Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
121 lines (84 loc) · 13.7 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

121 lines (84 loc) · 13.7 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for tiann/kernelsu

Mitigation Strategy: Principle of Least Privilege (KernelSU Focused)

  • Description:

    1. Minimize Root Requests to KernelSU: Developers should carefully analyze the application and reduce the number of times root privileges are requested from KernelSU. Each request should be justified and necessary.
    2. Isolate Root Functionality via KernelSU Modules (If Applicable): If KernelSU module functionality is used, isolate root-dependent features within specific KernelSU modules. This limits the scope of root access granted by KernelSU to only those modules.
    3. Request Minimal Permissions from KernelSU: When requesting root via KernelSU, request the least amount of permissions necessary. Avoid requesting broad or unnecessary permissions. Utilize KernelSU's permission management features to fine-tune requested privileges.
    4. Review KernelSU Permission Grants: Regularly review the permissions granted to the application by KernelSU to ensure they are still necessary and minimal. Revoke any excessive or outdated permissions.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • KernelSU Privilege Escalation Vulnerabilities (Medium to High Severity): If vulnerabilities exist within KernelSU itself that could be exploited for privilege escalation, limiting the scope of granted privileges reduces the potential impact.
    • Abuse of Root Access via KernelSU (Medium to High Severity): Even if KernelSU is secure, excessive root privileges granted to the application increase the potential for misuse or abuse if the application itself is compromised.
    • Accidental Root Operations via KernelSU (Low Severity): Minimizing root requests and permissions reduces the risk of accidental or unintended operations being performed with root privileges granted by KernelSU.

  • Impact:

    • KernelSU Privilege Escalation Vulnerabilities: Medium Reduction
    • Abuse of Root Access via KernelSU: High Reduction
    • Accidental Root Operations via KernelSU: Low Reduction

  • Currently Implemented: Hypothetical Application - Application generally requests root only when needed, but permission requests to KernelSU might be broader than strictly necessary.

  • Missing Implementation: Hypothetical Application - Fine-grained permission requests to KernelSU are not fully implemented. The application should be updated to request the minimal set of permissions from KernelSU for each root operation, leveraging KernelSU's permission management capabilities. Isolation of root functionality into KernelSU modules (if applicable and beneficial) is not explored.

Mitigation Strategy: Just-in-Time Privilege Elevation via KernelSU

  • Description:

    1. Trigger Root Requests Only When Needed via KernelSU API: Modify the application to interact with KernelSU's API to request root privileges only immediately before executing a root-requiring operation.
    2. Release Root Privileges Immediately After KernelSU Operation: After the root-dependent task is completed using KernelSU, explicitly release or relinquish the root privileges granted by KernelSU. Avoid holding onto root access for longer than necessary.
    3. Contextual Root Requests to KernelSU: When requesting root from KernelSU, provide context or information about why root is needed for this specific operation. This can aid in auditing and potentially user consent mechanisms within KernelSU or the application.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Time-Based Exploits Targeting KernelSU (Medium Severity): If vulnerabilities are discovered in KernelSU that are exploitable when root is granted, minimizing the duration of root privilege reduces the window of opportunity for exploitation.
    • KernelSU Resource Exhaustion (Low Severity): While less likely, continuously holding root privileges via KernelSU might potentially consume system resources unnecessarily. Just-in-time elevation can help optimize resource usage related to KernelSU.

  • Impact:

    • Time-Based Exploits Targeting KernelSU: Medium Reduction
    • KernelSU Resource Exhaustion: Low Reduction

  • Currently Implemented: Hypothetical Application - For some user-initiated actions, root is requested from KernelSU on demand.

  • Missing Implementation: Hypothetical Application - Background tasks and internal application processes might still be requesting and holding root privileges from KernelSU for extended periods. These should be refactored to use just-in-time privilege elevation via KernelSU's API. Explicitly releasing root privileges after use is not consistently implemented.

Mitigation Strategy: User Consent Mechanisms in Conjunction with KernelSU

  • Description:

    1. Application-Level User Consent Before KernelSU Root Request: Implement user consent prompts within the application that appear before the application requests root privileges from KernelSU. This adds an extra layer of user control.
    2. Informative Consent Dialogs (KernelSU Context): Design consent dialogs to be specific to KernelSU and root access. Explain that granting consent will allow the application to request elevated privileges via KernelSU and perform system-level operations.
    3. Integration with Potential KernelSU Consent Features: If KernelSU itself provides any user consent mechanisms in the future, explore integrating the application's consent prompts with KernelSU's features for a more unified user experience.
    4. Log User Consent Decisions Related to KernelSU: Log user consent decisions (granted or denied) specifically related to root requests via KernelSU. This provides an audit trail of user-approved root operations.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Unintentional Root Actions via KernelSU (Medium Severity): User consent prompts, especially when clearly explaining the use of KernelSU, reduce the risk of users unknowingly authorizing root operations.
    • Malicious Application Behavior Leveraging KernelSU (Medium Severity): While KernelSU aims to control root access, a compromised application might still attempt unauthorized root actions. User consent provides a defense layer by requiring explicit user approval before KernelSU grants root.

  • Impact:

    • Unintentional Root Actions via KernelSU: Medium Reduction
    • Malicious Application Behavior Leveraging KernelSU: Medium Reduction

  • Currently Implemented: Hypothetical Application - User consent is implemented for a few high-risk actions, but the connection to KernelSU and root access is not always explicitly communicated in the consent prompts.

  • Missing Implementation: Hypothetical Application - User consent prompts should be consistently implemented for all actions that will trigger a root request to KernelSU. Consent dialogs should be improved to clearly explain the role of KernelSU in granting root privileges. Integration with potential future KernelSU consent features is not considered.

Mitigation Strategy: Stay Updated with KernelSU Security Advisories (Application Level)

  • Description:

    1. Dedicated Monitoring of KernelSU Security Channels: Assign specific developers or security personnel to actively monitor KernelSU project channels (GitHub, forums, etc.) for security advisories and updates.
    2. Proactive Patching of KernelSU Integration: When KernelSU releases security patches or updates, prioritize and promptly update the application's integration with KernelSU to incorporate these fixes.
    3. Assess Impact of KernelSU Vulnerabilities on Application: When a KernelSU vulnerability is announced, immediately assess its potential impact on the application and its root-dependent functionalities.
    4. Communicate KernelSU Security Information to Users (If Relevant): In rare cases of critical KernelSU vulnerabilities that might directly affect application users, consider communicating relevant security information and recommended actions to users.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Known Vulnerabilities in KernelSU Exploited via Application (High Severity): If the application relies on a vulnerable version of KernelSU, attackers could exploit these KernelSU vulnerabilities through the application to gain root access or compromise the system. Staying updated mitigates this risk.

  • Impact:

    • Known Vulnerabilities in KernelSU Exploited via Application: High Reduction

  • Currently Implemented: Hypothetical Application - General awareness of the need to update dependencies, but no dedicated process for monitoring KernelSU security specifically.

  • Missing Implementation: Hypothetical Application - Establish a formal process for monitoring KernelSU security advisories and proactively patching the application's KernelSU integration. Include procedures for assessing the impact of KernelSU vulnerabilities on the application and communicating with users if necessary.

Mitigation Strategy: Understand KernelSU's Security Model (Application Development)

  • Description:

    1. Developer Training on KernelSU Security: Provide developers working on root-privileged components with specific training on KernelSU's security model, architecture, and best practices for secure integration.
    2. Security Reviews Focused on KernelSU Interaction: Conduct security code reviews specifically focusing on the application's interactions with KernelSU's API and root privilege management.
    3. Threat Modeling Considering KernelSU: Incorporate KernelSU into the application's threat model. Analyze potential attack vectors that involve exploiting vulnerabilities or misconfigurations in KernelSU or its integration.
    4. Security Testing of KernelSU Integration Points: Perform dedicated security testing of the application's integration points with KernelSU. This should include testing for privilege escalation issues, incorrect permission handling, and other vulnerabilities related to KernelSU usage.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Vulnerabilities Introduced by Misunderstanding KernelSU Security (Variable Severity): If developers lack a thorough understanding of KernelSU's security model, they might introduce vulnerabilities due to incorrect usage or assumptions about KernelSU's security features.
    • Bypasses of KernelSU Security Features due to Integration Errors (Variable Severity): Integration errors or oversights in the application's KernelSU interaction could potentially bypass KernelSU's intended security mechanisms.

  • Impact:

    • Vulnerabilities Introduced by Misunderstanding KernelSU Security: Medium Reduction
    • Bypasses of KernelSU Security Features due to Integration Errors: Medium Reduction

  • Currently Implemented: Hypothetical Application - Developers have basic knowledge of KernelSU, but no formal training or dedicated security reviews focused on KernelSU integration.

  • Missing Implementation: Hypothetical Application - Implement developer training on KernelSU security, establish security code reviews specifically for KernelSU interactions, incorporate KernelSU into threat modeling, and conduct dedicated security testing of KernelSU integration points.

Mitigation Strategy: Module Verification for KernelSU Modules (If Applicable)

  • Description:

    1. Digital Signing of KernelSU Modules: If the application utilizes KernelSU modules, implement a system to digitally sign these modules to ensure their authenticity and integrity.
    2. Verification of Module Signatures by Application/KernelSU: Implement verification logic within the application or leverage KernelSU's capabilities (if available) to verify the digital signatures of loaded KernelSU modules before they are executed.
    3. Trusted Module Source for KernelSU: Establish a trusted source or repository for KernelSU modules. Only load modules from this trusted source and reject modules from untrusted or unknown origins to prevent loading of malicious modules.
    4. Secure Distribution of KernelSU Modules: Ensure that KernelSU modules are distributed securely to prevent tampering or unauthorized modifications during distribution.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Malicious KernelSU Module Loading (High Severity): If the application or KernelSU integration allows loading of unsigned or untrusted KernelSU modules, attackers could load malicious modules to gain elevated privileges or compromise the system via KernelSU.
    • Compromised KernelSU Modules (Medium to High Severity): If KernelSU modules are not verified, attackers could potentially replace legitimate modules with compromised versions to execute malicious code within the KernelSU context.

  • Impact:

    • Malicious KernelSU Module Loading: High Reduction
    • Compromised KernelSU Modules: Medium to High Reduction

  • Currently Implemented: Hypothetical Application - KernelSU modules are not heavily used, and no module verification is implemented.

  • Missing Implementation: Hypothetical Application - If KernelSU modules become a significant part of the application's functionality, robust module verification mechanisms, including signing and signature verification, must be implemented to prevent loading of malicious or compromised KernelSU modules.