Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
225 lines (186 loc) · 15.6 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

225 lines (186 loc) · 15.6 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for oracle/helidon

Mitigation Strategy: Explicit Security Provider Configuration

  • Description:

    1. Configure Providers in application.yaml (or Programmatically): Create a dedicated section in your application.yaml (or equivalent programmatic configuration) to define each Helidon security provider. This is crucial for Helidon's security model. Example: 
      security:
  providers:
    - jwt:
        atn-token:
          header: "Authorization"
          scheme: "Bearer"
        jwk:
          url: "https://your-jwks-provider.com/.well-known/jwks.json"
        roles-attribute: "roles" # Attribute containing user roles
    - http-basic-auth: # Example, only if needed and configured securely
        realm: "My Application"
        users: # NEVER use cleartext in production! Use Helidon's password encryption.
          - login: "user1"
            password: "{ENCRYPTED}..." # Use Helidon's config encryption
            roles: ["user"]
    2. Define Roles and Permissions (within Helidon's context): Clearly define roles and their associated permissions, leveraging Helidon's role mapping capabilities. This often involves using Helidon's SecurityContext.
    3. Apply Security to Endpoints (using Helidon APIs): Use Helidon's security annotations (e.g., @Authenticated, @Authorized, @RolesAllowed) or programmatic checks using SecurityContext to enforce security on specific endpoints or methods. This is directly using Helidon's security features. Example: 
      @Path("/secured")
@Authenticated // Helidon annotation
public class SecuredResource {

    @GET
    @Path("/admin")
    @Authorized(roles = {"admin"}) // Helidon annotation
    public String adminOnly() {
        return "Admin access granted!";
    }

    @GET
    @Path("/user")
    public String userAccess(@Context SecurityContext securityContext) { // Helidon's SecurityContext
        if (securityContext.isUserInRole("user")) {
            return "User access granted!";
        } else {
            return "Access denied!";
        }
    }
}
    4. Test Security Configuration (using Helidon's testing support): Write unit and integration tests using Helidon's testing framework (e.g., HelidonTest) to verify that the security configuration is working as expected. This ensures your Helidon-specific security setup is correct.
    5. Disable unused providers: Comment out or remove configuration for providers that are not in use within the Helidon configuration.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Authentication Bypass (Severity: Critical): Directly related to Helidon's authentication mechanisms.
    • Authorization Bypass (Severity: Critical): Directly related to Helidon's authorization mechanisms.
    • Weak Authentication (Severity: High): Controlled by the choice of Helidon security providers and their configuration.
    • Configuration Errors (Severity: High): Specific to Helidon's security configuration.
    • Default Credential Usage (Severity: Critical): Avoid Helidon's default security settings if they are not secure enough.

  • Impact: (Same as before, but now focused on Helidon-specific aspects)

    • Authentication Bypass: Risk reduced significantly (90-100%).
    • Authorization Bypass: Risk reduced significantly (90-100%).
    • Weak Authentication: Risk reduced significantly (70-90%).
    • Configuration Errors: Risk reduced moderately (50-70%).
    • Default Credential Usage: Risk reduced completely (100%).

  • Currently Implemented: Partially. Authentication with JWT is implemented using Helidon's JwtAuthenticationProvider. Authorization is partially implemented using Helidon's @Authorized annotations.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Comprehensive RBAC using Helidon's features is not fully implemented across all resources.
    • Unit/integration tests specifically for Helidon's security features are incomplete.
    • Formalized review process for Helidon's security configuration.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Netty Web Server Configuration (via Helidon)

  • Description:

    1. Review Helidon Release Notes: Before each Helidon upgrade, check for security updates related to Netty as managed by Helidon.
    2. Configure Request Limits in application.yaml (Helidon's config): Set limits on request headers, body size, and connection timeouts using Helidon's configuration mechanism. This is not general Netty advice, but Helidon-specific configuration. Example: 
      server:
  port: 8080
  max-header-size: 8192 # bytes - Controlled by Helidon
  max-request-payload-size: 10MB # Controlled by Helidon
  read-timeout: 30s # Controlled by Helidon
  write-timeout: 30s # Controlled by Helidon
  idle-timeout: 60s # Controlled by Helidon
    3. Disable Unnecessary Helidon WebServer Features: If certain Helidon WebServer features (e.g., specific codecs or handlers exposed through Helidon) are not required, disable them in the Helidon configuration.
    4. Review Custom Helidon Handlers: If you have implemented any custom Helidon handlers (that interact with Netty), review them for vulnerabilities. This is specific to handlers written for Helidon.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial-of-Service (DoS) (Severity: High): Mitigated through Helidon's configuration of Netty.
    • Resource Exhaustion (Severity: High): Mitigated through Helidon's configuration of Netty.
    • HTTP/2-Specific Attacks (Severity: Medium): If Helidon allows disabling HTTP/2, this is relevant.
    • Vulnerabilities in Custom Helidon Handlers (Severity: Variable): Specific to handlers written for Helidon.

  • Impact: (Same as before, but focused on Helidon's control over Netty)

    • DoS: Risk reduced significantly (70-90%).
    • Resource Exhaustion: Risk reduced significantly (70-90%).
    • HTTP/2 Attacks: Risk reduced completely (100%) if disabled via Helidon.
    • Custom Handler Vulnerabilities: Risk reduction depends on the review.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially. Basic request limits are configured in Helidon's application.yaml.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Timeout configurations are not explicitly set within Helidon's configuration.
    • Review of custom Helidon handlers (if any) is not documented.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure MicroProfile Fault Tolerance (using Helidon's implementation)

  • Description:

    1. Configure Fault Tolerance Annotations (Helidon/MP): Use MicroProfile Fault Tolerance annotations provided by Helidon (e.g., @Retry, @CircuitBreaker, @Timeout) on methods. Configure the parameters carefully within the context of Helidon's implementation. Example: 
      @Retry(maxRetries = 3, delay = 1, delayUnit = ChronoUnit.SECONDS) // Helidon's MP implementation
@Timeout(value = 5, unit = ChronoUnit.SECONDS) // Helidon's MP implementation
public String getDataFromExternalService() {
    // ... code that might fail ...
}
    2. Set Realistic Timeouts (using Helidon's MP): Use @Timeout (Helidon's implementation) to prevent operations from hanging.
    3. Configure Retries Judiciously (using Helidon's MP): Use @Retry (Helidon's implementation) appropriately.
    4. Use Circuit Breakers (using Helidon's MP): Use @CircuitBreaker (Helidon's implementation) to prevent cascading failures.
    5. Monitor Fault Tolerance Metrics (using Helidon's MP Metrics): Use Helidon's built-in metrics (exposed via MicroProfile Metrics, a Helidon feature) to monitor fault tolerance.
    6. Test Failure Scenarios (using Helidon's testing support): Write tests using Helidon's testing framework to verify fault tolerance.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial-of-Service (DoS) (Severity: Medium): Helidon's fault tolerance can help mitigate some DoS scenarios.
    • Resource Exhaustion (Severity: Medium): Controlled by Helidon's fault tolerance configuration.
    • Application Instability (Severity: Medium): Improved by Helidon's fault tolerance.

  • Impact: (Same as before, but focused on Helidon's implementation)

    • DoS: Risk reduced moderately (40-60%).
    • Resource Exhaustion: Risk reduced significantly (60-80%).
    • Application Instability: Risk reduced significantly (70-90%).

  • Currently Implemented: Partially. @Retry and @Timeout (Helidon's implementation) are used in some service classes.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • @CircuitBreaker (Helidon's implementation) is not used consistently.
    • Monitoring of Helidon's fault tolerance metrics is not fully integrated.
    • Comprehensive testing using Helidon's testing framework is lacking.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure gRPC Configuration (via Helidon)

  • Description: (Assuming gRPC is used, and configured through Helidon)

    1. Enable TLS (using Helidon's gRPC support): Configure TLS for gRPC communication using Helidon's configuration options.
    2. Implement Authentication (using Helidon Security): Use Helidon's security framework to implement authentication for gRPC services.
    3. Implement Authorization (using Helidon Security): Use Helidon's security framework for authorization.
    4. Validate Input (within Helidon's gRPC context): Validate input, potentially using Protobuf features, but within the context of Helidon's gRPC handling.
    5. Implement Rate Limiting (using Helidon features, if available): If Helidon provides gRPC rate-limiting features, use them. Otherwise, a custom Helidon gRPC interceptor might be needed.
    6. Monitor gRPC Metrics (using Helidon's gRPC metrics): Use Helidon's gRPC metrics for monitoring.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks (Severity: Critical): TLS via Helidon's configuration.
    • Authentication Bypass (Severity: Critical): Authentication using Helidon Security.
    • Authorization Bypass (Severity: Critical): Authorization using Helidon Security.
    • Data Injection (Severity: High): Input validation within Helidon's gRPC context.
    • Denial-of-Service (DoS) (Severity: High): Rate limiting, potentially using Helidon features.

  • Impact: (Same as before, but focused on Helidon)

    • MitM Attacks: Risk reduced significantly (90-100%).
    • Authentication/Authorization Bypass: Risk reduced significantly (90-100%).
    • Data Injection: Risk reduced significantly (80-90%).
    • DoS: Risk reduced moderately (50-70%).

  • Currently Implemented: Not Applicable (gRPC is not currently used).

  • Missing Implementation: All aspects, if gRPC were to be used through Helidon.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Configuration Management (using Helidon's Config)

  • Description:

    1. Identify Sensitive Data: List all sensitive data.
    2. Choose External Configuration Source (supported by Helidon): Select a source supported by Helidon's Config component (environment variables, config servers, Vault - if Helidon has a connector).
    3. Configure Helidon's Config: Use the config section in application.yaml (or programmatic configuration) to tell Helidon how to read from the external source. This is key - it's using Helidon's Config API.
    4. Remove Secrets from Code: Replace hardcoded secrets with references that Helidon's Config can resolve.
    5. Use Helidon Config Encryption: If storing any sensitive data within Helidon configuration files, use Helidon built-in encryption support. 
        my-secret-value: "{ENCRYPTED}..."

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Credential Exposure (Severity: Critical): Addressed by using Helidon's Config correctly.
    • Unauthorized Access (Severity: Critical): Indirectly addressed by securing configuration.
    • Configuration Errors (Severity: High): Centralized configuration using Helidon's Config reduces errors.

  • Impact: (Same as before, but focused on Helidon's Config)

    • Credential Exposure: Risk reduced significantly (90-100%).
    • Unauthorized Access: Risk reduced significantly (80-90%).
    • Configuration Errors: Risk reduced moderately (50-70%).

  • Currently Implemented: Partially. Environment variables are used via Helidon's Config.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • A dedicated secrets management solution integrated with Helidon's Config is not used.
    • Helidon Config Encryption is not consistently applied.

Mitigation Strategy: Observability and Auditing (using Helidon's features)

  • Description:

    1. Configure Helidon's Logging: Configure Helidon's logging (which often wraps JUL or Logback) to capture security events. Use a structured format if supported by Helidon's logging integration.
    2. Configure Helidon's Metrics (MicroProfile Metrics): Use Helidon's built-in metrics (MicroProfile Metrics) to track KPIs and security metrics.
    3. Configure Helidon's Tracing (MicroProfile OpenTracing): Use Helidon's tracing capabilities (MicroProfile OpenTracing) to trace requests.
    4. Integrate with Monitoring Tools (using Helidon's integrations): Integrate Helidon's metrics and tracing with external tools using Helidon-provided integrations (e.g., Helidon's Prometheus exporter).
    5. Implement Audit Logging (if Helidon provides a mechanism): If Helidon offers specific audit logging features, use them. Otherwise, this might involve custom code within Helidon's request handling.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Undetected Attacks (Severity: High): Improved visibility using Helidon's observability features.
    • Delayed Incident Response (Severity: High): Faster response due to Helidon's monitoring.
    • Data Breaches (Severity: Critical): Helidon's observability helps detect and contain breaches.
    • Compliance Violations (Severity: Variable): Helidon's features can help with compliance.

  • Impact: (Same as before, but focused on Helidon)

    • Undetected Attacks: Risk reduced significantly (60-80%).
    • Delayed Incident Response: Risk reduced significantly (70-90%).
    • Data Breaches: Risk reduced moderately (40-60%).
    • Compliance Violations: Risk reduced significantly (70-90%).

  • Currently Implemented: Partially. Basic Helidon logging is configured, and some Helidon metrics are exposed.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Structured logging is not consistently used within Helidon's logging configuration.
    • Integration with a comprehensive monitoring system using Helidon's integrations is incomplete.
    • Helidon's tracing is not implemented.
    • Audit logging using Helidon-specific features (if any) is not implemented.