Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
87 lines (62 loc) · 210 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

87 lines (62 loc) · 210 KB

LeakCanary Deep Security Analysis

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

This deep analysis aims to thoroughly examine the security implications of using LeakCanary within an Android application. The primary goal is to identify potential security vulnerabilities introduced by LeakCanary itself, or vulnerabilities that LeakCanary might inadvertently expose or exacerbate within the host application. The analysis will focus on:

  • Confidentiality: Ensuring LeakCanary doesn't leak sensitive information from the host application.
  • Integrity: Ensuring LeakCanary's analysis and reporting are accurate and not susceptible to manipulation.
  • Availability: Ensuring LeakCanary doesn't negatively impact the host application's availability (e.g., causing crashes or performance degradation). While primarily a performance concern, excessive resource usage can become a denial-of-service vector.

Scope:

This analysis covers:

  • The LeakCanary library itself, as available on GitHub (https://github.com/square/leakcanary).
  • The typical integration of LeakCanary into an Android application's debug build.
  • The interaction between LeakCanary and the host application.
  • The data flow of heap dumps and leak reports.
  • The build and deployment process as described in the Security Design Review.

This analysis excludes:

  • The security of Square's infrastructure beyond what's directly relevant to LeakCanary's build and deployment.
  • The security of the host application itself, except where LeakCanary interacts with it.
  • The security of the Android operating system.

Methodology:

  1. Architecture and Component Review: Analyze the C4 diagrams and component descriptions from the Security Design Review to understand LeakCanary's architecture, data flow, and dependencies.
  2. Codebase Examination: Examine the LeakCanary codebase on GitHub to confirm the architecture, identify security-relevant code sections, and assess the implementation of security controls.
  3. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats based on the architecture, data flow, and identified components.
  4. Vulnerability Analysis: Analyze potential vulnerabilities related to each threat.
  5. Mitigation Strategies: Propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies for identified vulnerabilities.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Based on the C4 Container diagram and descriptions, here's a breakdown of the security implications of each key component:

  • Android Application:

    • Security Implication: This is the primary source of potential sensitive data that LeakCanary might encounter. If the application handles sensitive data (PII, credentials, financial data) insecurely in memory, LeakCanary's heap dumps will contain this data. LeakCanary itself doesn't cause this vulnerability, but it exposes it.
    • Threat: Leakage of sensitive data from the application via heap dumps.
    • Vulnerability: The application stores sensitive data in long-lived objects, making it available in heap dumps.

  • LeakCanary Library:

    • Security Implication: This is the core of LeakCanary. Its security posture directly impacts the overall security. Vulnerabilities here could lead to false reports, denial of service, or even potentially code execution (though unlikely).
    • Threat: Vulnerabilities within the library itself (e.g., buffer overflows, integer overflows) could be exploited.
    • Vulnerability: Bugs in the library's code, particularly in the heap parsing logic.

  • Heap Analyzer:

    • Security Implication: This component parses the heap dump, which is a large, complex data structure. This is a classic area for vulnerabilities.
    • Threat: Maliciously crafted heap dumps (e.g., from a compromised application) could exploit vulnerabilities in the parser.
    • Vulnerability: Buffer overflows, integer overflows, or other parsing errors in the heap analysis code. This is the most critical component from a security perspective.

  • Leak Reporter:

    • Security Implication: This component formats and presents the leak information. While less critical than the Heap Analyzer, vulnerabilities here could still lead to denial of service (e.g., crashing the reporting UI).
    • Threat: Malicious data from the Heap Analyzer could cause issues in the Leak Reporter.
    • Vulnerability: Bugs in the formatting or display logic.

  • User Interface:

    • Security Implication: This component displays the leak reports within the application. It's unlikely to be a major security concern, but it's important to ensure it doesn't leak sensitive information from the reports.
    • Threat: The UI could inadvertently display sensitive data from the heap dump in a way that's visible to the user or other apps.
    • Vulnerability: Improper handling of sensitive data within the UI components.

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow (Inferred)

Based on the provided information and common Android development practices, we can infer the following:

  1. Heap Dump Generation: LeakCanary likely uses the android.os.Debug.dumpHprofData() method (or a similar mechanism) to generate heap dumps. This is a standard Android API call.
  2. Heap Dump Storage: The heap dump is likely stored temporarily in the application's private storage (e.g., getFilesDir()).
  3. Heap Analysis: The Heap Analyzer parses the heap dump file. This likely involves reading the file sequentially and interpreting the HPROF file format.
  4. Leak Detection: LeakCanary likely uses a combination of techniques to identify leaks, such as:
    • Reference Counting: Tracking references to objects to identify those that are no longer reachable.
    • Object Graph Traversal: Analyzing the relationships between objects to identify potential leak paths.
    • Heuristics: Using rules and patterns to identify common leak scenarios.
  5. Report Generation: The Leak Reporter formats the detected leak information into a human-readable report.
  6. UI Display: The UI component displays the report within the application, likely using standard Android UI elements (e.g., TextView, RecyclerView).
  7. No Off-Device Transmission (Assumption): The Security Design Review assumes that heap dumps are analyzed locally. This is a crucial assumption for security.

4. Specific Security Considerations and Recommendations

Here are specific security considerations tailored to LeakCanary, along with actionable recommendations:

| Consideration | Threat | Vulnerability | Recommendation

| Consideration