Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
100 lines (88 loc) · 9.99 KB

File metadata and controls

100 lines (88 loc) · 9.99 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for oracle/helidon

Objective: Compromise a Helidon application by exploiting vulnerabilities or weaknesses within the Helidon framework itself or its common usage patterns.

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Goal: Compromise Helidon Application ├── OR -- Exploit Helidon Framework Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├── OR -- Vulnerability in Core Helidon SE/MP [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ ├── Code Injection (e.g., RCE via deserialization, template injection) [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ └── Action: Craft malicious input to exploit injection point. ├── OR -- [HIGH RISK PATH] Exploit Helidon Misconfiguration [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├── AND -- Identify Helidon Misconfiguration │ │ ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] Insecure Security Configuration │ │ │ ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] Weak Authentication/Authorization Schemes │ │ │ │ └── Action: Brute-force credentials, exploit default credentials, bypass weak auth. │ │ │ ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] Permissive CORS Policy │ │ │ │ └── Action: Launch cross-site scripting attacks or access sensitive data from different origins. │ │ │ ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] Disabled Security Features (e.g., missing security headers, disabled input validation) │ │ │ │ └── Action: Exploit missing security controls to conduct attacks. │ │ ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] Insecure Deployment Environment Configuration (related to Helidon setup) │ │ │ ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] Exposed Management Endpoints (Helidon specific management features) │ │ │ │ └── Action: Access and exploit unprotected management endpoints for control or information. ├── OR -- [HIGH RISK PATH] Exploit Helidon Dependency Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├── AND -- Identify Vulnerable Helidon Dependencies │ │ ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] Outdated Helidon Version with Known Vulnerabilities │ │ │ └── Action: Identify application's Helidon version and check for known CVEs. │ │ ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] Vulnerable Third-Party Libraries Used by Helidon (Transitive Dependencies) │ │ │ └── Action: Analyze Helidon's dependency tree for vulnerable libraries (e.g., using dependency scanning tools).

  • Vulnerability in Core Helidon SE/MP [CRITICAL NODE]:
    • Code Injection (e.g., RCE via deserialization, template injection) [CRITICAL NODE]:
      • Attack Vector: Crafting malicious input to exploit injection points within Helidon's core framework. This could involve insecure deserialization, template injection flaws, or other code execution vulnerabilities.
      • Risk Assessment:
        • Likelihood: Low (Framework vulnerabilities are less frequent but possible)
        • Impact: Critical (Full system compromise, complete control over the application and potentially the server)
        • Effort: High (Requires deep understanding of the Helidon framework, vulnerability research, and exploit development)
        • Skill Level: High (Expertise in vulnerability research, exploit development, and framework internals)
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Exploitation might be subtle, but post-exploit activity can be detected with proper monitoring)
  • [HIGH RISK PATH] Insecure Security Configuration:

    • [HIGH RISK PATH] Weak Authentication/Authorization Schemes:
      • Attack Vector: Exploiting weak or default credentials, brute-forcing authentication, or bypassing poorly implemented authorization checks.
      • Risk Assessment:
        • Likelihood: Medium to High (Common misconfiguration, especially with default settings or rushed deployments)
        • Impact: High (Unauthorized access to protected resources, data breaches, account compromise)
        • Effort: Low to Medium (Brute-force tools are readily available, default credentials are often public knowledge)
        • Skill Level: Low to Medium (Basic understanding of authentication and authorization, use of common security tools)
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Brute-force attempts can be logged, but weak authentication schemes themselves are harder to detect passively)
    • [HIGH RISK PATH] Permissive CORS Policy:
      • Attack Vector: Exploiting overly permissive CORS configurations to launch cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks or access sensitive data from unauthorized origins.
      • Risk Assessment:
        • Likelihood: Medium (Misconfiguration possible, especially during development or when not fully understanding CORS)
        • Impact: Medium (XSS attacks, data theft, session hijacking, client-side vulnerabilities)
        • Effort: Low (Basic web attack techniques, browser developer tools)
        • Skill Level: Low to Medium (Understanding of CORS and XSS vulnerabilities)
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium (CORS misconfigurations might be missed in initial testing, XSS detection depends on monitoring and input validation)
    • [HIGH RISK PATH] Disabled Security Features (e.g., missing security headers, disabled input validation):
      • Attack Vector: Exploiting the absence of security controls like missing security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) or disabled input validation to conduct various attacks.
      • Risk Assessment:
        • Likelihood: Medium (Oversight in configuration, especially during rapid development or lack of security awareness)
        • Impact: Medium to High (Increased vulnerability to XSS, clickjacking, injection attacks, depending on the missing feature)
        • Effort: Low (Identifying missing headers or features is relatively easy using browser tools or security scanners)
        • Skill Level: Low (Basic security knowledge, familiarity with web security best practices)
        • Detection Difficulty: Low (Security scanners can easily detect missing headers, input validation issues are harder to assess externally)
  • [HIGH RISK PATH] Insecure Deployment Environment Configuration (related to Helidon setup):

    • [HIGH RISK PATH] Exposed Management Endpoints (Helidon specific management features):
      • Attack Vector: Accessing and exploiting unprotected Helidon management endpoints (e.g., for metrics, health checks, configuration) to gain control over the application or extract sensitive information.
      • Risk Assessment:
        • Likelihood: Medium (Management endpoints are sometimes overlooked during security hardening or mistakenly left unprotected)
        • Impact: High (Full control over application configuration, potential for data breaches, service disruption, or further attacks)
        • Effort: Low to Medium (Discovering endpoints might require some reconnaissance, exploiting default credentials or lack of authentication is often straightforward)
        • Skill Level: Low to Medium (Basic web request knowledge, understanding of management interfaces and common security misconfigurations)
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Access attempts might be logged, but passively detecting unprotected endpoints is harder without active scanning)
  • [HIGH RISK PATH] Outdated Helidon Version with Known Vulnerabilities:

    • Attack Vector: Exploiting known vulnerabilities present in an outdated version of the Helidon framework itself.
      • Risk Assessment:
        • Likelihood: Medium (Organizations sometimes lag behind on updates due to various reasons like compatibility concerns or lack of patching processes)
        • Impact: Varies (Depends on the specific CVEs present in the outdated version, could range from information disclosure to remote code execution)
        • Effort: Low (Identifying the application's Helidon version is usually easy, and CVE databases are publicly accessible)
        • Skill Level: Low (Basic security knowledge, ability to use CVE databases and identify software versions)
        • Detection Difficulty: Low (Version information is often exposed in headers or easily discoverable, making it simple to check against known CVEs)
  • [HIGH RISK PATH] Vulnerable Third-Party Libraries Used by Helidon (Transitive Dependencies):

    • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in third-party libraries that Helidon depends on, including transitive dependencies (libraries that Helidon's direct dependencies rely on).
      • Risk Assessment:
        • Likelihood: Medium (Transitive dependencies are often overlooked in security assessments, and vulnerabilities in third-party libraries are common)
        • Impact: Varies (Depends on the vulnerability and the function of the vulnerable library, could range from denial of service to remote code execution)
        • Effort: Medium (Requires using dependency scanning tools to analyze the dependency tree and identify vulnerable libraries)
        • Skill Level: Medium (Using security tools, understanding dependency management concepts, and interpreting vulnerability reports)
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Dependency scanning tools can detect these vulnerabilities, but it requires proactive scanning and integration into development workflows)