Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
35 lines (30 loc) · 3.53 KB

File metadata and controls

35 lines (30 loc) · 3.53 KB

Threat Model Analysis for yiiguxing/translationplugin

  • Threat: Malicious Translation Content Injection (Cross-Site Scripting - XSS)
  • Description: An attacker injects malicious JavaScript code into translation strings. This could happen if the plugin or backend lacks proper input validation and sanitization. When a user views content with these translations, the injected JavaScript executes in their browser.
  • Impact:
    • User session hijacking, leading to unauthorized access to user accounts.
    • Data theft, including sensitive user information or application data.
    • Website defacement, damaging the application's reputation.
    • Redirection to malicious websites, potentially leading to malware infections.
  • Affected Component: Translation data storage (backend), Translation display logic (frontend plugin).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Input Validation: Implement robust server-side input validation to sanitize all translation input before storing it. Escape HTML characters and filter out potentially malicious code.
    • Context-Aware Output Encoding: Encode translations appropriately when displaying them in the web application. Use HTML entity encoding in HTML contexts and JavaScript escaping in JavaScript contexts.
    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strict CSP to limit the sources from which the browser can load resources, reducing the impact of XSS attacks.
    • Access Control: Restrict access to translation modification features to authorized users only using strong authentication and authorization mechanisms to prevent unauthorized injection.
  • Threat: Dependency Vulnerabilities
  • Description: The translationplugin might rely on third-party JavaScript libraries that contain known security vulnerabilities. If these vulnerabilities are critical, exploiting them could directly compromise the plugin and consequently the application.
  • Impact:
    • Potential for critical attacks depending on the specific vulnerability in the dependency, including Remote Code Execution (RCE), XSS, or other severe exploits.
    • Full compromise of the plugin's functionality and security.
    • Potential for wider application compromise if the plugin is deeply integrated and the vulnerability allows for escalation.
  • Affected Component: Third-party JavaScript libraries used by the plugin, Plugin's dependency management.
  • Risk Severity: High (can escalate to Critical depending on the specific vulnerability)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Dependency Scanning: Regularly scan the plugin's dependencies for known vulnerabilities using automated tools (e.g., npm audit, yarn audit, OWASP Dependency-Check).
    • Dependency Updates: Keep all dependencies up-to-date with the latest security patches and versions. Prioritize updating dependencies with known critical vulnerabilities.
    • Vulnerability Monitoring: Subscribe to security advisories and monitor vulnerability databases for any newly discovered vulnerabilities in the plugin's dependencies.
    • Dependency Review: Review the plugin's dependencies and assess the risk associated with each. Consider replacing high-risk or unnecessary dependencies if safer alternatives exist.