Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
144 lines (125 loc) · 16.2 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

144 lines (125 loc) · 16.2 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of the Spark Framework based on the provided design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of the Spark framework's key components, identify potential vulnerabilities, and provide actionable mitigation strategies. The analysis will focus on inferring the architecture, components, and data flow from the codebase (https://github.com/perwendel/spark) and available documentation, and tailor recommendations specifically to Spark's design and intended use.
  • Scope: The analysis will cover the core components of the Spark framework, including request handling, routing, filtering, template engines (if applicable), exception handling, and interaction with the embedded Jetty server. It will also consider the security implications of developer-implemented components (business logic, data access) within the context of how Spark facilitates or hinders secure development practices. Third-party libraries used by Spark are considered within the scope of supply chain risk. The deployment environment (Kubernetes) and build process are considered in terms of how they impact the security of a Spark application.
  • Methodology:
    1. Code Review: Examine the Spark source code on GitHub to understand the implementation details of key components. This is crucial for identifying vulnerabilities that might not be apparent from documentation alone.
    2. Documentation Review: Analyze the official Spark documentation to understand intended usage patterns and security recommendations.
    3. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats based on the inferred architecture and data flow, using the STRIDE model (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) as a guide.
    4. Vulnerability Analysis: Assess the likelihood and impact of identified threats, considering existing security controls and accepted risks.
    5. Mitigation Recommendations: Propose specific, actionable steps to mitigate identified vulnerabilities, tailored to the Spark framework.

2. Security Implications of Key Components (Inferred from Codebase and Documentation)

Let's break down the key components and their security implications, drawing inferences from the provided information and general knowledge of web frameworks:

  • Web Server (Embedded Jetty):

    • Component: Spark uses an embedded Jetty server to handle HTTP requests. This is a critical component as it's the first point of contact with the outside world.
    • Security Implications:
      • Vulnerabilities in Jetty: Any vulnerabilities in the specific version of Jetty used by Spark could be exploited. This is a supply chain risk. We need to know the exact Jetty version.
      • Configuration: How Jetty is configured within Spark is crucial. Does Spark expose secure defaults, or does it rely on developers to configure TLS, secure headers, etc.? Misconfiguration could lead to information disclosure or other attacks.
      • Request Handling: How does Jetty (as configured by Spark) handle malformed requests, large requests, slowloris attacks, etc.? This impacts denial-of-service (DoS) resilience.
      • HTTP/2 Support: Does Spark/Jetty support HTTP/2? If so, are there any specific security considerations related to HTTP/2 vulnerabilities?
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Keep Jetty Updated: The most critical mitigation is to ensure Spark uses a patched and up-to-date version of Jetty. The build process should include automated checks for new Jetty releases and trigger updates.
      • Secure Configuration by Default: Spark should configure Jetty with secure defaults, including:
        • Enabling TLS by default (with strong ciphers and protocols).
        • Setting secure HTTP headers (HSTS, CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection).
        • Configuring reasonable request size limits and timeouts to mitigate DoS attacks.
      • Expose Configuration Options: Provide clear and easy-to-use APIs for developers to further customize Jetty's security settings.
      • Regular Security Audits of Jetty Integration: Specifically audit how Spark integrates with and configures Jetty.

  • Request Handler (Spark):

    • Component: This is the core of Spark, responsible for routing incoming requests to the appropriate handler methods (defined by the developer).
    • Security Implications:
      • Routing Logic: Are there any vulnerabilities in the routing mechanism itself? Could a specially crafted URL bypass intended routes or access unintended resources? This is a critical area for code review.
      • Input Validation: Spark must provide mechanisms for validating user input. Does it offer built-in validation helpers, or does it rely entirely on developers to implement validation? Lack of built-in support increases the risk of injection vulnerabilities (SQL injection, command injection, etc.).
      • Parameter Handling: How does Spark extract parameters from the request (query parameters, path parameters, request body)? Are there any potential vulnerabilities in this process (e.g., type confusion, null byte injection)?
      • Filter Handling: Spark supports filters (before and after). How are these filters implemented? Could a malicious filter bypass security checks?
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Robust Input Validation: Spark should provide a comprehensive input validation library or framework. This should include:
        • Support for whitelisting (defining allowed characters and patterns).
        • Type validation (ensuring parameters are of the expected type).
        • Length validation.
        • Validation against regular expressions.
        • Easy-to-use APIs for developers to apply validation rules.
      • Secure Routing: The routing mechanism should be thoroughly reviewed and tested for vulnerabilities. Fuzz testing the routing logic is recommended.
      • Safe Parameter Handling: Use secure methods for extracting and parsing request parameters. Avoid any reliance on potentially unsafe string manipulation.
      • Filter Security: Ensure that filters cannot be bypassed or manipulated to compromise security. Consider a "fail-safe" approach where security checks are enforced even if a filter fails.

  • Business Logic (Developer Code):

    • Component: This is the application-specific code written by developers using Spark. Spark's role here is to provide a secure environment for this code to execute.
    • Security Implications: This is where the majority of application-specific vulnerabilities will reside. Spark can't directly prevent all vulnerabilities here, but it can influence secure coding practices.
      • Authentication and Authorization: Spark does not provide built-in authentication or authorization. This is a significant accepted risk. Developers must implement these themselves or use external libraries. This increases the risk of implementation errors.
      • Data Access: How developers interact with databases is crucial. Spark should encourage the use of parameterized queries (or an ORM that enforces them) to prevent SQL injection.
      • Output Encoding: If Spark is used to generate HTML, it must provide mechanisms for output encoding to prevent cross-site scripting (XSS). This might involve integrating with a templating engine that provides automatic escaping.
      • Session Management: Spark has limited built-in session management. Developers are responsible for implementing secure session handling.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Provide Clear Security Guidance: The Spark documentation should include a dedicated security section with detailed guidance on:
        • Implementing authentication and authorization (with examples using popular libraries like Apache Shiro or Spring Security).
        • Secure data access (using parameterized queries or an ORM).
        • Output encoding (using a secure templating engine or manual escaping).
        • Secure session management (using strong session IDs, secure cookies, and appropriate timeouts).
        • Handling file uploads securely.
        • Protecting against CSRF attacks.
      • Recommend Secure Libraries: Spark should recommend specific, well-vetted libraries for common security tasks (e.g., authentication, authorization, CSRF protection, input validation, output encoding).
      • Promote Secure Coding Practices: The documentation and examples should consistently demonstrate secure coding practices.
      • Consider Adding (Optional) Security Features: While maintaining its "micro" nature, Spark could consider adding optional modules for common security tasks (e.g., a CSRF protection module). This would provide a more secure-by-default experience for developers.

  • Data Access Layer:

    • Component: Abstraction for database interactions.
    • Security Implications:
      • SQL Injection: If developers directly construct SQL queries using string concatenation with user input, this is a major vulnerability.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strongly Encourage Parameterized Queries: The documentation and examples should exclusively use parameterized queries or an ORM that enforces them. Any mention of direct SQL construction should include prominent warnings.
      • Provide Database Abstraction (Optional): Consider providing a simple, optional database abstraction layer that enforces parameterized queries.

  • External API Interaction:

    • Component: Communication with external services.
    • Security Implications:
      • Secure Communication: All communication with external APIs should use HTTPS.
      • API Key Management: API keys should be stored securely (not in the codebase) and accessed using environment variables or a secure configuration mechanism.
      • Input Validation (for API calls): Data sent to external APIs should also be validated.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • HTTPS Enforcement: The documentation should clearly state that HTTPS is mandatory for all external API communication.
      • Secure Configuration Guidance: Provide clear guidance on how to securely manage API keys and other sensitive configuration data.

  • Templating Engine (If Applicable):

    • Component: If Spark uses a templating engine (e.g., Velocity, FreeMarker, Mustache), this engine is responsible for generating HTML output.
    • Security Implications:
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): The primary concern with templating engines is XSS. If the engine doesn't automatically escape user-provided data, attackers can inject malicious JavaScript into the generated HTML.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Use a Secure Templating Engine: Choose a templating engine that provides automatic contextual output encoding. This means the engine automatically escapes data based on where it's being inserted (e.g., HTML attributes, JavaScript, CSS).
      • Configure the Engine Securely: Ensure the templating engine is configured to enable automatic escaping.
      • Manual Escaping (If Necessary): If automatic escaping is not available or not sufficient, provide clear guidance on how to manually escape data using the templating engine's built-in escaping functions.
      • Content Security Policy (CSP): Use CSP headers to further mitigate the impact of XSS vulnerabilities, even if the templating engine has flaws.

  • Exception Handling:

    • Component: How Spark handles exceptions and errors.
    • Security Implications:
      • Information Disclosure: Error messages should never reveal sensitive information about the application's internal workings, database structure, or configuration.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Generic Error Messages: Display generic error messages to users.
      • Detailed Logging: Log detailed error information (including stack traces) to a secure log file for debugging purposes.
      • Custom Error Pages: Provide custom error pages (e.g., for 404 and 500 errors) that don't reveal any sensitive information.

  • Logging (SLF4J):

    • Component: Spark uses SLF4J for logging.
    • Security Implications:
      • Security Auditing: Proper logging is crucial for security auditing. Security-relevant events (authentication failures, authorization denials, input validation errors) should be logged.
      • Log Injection: Ensure that user-provided data is not directly logged without proper sanitization, to prevent log injection attacks.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Log Security Events: Provide guidance on what events should be logged for security auditing purposes.
      • Sanitize Log Data: Sanitize any user-provided data before logging it.
      • Secure Log Storage: Ensure that log files are stored securely and protected from unauthorized access.

3. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Summary and Prioritization)

Here's a summary of the most important mitigation strategies, prioritized:

  • High Priority:

    • Keep Dependencies Updated: Automate checks for updates to Jetty and all other third-party libraries. This is the most critical ongoing task.
    • Robust Input Validation: Provide a comprehensive input validation library or framework, or strongly recommend a well-vetted external library.
    • Output Encoding (if HTML is generated): Integrate with a secure templating engine that provides automatic contextual output encoding, or provide clear guidance on manual escaping.
    • Secure Authentication and Authorization Guidance: Provide detailed documentation and examples on how to implement secure authentication and authorization using external libraries.
    • Parameterized Queries: Exclusively promote the use of parameterized queries or an ORM that enforces them for all database interactions.
    • Secure Configuration by Default (Jetty): Configure Jetty with secure defaults (TLS, secure headers, request limits).
    • Vulnerability Reporting Process: Establish a clear process for users to report security vulnerabilities, and have a plan for promptly addressing them.

  • Medium Priority:

    • CSRF Protection: Recommend a library for CSRF protection and provide guidance on its use. Consider adding an optional CSRF protection module to Spark.
    • Secure Session Management Guidance: Provide detailed guidance on implementing secure session management.
    • Secure Configuration Management: Provide guidance on securely managing API keys and other sensitive configuration data.
    • Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing of the Spark framework itself.
    • SAST and Dependency Checking: Integrate SAST and dependency checking tools into the build process.

  • Low Priority:

    • Custom Error Pages: Provide custom error pages that don't reveal sensitive information.
    • Log Security Events: Provide guidance on logging security-relevant events.

4. Conclusion

The Spark framework, by its nature as a micro-framework, places a significant responsibility on developers to implement security controls. While this allows for flexibility and rapid development, it also increases the risk of vulnerabilities if developers are not security-conscious. The most critical areas for Spark to address are: providing robust input validation mechanisms, clear guidance on secure authentication/authorization/session management, and ensuring the underlying Jetty server is securely configured and kept up-to-date. By focusing on these areas, Spark can significantly improve the security posture of applications built with it. The recommendations above are tailored to Spark's design and aim to provide a balance between its "micro" philosophy and the need for robust security.