Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
97 lines (73 loc) · 7.13 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

97 lines (73 loc) · 7.13 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for mikepenz/android-iconics

Objective: Compromise Application using android-iconics

Attack Tree Visualization

Goal: Compromise Application using android-iconics ├── 1. Denial of Service (DoS) / Application Crash [HIGH-RISK] │ ├── 1.1. Malformed Icon Resource Input [CRITICAL] │ │ ├── 1.1.1. Extremely Large Icon Definition (Size) [HIGH-RISK] │ │ │ └── 1.1.1.2. Cause OutOfMemoryError (OOM) [CRITICAL] │ │ │ └── 1.1.1.2.1. Provide icon definition that consumes excessive memory. [HIGH-RISK] │ │ ├── 1.1.2. Invalid Icon Font/Character Reference [HIGH-RISK] │ │ │ ├── 1.1.2.1. Trigger Exception due to Unhandled Font/Character [CRITICAL] │ │ │ │ └── 1.1.2.1.1. Provide non-existent font or character code. [HIGH-RISK] │ │ │ └── 1.1.2.2. Exploit potential vulnerabilities in font loading/rendering. [CRITICAL if custom fonts] │ │ │ └── 1.1.2.2.1. If custom fonts are supported, supply a malicious font file. [HIGH-RISK if custom fonts]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Denial of Service (DoS) / Application Crash [HIGH-RISK]

  • Description: The attacker aims to make the application unusable by causing it to crash or become unresponsive. This is the most likely and impactful category of attacks against the android-iconics library.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Robust input validation.
    • Careful resource management.
    • Comprehensive exception handling.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1. Malformed Icon Resource Input [CRITICAL]

  • Description: This is the primary entry point for several high-risk DoS attacks. The attacker provides invalid or malicious data to the library, hoping to trigger vulnerabilities or errors.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strictly validate all input data, including icon definitions, font names, character codes, and styling parameters.
    • Enforce size limits on icon definitions.
    • Use a secure XML parser (if applicable) with features like external entity resolution disabled.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.1. Extremely Large Icon Definition (Size) [HIGH-RISK]

  • Description: The attacker provides an icon definition with excessively large dimensions or a massive amount of data.
  • Attack Vector:
    • Submit an icon definition (e.g., through an XML file if the application loads icons externally) that specifies extremely large width and height values, or includes a very large embedded image or data payload.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement strict size limits on icon dimensions and data size.
    • Validate the size of any embedded images or data before processing.
    • Perform fuzz testing with large and malformed icon definitions.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.1.2. Cause OutOfMemoryError (OOM) [CRITICAL]

  • Description: This is the direct consequence of providing an extremely large icon definition. The application runs out of memory while trying to process the icon, leading to a crash.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • All strategies listed under 1.1.1.
    • Monitor memory usage and implement safeguards to prevent excessive memory allocation.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.1.2.1. Provide icon definition that consumes excessive memory. [HIGH-RISK]

  • Description: This is the specific action the attacker takes to cause an OOM error.
  • Mitigation Strategies: Same as 1.1.1.2

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.2. Invalid Icon Font/Character Reference [HIGH-RISK]

  • Description: The attacker provides a non-existent font name or character code to the library.
  • Attack Vector:
    • Specify an invalid font name or a character code that does not exist within the specified font.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Validate font names against a whitelist, if possible.
    • Validate character codes against the valid range for the specified font.
    • Handle font loading and character rendering exceptions gracefully.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.2.1. Trigger Exception due to Unhandled Font/Character [CRITICAL]

  • Description: This is the direct consequence of providing an invalid font or character reference. If the application does not handle the resulting exception, it will crash.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement robust exception handling for all font loading and character rendering operations.
    • Use try-catch blocks to gracefully handle potential errors.
    • Log any exceptions that occur for debugging and monitoring.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.2.1.1. Provide non-existent font or character code. [HIGH-RISK]

  • Description: This is the specific action the attacker takes.
    • Mitigation Strategies: Same as 1.1.2.1

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.2.2. Exploit potential vulnerabilities in font loading/rendering. [CRITICAL if custom fonts]

  • Description: This is a highly specialized attack that targets vulnerabilities in the underlying font rendering engine (often part of the OS). It's much more likely if the application allows the use of custom fonts.
  • Attack Vector (if custom fonts are used):
    • Provide a maliciously crafted font file that exploits a vulnerability in the font rendering engine. This could lead to arbitrary code execution.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Avoid custom fonts if possible. This significantly reduces the attack surface.
    • If custom fonts are absolutely necessary:
      • Thoroughly validate the font file before loading it. Use multiple independent validation tools.
      • Consider using a sandboxed environment for font rendering. This isolates the font rendering process from the rest of the application, limiting the impact of a potential exploit.
      • Keep the underlying OS and any font rendering libraries up-to-date. This ensures that any known vulnerabilities are patched.
      • Implement strict file permissions to prevent unauthorized modification of font files.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.2.2.1. If custom fonts are supported, supply a malicious font file. [HIGH-RISK if custom fonts]

  • Description: This is the specific, high-risk action if custom fonts are allowed.
    • Mitigation Strategies: Same as 1.1.2.2