Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
91 lines (66 loc) · 8.28 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

91 lines (66 loc) · 8.28 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for pinterest/ktlint

Mitigation Strategy: Consistent Configuration and Enforcement

Description:

  1. Centralized Configuration: Create a single .editorconfig file at the root of the project repository. This file defines the basic code style rules (indentation, line endings, etc.). Also, define the ktlint configuration within the project's build file (e.g., build.gradle.kts for Gradle, pom.xml for Maven). This ensures all modules and developers use the same settings. Crucially, this configuration should be version-controlled and treated as part of the codebase.
  2. Pre-Commit Hooks: Install and configure a pre-commit hook system (e.g., using the pre-commit framework). Create a pre-commit hook that runs ktlint (e.g., ktlint --format) on all staged Kotlin files before allowing a commit. Provide clear instructions to developers on how to install and use the pre-commit hooks. This hook directly uses ktlint.
  3. CI/CD Integration: Add a step to the CI/CD pipeline (e.g., Jenkins, GitLab CI, GitHub Actions) that runs ktlint (e.g., ktlint check) on the entire codebase. Configure the pipeline to fail the build if ktlint reports any violations. Ensure the CI/CD environment uses the same ktlint version and configuration as the developers' local environments. This is a direct use of ktlint for enforcement.
  4. Regular Audits: Schedule periodic (e.g., monthly or quarterly) reviews of the .editorconfig and ktlint configuration within the build file. Check for outdated rules, inconsistencies, or rules that might have been accidentally disabled. This directly impacts how ktlint behaves.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Inconsistent Rule Application: (Severity: Medium) - Different parts of the codebase have different style rules, masking potential issues.
  • Ignoring Warnings/Errors: (Severity: Medium) - Developers bypass ktlint checks locally.
  • Outdated or Misconfigured Rulesets: (Severity: Medium) - Using an old version of ktlint or a configuration that disables important checks.

Impact:

  • Inconsistent Rule Application: Eliminates the risk. All code adheres to the same style, enforced by ktlint.
  • Ignoring Warnings/Errors: Significantly reduces the risk. Pre-commit hooks and CI/CD integration, both running ktlint, enforce compliance.
  • Outdated or Misconfigured Rulesets: Reduces the risk through regular audits of the ktlint configuration.

Currently Implemented:

  • Centralized .editorconfig file exists.
  • ktlint configuration is in build.gradle.kts.
  • CI/CD pipeline runs ktlint check.

Missing Implementation:

  • No pre-commit hooks are configured. Developers can commit code that violates ktlint rules.
  • No regular audits of the .editorconfig and ktlint configuration are scheduled.

Mitigation Strategy: Version Management (of ktlint)

Description:

  1. Version Pinning: In the build file (e.g., build.gradle.kts), specify a fixed version of ktlint (e.g., ktlint = "0.48.2"), rather than a version range. This ensures all developers and the CI/CD pipeline use the exact same version of ktlint.
  2. Regular Updates: Establish a process for regularly updating ktlint to the latest stable version. This could be a scheduled task (e.g., monthly) or triggered by the release of a new version. Before updating, review the ktlint release notes for any security-related changes or bug fixes that might affect how ktlint operates. This is a direct management of the ktlint tool.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Outdated or Misconfigured Rulesets: (Severity: Medium) - Using an old version of ktlint with known bugs or missing features that could indirectly impact security.
  • Supply Chain Attacks (Indirect): (Severity: Low, but potentially high impact) - While unlikely, a compromised version of ktlint itself could be used. Keeping it updated reduces the window of opportunity.

Impact:

  • Outdated or Misconfigured Rulesets: Reduces the risk by ensuring the latest version of ktlint is used, with the latest bug fixes and improvements.
  • Supply Chain Attacks (Indirect): Reduces the risk, albeit a small one, by minimizing the time a potentially vulnerable version of ktlint is in use.

Currently Implemented:

  • ktlint version is pinned in build.gradle.kts.

Missing Implementation:

  • No established process for regularly updating ktlint.

Mitigation Strategy: Controlled Use of ktlint-disable

Description:

  1. Policy Definition: Create a clear and concise policy document (e.g., in the project's coding guidelines) that outlines the acceptable use of // ktlint-disable comments. The policy should state that disabling ktlint rules should be avoided unless absolutely necessary and must be accompanied by a clear and justifiable reason in a comment.
  2. Code Review Enforcement: Train code reviewers to specifically look for // ktlint-disable comments during code reviews. Reviewers should challenge the justification for disabling the ktlint rule and ensure it aligns with the defined policy. Reject pull requests with unjustified or excessive use of // ktlint-disable. This directly controls how developers interact with ktlint.
  3. Automated Detection (Optional): Consider using a custom script or leveraging features within your IDE or build system to detect and report on the usage of // ktlint-disable comments. This could involve a simple grep command or a more sophisticated analysis. The goal is to directly monitor how ktlint is being overridden.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Ignoring Warnings/Errors: (Severity: Medium) - Developers use // ktlint-disable to bypass ktlint checks without justification, potentially masking underlying issues.

Impact:

  • Ignoring Warnings/Errors: Significantly reduces the risk. Developers are held accountable for disabling ktlint rules, and unjustified overrides are prevented.

Currently Implemented:

  • None.

Missing Implementation:

  • No policy document defining the acceptable use of // ktlint-disable.
  • No specific focus on // ktlint-disable comments during code reviews.
  • No automated detection of // ktlint-disable usage.

Mitigation Strategy: Custom Rule Review (If Applicable, and Directly Related to ktlint)

Description: If and only if custom ktlint rules are used:

  1. Test-Driven Development: Write unit tests specifically for the custom ktlint rules. These tests should ensure that the rules behave as expected and correctly identify the intended code patterns, and do not introduce unintended side effects.
  2. Security Review: Have a security expert (or a developer with strong security knowledge) review the code of the custom ktlint rules themselves. Look for potential vulnerabilities, logic errors, or unintended consequences within the rule's implementation.
  3. Code Review: Subject custom ktlint rules to the same rigorous code review process as the main application code. Ensure multiple developers review the rules before they are merged. This is a direct review of ktlint-related code.
  4. Documentation: Document each custom ktlint rule, explaining its purpose, the code patterns it targets (and why), and any potential limitations. This documentation should be kept up-to-date with the rule's code.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Custom Rule Vulnerabilities: (Severity: Medium to High, depending on the rule) - Bugs or logic errors in custom ktlint rules lead to incorrect code modifications or missed security-relevant patterns. This is a direct threat from using custom ktlint rules.

Impact:

  • Custom Rule Vulnerabilities: Significantly reduces the risk. Thorough testing, security review, and code review minimize the chance of introducing vulnerabilities through custom ktlint rules.

Currently Implemented:

  • None (assuming no custom rules are currently used).

Missing Implementation:

  • All aspects (if custom rules were to be introduced).