization.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized Access (Authorization Bypass) - Severity: High.
    • Privilege Escalation - Severity: High.
    • Data Breaches - Severity: High.

  • Impact:

    • Unauthorized Access (Authorization Bypass): High Risk Reduction.
    • Privilege Escalation: High Risk Reduction.
    • Data Breaches: High Risk Reduction.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Basic role-based authorization in some areas of the Ktor application, but authorization logic is often scattered.

  • Missing Implementation: Centralized authorization framework within the Ktor application. Consistent authorization checks across all Ktor endpoints and actions.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Session Configuration (Ktor Specific)

  • Description:

    1. Configure Session Cookies in Ktor: When using Ktor's install(Sessions) feature, configure session cookies within the cookie<SessionClass>("SESSION_COOKIE_NAME") block.
    2. Set Security Attributes: Within the cookie configuration, set security attributes: cookie.httpOnly = true, cookie.secure = true, cookie.extensions["SameSite"] = "Strict" (or "Lax").
    3. Choose Secure Session Storage in Ktor: Select a secure session storage mechanism supported by Ktor, such as server-side sessions or encrypted cookies.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Session Hijacking (XSS) - Severity: Medium to High.
    • Session Hijacking (Man-in-the-Middle) - Severity: Medium to High.
    • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) - Severity: Medium.
    • Session Fixation - Severity: Low to Medium (indirectly mitigated).

  • Impact:

    • Session Hijacking (XSS): High Risk Reduction.
    • Session Hijacking (Man-in-the-Middle): High Risk Reduction.
    • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): Medium Risk Reduction.
    • Session Fixation: Low to Medium Risk Reduction.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - httpOnly and secure attributes are generally set in Ktor session configuration, but sameSite and session storage need review.

  • Missing Implementation: Consistent and enforced sameSite attribute configuration in Ktor session settings. Review and potentially switch to more secure server-side session storage within Ktor.

Mitigation Strategy: Prevent Session Fixation (Ktor Specific)

  • Description:

    1. Verify Ktor Session ID Regeneration: Confirm that Ktor's session management automatically regenerates session IDs upon successful authentication. Review Ktor documentation or test behavior.
    2. Implement Explicit Regeneration if Needed: If Ktor doesn't handle it by default for custom authentication flows, implement explicit session ID regeneration logic within your Ktor authentication handlers. This might involve invalidating the old session and creating a new one after successful login.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Session Fixation Attacks - Severity: Medium.

  • Impact:

    • Session Fixation Attacks: High Risk Reduction.

  • Currently Implemented: Likely Yes - Assumed that Ktor's default session management handles session ID regeneration. Verification is needed.

  • Missing Implementation: Explicit verification of session ID regeneration behavior in Ktor. Implement explicit regeneration for custom authentication flows if needed within Ktor application code.

Mitigation Strategy: Selective Plugin Usage and Auditing (Ktor Specific)

  • Description:

    1. Evaluate Security of Ktor Plugins: Before using any Ktor plugin, especially third-party ones, evaluate its security. Review plugin documentation, source code, and community reputation within the Ktor ecosystem.
    2. Use Trusted Ktor Plugin Sources: Prefer plugins from official Ktor repositories or well-known and maintained Kotlin/Ktor libraries.
    3. Minimize Ktor Plugin Usage: Only install and use Ktor plugins that are strictly necessary for your application's features.
    4. Regularly Audit Ktor Plugins: Periodically audit used Ktor plugins for security updates, vulnerabilities, and continued necessity.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Vulnerabilities in Plugins - Severity: Medium to High.
    • Supply Chain Attacks - Severity: Medium.
    • Unnecessary Attack Surface - Severity: Low to Medium.

  • Impact:

    • Vulnerabilities in Plugins: Medium to High Risk Reduction.
    • Supply Chain Attacks: Medium Risk Reduction.
    • Unnecessary Attack Surface: Low to Medium Risk Reduction.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Plugins are generally chosen based on need, but formal security evaluation and regular auditing of Ktor plugins are not consistently done.

  • Missing Implementation: Formal process for security evaluation of Ktor plugins before adoption. Regular Ktor plugin auditing schedule.

Mitigation Strategy: Keep Ktor Core and Plugins Updated

  • Description:

    1. Monitor Ktor Releases: Regularly monitor Ktor's official channels (GitHub, blog, release notes) for updates to Ktor core libraries and plugins.
    2. Update Ktor Dependencies Proactively: Proactively update Ktor core libraries and plugins in your build.gradle.kts (or pom.xml) to the latest stable versions after releases.
    3. Test Ktor Updates in Ktor Environment: Thoroughly test Ktor updates in a testing environment that mirrors your Ktor application setup before deploying to production.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities in Ktor Framework - Severity: High.
    • Zero-Day Vulnerabilities (Reduced Window) - Severity: High.

  • Impact:

    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities in Ktor Framework: High Risk Reduction.
    • Zero-Day Vulnerabilities (Reduced Window): High Risk Reduction.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Ktor versions are updated periodically, but not always proactively and immediately upon release.

  • Missing Implementation: Establish a proactive Ktor update schedule. Automate Ktor dependency updates and testing process within the Ktor project's CI/CD.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Ktor Application Configuration

  • Description:

    1. Review Ktor Configuration Files: Regularly review Ktor application configuration files (application.conf, programmatically configured settings) for security.
    2. Minimize Sensitive Information in Ktor Config: Avoid storing sensitive information directly in Ktor configuration files. Use environment variables or secure secret management for credentials.
    3. Secure Settings for Ktor Features: Ensure security-related Ktor features like TLS, CORS (configured in Ktor), logging (configured in Ktor), and sessions are configured with secure settings within Ktor's configuration.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Information Disclosure - Severity: Medium to High.
    • Bypass of Security Controls - Severity: Medium to High.
    • Unauthorized Access (Indirect) - Severity: Medium.

  • Impact:

    • Information Disclosure: Medium to High Risk Reduction.
    • Bypass of Security Controls: Medium to High Risk Reduction.
    • Unauthorized Access (Indirect): Medium Risk Reduction.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Basic configuration review is done, but a systematic security-focused audit of Ktor configuration is not regular.

  • Missing Implementation: Establish a regular security configuration audit process specifically for Ktor application settings. Document secure Ktor configuration best practices.

Mitigation Strategy: HTTPS/TLS Enforcement in Ktor

  • Description:

    1. Configure TLS in Ktor Server: Configure TLS certificates directly within your Ktor server setup (e.g., embedded server configuration using embeddedServer or reverse proxy configuration).
    2. Enable HTTPS Connector in Ktor: Ensure your Ktor server is configured to listen on HTTPS using the configured TLS certificates.
    3. Implement HTTP to HTTPS Redirection in Ktor: Use Ktor's routing or interceptors to implement automatic redirection of all HTTP requests to HTTPS within the Ktor application.
    4. Set HSTS Header in Ktor Responses: Configure Ktor to send the Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS) header in responses, typically using Ktor's headers feature in responses or a dedicated interceptor.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks - Severity: High.
    • Data Interception - Severity: High.
    • Session Hijacking (MitM) - Severity: Medium to High.

  • Impact:

    • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks: High Risk Reduction.
    • Data Interception: High Risk Reduction.
    • Session Hijacking (MitM): Medium Risk Reduction.

  • Currently Implemented: Yes - HTTPS is enforced for production Ktor environments, with TLS and HTTP to HTTPS redirection.

  • Missing Implementation: HSTS header configuration is not consistently applied in Ktor responses across all environments.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Rate Limiting Middleware/Interceptors (Ktor Specific)

  • Description:

    1. Create Ktor Rate Limiting Interceptor: Develop a Ktor interceptor or utilize a community-developed Ktor rate limiting plugin.
    2. Implement Rate Limiting Logic in Interceptor: Within the Ktor interceptor, implement rate limiting logic based on IP address, user ID, or other criteria. Track request counts and enforce limits.
    3. Configure Rate Limits in Ktor: Configure rate limits for specific routes or globally within your Ktor application, defining thresholds and time windows.
    4. Use Ktor's respond for Rate Limit Exceeded: In the interceptor, use call.respond(HttpStatusCode.TooManyRequests) to return 429 responses when rate limits are exceeded.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks - Severity: High.
    • Brute-Force Attacks (Password Guessing, etc.) - Severity: Medium.
    • Resource Exhaustion - Severity: Medium.

  • Impact:

    • DoS Attacks: High Risk Reduction.
    • Brute-Force Attacks: Medium Risk Reduction.
    • Resource Exhaustion: Medium Risk Reduction.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Basic rate limiting for login endpoints using custom Ktor interceptors, but not system-wide.

  • Missing Implementation: Systematic rate limiting using Ktor interceptors across all public APIs and critical endpoints. Centralized rate limiting configuration within the Ktor application.

Mitigation Strategy: Request Size Limits (Ktor Specific)

  • Description:

    1. Configure Request Size Limits in Ktor Server: Configure request size limits within your Ktor server configuration (e.g., using embedded server settings or reverse proxy configurations that Ktor is behind). Ktor itself might have configuration options for request size limits depending on the server engine used.
    2. Implement Request Size Check Interceptor (Optional): Alternatively, create a Ktor interceptor to explicitly check call.request.contentLength() and reject requests exceeding limits.
    3. Use Ktor's respond for Payload Too Large: Use call.respond(HttpStatusCode.PayloadTooLarge) to return 413 responses for oversized requests.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks (Large Request Payloads) - Severity: Medium.
    • Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities (Indirect) - Severity: Low.

  • Impact:

    • DoS Attacks (Large Request Payloads): Medium Risk Reduction.
    • Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities (Indirect): Low Risk Reduction.

  • Currently Implemented: Yes - Request size limits are configured in the Ktor server settings (engine specific configuration).

  • Missing Implementation: Review and fine-tune request size limits for different Ktor endpoints or content types. Consider using a Ktor interceptor for more granular control if needed.

Mitigation Strategy: Security-Focused Logging with Ktor Logging

  • Description:

    1. Configure Ktor Logging Framework: Configure Ktor's logging framework (e.g., SLF4J, Logback, Kotlin Logging) within your Ktor application.
    2. Log Security Events in Ktor: Use Ktor's logging to log security-relevant events within your Ktor application code, such as authentication attempts, authorization failures, input validation errors, and exceptions related to security checks.
    3. Include Context in Ktor Logs: Ensure Ktor logs include relevant context like timestamps, user IDs (from call.principal()), IP addresses (from call.request.origin.remoteHost), and request details available within the Ktor call context.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Lack of Audit Trail - Severity: Medium to High.
    • Delayed Incident Detection - Severity: Medium.
    • Ineffective Incident Response - Severity: Medium.

  • Impact:

    • Lack of Audit Trail: High Risk Reduction.
    • Delayed Incident Detection: Medium Risk Reduction.
    • Ineffective Incident Response: Medium Risk Reduction.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Basic logging is configured in Ktor, but security-specific logging within Ktor application code is not comprehensive.

  • Missing Implementation: Comprehensive security-focused logging configuration within Ktor application. Leverage Ktor's context to enrich security logs.

Mitigation Strategy: Custom Error Handling for Security (Ktor Specific)

  • Description:

    1. Install Ktor StatusPages Feature: Install Ktor's StatusPages feature in your Ktor application module: install(StatusPages).
    2. Define Custom Error Pages in StatusPages: Within the StatusPages configuration, define custom error handling for different HTTP status codes using exception<T> and status(HttpStatusCode) blocks.
    3. Generic Error Responses in Ktor: In custom error handlers within StatusPages, use call.respond to send generic, user-friendly error responses, avoiding sensitive details.
    4. Secure Error Logging in Ktor: Within StatusPages error handlers, log detailed error information (stack traces, request details from call) securely using Ktor's logging framework, but do not expose this in the response.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Information Leakage in Error Responses - Severity: Medium.
    • Security Through Obscurity (Limited) - Severity: Low.

  • Impact:

    • Information Leakage in Error Responses: High Risk Reduction.
    • Security Through Obscurity (Limited): Low Risk Reduction.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Custom error pages are implemented for some common error codes using Ktor's StatusPages, but not consistently for all error scenarios.

  • Missing Implementation: Comprehensive custom error handling using Ktor StatusPages for all relevant HTTP status codes. Consistent application of generic error messages in Ktor responses.