Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
46 lines (37 loc) · 5.61 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

46 lines (37 loc) · 5.61 KB

Threat Model Analysis for yiiguxing/translationplugin

Threat: API Key Exposure

  • Description: An attacker gains access to the API keys used by the plugin to communicate with translation services. This is a direct threat to the plugin because it likely handles the storage and use of these keys. The attacker could achieve this by:
    • Examining the application's configuration files if the plugin stores the keys insecurely.
    • Inspecting the application's memory if the plugin loads the keys into memory in an unprotected manner.
    • Finding keys accidentally committed to a public code repository if the plugin's code or configuration instructions lead to this.
  • Impact: The attacker can use the stolen API keys to make unauthorized translation requests, incurring costs, exceeding rate limits, and potentially using the service maliciously under the application's identity.
  • Affected Component: Plugin's configuration management (e.g., Settings, configuration files managed by the plugin), potentially plugin's network communication components if keys are transmitted during initialization.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers (of the plugin): Store API keys securely using environment variables, a secrets management service, or a secure configuration system. Never hardcode keys in the plugin's source code or instruct users to do so in configuration files. Implement strict access controls on any configuration files managed by the plugin.
    • Developers (integrating the plugin): Follow the plugin's documentation carefully regarding secure key management. If the documentation is lacking, contact the plugin developers.
    • Users: Ensure the application environment is secure and that configuration files managed by the plugin are protected. Regularly rotate API keys.

Threat: Malicious Translation Injection (Plugin-Side Vulnerability)

  • Description: While the source of the malicious translation is often an external service, the plugin is directly vulnerable if it fails to properly sanitize the translated output. An attacker could compromise the translation service or perform a MitM attack, and the plugin's lack of sanitization would allow the injection to succeed.
  • Impact: If the plugin returns unsanitized translated text, and the application uses it without further checks, it could lead to XSS attacks (executing arbitrary code in the user's browser). Altered translations could also cause misinformation or application malfunction.
  • Affected Component: Plugin's text processing/rendering components (where the translated text is received and prepared for use by the application). Specifically, any code within the plugin that handles the translationResult or similar object before passing it back to the main application.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers (of the plugin): Treat all translated text received from the external service as untrusted input within the plugin's code. Always sanitize and validate the translated output before returning it to the calling application. Use appropriate output encoding to prevent XSS.
    • Developers (integrating the plugin): While the plugin should handle this, it's a defense-in-depth best practice to also sanitize the output received from the plugin within the main application.

Threat: Dependency Vulnerabilities (Within the Plugin)

  • Description: The plugin itself, or the libraries it depends on, contain known security vulnerabilities. This is a direct threat to the plugin's code. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities.
  • Impact: Depending on the vulnerability, an attacker could gain access to sensitive data, execute arbitrary code within the context of the plugin (and potentially the larger application), or cause the application to crash.
  • Affected Component: The entire plugin's codebase and its dependencies.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers (of the plugin): Regularly update the plugin and all its dependencies to the latest versions. Use a software composition analysis (SCA) tool or dependency vulnerability scanner to identify and address known vulnerabilities. Conduct security audits of the plugin's code.
    • Developers (integrating the plugin): Use a dependency management system that can track and alert on vulnerable dependencies. Regularly update the plugin to the latest version.

Threat: Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attack (Plugin-Side Handling)

  • Description: An attacker intercepts communication between the plugin and the translation service. While the attack itself happens on the network, the plugin is directly responsible for securely handling this communication.
  • Impact: The attacker can steal API keys, alter translations, or obtain sensitive user data.
  • Affected Component: Plugin's network communication components responsible for sending and receiving data.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers (of the plugin): Enforce HTTPS for all communication with the translation service within the plugin's code. Verify the TLS certificate of the translation service. Consider using certificate pinning.
    • Developers (integrating the plugin): Ensure that the plugin is configured to use HTTPS.