Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
148 lines (113 loc) · 20.6 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

148 lines (113 loc) · 20.6 KB

Deep Analysis of Moshi Security Considerations

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The objective of this deep analysis is to conduct a thorough security assessment of the Moshi JSON library (https://github.com/square/moshi), focusing on its key components, architecture, and data flow. The analysis aims to identify potential security vulnerabilities, assess their impact, and propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to Moshi's design and intended use. The analysis will consider the library's role in the broader application context, recognizing that Moshi's security is intertwined with how it's used.

Scope:

This analysis covers the following aspects of Moshi:

  • Core Serialization/Deserialization Logic: The mechanisms for converting Java/Kotlin objects to and from JSON.
  • Adapter System: Built-in and custom adapters, including the use of reflection.
  • Input Validation: How Moshi handles malformed, unexpected, or excessively large JSON input.
  • Dependencies: The security implications of Moshi's dependencies (Okio, Kotlin Standard Library, Java Standard Library).
  • Configuration Options: Any settings that could impact security.
  • Error Handling: How errors are reported and handled, and potential information leakage.
  • Integration with Build and Deployment Processes: How security is considered in the library's development lifecycle.

Methodology:

This analysis will employ the following methods:

  1. Code Review: Examination of the Moshi source code on GitHub to understand its internal workings and identify potential vulnerabilities. This will be targeted based on the identified key components.
  2. Documentation Review: Analysis of Moshi's official documentation, including Javadocs/Kdocs, to understand its intended behavior and security features.
  3. Dependency Analysis: Assessment of the security posture of Moshi's dependencies using vulnerability databases and security advisories.
  4. Threat Modeling: Identification of potential threats and attack vectors based on Moshi's functionality and how it's likely to be used.
  5. Inference: Drawing conclusions about the architecture, components, and data flow based on the codebase and documentation.
  6. Best Practices Comparison: Evaluating Moshi's design and implementation against established security best practices for JSON processing.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Based on the C4 diagrams and provided information, the following key components are analyzed:

  • Moshi API:

    • Security Implications: The API surface is the primary entry point for users. A poorly designed API could expose insecure methods or allow for misconfiguration. The API should enforce secure defaults and make it difficult for users to accidentally introduce vulnerabilities.
    • Specific to Moshi: Examine the Moshi.Builder class and its methods. Are there any options that could weaken security if misconfigured? Are there any deprecated methods that should be avoided? How does the API handle adapter registration and prioritization?
    • Mitigation: API design should follow the principle of least privilege. Provide clear documentation on secure usage. Consider using a builder pattern with immutable configurations to prevent accidental modification after creation. Deprecate and remove insecure methods.

  • JSON Adapters (Built-in and Custom):

    • Security Implications: Adapters are responsible for the actual serialization and deserialization logic. Vulnerabilities in adapters could lead to data corruption, injection attacks, or denial-of-service. Custom adapters are particularly risky, as they are outside the control of the Moshi developers.
    • Specific to Moshi: Review the built-in adapters for common data types (e.g., CollectionJsonAdapter, MapJsonAdapter, StandardJsonAdapters). Are there any known vulnerabilities or weaknesses? How does Moshi handle type safety and prevent type confusion attacks? How are custom adapters loaded and validated?
    • Mitigation: Thoroughly review and test built-in adapters. Provide clear guidelines and security best practices for developers creating custom adapters. Consider providing a mechanism for validating custom adapters (e.g., through annotations or a registration process). Implement robust type checking to prevent type confusion.

  • Reflection (Optional):

    • Security Implications: Reflection can be a powerful tool, but it can also introduce security risks if not used carefully. Reflection can bypass access controls and allow for the manipulation of private fields or methods. It can also be used to create unexpected objects or trigger unintended behavior.
    • Specific to Moshi: How extensively does Moshi use reflection? Is it used only for specific cases, or is it a core part of the serialization/deserialization process? Are there any safeguards in place to prevent the misuse of reflection? Can users disable reflection if they don't need it?
    • Mitigation: Minimize the use of reflection whenever possible. If reflection is necessary, use it carefully and with appropriate safeguards. Validate class names and field names before accessing them reflectively. Consider providing a configuration option to disable reflection entirely for security-sensitive applications. Use java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.setAccessible(true) with extreme caution. Prefer using Moshi's Kotlin support, which relies less on reflection.

  • Okio (Dependency):

    • Security Implications: Okio is used for I/O operations. Vulnerabilities in Okio could lead to buffer overflows, denial-of-service, or other I/O-related attacks.
    • Specific to Moshi: How does Moshi use Okio? Is it used for reading and writing JSON data directly, or only for internal buffering? Are there any specific Okio features that Moshi relies on?
    • Mitigation: Keep Okio up to date with the latest security patches. Monitor Okio's security advisories and vulnerability reports. Consider using a dependency analysis tool to track Okio's version and identify known vulnerabilities.

  • Kotlin/Java Standard Library (Dependencies):

    • Security Implications: Vulnerabilities in the standard libraries could have a wide-ranging impact.
    • Specific to Moshi: Moshi relies on the standard libraries for basic functionalities.
    • Mitigation: Keep the Kotlin and Java runtimes up to date with the latest security patches.

  • Input Validation:

    • Security Implications: Insufficient input validation is a major source of vulnerabilities in JSON processing libraries. Malformed or excessively large JSON input can lead to denial-of-service, crashes, or even arbitrary code execution.
    • Specific to Moshi: How does Moshi validate JSON input? Does it enforce a strict schema by default? Does it have limits on the size of JSON documents or the depth of nesting? How does it handle unexpected characters or data types?
    • Mitigation: Moshi should enforce strict parsing by default. Provide options for users to customize validation rules, but ensure that the defaults are secure. Implement limits on input size and nesting depth to prevent denial-of-service attacks. Use a well-defined state machine for parsing to handle malformed input gracefully. Reject invalid JSON with informative error messages (without revealing sensitive information).

  • Error Handling:

    • Security Implications: Poor error handling can leak sensitive information or provide attackers with clues about the system's internal workings.
    • Specific to Moshi: How does Moshi report errors? Does it throw exceptions? Does it log error messages? Are the error messages informative but not overly verbose?
    • Mitigation: Use a consistent error handling strategy throughout the library. Throw specific exception types for different error conditions. Provide informative error messages that help users diagnose problems without revealing sensitive information. Avoid logging sensitive data in error messages.

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow (Inferred)

Based on the provided information and common patterns in JSON libraries, the following architecture and data flow are inferred:

  1. User Input: The application provides data (Java/Kotlin objects or JSON strings/streams) to the Moshi API.
  2. Moshi API: The API receives the input and selects the appropriate JsonAdapter based on the data type.
  3. Adapter Selection: Moshi uses a chain-of-responsibility pattern to find the correct adapter. It first checks built-in adapters, then custom adapters, and finally may fall back to reflection (if enabled).
  4. Serialization (Object to JSON):
    • The selected JsonAdapter uses Okio to write the JSON data to an output stream (or buffer).
    • The adapter handles the conversion of the object's fields to JSON values, recursively calling other adapters as needed.
  5. Deserialization (JSON to Object):
    • The selected JsonAdapter uses Okio to read the JSON data from an input stream (or buffer).
    • The adapter parses the JSON tokens and constructs the corresponding Java/Kotlin object, recursively calling other adapters as needed.
  6. Error Handling: If any errors occur during parsing or conversion, the adapter throws an exception (e.g., JsonDataException, IOException).
  7. Output: The application receives the serialized JSON string/stream or the deserialized Java/Kotlin object.

4. Specific Security Considerations and Recommendations

Given the inferred architecture and the nature of Moshi as a JSON processing library, the following specific security considerations and recommendations are provided:

  • JSON Injection:

    • Threat: Attackers could inject malicious JSON code into the input, leading to unexpected behavior or data corruption. This is particularly relevant if the application using Moshi receives JSON data from untrusted sources.
    • Moshi-Specific: Moshi's strict parsing helps mitigate this, but custom adapters need careful review.
    • Mitigation: Ensure that all JsonAdapter implementations (both built-in and custom) properly validate and escape JSON data. Avoid using string concatenation to build JSON strings; use the provided JsonWriter API. Educate users on the risks of JSON injection and the importance of validating input data before passing it to Moshi.

  • Denial-of-Service (DoS):

    • Threat: Attackers could send excessively large or deeply nested JSON documents, causing Moshi to consume excessive resources (CPU, memory) and potentially crash the application.
    • Moshi-Specific: Moshi needs built-in limits on input size and nesting depth.
    • Mitigation: Implement configurable limits on the maximum size of JSON documents and the maximum depth of nesting. Reject input that exceeds these limits with a clear error message. Consider using a streaming approach (if applicable) to process large JSON documents incrementally. Test Moshi's performance with large and complex JSON data to identify potential bottlenecks. The JsonReader.Options should be used to prevent consuming too many resources when parsing untrusted data.

  • Type Confusion:

    • Threat: Attackers could exploit type mismatches between the expected data type and the actual data type in the JSON input, leading to unexpected behavior or security vulnerabilities.
    • Moshi-Specific: Moshi's type system and adapter mechanism are crucial here.
    • Mitigation: Ensure that JsonAdapter implementations rigorously check the types of the data they are processing. Avoid using Object or other generic types when a more specific type is expected. Use Kotlin's type system and null safety features to prevent type-related errors. Be particularly careful with polymorphic types and custom adapters that handle multiple types.

  • Reflection-Based Attacks:

    • Threat: If reflection is enabled, attackers could potentially use it to bypass security controls or access private data.
    • Moshi-Specific: Limit and control Moshi's use of reflection.
    • Mitigation: Provide a configuration option to disable reflection entirely. If reflection is used, validate class names and field names before accessing them. Avoid using reflection to access or modify private fields or methods unless absolutely necessary. Prefer Moshi's code-generation capabilities over reflection.

  • Dependency Vulnerabilities:

    • Threat: Vulnerabilities in Moshi's dependencies (Okio, Kotlin/Java standard libraries) could be exploited to compromise the application.
    • Moshi-Specific: Regularly update dependencies.
    • Mitigation: Use a dependency management tool (like Gradle or Maven) to track dependencies and their versions. Use a software composition analysis (SCA) tool (like OWASP Dependency-Check) to identify known vulnerabilities in dependencies. Regularly update dependencies to the latest secure versions.

  • Custom Adapter Security:

    • Threat: Custom adapters are a potential source of vulnerabilities, as they are written by users and may not follow secure coding practices.
    • Moshi-Specific: Provide clear guidelines and security best practices for custom adapter development.
    • Mitigation: Provide clear documentation and examples for writing secure custom adapters. Encourage users to test their custom adapters thoroughly. Consider providing a mechanism for validating custom adapters (e.g., through annotations or a registration process). Review custom adapters carefully before using them in production.

  • Data Sensitivity:

    • Threat: Moshi processes data that could be sensitive, depending on the application.
    • Moshi-Specific: Moshi itself doesn't handle data sensitivity; this is the responsibility of the application using it.
    • Mitigation: The application using Moshi must implement appropriate security controls to protect sensitive data, both before serialization and after deserialization. This includes encryption, access controls, and secure storage. Moshi should not be used to store or transmit sensitive data directly; it should only be used to serialize and deserialize data that is already protected by other mechanisms.

  • Unsafe Deserialization:

    • Threat: Deserializing untrusted data can lead to arbitrary code execution.
    • Moshi-Specific: Moshi's design, particularly with its focus on adapters and type safety, inherently mitigates many of the risks associated with traditional Java serialization. However, custom adapters and the use of @JsonClass(generateAdapter = false) could introduce vulnerabilities if not carefully implemented.
    • Mitigation: Avoid using @JsonClass(generateAdapter = false) unless absolutely necessary, and if used, ensure the class does not have any side effects in its constructor or any methods that could be called during deserialization. Thoroughly vet any custom adapters for potential vulnerabilities. Consider using a whitelist approach for allowed types during deserialization, especially when dealing with polymorphic types.

5. Actionable Mitigation Strategies

The following table summarizes the actionable mitigation strategies, categorized by the component they address:

Component Threat Mitigation Strategy
Moshi API Insecure API methods or misconfiguration Follow the principle of least privilege in API design. Provide clear documentation on secure usage. Use a builder pattern with immutable configurations. Deprecate and remove insecure methods.
JSON Adapters Injection attacks, data corruption Thoroughly review and test built-in adapters. Provide clear guidelines and security best practices for custom adapter development. Implement robust type checking. Validate and escape JSON data in adapters. Avoid string concatenation for building JSON.
Reflection Reflection-based attacks Minimize reflection use. Validate class and field names before reflective access. Provide an option to disable reflection. Use AccessibleObject.setAccessible(true) with extreme caution. Prefer code generation.
Okio I/O-related vulnerabilities Keep Okio up to date. Monitor Okio's security advisories. Use a dependency analysis tool.
Kotlin/Java Stdlib Standard library vulnerabilities Keep Kotlin and Java runtimes up to date.
Input Validation DoS, crashes, injection Enforce strict parsing by default. Implement configurable limits on input size and nesting depth. Reject invalid input with informative error messages. Use a well-defined state machine for parsing. Use JsonReader.Options to limit resource consumption.
Error Handling Information leakage Use a consistent error handling strategy. Throw specific exception types. Provide informative but not overly verbose error messages. Avoid logging sensitive data.
Custom Adapters Various vulnerabilities Provide clear documentation and examples for secure custom adapter development. Encourage thorough testing of custom adapters. Consider a validation mechanism for custom adapters. Review custom adapters carefully.
General Data sensitivity, Unsafe Deserialization Application must implement data protection. Avoid @JsonClass(generateAdapter = false) where possible. Vet custom adapters. Use whitelists for allowed types during deserialization.
Build Process Introduction of vulnerabilities during build Use SAST and SCA tools. Automate security checks in the CI/CD pipeline.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for the Moshi JSON library. By addressing these considerations and implementing the recommended mitigation strategies, developers can significantly reduce the risk of security vulnerabilities in applications that use Moshi. It is crucial to remember that Moshi's security is heavily dependent on how it is used within an application. The application itself must also implement robust security controls to protect the data it handles, regardless of how that data is serialized or deserialized.