Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
87 lines (76 loc) · 10.9 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

87 lines (76 loc) · 10.9 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for pinterest/ktlint

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update ktlint

  • Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update ktlint Dependency
  • Description:
    1. Monitor ktlint Releases: Track new ktlint releases by watching the official repository or subscribing to release notifications.
    2. Review ktlint Changelogs: When updates are available, review the changelogs specifically for bug fixes or improvements that could impact ktlint's reliability or performance.
    3. Update ktlint Version: Update the ktlint dependency version in your project's build files (e.g., build.gradle.kts, pom.xml) to the latest stable version.
    4. Test ktlint Integration: After updating, run ktlint checks in your project to ensure the update hasn't introduced any unexpected behavior or broken existing configurations.
    5. Commit and Deploy Updates: Commit the updated dependency version to version control.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Bugs in ktlint (Medium Severity): Older versions of ktlint might contain bugs that could lead to incorrect code style enforcement or unexpected behavior during linting. Updating reduces exposure to known bugs.
    • Performance Issues in ktlint (Low Severity): Updates may include performance improvements in ktlint itself, leading to faster linting times.
  • Impact: Reduces the risk of encountering bugs and performance issues within ktlint itself.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Dependency updates are generally performed, but a dedicated process for specifically tracking and updating ktlint might be less formalized.
    • Where: Dependency management process, potentially automated dependency update tools.
  • Missing Implementation: A proactive and documented process for regularly checking for and applying ktlint updates, specifically focusing on bug fixes and performance improvements in ktlint.

Mitigation Strategy: Verify ktlint Artifact Integrity

  • Mitigation Strategy: Verify ktlint Artifact Integrity
  • Description:
    1. Obtain Official Checksums/Signatures: When including ktlint in your project (especially if downloading JARs manually), obtain official checksums (like SHA-256) or digital signatures from the official ktlint distribution channels (e.g., GitHub releases, Maven Central).
    2. Automate Verification in Build: Integrate checksum or signature verification into your build process. Dependency management tools like Gradle and Maven often do this automatically for dependencies from trusted repositories. For manual downloads, implement a verification step.
    3. Verify Before Usage: Before ktlint is used in the build or by developers, ensure the downloaded artifact's checksum or signature matches the official value.
    4. Fail Build on Verification Failure: Configure the build to fail if the integrity verification fails, indicating a potentially compromised or corrupted ktlint artifact.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Compromised ktlint Distribution (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of using a tampered or malicious version of ktlint if the official distribution channels are compromised or if artifacts are downloaded from untrusted sources.
    • Artifact Corruption (Low Severity): Protects against using corrupted ktlint artifacts due to download errors or storage issues, which could lead to unpredictable ktlint behavior.
  • Impact: Moderately reduces the risk of using a compromised or corrupted ktlint artifact.
  • Currently Implemented: Potentially partially implemented if using dependency management tools that perform checksum verification for dependencies from standard repositories. Explicit verification steps for ktlint specifically might be missing.
    • Where: Dependency management system (Gradle, Maven), build scripts (potentially).
  • Missing Implementation: Explicit and documented steps to verify ktlint artifact integrity, especially if artifacts are not solely obtained through automated dependency management. Clear build failure mechanism on verification failure.

Mitigation Strategy: Review and Understand ktlint Configuration

  • Mitigation Strategy: Review and Understand ktlint Configuration
  • Description:
    1. Locate Configuration Files: Identify all ktlint configuration files used in the project (.editorconfig, .ktlint files).
    2. Document Rule Choices: Document the rationale behind enabling, disabling, or customizing specific ktlint rules. Explain why certain style choices are enforced or ignored.
    3. Code Review Configuration Changes: Treat modifications to ktlint configuration files as code changes and subject them to code review. Ensure changes are intentional and understood by the team.
    4. Understand Rule Impact: Ensure developers understand what each configured ktlint rule does and how it affects code style and potential code behavior (though ktlint primarily focuses on style).
    5. Regular Configuration Audit: Periodically review the ktlint configuration to ensure it still aligns with project style guidelines and team preferences.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Misconfigured ktlint Rules (Low Severity): Prevents accidental or unintentional misconfigurations of ktlint rules that could lead to inconsistent code style or less effective linting.
    • Unintended Style Enforcement (Low Severity): Reduces the risk of enforcing style rules that are not desired or understood by the team, leading to unnecessary code changes or developer friction.
  • Impact: Minimally reduces the risk of misconfiguration and unintended style enforcement by promoting understanding and review of ktlint configuration.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Configuration files likely exist and are version controlled, but formal documentation of rule choices and dedicated code review for configuration changes might be missing.
    • Where: Version control system, project documentation (potentially missing).
  • Missing Implementation: Formal documentation of ktlint configuration decisions and rule rationales. A defined code review process specifically for changes to ktlint configuration files.

Mitigation Strategy: Minimize Custom Rule Usage

  • Mitigation Strategy: Minimize Custom Rule Usage
  • Description:
    1. Prefer Standard ktlint Rules: Prioritize using the standard rules provided by ktlint or well-established, reputable ktlint rule extensions.
    2. Justify Custom Rules: Before implementing custom ktlint rules, thoroughly justify the need. Explore if existing standard rules or extensions can achieve the desired outcome.
    3. Secure Custom Rule Development (If Necessary): If custom rules are truly necessary, develop them with care. Ensure they are well-tested, performant, and do not introduce unintended side effects or vulnerabilities (though less likely in style linters, still good practice).
    4. Code Review Custom Rules: If custom rules are implemented, subject their code to rigorous code review, focusing on correctness, performance, and maintainability.
    5. Maintain Custom Rules: Treat custom rules as project code and maintain them. Update them as needed for compatibility with new ktlint versions or changes in project style requirements.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Bugs in Custom ktlint Rules (Low Severity): Poorly written custom rules could contain bugs that lead to incorrect linting results or unexpected behavior during the linting process.
    • Performance Impact of Custom Rules (Low Severity): Inefficient custom rules could negatively impact ktlint's performance, increasing build times.
    • Maintenance Overhead of Custom Rules (Low Severity): Custom rules increase the maintenance burden compared to using standard, community-maintained rules.
  • Impact: Minimally reduces the risk of bugs, performance issues, and maintenance overhead associated with custom ktlint rules.
  • Currently Implemented: Likely partially implemented if custom rules are not heavily used. Formal guidelines and review processes for custom rule development are probably missing.
    • Where: Codebase (if custom rules exist), potentially development guidelines (if they exist).
  • Missing Implementation: Clear guidelines on when custom ktlint rules are acceptable and when standard rules should be preferred. A defined review process for any custom ktlint rules, focusing on correctness and performance.

Mitigation Strategy: Monitor ktlint Execution Performance

  • Mitigation Strategy: Monitor ktlint Execution Performance
  • Description:
    1. Track ktlint Task Duration: In your CI/CD pipeline or local development environment, monitor the execution time of ktlint tasks during builds or linting processes.
    2. Establish Performance Baselines: Define acceptable performance baselines for ktlint execution in your project.
    3. Alert on Performance Anomalies: Set up alerts to notify developers if ktlint execution time significantly exceeds established baselines.
    4. Investigate Performance Degradation: When performance issues are detected, investigate the cause. This could be due to changes in ktlint configuration, new rules, increased code complexity, or issues within ktlint itself.
    5. Optimize ktlint Configuration (If Needed): If performance issues are due to ktlint configuration, review and optimize the configuration. This might involve disabling resource-intensive rules or adjusting rule settings.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Slow Build Times due to ktlint (Low Severity): Prevents ktlint from becoming a bottleneck in the development process by identifying and addressing performance issues.
    • Development Workflow Disruption (Very Low Severity): In extreme cases, very slow ktlint execution could disrupt developer workflows. Monitoring helps prevent this.
  • Impact: Minimally reduces the risk of performance-related issues with ktlint impacting build times and development workflows.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented if build times are generally monitored. Specific monitoring and alerting focused on ktlint task performance might be missing.
    • Where: CI/CD pipeline monitoring, build performance dashboards (potentially).
  • Missing Implementation: Dedicated monitoring of ktlint task execution time within the CI/CD pipeline. Automated alerting for significant performance degradation in ktlint tasks.