Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
41 lines (34 loc) · 5.8 KB

File metadata and controls

41 lines (34 loc) · 5.8 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for square/okio

  • Description: Attackers provide malicious data through input sources (network, files, etc.) that Okio reads. The vulnerability lies in how the application using Okio handles this potentially malicious input after Okio has read it. Okio is the direct conduit for the malicious data.
  • How Okio Contributes: Okio's Source and BufferedSource interfaces are the direct mechanisms used to read the attacker-controlled data. Okio's buffering, while efficient, can be leveraged by attackers to send large payloads if the application doesn't implement proper limits.
  • Example: An attacker sends a specially crafted, extremely long stream of data to an application. The application uses Okio's BufferedSource.readUtf8() to read the stream without checking the length before or during the read operation. This can lead to a denial-of-service (DoS) due to excessive memory allocation.
  • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS), Remote Code Execution (RCE) (if the input triggers vulnerabilities in subsequent processing), Data Corruption.
  • Risk Severity: Critical/High (depending on the application's subsequent handling of the input).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Input Validation (Pre and Post Okio): Implement strict input validation before passing data to Okio (if possible, e.g., checking content type headers) and immediately after reading it using Okio. Validate length, content type, format, and expected values.
    • Size Limits (Using Okio): Enforce maximum input sizes using Okio's capabilities. Use methods like BufferedSource.readByteArray(maxSize) or BufferedSource.readByteString(maxSize) to limit the amount of data read at once. This is a direct Okio-based mitigation.
    • Timeouts (Using Okio): Use Okio's Timeout class to set deadlines for read operations. This prevents indefinite blocking on malicious input, a direct Okio-level defense. source.timeout().timeout(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS) is a concrete example.
    • Resource Limits (System-Level): Configure overall resource limits (memory) for the application, but this is indirect to Okio.
  • Description: Attackers manipulate file paths used by Okio for writing data, attempting to write to unauthorized locations on the file system. Okio is the direct mechanism for writing to the manipulated path.
  • How Okio Contributes: Okio's Sink and BufferedSink interfaces are the direct mechanisms used to write data to files. If the application constructs file paths based on untrusted input, Okio becomes the tool for executing the path traversal.
  • Example: An application allows users to specify a filename for saving data. An attacker provides a filename like ../../etc/passwd. The application, without sanitization, uses FileSystem.SYSTEM.sink(File(maliciousPath)) (Okio's API) to create a Sink and write to that location.
  • Impact: Data Corruption, System Compromise, Privilege Escalation.
  • Risk Severity: High/Critical (depending on the target file and system configuration).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Path Sanitization: Never construct file paths directly from user input. Sanitize any user-provided components rigorously, removing ".." sequences and other path traversal attempts. This is done before using Okio.
    • Whitelisting: Use a whitelist of allowed directories and filenames, rejecting any input that doesn't match. This is done before using Okio.
    • Secure Base Directory: Confine file writing operations to a designated, secure base directory with appropriate permissions. This is configured before using Okio.
    • File System Permissions (System-Level): Ensure the application runs with least privileges. This is indirect to Okio.
  • Description: Attackers influence network destinations or inject data into network streams managed by Okio. Okio is the direct mechanism for establishing and using the network connection.
  • How Okio Contributes: Okio provides Source and Sink implementations for network sockets (typically through Okio.source(socket) and Okio.sink(socket)). If the application uses user-supplied data to determine the destination address or port before creating the socket, Okio becomes the tool for the redirection.
  • Example: An application uses Okio to connect to a server. The server address is read from a configuration file that an attacker can modify. The attacker changes the address to point to a malicious server. The application then uses Okio.sink(socket) to send data to the attacker-controlled server.
  • Impact: Data Interception, Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks, Data Injection, System Compromise.
  • Risk Severity: High/Critical (depending on the sensitivity of the data).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Hardcoded Endpoints: Use hardcoded server addresses and ports whenever possible. This is done before using Okio.
    • Secure Configuration: If endpoints must be configurable, store them securely and validate their integrity before using Okio.
    • Certificate Pinning: Implement certificate pinning or other strong authentication mechanisms to verify the server's identity before sending data via Okio.
    • TLS/SSL: Always use TLS/SSL for network communication. This is typically configured on the Socket before passing it to Okio.