Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
154 lines (114 loc) · 18 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

154 lines (114 loc) · 18 KB

Deep Security Analysis of RIBs Framework

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

This deep analysis aims to provide a thorough security assessment of the RIBs (Router, Interactor, Builder Service) framework, as described in the provided security design review. The objective is to identify potential security vulnerabilities inherent in the framework's design and implementation, as well as security risks associated with its usage in mobile application development. The analysis will focus on understanding the architecture, components, and data flow of RIBs to pinpoint specific security considerations and recommend actionable mitigation strategies.

Scope:

The scope of this analysis is limited to the RIBs framework as described in the provided security design review document and the publicly available GitHub repository (https://github.com/uber/ribs). It encompasses the following key areas:

  • Core RIBs Library: Security implications of the framework's core components (Routers, Interactors, Builders, etc.) and their interactions.
  • Example Applications and Documentation: Security considerations related to the provided examples and documentation as they influence developer understanding and secure usage of the framework.
  • Integration with Mobile Platforms (Android & iOS): Security aspects of RIBs' reliance on and interaction with Android and iOS SDKs and platform security features.
  • Build and Deployment Processes: Security considerations within the typical CI/CD pipeline used for building and deploying RIBs-based applications.
  • Identified Security Controls and Risks: Analysis of the existing and recommended security controls, and accepted risks outlined in the security design review.

This analysis will not cover:

  • Security vulnerabilities within specific applications built using RIBs (unless directly related to framework misuse).
  • Detailed code-level vulnerability analysis of the entire RIBs codebase (SAST/DAST findings are recommended separately).
  • Security of the underlying Android and iOS platforms themselves, except where directly relevant to RIBs usage.
  • Business logic security of applications built with RIBs.

Methodology:

This analysis will employ the following methodology:

  1. Document Review: In-depth review of the provided security design review document, focusing on business posture, security posture, design diagrams (C4 Context, Container, Deployment, Build), risk assessment, and questions/assumptions.
  2. Architecture Inference: Based on the design review and general knowledge of mobile application architectures and the RIBs naming convention (Router, Interactor, Builder), infer the likely architecture, component interactions, and data flow within a RIBs application.
  3. Component-Based Security Analysis: Break down the RIBs framework into its key components (as identified in the design review and inferred architecture) and analyze the security implications of each component. This will include considering potential vulnerabilities, attack vectors, and data security concerns.
  4. Threat Modeling (Implicit): While not explicitly creating a formal threat model, the analysis will implicitly identify potential threats and vulnerabilities by considering how an attacker might exploit weaknesses in the RIBs framework or its usage.
  5. Mitigation Strategy Development: For each identified security implication, develop specific, actionable, and tailored mitigation strategies applicable to the RIBs framework and its development lifecycle. These strategies will be aligned with the recommended security controls in the design review.
  6. Tailored Recommendations: Ensure all security considerations and recommendations are specific to the RIBs framework and its context, avoiding generic security advice.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Based on the design review and inferred RIBs architecture, the key components and their security implications are analyzed below:

2.1. Core RIBs Library:

  • Security Implication: Vulnerabilities within the core RIBs library directly impact all applications built upon it. A flaw in the framework's routing logic, inter-component communication, or lifecycle management could be exploited to compromise applications.
    • Example Threat: A vulnerability in the RIBs router could allow an attacker to bypass intended navigation flows and access restricted parts of the application.
    • Example Threat: Improper handling of inter-actor communication could lead to data leakage or unauthorized access to sensitive information within the application's business logic.
  • Security Implication: Complexity of the framework can lead to developer errors and misconfigurations, introducing vulnerabilities in applications. If the framework is not easy to understand and use securely, developers might unintentionally create security weaknesses.
    • Example Threat: Developers might misuse RIBs lifecycle methods, leading to resource leaks or insecure state management.
    • Example Threat: Incorrect implementation of inter-RIB communication could create unintended data sharing or access control bypasses.
  • Security Implication: Reliance on platform APIs (Android/iOS SDKs) means RIBs applications inherit platform security characteristics and potential vulnerabilities. While RIBs itself might not introduce platform vulnerabilities, it needs to be designed to work securely with platform APIs and not circumvent platform security features.
    • Example Threat: If RIBs encourages patterns that bypass Android/iOS permission models, it could lead to applications with excessive privileges.
    • Example Threat: If RIBs doesn't properly handle platform-specific security updates or changes, applications might become vulnerable over time.

2.2. Example Applications:

  • Security Implication: Example applications serve as learning resources. If they demonstrate insecure coding practices or framework misuse, developers might replicate these vulnerabilities in their own applications.
    • Example Threat: Example applications might not showcase proper input validation or secure data handling, leading developers to overlook these aspects in their projects.
    • Example Threat: If example applications use outdated or vulnerable dependencies, developers might unknowingly include these in their applications.
  • Security Implication: Example applications themselves could contain vulnerabilities. While intended for demonstration, they are still code and could be targeted or misused if they contain exploitable flaws.
    • Example Threat: An example application might have a hardcoded API key or a publicly accessible debug endpoint, which could be exploited if deployed unintentionally.

2.3. Documentation:

  • Security Implication: Incomplete, inaccurate, or missing security guidance in the documentation can lead to developers using RIBs insecurely. Documentation is crucial for developers to understand best practices and avoid common pitfalls.
    • Example Threat: If documentation doesn't emphasize input validation within RIBs components, developers might neglect this critical security measure.
    • Example Threat: Lack of guidance on secure data handling and cryptography within RIBs applications could lead to insecure data storage and transmission.
  • Security Implication: Outdated documentation might not reflect the latest security best practices or framework updates, potentially leading to developers using outdated and insecure approaches.

2.4. Android/iOS Platform APIs:

  • Security Implication: RIBs applications rely on the security of the underlying Android and iOS platforms. Vulnerabilities in these platforms can indirectly affect RIBs applications.
    • Example Threat: A vulnerability in the Android or iOS operating system could be exploited by an attacker to compromise a RIBs application running on a vulnerable device.
  • Security Implication: Improper usage of platform APIs within RIBs or applications can introduce vulnerabilities. Developers need to understand platform security best practices and use APIs securely.
    • Example Threat: Incorrectly using Android Intent system could lead to unintended data exposure or privilege escalation.
    • Example Threat: Misusing iOS Keychain services could result in insecure storage of sensitive credentials.

2.5. Build Tools (Gradle, Xcode) & Dependency Repositories (Maven, CocoaPods):

  • Security Implication: Vulnerabilities in build tools or dependencies can be injected into RIBs applications during the build process. Compromised dependencies or build tools can lead to supply chain attacks.
    • Example Threat: A malicious dependency in Maven or CocoaPods could be included in a RIBs application, introducing malware or vulnerabilities.
    • Example Threat: A compromised Gradle plugin or Xcode build script could inject malicious code into the application during compilation.
  • Security Implication: Insecure configuration of build tools or dependency management can expose sensitive information or create vulnerabilities.
    • Example Threat: Storing secrets (API keys, signing certificates) directly in build scripts or version control can lead to exposure.
    • Example Threat: Using insecure or outdated versions of build tools or dependencies can introduce known vulnerabilities.

2.6. CI/CD Pipeline Components (Source Code Repository, Build Server, Artifact Repository):

  • Security Implication: Compromise of CI/CD pipeline components can lead to unauthorized code changes, malicious builds, and distribution of compromised applications.
    • Example Threat: An attacker gaining access to the Source Code Repository (GitHub) could inject malicious code into the RIBs framework or applications.
    • Example Threat: Compromising the Build Server (GitHub Actions Runner) could allow an attacker to manipulate the build process and create backdoored application artifacts.
    • Example Threat: Unauthorized access to the Artifact Repository could allow an attacker to replace legitimate application builds with malicious ones.
  • Security Implication: Insecure configuration or practices within the CI/CD pipeline can introduce vulnerabilities.
    • Example Threat: Weak access controls to CI/CD systems or repositories can allow unauthorized access.
    • Example Threat: Storing secrets insecurely within the CI/CD pipeline can lead to exposure.
    • Example Threat: Lack of integrity checks on build artifacts can allow for tampering without detection.

3. Actionable and Tailored Mitigation Strategies

Based on the identified security implications, here are actionable and tailored mitigation strategies for the RIBs framework and its ecosystem:

For the RIBs Framework Development Team (Uber):

  • 3.1. Proactive Security Scanning (Recommended Security Control - Automated Security Scanning):

    • Action: Implement automated Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dependency Check tools within the RIBs framework's CI/CD pipeline.
    • Tailoring: Configure SAST tools to specifically analyze Kotlin (Android) and Swift/Objective-C (iOS) codebases, focusing on common mobile vulnerabilities (e.g., injection flaws, insecure data handling, logic errors). Integrate dependency scanning to identify vulnerable libraries used by RIBs.
    • Actionable: Integrate tools like SonarQube, Checkmarx (SAST), and OWASP Dependency-Check into GitHub Actions workflows for the RIBs repository. Fail builds on high-severity findings and establish a process for triaging and fixing identified vulnerabilities.

  • 3.2. Regular Security Audits (Recommended Security Control - Regular Security Audits):

    • Action: Conduct periodic security audits of the RIBs framework codebase by reputable external security experts.
    • Tailoring: Focus audits on architectural security, code review of critical components (router, interactor communication), and penetration testing of example applications. Audits should specifically assess for vulnerabilities that could be inherited by applications built with RIBs.
    • Actionable: Schedule annual security audits with a specialized mobile security firm. Ensure audit findings are documented, prioritized, and remediated in a timely manner.

  • 3.3. Secure Development Guidelines (Recommended Security Control - Secure Development Guidelines):

    • Action: Establish and publish comprehensive secure development guidelines specifically for contributors to the RIBs framework.
    • Tailoring: Guidelines should cover secure coding practices relevant to mobile development and the RIBs architecture, including input validation, secure data handling, secure inter-component communication, and platform API security best practices. Include specific examples and recommendations within the context of RIBs components (Routers, Interactors, Builders).
    • Actionable: Create a dedicated "Security Guidelines" section in the RIBs documentation. Mandate adherence to these guidelines for all code contributions. Provide security training to contributors (see below).

  • 3.4. Vulnerability Disclosure Program (Recommended Security Control - Vulnerability Disclosure Program):

    • Action: Implement a clear and easily accessible vulnerability disclosure program for the RIBs framework.
    • Tailoring: Provide a dedicated email address or platform for security researchers and the community to report potential security issues responsibly. Define a clear process for acknowledging, investigating, and resolving reported vulnerabilities. Publicly acknowledge reporters (with their consent) to encourage community participation.
    • Actionable: Create a SECURITY.md file in the RIBs GitHub repository with clear instructions on how to report vulnerabilities. Establish an internal security team process for handling vulnerability reports.

  • 3.5. Security Training for Contributors (Recommended Security Control - Security Training for Contributors):

    • Action: Provide security training to all contributors to the RIBs framework.
    • Tailoring: Training should focus on common mobile security vulnerabilities, secure coding practices, and the specific security considerations within the RIBs architecture. Include hands-on exercises and code examples relevant to RIBs development.
    • Actionable: Develop a security training module for new contributors. Conduct periodic security awareness sessions for the development team.

  • 3.6. Enhance Documentation with Security Best Practices:

    • Action: Proactively incorporate security best practices and guidance throughout the RIBs documentation.
    • Tailoring: Include sections on secure data handling within RIBs applications, input validation strategies for different RIB components, secure communication patterns, and platform-specific security considerations. Provide code examples demonstrating secure implementations within the RIBs framework.
    • Actionable: Review existing documentation and add security-focused content. Create dedicated documentation pages or sections on security best practices for RIBs developers.

  • 3.7. Secure Example Applications:

    • Action: Ensure example applications included in the RIBs repository are developed with security in mind and demonstrate secure coding practices.
    • Tailoring: Review example applications for common vulnerabilities (e.g., hardcoded secrets, insecure data handling). Update examples to showcase input validation, secure data storage, and other relevant security measures within the RIBs context.
    • Actionable: Conduct security reviews of example applications. Include security considerations as part of the example application development process.

For Developers Using the RIBs Framework:

  • 3.8. Secure Application Development Practices:

    • Action: Developers using RIBs must adhere to general secure mobile application development practices.
    • Tailoring: This includes implementing robust authentication and authorization mechanisms, comprehensive input validation at all application boundaries (especially within Interactors and Routers handling user input), using strong cryptography for sensitive data, and following platform-specific security guidelines (Android and iOS).
    • Actionable: Integrate security checks (SAST, DAST, dependency scanning) into the CI/CD pipeline of applications built with RIBs. Conduct regular security code reviews and penetration testing of applications.

  • 3.9. Dependency Management and Vulnerability Scanning:

    • Action: Carefully manage dependencies used in RIBs applications and regularly scan for vulnerabilities.
    • Tailoring: Use dependency management tools (Gradle dependency management, CocoaPods) to track and update dependencies. Integrate dependency vulnerability scanning tools into the application's CI/CD pipeline to identify and address vulnerable libraries.
    • Actionable: Use tools like OWASP Dependency-Check or Snyk to scan application dependencies. Establish a process for monitoring and updating dependencies to address reported vulnerabilities.

  • 3.10. Secure Build Pipeline for Applications:

    • Action: Secure the CI/CD pipeline used to build RIBs applications.
    • Tailoring: Implement strong access controls for CI/CD systems and repositories. Securely manage secrets (API keys, signing certificates) used in the build process (using dedicated secret management tools). Implement build artifact integrity checks.
    • Actionable: Use secure CI/CD platforms (e.g., GitHub Actions with best practices), implement role-based access control, use tools like HashiCorp Vault or AWS Secrets Manager for secret management, and implement checksum verification for build artifacts.

By implementing these tailored mitigation strategies, both the RIBs framework development team and developers using RIBs can significantly enhance the security posture of the framework and applications built upon it, mitigating the identified risks and fostering a more secure mobile development ecosystem.