Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
119 lines (94 loc) · 9.75 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

119 lines (94 loc) · 9.75 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for square/okio

Mitigation Strategy: Strict API Usage and Input Validation

Description:

  1. Enforce Okio API: Developers must exclusively use the documented Okio API methods (e.g., BufferedSource.readUtf8(), BufferedSink.writeUtf8(), Buffer.write(), Buffer.read()) for all read and write operations.
  2. Prohibit Direct Byte Array Access: Direct manipulation of the internal byte arrays of Buffer objects is strictly prohibited unless absolutely necessary and justified with a documented security review.
  3. Pre-Validation: Before any data is passed to Okio for processing (reading or writing), validate its size and, where possible, its content. This includes checking for maximum length, allowed character sets, and expected data formats.
  4. Error Handling: Implement robust error handling for all Okio operations, including catching IOException and its subclasses (like EOFException, InterruptedIOException). Handle these exceptions gracefully, logging errors and preventing unexpected application behavior.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Buffer Overflows/Underflows (Severity: High): Incorrect direct byte array manipulation can lead to writing beyond buffer boundaries or reading from uninitialized memory, potentially causing crashes or exploitable vulnerabilities.
  • Data Corruption (Severity: High): Incorrect handling of Okio objects or thread interruptions can lead to inconsistent data being written or read.
  • Resource Exhaustion (DoS) (Severity: Medium): Input validation helps prevent excessively large inputs from being processed by Okio, mitigating the risk of memory exhaustion.
  • Unexpected Behavior (Severity: Low to Medium): Proper error handling and API usage prevent unexpected application states due to incorrect Okio interactions.

Impact:

  • Buffer Overflows/Underflows: Risk reduced significantly (from High to Low) by preventing direct byte array access and enforcing API usage.
  • Data Corruption: Risk reduced significantly (from High to Low) by ensuring consistent and correct use of Okio's API.
  • Resource Exhaustion (DoS): Risk reduced moderately (from Medium to Low) by pre-validating input sizes.
  • Unexpected Behavior: Risk reduced significantly (from Low/Medium to Low) by ensuring consistent and correct use of Okio's API and proper error handling.

Currently Implemented:

  • API usage enforcement is partially implemented in the NetworkService module. Code reviews have emphasized this, but no formal static analysis is in place.
  • Input validation is implemented for user-provided data in the UserInputHandler class, but not consistently for data received from external services.
  • Basic error handling is present, but it could be more comprehensive.

Missing Implementation:

  • Formal static analysis to enforce API usage is missing project-wide.
  • Consistent input validation is missing for data received from external services (e.g., in the ExternalDataFetcher class).
  • Comprehensive error handling, including specific handling of InterruptedIOException and detailed logging, is missing in several modules.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Size Limits and Timeouts

Description:

  1. Define Maximum Sizes: Determine the maximum expected size for each type of data processed by the application using Okio (e.g., request body, file uploads, messages). Document these limits.
  2. Enforce Limits: Before passing data to Okio, check if its size exceeds the defined limits. If it does, reject the data.
  3. Configure Timeouts: Use Okio's Timeout class to set deadlines for all I/O operations:
    • readTimeout(): Set a maximum time to wait for data to be read using Okio.
    • writeTimeout(): Set a maximum time to wait for data to be written using Okio.
    • connectTimeout(): (If applicable, when using Okio for network connections) Set a maximum time to wait for a connection to be established.
  4. Timeout Handling: Handle SocketTimeoutException (and other timeout-related exceptions) gracefully. Log the timeout, potentially retry (if appropriate), and inform the user or calling system.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Resource Exhaustion (DoS) (Severity: High): Limits on input size prevent attackers from sending excessively large data that could cause Okio to consume all available memory.
  • Slowloris Attacks (Severity: Medium): Timeouts prevent attackers from holding Okio-managed connections open indefinitely.
  • Application Hangs (Severity: Medium): Timeouts prevent the application from becoming unresponsive due to slow or stalled Okio I/O operations.

Impact:

  • Resource Exhaustion (DoS): Risk reduced significantly (from High to Low) by enforcing input size limits.
  • Slowloris Attacks: Risk reduced significantly (from Medium to Low) by using appropriate timeouts.
  • Application Hangs: Risk reduced significantly (from Medium to Low) by using appropriate timeouts.

Currently Implemented:

  • Basic input size limits are implemented for file uploads in the FileUploadHandler class.
  • A default readTimeout is set on the OkHttpClient instance, but writeTimeout and connectTimeout are not explicitly configured.

Missing Implementation:

  • Comprehensive input size limits are missing for other data sources processed by Okio.
  • Explicit configuration of writeTimeout and connectTimeout on the OkHttpClient is missing.
  • Consistent use of timeouts for all Okio operations (including direct use of BufferedSource and BufferedSink) is missing.

Mitigation Strategy: Thread Safety and Interruption Handling

Description:

  1. Thread-Local Buffers: Whenever possible, use thread-local Buffer instances to avoid sharing Okio buffers between threads.
  2. Synchronization (If Necessary): If Okio Buffer objects must be shared between threads, use appropriate synchronization mechanisms (e.g., synchronized blocks, ReentrantLock).
  3. Handle Interruptions: Wrap Okio I/O operations in try-catch blocks that specifically catch InterruptedIOException. In the catch block:
    • Log the interruption.
    • Clean up any Okio resources (e.g., close streams).
    • Decide whether to retry the operation or propagate the exception.
  4. Avoid Abrupt Thread Termination: Avoid using deprecated methods like Thread.stop() with threads performing Okio I/O.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Data Corruption (Severity: High): Race conditions due to unsynchronized access to shared Okio buffers can lead to data corruption.
  • Unexpected Behavior (Severity: Medium): Incorrect handling of thread interruptions can leave Okio objects in an inconsistent state.
  • Resource Leaks (Severity: Low): Improper cleanup after thread interruptions can lead to resource leaks (e.g., open Okio-managed file handles).

Impact:

  • Data Corruption: Risk reduced significantly (from High to Low) by using thread-local Okio buffers or proper synchronization.
  • Unexpected Behavior: Risk reduced significantly (from Medium to Low) by correctly handling InterruptedIOException.
  • Resource Leaks: Risk reduced (from Low to Very Low) by ensuring proper cleanup in interruption handlers.

Currently Implemented:

  • The NetworkService module uses a thread pool, and Okio buffers are generally used within a single task.
  • Basic try-catch blocks are used, but specific handling of InterruptedIOException is inconsistent.

Missing Implementation:

  • Explicit enforcement of thread-local Okio buffer usage or synchronization is missing.
  • Consistent and comprehensive handling of InterruptedIOException is missing.
  • Code review guidelines do not explicitly emphasize thread safety with Okio.

Mitigation Strategy: Proper EOFException Handling

Description:

  1. Understand EOFException: Ensure all developers understand that EOFException signals the end of an Okio stream and is not necessarily an error.
  2. Contextual Handling: Handle EOFException appropriately based on the context of the Okio operation:
    • Expected EOF: If the end of the stream is expected, treat EOFException as normal termination.
    • Unexpected EOF: If the end of the stream is unexpected, treat EOFException as an error, log it, and potentially take corrective action.
  3. Code Reviews: Include specific checks for correct EOFException handling during code reviews of code using Okio.
  4. Unit Tests: Create unit tests that specifically verify the application's behavior when EOFException is thrown by Okio, both in expected and unexpected scenarios.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Logic Errors (Severity: Low to Medium): Misinterpreting Okio's EOFException can lead to incorrect program flow.
  • Unexpected Behavior (Severity: Low): Incorrect handling can lead to unexpected application states.

Impact:

  • Logic Errors: Risk reduced (from Low/Medium to Low) by ensuring correct interpretation and handling.
  • Unexpected Behavior: Risk reduced (from Low to Very Low) by ensuring consistent and correct handling.

Currently Implemented:

  • Basic try-catch blocks around Okio I/O operations generally catch EOFException.
  • Some unit tests cover scenarios where the end of a stream is reached.

Missing Implementation:

  • Code review guidelines do not explicitly emphasize correct EOFException handling with Okio.
  • Comprehensive unit tests specifically targeting EOFException in various Okio contexts are missing.
  • Documentation on the expected handling of EOFException is lacking.