Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
141 lines (90 loc) · 10.7 KB

File metadata and controls

141 lines (90 loc) · 10.7 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for zetbaitsu/compressor

Objective: Compromise Application via zetbaitsu/compressor Vulnerabilities

Attack Tree Visualization

  • Attack Vectors: This is the overarching goal. Attackers aim to leverage any weakness in zetbaitsu/compressor or its usage to compromise the application. This can be achieved through various means detailed below.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Malicious Image Upload (Image Parsing Exploits):
      • Attackers upload specially crafted image files (e.g., JPEG, PNG, GIF) designed to trigger vulnerabilities in the image parsing libraries used by zetbaitsu/compressor or its dependencies.
      • These vulnerabilities can include:
        • Buffer Overflows: Overloading buffers during image processing, potentially overwriting memory and leading to code execution.
        • Integer Overflows: Causing integer overflows during size calculations, leading to unexpected behavior or memory corruption.
        • Heap Overflows: Corrupting the heap memory during image processing, potentially leading to code execution.
    • Use of Vulnerable Image Parsing Libraries (Dependencies):
      • Attackers exploit known vulnerabilities (CVEs) in the image parsing libraries that zetbaitsu/compressor depends on (e.g., libraries for JPEG, PNG, GIF processing).
      • They leverage publicly available exploits or develop their own to target these CVEs.
      • Attack vectors involve uploading images that trigger the specific vulnerable code paths in these libraries.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Successful exploitation of input handling vulnerabilities like buffer overflows, heap overflows, or known CVEs in image parsing libraries can lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE).
    • Attackers can inject and execute arbitrary code on the server by carefully crafting malicious images that exploit these memory corruption vulnerabilities.
    • RCE allows attackers to gain full control over the server, potentially leading to data breaches, system compromise, and further attacks.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Attackers upload extremely large or complex image files (Image Bombs) that are designed to consume excessive server resources (CPU, memory, disk I/O) during the compression process.
    • These images are often crafted to have a very high compression ratio or require intensive processing, leading to resource exhaustion.
    • This can cause Denial of Service (DoS) by making the application unresponsive or unavailable to legitimate users.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • The attack vector here is the crafted Image Bomb itself.
    • When the application attempts to process and compress the Image Bomb using zetbaitsu/compressor, the library will consume excessive resources trying to handle the complex or large image.
    • This resource exhaustion is the direct mechanism that leads to the DoS condition.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • As server resources (CPU, memory, disk I/O) are exhausted by processing Image Bombs, the application's performance degrades significantly.
    • Eventually, the application may become unresponsive, crash, or be unable to handle legitimate user requests, resulting in application unavailability.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • zetbaitsu/compressor relies on external libraries (dependencies) for image processing tasks.
    • These dependencies may contain known security vulnerabilities (CVEs).
    • Attackers can identify outdated or vulnerable dependencies used by zetbaitsu/compressor by using dependency scanning tools or checking public vulnerability databases.
    • Once vulnerable dependencies are identified, attackers can exploit known CVEs in these libraries to compromise the application.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • The attack vector is the presence of vulnerable libraries within the dependency tree of zetbaitsu/compressor.
    • Common vulnerable dependencies in image processing contexts are often related to libraries like libjpeg, libpng, giflib, etc.
    • Attackers focus on exploiting vulnerabilities within these specific libraries.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Attackers use automated tools (dependency scanners) or manual methods to analyze the dependencies of zetbaitsu/compressor.
    • They compare the versions of used libraries against public vulnerability databases (like CVE databases) to identify outdated or vulnerable components.
    • This identification step is crucial for targeting known vulnerabilities.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Once vulnerable dependencies and their CVEs are identified, attackers search for publicly available exploits or develop their own.
    • They craft attacks that leverage these known CVEs to target the application.
    • This often involves sending specific inputs (e.g., malicious images) that trigger the vulnerable code paths in the outdated dependencies.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Even if zetbaitsu/compressor itself is secure, misconfigurations or improper usage within the application can introduce vulnerabilities.
    • This category focuses on how the application uses the compressor, rather than vulnerabilities within the compressor code itself.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • If the application stores compressed images in a publicly accessible location (e.g., a publicly accessible cloud storage bucket or web directory), attackers can directly access these images without authorization.
    • This leads to information disclosure if the compressed images contain sensitive data.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • The misconfiguration of the storage location itself is the attack vector.
    • This can be due to incorrect permissions settings on cloud storage, misconfigured web server directories, or other access control failures.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Attackers simply access the publicly accessible storage location using standard web browsers or tools.
    • They can list directory contents or directly request image files if they know the file names or paths.
    • This results in unauthorized access and potential information disclosure.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • If the application fails to validate user-provided input (e.g., uploaded image files) before passing it to zetbaitsu/compressor, it becomes vulnerable to all input handling attacks that the compressor or its dependencies might be susceptible to.
    • This lack of validation acts as a multiplier, amplifying the risk of all input-related vulnerabilities.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • The application code directly takes user-provided image data and feeds it into the zetbaitsu/compressor library without performing any checks or sanitization.
    • This direct passthrough of unvalidated input is the core attack vector, exposing the compressor to potentially malicious data.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • By passing unvalidated input, the application becomes vulnerable to all the input handling attack vectors described earlier (Malicious Image Upload, Image Parsing Exploits, etc.).
    • The lack of input validation essentially removes a crucial security layer, making the application directly susceptible to these attacks.