Objective: Compromise Application via Translation Plugin
Attack Goal: Compromise Application via Translation Plugin [HIGH-RISK PATH START]
└── 1. Exploit Vulnerabilities in Plugin Code/Logic **[CRITICAL NODE]**
├── 1.1. Code Injection Vulnerabilities **[CRITICAL NODE]** **[HIGH-RISK PATH START]**
│ ├── 1.1.1. Translation Data Injection **[CRITICAL NODE]** **[HIGH-RISK PATH START]**
│ │ ├── 1.1.1.1. Malicious Code in Translation Files **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
│ │ ├── 1.1.1.2. Database Injection (if DB storage) **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
│ ├── 1.2.3. SQL Injection (if Database Driven) **[CRITICAL NODE]** **[HIGH-RISK PATH START]**
│ │ ├── 1.2.3.1. SQL Injection in Translation Key Lookup **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
│ ├── 1.3. Logic/Design Flaws **[CRITICAL NODE]**
│ │ ├── 1.3.1. Insecure Translation Storage **[CRITICAL NODE]**
│ │ ├── 1.3.2. Insecure Configuration Management **[CRITICAL NODE]**
└── 2. Exploit Dependencies/Environment (Less Plugin-Specific, but relevant)
├── 2.1. Vulnerable Dependencies **[CRITICAL NODE]** **[HIGH-RISK PATH START]**
│ ├── 2.1.1. Outdated Libraries **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Vulnerabilities in Plugin Code/Logic [CRITICAL NODE]:
- Attack Vector: This is a broad category encompassing vulnerabilities within the plugin's code itself.
- Breakdown: If the plugin code has flaws in how it processes data, handles requests, or manages its internal state, attackers can exploit these flaws to compromise the application.
- Impact: Can lead to a wide range of issues, from information disclosure to complete application takeover.
- Mitigation: Secure coding practices, thorough code reviews, static and dynamic code analysis, and regular security testing are crucial.
- Attack Vector: Exploiting situations where the plugin interprets data as code, allowing attackers to inject and execute their own malicious code.
- Breakdown: If the plugin doesn't properly sanitize or validate data before processing it as code (e.g., in
eval()
-like functions or insecure file processing), attackers can inject malicious scripts or commands. - Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), allowing attackers to fully control the server and application.
- Mitigation: Avoid interpreting data as code whenever possible. If necessary, use secure code execution methods with strict input validation and sanitization.
- Attack Vector: Injecting malicious code directly into translation data, which is then processed and potentially executed by the plugin.
- Breakdown: Attackers can modify translation files or database entries to include malicious payloads (e.g., PHP, JavaScript, shell commands). If the plugin processes this data without proper sanitization, the injected code will be executed.
- Impact: RCE, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), application defacement, data manipulation.
- Mitigation:
-
Input Sanitization: Strictly sanitize and validate all translation data upon input and storage.
-
Output Encoding: Properly encode translation data when outputting it to web pages to prevent XSS.
-
Principle of Least Privilege: Avoid executing or interpreting translation data as code.
-
Secure Storage: Protect translation files and databases from unauthorized modification.
-
1.1.1.1. Malicious Code in Translation Files [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
- Attack Vector: Directly modifying translation files (if file-based storage) to inject malicious code.
- Exploitation: If translation files are stored in world-writable locations or accessible through other vulnerabilities, attackers can modify them. If the plugin then processes these files and executes the content, the injected code runs.
- Impact: RCE, application compromise.
- Mitigation: Secure file permissions, file integrity monitoring, input sanitization by the plugin.
-
1.1.1.2. Database Injection (if DB storage) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
- Attack Vector: Injecting malicious code into translation database entries.
- Exploitation: If the database is vulnerable to SQL injection or if attackers gain database access through other means, they can modify translation entries to include malicious code. If the plugin retrieves and executes this data, the injected code runs.
- Impact: RCE, database compromise, application compromise.
- Mitigation: SQL injection prevention (parameterized queries), database access control, input sanitization by the plugin.
-
- Attack Vector: Exploiting SQL injection vulnerabilities in database queries used by the plugin, particularly when looking up translations.
- Breakdown: If the plugin constructs SQL queries dynamically using user-controlled input (e.g., translation keys, language codes) without proper sanitization or parameterization, attackers can inject malicious SQL code.
- Impact: Database compromise, data breach, potential application takeover, authentication bypass.
- Mitigation:
-
Parameterized Queries/Prepared Statements: Use parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database interactions.
-
Input Validation: Validate and sanitize user input used in database queries.
-
Principle of Least Privilege: Limit database user permissions to the minimum required.
-
Web Application Firewall (WAF): Deploy a WAF to detect and block SQL injection attempts.
-
1.2.3.1. SQL Injection in Translation Key Lookup [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
- Attack Vector: Specifically targeting SQL injection vulnerabilities in queries that retrieve translations based on keys or language codes provided by the application or user requests.
- Exploitation: Attackers manipulate translation keys or language codes in requests. If the plugin uses these inputs directly in SQL queries without proper sanitization, they can inject SQL code.
- Impact: Database compromise, data breach, potential application takeover.
- Mitigation: Parameterized queries for translation lookups, input validation of translation keys and language codes.
-
Attack Tree Path: 1.3. Logic/Design Flaws [CRITICAL NODE]:
-
Attack Vector: Exploiting inherent weaknesses in the plugin's design or implementation logic.
-
Breakdown: Flaws in how the plugin is designed or implemented can create vulnerabilities even if individual code components seem secure. This can include insecure storage, weak configuration management, or flawed access control.
-
Impact: Varies depending on the specific flaw, but can range from information disclosure to full system compromise.
-
Mitigation: Secure design principles, threat modeling during design phase, thorough security reviews of the plugin's architecture and logic.
-
1.3.1. Insecure Translation Storage [CRITICAL NODE]:
- Attack Vector: Exploiting insecure storage of translation files or data.
- Breakdown: If translation files are stored in publicly accessible locations, with weak permissions, or without proper integrity checks, attackers can access, modify, or replace them with malicious content.
- Impact: Information disclosure, translation data manipulation, code injection (if files are executed).
- Mitigation: Store translation files outside the web root, use secure file permissions, implement file integrity monitoring.
-
1.3.2. Insecure Configuration Management [CRITICAL NODE]:
- Attack Vector: Exploiting insecure handling of plugin configuration files.
- Breakdown: If configuration files are stored insecurely (e.g., publicly accessible, world-writable) or if the plugin parses configuration data insecurely, attackers can modify configurations to compromise the plugin or application. This is especially critical if configuration files store sensitive information like database credentials.
- Impact: Plugin misconfiguration, sensitive information disclosure (e.g., database credentials), application compromise.
- Mitigation: Store configuration files outside the web root, use secure file permissions, encrypt sensitive data in configuration files, secure parsing of configuration data.
-
- Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in external libraries or the environment that the plugin depends on.
- Breakdown: Plugins often rely on third-party libraries. If these libraries have known vulnerabilities, and the plugin uses vulnerable versions or functions, attackers can exploit these vulnerabilities through the plugin. Server misconfigurations can also create vulnerabilities.
- Impact: Varies depending on the vulnerability, but can range from Denial of Service (DoS) to Remote Code Execution (RCE).
- Mitigation:
-
Dependency Management: Maintain an inventory of plugin dependencies, regularly update dependencies to the latest secure versions, use dependency vulnerability scanning tools.
-
Server Hardening: Follow server hardening best practices, secure file permissions, restrict web server access, regularly patch the server operating system and web server software.
-
2.1. Vulnerable Dependencies [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH START]:
-
Attack Vector: Specifically targeting vulnerabilities in outdated or insecure libraries used by the plugin.
-
Exploitation: Attackers identify known vulnerabilities in the plugin's dependencies. If the plugin uses vulnerable versions of these libraries, attackers can exploit these vulnerabilities to compromise the application.
-
Impact: Varies depending on the dependency vulnerability, but can include RCE, DoS, information disclosure.
-
Mitigation: Regular dependency updates, vulnerability scanning of dependencies, using dependency management tools.
-
2.1.1. Outdated Libraries [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
- Attack Vector: Using outdated versions of external libraries that have known security vulnerabilities.
- Exploitation: Attackers know about vulnerabilities in older versions of libraries. If the plugin uses these outdated libraries, it becomes vulnerable to these known exploits.
- Impact: Varies depending on the library vulnerability, can be RCE, DoS, information disclosure.
- Mitigation: Keep dependencies up-to-date, use automated dependency update tools, regularly scan for dependency vulnerabilities.
-
-