Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
63 lines (54 loc) · 7.37 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

63 lines (54 loc) · 7.37 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for yiiguxing/translationplugin

Attack Surface: Untrusted Input to Translation Engine (Plugin Vulnerabilities)

  • Description: User-supplied or externally-sourced text is passed to the translation plugin, and the plugin itself contains vulnerabilities exploitable through this input. This is distinct from vulnerabilities in the host application or the translation service.
    • Translation Plugin Contribution: The plugin's code directly handles the input and may have flaws (e.g., buffer overflows, format string bugs, improper handling of character encodings) that can be triggered by malicious input.
    • Example: The plugin has a vulnerability in how it parses a specific language's character encoding or handles certain Unicode control characters. An attacker crafts a specially designed input string that exploits this vulnerability, leading to code execution within the plugin's context.
    • Impact: Code Injection (in the plugin), Denial of Service (crashing the plugin), Potential privilege escalation (depending on the plugin's permissions).
    • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the nature of the vulnerability).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Developer:
        • Plugin Code Review: If the plugin's source code is available, conduct a thorough security code review, focusing on input handling, string manipulation, and error handling.
        • Static Analysis: Use static analysis tools to automatically scan the plugin's code for potential vulnerabilities.
        • Fuzz Testing: Employ fuzz testing techniques to provide the plugin with a wide range of unexpected inputs and identify potential crashes or vulnerabilities.
        • Regular Updates: Keep the plugin updated to the latest version to benefit from security patches provided by the plugin's maintainers.
        • Input Validation (Defense-in-Depth): Even though the host application should be primarily responsible for input validation, the plugin should also perform its own input validation as a defense-in-depth measure. This can help mitigate vulnerabilities that might be missed in the host application's validation.
      • User:
        • Plugin Updates: Ensure the plugin is updated to the latest version.

Attack Surface: API Key Exposure (Plugin Mismanagement)

  • Description: The API key used to access the translation service is exposed due to improper handling within the plugin itself or its immediate configuration.
    • Translation Plugin Contribution: The plugin is responsible for securely storing and using the API key. Vulnerabilities or misconfigurations within the plugin can lead to key exposure.
    • Example: The plugin stores the API key in a plain text configuration file that is world-readable, or it accidentally logs the API key to a file or console. An attacker with access to the system (or even a less-privileged user) can retrieve the key.
    • Impact: Financial loss (if the translation service charges per request), Denial of Service (if the API key is blocked due to overuse or misuse), Reputational damage.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Developer:
        • Secure Key Storage (Plugin-Specific): Review the plugin's code and documentation to ensure it handles API keys securely. If the plugin stores the key itself (which is generally discouraged), it should use appropriate encryption and access controls. Report any insecure key handling practices to the plugin's maintainers.
        • Minimal Logging (Plugin-Specific): Ensure the plugin itself does not log the API key or any other sensitive information.
      • User:
        • Configuration Review: Carefully review the plugin's configuration instructions and ensure the API key is stored securely according to best practices (e.g., using environment variables, a secure configuration file with restricted permissions). Never store the API key in a location accessible from the web.

Attack Surface: Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks (Plugin-Level)

  • Description: An attacker intercepts the communication between the plugin and the translation service due to vulnerabilities within the plugin's network communication handling.
    • Translation Plugin Contribution: The plugin is directly responsible for establishing and maintaining the secure connection to the translation service. If it fails to use HTTPS or properly validate TLS certificates, it's vulnerable.
    • Example: The plugin uses an outdated or vulnerable TLS library, disables certificate verification, or incorrectly implements HTTPS. An attacker can then intercept and modify the communication.
    • Impact: Data modification, Data theft, Injection of malicious content.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Developer:
        • Enforce HTTPS (Plugin-Specific): Ensure the plugin always uses HTTPS for communication with the translation service. Hardcode HTTPS URLs and do not allow fallback to HTTP.
        • Certificate Validation (Plugin-Specific): Implement strict TLS certificate validation within the plugin's code. Verify the certificate's validity, revocation status, and that it's issued by a trusted CA. Do not provide options to disable certificate verification. Use up-to-date TLS libraries.
      • User:
        • Plugin Updates: Keep the plugin updated to the latest version, as updates often include security fixes for network communication.

Attack Surface: Vulnerabilities in Plugin Dependencies

  • Description: The plugin relies on external libraries that may contain security vulnerabilities.
    • Translation Plugin Contribution: The plugin's functionality and security are directly tied to the security of its dependencies.
    • Example: A dependency used for making HTTP requests has a known vulnerability that allows for remote code execution. An attacker exploits this vulnerability through the plugin.
    • Impact: Varies depending on the vulnerability in the dependency (e.g., code execution, data leakage, denial of service).
    • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the vulnerability).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Developer:
        • Dependency Scanning: Use software composition analysis (SCA) tools or dependency scanning tools to identify known vulnerabilities in the plugin's dependencies.
        • Regular Updates: Keep all dependencies updated to their latest versions.
        • Dependency Pinning: Consider pinning dependency versions to prevent unexpected updates that might introduce new vulnerabilities or break compatibility. However, balance this with the need to apply security updates.
        • Vulnerability Monitoring: Subscribe to security advisories for the plugin and its dependencies.
      • User:
        • Plugin Updates: Keep the plugin itself updated to the latest version, as updates often include dependency updates.