Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
323 lines (256 loc) · 29 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

323 lines (256 loc) · 29 KB

Deep Security Analysis of Spark Web Application

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The primary objective of this deep security analysis is to thoroughly evaluate the security posture of a web application built using the Spark micro web framework (https://github.com/perwendel/spark). This analysis will delve into the key components of a Spark application, as inferred from the provided security design review and general Spark framework architecture, to identify potential security vulnerabilities and recommend specific, actionable mitigation strategies. The analysis aims to provide the development team with a clear understanding of security considerations unique to Spark and guide them in building more secure applications.

Scope:

This analysis encompasses the following aspects of a Spark-based web application, as defined in the security design review:

  • Architecture and Components: Analysis of the inferred architecture based on C4 Context, Container, Deployment, and Build diagrams, focusing on key components like Web Server, Routing, Application Logic, Data Access Layer, Database System, External APIs, Load Balancer, Container Instances, CI/CD Pipeline, and Security Scanners.
  • Security Controls: Evaluation of existing, accepted, and recommended security controls outlined in the security posture section of the design review.
  • Security Requirements: Review of the defined security requirements for Authentication, Authorization, Input Validation, and Cryptography.
  • Threat Identification: Identification of potential security threats and vulnerabilities relevant to each component and the Spark framework itself.
  • Mitigation Strategies: Provision of specific, actionable, and Spark-tailored mitigation strategies to address the identified threats.

The analysis is limited to the information provided in the security design review document and publicly available information about the Spark framework. It does not include a live penetration test or source code audit of a specific Spark application.

Methodology:

This deep security analysis will employ the following methodology:

  1. Document Review: Thorough review of the provided security design review document, including business posture, security posture, design diagrams (Context, Container, Deployment, Build), risk assessment, questions, and assumptions.
  2. Architecture Inference: Based on the design diagrams and understanding of Spark as a micro web framework, infer the application's architecture, component interactions, and data flow.
  3. Component-Based Threat Modeling: For each key component identified in the architecture, conduct a threat modeling exercise to identify potential security vulnerabilities and threats relevant to Spark and web applications in general. This will consider common web application vulnerabilities (OWASP Top 10) and framework-specific risks.
  4. Control Mapping and Gap Analysis: Map the existing and recommended security controls against the identified threats to assess their effectiveness and identify any gaps in security coverage.
  5. Spark-Specific Recommendation Development: Develop specific, actionable, and Spark-tailored security recommendations and mitigation strategies for each identified threat and gap. These recommendations will leverage Spark's features and address its specific security considerations.
  6. Documentation and Reporting: Document the findings, analysis, recommendations, and mitigation strategies in a clear and structured report.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Based on the provided design review, we can break down the security implications of each key component of the Spark application.

2.1. C4 Context Diagram - System Level

2.1.1. Web Application User & Mobile Application User:

  • Security Implications: These are external entities interacting with the Spark application. Security concerns revolve around authenticating these users, authorizing their actions, and protecting their data during interaction.
    • Threats:
      • Unauthorized Access: Users gaining access without proper authentication.
      • Session Hijacking: Attackers stealing user sessions to impersonate legitimate users.
      • Data Breaches: Exposure of user data due to vulnerabilities in the application.
      • Phishing/Social Engineering: Attackers tricking users into revealing credentials.
  • Existing/Recommended Controls: Browser/Mobile OS security controls, User Authentication (Spark Application), HTTPS, Security Training, Authentication Requirements.
  • Spark Specific Considerations: Spark itself doesn't enforce specific authentication mechanisms. Developers are responsible for implementing authentication and session management. Choice of authentication protocols (OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML) and session management techniques directly impacts security.

2.1.2. Spark Application:

  • Security Implications: This is the core component and the primary focus of security efforts. Vulnerabilities here can directly impact users, data, and business processes.
    • Threats:
      • Injection Attacks (SQL, XSS, Command Injection): Exploiting vulnerabilities in input handling and data processing.
      • Authentication and Authorization Bypass: Circumventing security mechanisms to gain unauthorized access or privileges.
      • Session Management Vulnerabilities: Weak session handling leading to hijacking or fixation attacks.
      • Business Logic Flaws: Errors in application logic leading to unintended security consequences.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Overwhelming the application with requests to make it unavailable.
      • Vulnerable Dependencies: Using vulnerable libraries that Spark or the application depends on.
      • Misconfiguration: Incorrectly configured Spark application or underlying server leading to vulnerabilities.
  • Existing/Recommended Controls: SAST, DAST, Dependency Scanning, Code Reviews, Authentication, Authorization, Input Validation, Output Encoding, Session Management, Error Handling, Logging, Monitoring, SCA, Security Champions, Secure Coding Guidelines, Security Training.
  • Spark Specific Considerations: Spark's simplicity can be a double-edged sword. While it reduces boilerplate, it also means developers have more responsibility for implementing security features correctly. Spark's routing and request handling mechanisms need to be used securely. Dependency management in Java/Kotlin projects is crucial.

2.1.3. Database System:

  • Security Implications: Stores persistent data, making it a prime target for attackers. Compromise can lead to data breaches and loss of data integrity.
    • Threats:
      • SQL Injection (if using SQL databases): Exploiting vulnerabilities in database queries.
      • Data Breaches: Unauthorized access to sensitive data stored in the database.
      • Data Integrity Issues: Modification or deletion of data by unauthorized users.
      • Denial of Service: Overloading the database to disrupt application functionality.
      • Insufficient Access Controls: Weak database user and permission management.
      • Unencrypted Data at Rest/In Transit: Sensitive data exposed if encryption is not implemented.
  • Existing/Recommended Controls: Database Access Controls, Encryption at Rest/In Transit, Database Auditing, Backup and Recovery.
  • Spark Specific Considerations: Spark applications interact with databases through the Data Access Layer. Secure configuration of database connections, use of parameterized queries or ORMs, and proper data sanitization before database interaction are critical.

2.1.4. External API:

  • Security Implications: Integration with external APIs introduces new attack vectors and dependencies. Vulnerabilities in external APIs or insecure integration can compromise the Spark application.
    • Threats:
      • API Key Compromise: Exposure or theft of API keys leading to unauthorized API access.
      • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks: Interception of communication with external APIs if HTTPS is not used.
      • Data Injection from External APIs: Malicious data from compromised APIs affecting the Spark application.
      • API Abuse/Rate Limiting Issues: Overuse or misuse of external APIs leading to service disruption or cost overruns.
      • Vulnerabilities in External API itself: Security flaws in the external API impacting the Spark application.
  • Existing/Recommended Controls: API Authentication/Authorization, HTTPS, Input Validation of External Data, Rate Limiting.
  • Spark Specific Considerations: When integrating with external APIs, Spark applications need to handle API keys securely, validate data received from APIs, and implement proper error handling for API interactions.

2.2. C4 Container Diagram - Application Internal Components

2.2.1. Web Server:

  • Security Implications: The entry point for all HTTP requests. Vulnerabilities here can directly expose the application to attacks.
    • Threats:
      • Web Server Misconfiguration: Weak SSL/TLS configuration, default settings, exposed management interfaces.
      • DoS Attacks: Web server being overwhelmed by malicious requests.
      • Directory Traversal: Attackers accessing files outside the intended web root.
      • Information Disclosure: Web server revealing sensitive information in error messages or headers.
      • Vulnerabilities in Web Server Software: Exploitable flaws in the underlying web server (e.g., Jetty, Tomcat).
  • Existing/Recommended Controls: HTTPS Configuration, Web Server Hardening, Rate Limiting, Request Filtering, WAF.
  • Spark Specific Considerations: Spark can use embedded Jetty or external servers. Secure configuration of the chosen web server, especially HTTPS and TLS settings, is crucial. Consider using a WAF in front of the web server for added protection.

2.2.2. Application Logic:

  • Security Implications: Contains the core business logic and is responsible for handling user requests and data. Vulnerabilities here are often application-specific and can lead to significant security breaches.
    • Threats:
      • Business Logic Flaws: Errors in the application's logic leading to unauthorized actions or data manipulation.
      • Improper Error Handling: Revealing sensitive information in error messages or not logging security-relevant errors.
      • Insecure File Handling: Vulnerabilities related to file uploads, downloads, or processing.
      • Race Conditions: Concurrency issues leading to security vulnerabilities.
      • Memory Leaks/Resource Exhaustion: Application logic consuming excessive resources, leading to DoS.
  • Existing/Recommended Controls: Input Validation, Authorization Logic, Secure Coding Practices, Error Handling, Logging, Monitoring, Vulnerability Scanning.
  • Spark Specific Considerations: Developers need to apply secure coding practices when writing Spark application logic. Proper input validation, authorization checks, and secure handling of sensitive data within the application logic are paramount.

2.2.3. Routing:

  • Security Implications: Defines how HTTP requests are mapped to application handlers. Insecure routing can lead to unauthorized access or unexpected application behavior.
    • Threats:
      • Route Injection: Attackers manipulating routing configurations to access unintended endpoints.
      • Insufficient Route Authorization: Lack of proper authorization checks on specific routes.
      • Exposed Debug/Admin Endpoints: Unprotected access to sensitive administrative or debugging routes.
      • Parameter Tampering: Manipulation of route parameters to bypass security checks or access unauthorized data.
  • Existing/Recommended Controls: Secure Routing Configuration, Protection against Route Injection, Input Validation of Route Parameters.
  • Spark Specific Considerations: Spark's routing mechanism is straightforward. Developers must ensure that all routes are properly secured with authentication and authorization checks where necessary. Avoid exposing sensitive endpoints without proper protection.

2.2.4. Data Access Layer:

  • Security Implications: Handles database interactions. Vulnerabilities here can lead to SQL injection and data breaches.
    • Threats:
      • SQL Injection: If using SQL databases and not using parameterized queries or ORMs correctly.
      • Insufficient Data Sanitization: Not properly sanitizing data before database queries.
      • Database Connection String Exposure: Hardcoding or insecurely storing database credentials.
      • Lack of Input Validation before Database Queries: Not validating user input before using it in database queries.
  • Existing/Recommended Controls: Parameterized Queries/ORM, Database Connection Security, Data Access Authorization, Input Validation before Database Queries.
  • Spark Specific Considerations: When using Spark with databases, developers should prioritize using ORMs or parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection. Securely manage database credentials and implement proper input validation before interacting with the database.

2.3. C4 Deployment Diagram - Infrastructure Level

2.3.1. Load Balancer:

  • Security Implications: Front-facing component that can be targeted for attacks. Misconfiguration or vulnerabilities can impact the availability and security of the entire application.
    • Threats:
      • DDoS Attacks: Load balancer being targeted by distributed denial of service attacks.
      • SSL/TLS Misconfiguration: Weak or outdated SSL/TLS settings.
      • Access Control Bypass: Circumventing load balancer access controls.
      • WAF Bypass (if WAF is integrated): Attackers finding ways to bypass WAF rules.
      • Information Leakage: Load balancer revealing sensitive information in headers or error messages.
  • Existing/Recommended Controls: SSL/TLS Configuration, DDoS Protection, Rate Limiting, ACLs, WAF.
  • Spark Specific Considerations: The load balancer is crucial for securing the Spark application in a cloud environment. Proper SSL/TLS configuration, DDoS protection, and potentially a WAF are essential.

2.3.2. Spark Application Container Instances:

  • Security Implications: Running instances of the application. Security here focuses on container security and isolation.
    • Threats:
      • Container Image Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in the base image or application dependencies within the container.
      • Container Escape: Attackers escaping the container to access the host system.
      • Resource Exhaustion: One container instance impacting others due to resource over-consumption.
      • Misconfiguration of Container Runtime: Insecure container runtime settings.
      • Lack of Runtime Security Monitoring: Not detecting malicious activity within containers.
  • Existing/Recommended Controls: Container Image Security Scanning, Runtime Security Monitoring, Resource Isolation, Least Privilege Container Configuration, Regular Patching.
  • Spark Specific Considerations: Ensure the Docker image used for Spark applications is built securely, scanned for vulnerabilities, and regularly updated. Apply least privilege principles to container configurations and monitor container runtime for suspicious activity.

2.3.3. Database Service (RDS, Cloud SQL, etc.):

  • Security Implications: Managed database service. Security is shared responsibility between the cloud provider and the application team.
    • Threats:
      • Cloud Provider Vulnerabilities: Security flaws in the cloud database service itself.
      • Misconfiguration of Database Service: Incorrectly configured database service settings.
      • Insufficient Access Controls (IAM): Weak IAM policies allowing unauthorized access to the database.
      • Data Breaches due to Cloud Misconfiguration: Cloud storage buckets or database backups being publicly accessible.
      • Lack of Database Auditing: Insufficient logging of database access and activities.
  • Existing/Recommended Controls: Database Access Controls (IAM), Encryption at Rest/In Transit, Database Auditing, Vulnerability Scanning, Regular Patching.
  • Spark Specific Considerations: Leverage the security features provided by the cloud database service, such as IAM for access control, encryption options, and auditing. Ensure proper configuration of the database service and regular security assessments.

2.3.4. External API (Deployment Context):

  • Security Implications: Same as in Context Diagram. Security concerns related to API integration remain relevant in the deployment context.
  • Existing/Recommended Controls: Same as in Context Diagram. API Authentication/Authorization, HTTPS, Input Validation of External Data, Rate Limiting.
  • Spark Specific Considerations: Deployment environment should enforce secure communication (HTTPS) for all external API interactions.

2.4. C4 Build Diagram - Build Pipeline Security

2.4.1. Code Repository (GitHub):

  • Security Implications: Source code repository. Compromise can lead to code tampering, malware injection, and intellectual property theft.
    • Threats:
      • Unauthorized Access to Code Repository: Attackers gaining access to source code.
      • Code Tampering: Malicious modifications to the codebase.
      • Credential Leakage in Code: Accidental exposure of secrets in the code repository.
      • Vulnerabilities in Repository Platform: Security flaws in GitHub itself.
  • Existing/Recommended Controls: Access Control, Branch Protection, Audit Logging, Vulnerability Scanning of Repository Settings.
  • Spark Specific Considerations: Secure access control to the code repository is paramount. Implement branch protection and code review processes to prevent unauthorized code changes. Regularly audit repository access and settings.

2.4.2. CI/CD Pipeline (GitHub Actions):

  • Security Implications: Automates build and deployment. Compromise can lead to malicious code deployment and system compromise.
    • Threats:
      • Pipeline Configuration Tampering: Attackers modifying the CI/CD pipeline to inject malicious steps.
      • Secret Leakage in Pipeline: Exposure of sensitive credentials stored in the pipeline configuration.
      • Compromised Pipeline Components: Vulnerabilities in CI/CD tools or plugins.
      • Supply Chain Attacks: Introduction of malicious dependencies through the build pipeline.
  • Existing/Recommended Controls: Secure Pipeline Configuration, Access Control to Pipeline Definitions/Secrets, Audit Logging, Secure Secret Storage, Vulnerability Scanning of Pipeline Components.
  • Spark Specific Considerations: Secure the CI/CD pipeline by implementing strict access controls, secure secret management (e.g., GitHub Secrets), and regularly auditing pipeline configurations.

2.4.3. Build Process (Maven/Gradle):

  • Security Implications: Build tools manage dependencies and compile code. Vulnerabilities here can lead to supply chain attacks and compromised builds.
    • Threats:
      • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Using vulnerable libraries in the Spark application.
      • Malicious Dependencies: Introduction of malicious dependencies into the project.
      • Build Tool Plugin Vulnerabilities: Security flaws in Maven or Gradle plugins.
      • Build Process Tampering: Attackers modifying the build process to inject malicious code.
  • Existing/Recommended Controls: Dependency Management (Vulnerability Scanning, Lock Files), Build Tool Configuration Security, Secure Plugin Management.
  • Spark Specific Considerations: Utilize dependency scanning tools (SCA) within the build process to identify and manage vulnerable dependencies. Use dependency lock files to ensure consistent and reproducible builds.

2.4.4. Security Scanners (SAST, SCA):

  • Security Implications: Tools for identifying vulnerabilities. Ineffective scanners or misconfiguration can lead to missed vulnerabilities.
    • Threats:
      • False Negatives: Scanners failing to detect real vulnerabilities.
      • False Positives: Scanners reporting vulnerabilities that are not actually exploitable.
      • Scanner Misconfiguration: Incorrectly configured scanners leading to ineffective scans.
      • Outdated Scanner Rules/Databases: Scanners not being updated with the latest vulnerability information.
  • Existing/Recommended Controls: Regular Updates of Scanner Rules/Databases, Secure Configuration of Scanners, Vulnerability Reporting and Management.
  • Spark Specific Considerations: Ensure SAST and SCA tools are properly configured and regularly updated. Integrate SCA specifically for Java/Kotlin dependencies used in Spark applications.

2.4.5. Container Image Registry:

  • Security Implications: Stores container images. Compromised registry or images can lead to deployment of vulnerable or malicious applications.
    • Threats:
      • Unauthorized Access to Registry: Attackers gaining access to container images.
      • Image Tampering: Malicious modification of container images in the registry.
      • Vulnerable Container Images: Storing container images with known vulnerabilities.
      • Lack of Image Scanning: Not scanning container images for vulnerabilities before deployment.
  • Existing/Recommended Controls: Access Control, Vulnerability Scanning of Container Images, Image Signing, Audit Logging.
  • Spark Specific Considerations: Secure the container image registry with strong access controls. Implement vulnerability scanning for all container images before deployment. Consider image signing to ensure image integrity.

3. Actionable and Tailored Mitigation Strategies for Spark

Based on the identified threats and security implications, here are actionable and tailored mitigation strategies specifically for Spark applications:

3.1. Authentication & Authorization:

  • Recommendation 1 (Authentication): Implement a robust authentication mechanism using established libraries like Spring Security or Apache Shiro. While Spark is lightweight, integrating a dedicated security library is crucial for production applications. Choose an authentication strategy appropriate for the application (e.g., session-based, token-based like JWT, OAuth 2.0/OpenID Connect for API access).
    • Mitigation Strategy:
      • Choose a suitable authentication library and integrate it into the Spark application.
      • Implement authentication filters or interceptors in Spark to protect routes requiring authentication.
      • Enforce strong password policies and consider multi-factor authentication (MFA).
      • Securely store user credentials (hashed and salted passwords).
  • Recommendation 2 (Authorization): Implement fine-grained authorization using Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) or Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC). Spark applications often handle different user roles and permissions.
    • Mitigation Strategy:
      • Define clear roles and permissions based on application functionalities.
      • Implement authorization checks in Spark routes to control access based on user roles or attributes.
      • Use authorization libraries or frameworks to simplify RBAC/ABAC implementation.
      • Regularly review and update roles and permissions as application functionalities evolve.

3.2. Input Validation & Output Encoding:

  • Recommendation 3 (Input Validation): Implement comprehensive input validation for all user inputs at both the routing and application logic layers. Spark's request handling provides access to parameters and headers. Validate these rigorously.
    • Mitigation Strategy:
      • Use Spark's request parameter handling to access and validate inputs.
      • Define validation rules for each input field (data type, format, length, allowed characters).
      • Perform server-side validation even if client-side validation is implemented.
      • Sanitize inputs to remove potentially harmful characters before processing.
  • Recommendation 4 (Output Encoding): Apply output encoding to all dynamic content rendered in responses to prevent Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities. Spark's rendering mechanisms need to be used securely.
    • Mitigation Strategy:
      • Use templating engines that provide automatic output encoding (if applicable).
      • Manually encode output data before rendering in responses, especially when displaying user-generated content.
      • Use context-aware encoding based on the output context (HTML, JavaScript, URL, etc.).

3.3. Cryptography & HTTPS:

  • Recommendation 5 (HTTPS Enforcement): Enforce HTTPS for all communication with the Spark application. This is non-negotiable for protecting data in transit.
    • Mitigation Strategy:
      • Configure the web server (embedded Jetty or external) to use HTTPS.
      • Configure the load balancer to terminate SSL/TLS and forward HTTPS traffic to Spark instances.
      • Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) headers to force browsers to use HTTPS.
  • Recommendation 6 (Sensitive Data Encryption): Encrypt sensitive data at rest and in transit. Determine what data is sensitive and apply appropriate encryption.
    • Mitigation Strategy:
      • Use database encryption features for sensitive data at rest.
      • Encrypt sensitive data in configuration files if necessary.
      • Use secure key management practices for cryptographic keys (e.g., using a secrets management service).

3.4. Dependency Management & SCA:

  • Recommendation 7 (Software Composition Analysis - SCA): Implement SCA in the CI/CD pipeline to automatically scan Spark framework dependencies and application dependencies for known vulnerabilities.
    • Mitigation Strategy:
      • Integrate SCA tools (like OWASP Dependency-Check, Snyk, or Sonatype Nexus IQ) into the build process.
      • Configure SCA to scan both direct and transitive dependencies.
      • Establish a process for reviewing and remediating vulnerabilities identified by SCA.
      • Regularly update dependencies to patch known vulnerabilities.

3.5. Secure Coding Practices & Training:

  • Recommendation 8 (Spark-Specific Secure Coding Guidelines): Develop and enforce secure coding guidelines specifically tailored to the Spark framework. Address common pitfalls and best practices for Spark development.
    • Mitigation Strategy:
      • Create a document outlining secure coding guidelines for Spark applications, covering topics like input validation, output encoding, session management, error handling, and secure routing.
      • Conduct training sessions for developers on these guidelines.
      • Incorporate secure code reviews into the development process, focusing on adherence to these guidelines.
  • Recommendation 9 (Security Training for Developers): Provide regular security training for developers focusing on web application security principles and Spark framework specifics.
    • Mitigation Strategy:
      • Conduct training sessions covering OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities, secure coding practices, and Spark-specific security considerations.
      • Include hands-on exercises and examples relevant to Spark development.
      • Keep training content up-to-date with the latest security threats and best practices.

3.6. Logging and Monitoring:

  • Recommendation 10 (Security Logging and Monitoring): Implement comprehensive logging and monitoring for security-relevant events in the Spark application.
    • Mitigation Strategy:
      • Log authentication attempts, authorization failures, input validation errors, exceptions, and other security-relevant events.
      • Use a centralized logging system for easier analysis and correlation.
      • Implement monitoring and alerting for suspicious activities or security incidents.
      • Regularly review logs and monitoring data to identify and respond to security threats.

3.7. Error Handling:

  • Recommendation 11 (Secure Error Handling): Implement secure error handling to prevent information leakage and provide user-friendly error messages.
    • Mitigation Strategy:
      • Avoid displaying detailed error messages to users in production environments.
      • Log detailed error information for debugging purposes, but store logs securely.
      • Implement custom error pages that provide generic error messages to users.
      • Handle exceptions gracefully and prevent application crashes that could lead to DoS.

By implementing these tailored mitigation strategies, the development team can significantly enhance the security posture of Spark-based web applications and mitigate the identified risks. Regular security assessments and continuous improvement of security practices are essential for maintaining a strong security posture over time.