Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
110 lines (98 loc) · 9.97 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

110 lines (98 loc) · 9.97 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for touchlab/kermit

Objective: Compromise Application via Kermit Exploitation

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application via Kermit Exploitation [CRITICAL NODE]
├───(OR)─ Exploit Information Disclosure via Logs [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   ├───(OR)─ Insecure Log Storage/Access [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   └─── Access Log Files Directly (e.g., file system access, exposed directory) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │       └─── Exploit Weak File Permissions on Log Files [CRITICAL NODE]
├───(OR)─ Exploit Kermit Configuration Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   ├─── Overly Verbose Logging Configuration [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   └─── Capture Sensitive Data Logged Unnecessarily [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   └─── Insecure Sink Configuration [CRITICAL NODE]
│       └─── Misconfigured File Sink (e.g., world-readable log files) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│           └─── Access World-Readable Log Files [CRITICAL NODE]
├───(OR)─ Exploit Vulnerabilities in Custom Kermit Sinks (If Used)
│   └─── Analyze and Exploit Custom Sink Implementation Flaws
│       ├─── Code Injection in Custom Sink Logic [CRITICAL NODE]
│       └─── Buffer Overflow in Custom Sink Handling [CRITICAL NODE]

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Weak File Permissions on Log Files [CRITICAL NODE, Part of HIGH-RISK PATH: Exploit Information Disclosure via Logs -> Insecure Log Storage/Access -> Access Log Files Directly]

  • Attack Vector: Weak file permissions on log files allow unauthorized access and reading of sensitive information contained within the logs.
  • Attack Steps:
    1. Identify Log Storage Location: Determine the file system path where Kermit logs are stored.
    2. Check File Permissions: Attempt to access log files with unauthorized credentials or by exploiting system vulnerabilities to gain file system access.
    3. Exploit Weak Permissions: If file permissions are overly permissive (e.g., world-readable), directly access and read the log files.
    4. Extract Sensitive Information: Search the log files for sensitive data logged by the application through Kermit.
  • Risk Factors:
    • Likelihood: Medium (Common misconfiguration, especially in default setups).
    • Impact: Medium-High (Sensitive data exposure, potential credential leaks, system information disclosure).
    • Effort: Low (Simple file system access, readily available tools).
    • Skill Level: Low (Basic operating system knowledge).
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Depends on file access monitoring capabilities).
  • Mitigation:
    • Implement strict file permissions on log files and directories.
    • Ensure only authorized users and processes have read access.
    • Regularly audit file permissions on log storage locations.

Attack Tree Path: Overly Verbose Logging Configuration [CRITICAL NODE, Part of HIGH-RISK PATH: Exploit Kermit Configuration Vulnerabilities -> Capture Sensitive Data Logged Unnecessarily]

  • Attack Vector: Kermit is configured to log an excessive amount of detail, including sensitive information that is not necessary for operational purposes, increasing the risk of accidental exposure.
  • Attack Steps:
    1. Review Kermit Configuration: Analyze the application's Kermit configuration to identify the level of logging verbosity and the types of data being logged.
    2. Identify Sensitive Data Logging: Determine if sensitive information (credentials, PII, secrets, internal system details) is being logged unnecessarily due to verbose configuration.
    3. Access Logs (Insecurely): Gain unauthorized access to logs through insecure storage or access mechanisms (as described in other attack vectors).
    4. Capture Sensitive Data: Extract the unnecessarily logged sensitive data from the logs.
  • Risk Factors:
    • Likelihood: Medium-High (Common in development environments and sometimes carried over to production).
    • Impact: Medium-High (Sensitive data exposure, potential for identity theft, data breaches).
    • Effort: Low (Configuration review, log access is often the primary effort).
    • Skill Level: Low (Basic configuration understanding).
    • Detection Difficulty: Low (Configuration review and log content analysis can easily reveal verbose logging).
  • Mitigation:
    • Minimize the amount of data logged to only essential information.
    • Avoid logging sensitive data directly.
    • Implement redaction or sanitization for sensitive data that must be logged.
    • Regularly review and adjust logging configurations to maintain minimal verbosity.

Attack Tree Path: Access World-Readable Log Files [CRITICAL NODE, Part of HIGH-RISK PATH: Exploit Kermit Configuration Vulnerabilities -> Insecure Sink Configuration -> Misconfigured File Sink]

  • Attack Vector: Kermit is configured to write logs to files with overly permissive permissions (world-readable), allowing any user on the system to access and read the logs. This is a specific instance of weak file permissions arising from sink misconfiguration.
  • Attack Steps:
    1. Identify File Sink Configuration: Determine if Kermit is configured to use a file sink and the location of the log files.
    2. Check File Permissions (Sink Output): Verify the file permissions of the log files created by the file sink.
    3. Exploit World-Readable Permissions: If log files are world-readable, any user (including attackers who gain minimal access to the system) can directly read the log files.
    4. Extract Sensitive Information: Search the log files for sensitive data logged by the application.
  • Risk Factors:
    • Likelihood: Medium (Common misconfiguration, especially in simpler deployments or quick setups).
    • Impact: Medium-High (Sensitive data exposure, similar to weak file permissions in general).
    • Effort: Low (File system access, permission checks are straightforward).
    • Skill Level: Low (Basic operating system knowledge).
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium (File permission audits can detect world-readable files).
  • Mitigation:
    • Configure file sinks to create log files with restricted permissions.
    • Ensure only the application process and authorized users can read the log files.
    • Regularly review file sink configurations and output file permissions.

Attack Tree Path: Code Injection in Custom Sink Logic & Buffer Overflow in Custom Sink Handling [CRITICAL NODES, Part of HIGH-RISK PATH: Exploit Vulnerabilities in Custom Kermit Sinks -> Analyze and Exploit Custom Sink Implementation Flaws]

  • Attack Vector: If the application uses custom-developed Kermit sinks, these sinks might contain vulnerabilities such as code injection flaws or buffer overflows due to insecure coding practices.
  • Attack Steps (Code Injection):
    1. Identify Custom Sinks: Determine if the application utilizes custom Kermit sinks.
    2. Analyze Custom Sink Code: Reverse engineer or analyze the code of the custom sink to understand its logic and identify potential vulnerabilities.
    3. Identify Injection Points: Look for areas in the custom sink code where external input (e.g., log messages, configuration data) is processed without proper sanitization or validation, potentially leading to code injection.
    4. Craft Malicious Input: Create crafted log messages or input that, when processed by the vulnerable custom sink, will inject and execute arbitrary code.
    5. Exploit Code Injection: Trigger the logging of the malicious message to execute injected code and compromise the application or system.
  • Attack Steps (Buffer Overflow):
    1. Identify Custom Sinks: Same as above.
    2. Analyze Custom Sink Code: Same as above.
    3. Identify Buffer Handling Flaws: Look for areas in the custom sink code where fixed-size buffers are used to handle log data or other input, without proper bounds checking.
    4. Craft Overflow Input: Create log messages or input that exceed the buffer size in the custom sink.
    5. Exploit Buffer Overflow: Trigger the logging of the overflow input to cause a buffer overflow, potentially leading to system crashes or, in more sophisticated attacks, code execution.
  • Risk Factors (Both Code Injection & Buffer Overflow):
    • Likelihood: Low (Requires custom sink implementation and coding errors, less common than configuration issues).
    • Impact: High (Full system compromise, arbitrary code execution, data breaches, denial of service).
    • Effort: High (Reverse engineering, vulnerability analysis, exploit development requires significant effort and time).
    • Skill Level: High (Requires deep understanding of software security, reverse engineering, exploit development techniques).
    • Detection Difficulty: High (Code injection and buffer overflows in custom components can be subtle and difficult to detect without thorough code analysis and runtime monitoring).
  • Mitigation:
    • Avoid developing custom Kermit sinks if possible. Use standard, well-vetted sinks.
    • If custom sinks are necessary, follow secure coding practices rigorously.
    • Implement robust input validation and sanitization in custom sink code.
    • Perform thorough security code reviews and penetration testing of custom sink implementations.
    • Utilize memory-safe programming languages or techniques to minimize buffer overflow risks.