Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
193 lines (145 loc) · 17.8 KB

File metadata and controls

193 lines (145 loc) · 17.8 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for mikepenz/materialdrawer

Objective: Compromise Application using MaterialDrawer

Attack Tree Visualization

  • Attack Goal: Compromise Application using MaterialDrawer [CRITICAL NODE]
    • Exploit MaterialDrawer Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]
      • Client-Side Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]
        • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Drawer Content [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH-RISK PATH]
          • Inject Malicious Script via Drawer Item Text/HTML
            • Application fails to sanitize user-controlled data used in Drawer items [HIGH-RISK PATH]
      • Dependency Vulnerabilities in MaterialDrawer [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH-RISK PATH]
        • Exploit Vulnerable Dependencies of MaterialDrawer [HIGH-RISK PATH]
          • Identify Outdated or Vulnerable Dependencies used by MaterialDrawer [HIGH-RISK PATH]
            • Analyze MaterialDrawer's build.gradle or similar dependency files [HIGH-RISK PATH]
          • Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in those Dependencies [HIGH-RISK PATH]
            • Leverage public exploits for identified vulnerable dependencies [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    • Misconfiguration/Misuse of MaterialDrawer in Application [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH-RISK PATH]
      • Insecure Implementation of Drawer Item Actions [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH-RISK PATH]
        • Application code handles Drawer item clicks insecurely [HIGH-RISK PATH]
          • Drawer item actions trigger vulnerable application functionalities [HIGH-RISK PATH]
        • Lack of proper input validation or authorization in Drawer item action handlers [HIGH-RISK PATH]
          • Application doesn't validate user input or permissions when handling Drawer actions [HIGH-RISK PATH]
      • Insecure Deep Linking/Navigation via Drawer [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH-RISK PATH]
        • Drawer items trigger deep links or navigation actions [HIGH-RISK PATH]
          • Drawer is used as a navigation mechanism within the application [HIGH-RISK PATH]
        • Deep links/navigation actions are vulnerable to manipulation or injection [HIGH-RISK PATH]
          • Application's deep link handling or navigation logic is insecure and exploitable [HIGH-RISK PATH]
  • This is the ultimate objective of the attacker. Success here means the attacker has achieved some level of control or negative impact on the application through vulnerabilities related to MaterialDrawer.
  • This node represents the broad category of attacks that directly target weaknesses within the MaterialDrawer library itself or its integration points.
  • This focuses on vulnerabilities that manifest and are exploitable within the user's browser or client-side environment when interacting with the MaterialDrawer UI.
  • Attack Vector: Injecting malicious JavaScript code into the content of the MaterialDrawer (e.g., item text, descriptions).
    • Attack Steps:
      • Attacker finds a way to inject script into data used to populate Drawer items (e.g., via application input vulnerability).
      • When the Drawer is rendered, the script executes in the user's browser.
    • Impact: Full client-side compromise, session hijacking, cookie theft, redirection to malicious sites, defacement, actions performed on behalf of the user.
    • Mitigation: Strict input sanitization of all user-controlled data used in Drawer content, Content Security Policy (CSP), regular MaterialDrawer updates.
  • Attack Vector: The application's failure to properly sanitize user-provided or user-influenced data before displaying it in the MaterialDrawer.
    • Attack Steps:
      • Attacker provides malicious input through application interfaces (forms, APIs, etc.).
      • Application stores or processes this data without sanitization.
      • This unsanitized data is used to populate Drawer items.
    • Impact: XSS vulnerabilities as described above.
    • Mitigation: Implement robust input sanitization and validation at all application input points, especially before data is used in UI components like MaterialDrawer.
  • Attack Vector: Exploiting known vulnerabilities in the dependencies used by the MaterialDrawer library.
    • Attack Steps:
      • Attacker identifies outdated or vulnerable dependencies of MaterialDrawer (e.g., by analyzing build.gradle).
      • Attacker leverages public exploits for these known vulnerabilities.
    • Impact: Depends on the specific vulnerability, but can range from Denial of Service (DoS) to Remote Code Execution (RCE), potentially compromising the entire application and server.
    • Mitigation: Regularly update MaterialDrawer and all its dependencies, use dependency scanning tools, monitor vulnerability databases for alerts.
  • Attack Vector: The general path of identifying and exploiting vulnerabilities within MaterialDrawer's dependencies.
    • Attack Steps: As described in "Dependency Vulnerabilities in MaterialDrawer".
    • Impact: As described in "Dependency Vulnerabilities in MaterialDrawer".
    • Mitigation: As described in "Dependency Vulnerabilities in MaterialDrawer".
  • Attack Vector: The initial step in exploiting dependency vulnerabilities - identifying the vulnerable components.
    • Attack Steps:
      • Attacker analyzes MaterialDrawer's dependency files (e.g., build.gradle).
      • Attacker uses vulnerability databases or tools to check for known vulnerabilities in the identified dependencies and their versions.
    • Impact: Sets the stage for exploiting dependency vulnerabilities.
    • Mitigation: Proactive dependency scanning and management are crucial to prevent this step from being successful for attackers.
  • Attack Vector: The specific action of examining dependency files to gather information about dependencies.
    • Attack Steps: Attacker directly inspects the project's dependency configuration files.
    • Impact: Provides attackers with the necessary information to proceed with dependency vulnerability exploitation.
    • Mitigation: While you can't prevent attackers from analyzing public files, robust dependency management and scanning are the key mitigations.
  • Attack Vector: The action of actively using exploits against identified vulnerable dependencies.
    • Attack Steps:
      • Attacker finds or develops exploits for the identified vulnerabilities.
      • Attacker deploys these exploits against the application.
    • Impact: As described in "Dependency Vulnerabilities in MaterialDrawer".
    • Mitigation: Patching vulnerabilities promptly is the primary mitigation. Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) and Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) can help detect exploitation attempts.
  • Attack Vector: Specifically using publicly available exploits, which lowers the barrier to entry for attackers.
    • Attack Steps: Attacker searches for and utilizes publicly available exploit code or tools for the identified vulnerabilities.
    • Impact: Increases the likelihood of successful exploitation due to readily available tools.
    • Mitigation: Rapid patching is even more critical when public exploits exist.
  • This node represents vulnerabilities arising from how developers incorrectly or insecurely implement MaterialDrawer features within their application code.
  • Attack Vector: Vulnerabilities introduced by insecurely handling actions triggered when users interact with Drawer items (e.g., clicking on a menu item).
    • Attack Steps:
      • Developer implements Drawer item actions that directly trigger sensitive functionalities without proper authorization or input validation.
      • Attacker manipulates Drawer interactions to exploit these insecure action handlers.
    • Impact: Unauthorized access to functionalities, data manipulation, privilege escalation, unintended application behavior.
    • Mitigation: Implement secure action handling for all Drawer item interactions, enforce authorization checks before executing sensitive actions, validate and sanitize all user input from Drawer interactions.
  • Attack Vector: The application's code responsible for processing Drawer item clicks is written in a way that introduces vulnerabilities.
    • Attack Steps: As described in "Insecure Implementation of Drawer Item Actions".
    • Impact: As described in "Insecure Implementation of Drawer Item Actions".
    • Mitigation: Secure coding practices, thorough code reviews, and security testing of Drawer action handling logic.
  • Attack Vector: Drawer items are directly linked to application functionalities that are themselves vulnerable (e.g., due to missing authorization or input validation).
    • Attack Steps: Attacker uses Drawer navigation to directly access and exploit pre-existing vulnerabilities in application functionalities.
    • Impact: Exploitation of underlying application vulnerabilities, potentially leading to significant compromise.
    • Mitigation: Secure all application functionalities, regardless of how they are accessed (including via UI elements like MaterialDrawer).
  • Attack Vector: Specifically, the absence or inadequacy of input validation and authorization checks in the code that handles Drawer item actions.
    • Attack Steps:
      • Developer fails to validate user input received from Drawer interactions.
      • Developer fails to implement proper authorization checks before executing actions triggered by Drawer items.
      • Attacker exploits these omissions to bypass security controls.
    • Impact: Unauthorized actions, data manipulation, privilege escalation.
    • Mitigation: Mandatory input validation and authorization checks for all Drawer item action handlers.
  • Attack Vector: The application's failure to perform input validation and authorization for Drawer actions.
    • Attack Steps: As described in "Lack of proper input validation or authorization in Drawer item action handlers".
    • Impact: As described in "Lack of proper input validation or authorization in Drawer item action handlers".
    • Mitigation: As described in "Lack of proper input validation or authorization in Drawer item action handlers".
  • Attack Vector: Vulnerabilities arising from the use of MaterialDrawer for navigation via deep links, where the deep link handling is insecure.
    • Attack Steps:
      • Drawer items trigger deep links or navigation actions within the application.
      • Application's deep link handling logic is vulnerable to manipulation or injection.
      • Attacker manipulates deep links via the Drawer to redirect users or trigger unintended actions.
    • Impact: Redirection to malicious sites, bypassing application flow, triggering unintended actions, potentially leading to more severe vulnerabilities depending on the application's deep link handling.
    • Mitigation: Implement secure deep link handling, validate and sanitize all deep link parameters, enforce authorization before navigation via deep links, consider URL whitelisting/blacklisting.
  • Attack Vector: The application's design choice to use Drawer items for navigation via deep links, which introduces the potential for deep link related vulnerabilities if not handled securely.
    • Attack Steps: This is a prerequisite for deep link attacks via the Drawer.
    • Impact: Exposes the application to deep link vulnerabilities.
    • Mitigation: If using Drawer for deep linking, prioritize secure deep link implementation.
  • Attack Vector: The application's architectural decision to use the Drawer as a primary navigation method, making it a critical point for navigation-based attacks.
    • Attack Steps: This is a design characteristic that influences the attack surface.
    • Impact: Increases the relevance and potential impact of deep link and navigation vulnerabilities related to the Drawer.
    • Mitigation: Recognize the Drawer's role in navigation and ensure all navigation paths, especially those accessible via the Drawer, are secure.
  • Attack Vector: The core vulnerability in the deep link handling logic itself, allowing attackers to manipulate or inject malicious parameters.
    • Attack Steps:
      • Attacker identifies that deep link parameters are not validated or sanitized.
      • Attacker crafts malicious deep links with manipulated parameters.
    • Impact: As described in "Insecure Deep Linking/Navigation via Drawer".
    • Mitigation: Robust input validation and sanitization for all deep link parameters, secure deep link parsing and processing logic.
  • Attack Vector: The application's code responsible for handling deep links and navigation contains exploitable vulnerabilities.
    • Attack Steps: As described in "Insecure Deep Linking/Navigation via Drawer".
    • Impact: As described in "Insecure Deep Linking/Navigation via Drawer".
    • Mitigation: Secure coding practices for deep link handling, thorough security testing of deep link navigation logic.