Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
78 lines (61 loc) · 6.63 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

78 lines (61 loc) · 6.63 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for tapadoo/alerter

Objective: Compromise Application Using Alerter by Exploiting High-Risk Vulnerabilities

Attack Tree Visualization

  • [CRITICAL NODE] 1. Exploit Input Handling Vulnerabilities in Alerter [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    • [CRITICAL NODE] 1.1. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Alert Message [HIGH-RISK PATH]
      • [CRITICAL NODE] 1.1.1. Inject Malicious JavaScript in Alert Message [HIGH-RISK PATH]
      • [CRITICAL NODE] 1.1.2. Inject Malicious HTML Attributes in Alert Message [HIGH-RISK PATH]
  • [CRITICAL NODE] 2. Exploit Application Misuse of Alerter [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    • [CRITICAL NODE] 2.1. Display Sensitive Information in Alerts [HIGH-RISK PATH]
      • [CRITICAL NODE] 2.1.1. Expose PII, Credentials, or Internal Data in Alert Messages [HIGH-RISK PATH]
  • [CRITICAL NODE] 3. Dependency Vulnerabilities in Alerter [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    • [CRITICAL NODE] 3.1. Vulnerabilities in Alerter's Dependencies [HIGH-RISK PATH]
      • [CRITICAL NODE] 3.1.1. Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Libraries Used by Alerter [HIGH-RISK PATH]

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Input Handling Vulnerabilities in Alerter [HIGH-RISK PATH]

Description: This high-risk path focuses on exploiting vulnerabilities arising from how the application handles user-provided input that is displayed within Alerter alerts. If input is not properly sanitized or encoded, it can lead to injection attacks.

  • Critical Nodes within this path:

    • 1.1. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Alert Message
    • 1.1.1. Inject Malicious JavaScript in Alert Message
    • 1.1.2. Inject Malicious HTML Attributes in Alert Message

  • Attack Vector 1.1.1: Inject Malicious JavaScript in Alert Message [HIGH-RISK PATH]

    • Attack Description: An attacker injects malicious JavaScript code into the alert message. If the application doesn't sanitize this input, Alerter will render it, and the JavaScript will execute in the user's browser.
    • Impact: High - Full compromise of user session, data theft, actions on behalf of user.
    • Likelihood: Medium - Common vulnerability if input sanitization is weak or missing.
    • Effort: Low - Readily available XSS payloads and browser developer tools.
    • Skill Level: Low - Beginner to Intermediate.
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Can be missed if not actively tested for, but security tools can detect.
    • Mitigation: Server-side and client-side input sanitization/encoding of alert messages. Use Content Security Policy (CSP).

  • Attack Vector 1.1.2: Inject Malicious HTML Attributes in Alert Message [HIGH-RISK PATH]

    • Attack Description: An attacker injects malicious HTML attributes into the alert message. Even without JavaScript, this can lead to various attacks if Alerter renders these attributes unsafely.
    • Impact: Medium - Phishing, defacement, triggering client-side vulnerabilities, clickjacking.
    • Likelihood: Medium - Similar to JavaScript injection, depends on input handling.
    • Effort: Low - Easy to craft HTML injection payloads.
    • Skill Level: Low - Beginner.
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Similar to JavaScript XSS.
    • Mitigation: Server-side and client-side input sanitization/encoding of alert messages. Use Content Security Policy (CSP).

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Application Misuse of Alerter [HIGH-RISK PATH]

Description: This high-risk path focuses on vulnerabilities introduced by how the application uses Alerter, rather than vulnerabilities within Alerter itself. Misuse, particularly displaying sensitive information, can have significant security implications.

  • Critical Nodes within this path:

    • 2.1. Display Sensitive Information in Alerts
    • 2.1.1. Expose PII, Credentials, or Internal Data in Alert Messages

  • Attack Vector 2.1.1: Expose PII, Credentials, or Internal Data in Alert Messages [HIGH-RISK PATH]

    • Attack Description: Developers mistakenly include sensitive information (like user IDs, email addresses, error details, or credentials) in alert messages displayed to users via Alerter.
    • Impact: Medium to High - Information disclosure, privacy violation, potential account compromise.
    • Likelihood: Medium - Developer oversight, especially in debugging or error handling.
    • Effort: Low - No active attack needed, just observation.
    • Skill Level: Low - Beginner (just needs to use the application).
    • Detection Difficulty: Easy - Code review and security audits should easily identify this.
    • Mitigation: Strictly avoid displaying sensitive information in alerts. Use generic error messages and log detailed information securely server-side.

Attack Tree Path: Dependency Vulnerabilities in Alerter [HIGH-RISK PATH]

Description: This high-risk path addresses vulnerabilities that might exist in the dependencies used by the tapadoo/alerter library. If these dependencies have known security flaws, they can indirectly affect applications using Alerter.

  • Critical Nodes within this path:

    • 3.1. Vulnerabilities in Alerter's Dependencies
    • 3.1.1. Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Libraries Used by Alerter

  • Attack Vector 3.1.1: Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Libraries Used by Alerter [HIGH-RISK PATH]

    • Attack Description: Attackers exploit known vulnerabilities in the JavaScript libraries that tapadoo/alerter depends on. This requires identifying vulnerable dependencies and exploiting those flaws within the context of the application using Alerter.
    • Impact: High - Could range from XSS to Remote Code Execution depending on the dependency vulnerability.
    • Likelihood: Low - Depends on the dependencies and their vulnerability history, requires outdated dependencies.
    • Effort: Medium - Requires vulnerability research and potentially exploit development if no public exploit exists.
    • Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced - Need to understand dependency vulnerabilities and exploitation techniques.
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Dependency scanning tools can detect known vulnerabilities, but exploit detection can be harder.
    • Mitigation: Regularly update Alerter and its dependencies. Perform dependency scanning and vulnerability assessments.