Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
188 lines (132 loc) · 20.3 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

188 lines (132 loc) · 20.3 KB

Deep Security Analysis of Compressor Tool

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

This deep analysis aims to provide a thorough security evaluation of the "compressor" command-line tool, based on the provided security design review and inferred architecture from the codebase documentation. The primary objective is to identify potential security vulnerabilities within the tool's design and implementation, focusing on key components and data flow. This analysis will deliver specific, actionable, and tailored security recommendations and mitigation strategies to enhance the security posture of the "compressor" project.

Scope:

The scope of this analysis encompasses the following aspects of the "compressor" tool:

  • Architecture and Components: Analyzing the Command-Line Interface (CLI), File Handler, and Compression Libraries as outlined in the C4 Container diagram.
  • Data Flow: Examining the flow of data from user input through the tool's components to the file system and back.
  • Security Controls: Evaluating the effectiveness of existing and recommended security controls mentioned in the security design review.
  • Identified Risks: Deep diving into the business and security risks outlined in the review, and identifying potential threats based on the tool's functionality.
  • Build Process: Assessing the security of the build pipeline and artifact generation.

This analysis will primarily focus on security considerations relevant to the tool's intended use as a command-line application executed locally. Server-side deployment scenarios are considered out of scope unless explicitly mentioned in the design review.

Methodology:

This deep analysis will employ the following methodology:

  1. Document Review: Thoroughly review the provided security design review document, including business and security posture, C4 diagrams, risk assessment, and questions/assumptions.
  2. Architecture Inference: Based on the C4 diagrams and component descriptions, infer the detailed architecture and data flow within the "compressor" tool. This will involve understanding the responsibilities of each component and their interactions.
  3. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats relevant to each component and the overall system, considering common vulnerabilities in command-line tools, file handling, and dependency management.
  4. Security Implication Analysis: Analyze the security implications of each key component, focusing on potential vulnerabilities and weaknesses based on its functionality and interactions.
  5. Tailored Recommendation Generation: Develop specific, actionable, and tailored security recommendations and mitigation strategies for each identified threat. These recommendations will be directly applicable to the "compressor" project and consider its open-source nature and business goals.
  6. Prioritization: Implicitly prioritize recommendations based on the severity of the potential risk and the ease of implementation.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Based on the C4 Container diagram and descriptions, the key components of the "compressor" tool are: Command-Line Interface (CLI), File Handler, and Compression Libraries. Let's analyze the security implications of each:

2.1. Command-Line Interface (CLI)

  • Responsibilities:

    • Accepts user commands and arguments (input file paths, output file paths, compression algorithm).
    • Parses commands and arguments.
    • Invokes the File Handler with parsed information.

  • Security Implications:

    • Command Injection: Although less likely in a Go application due to memory safety, improper handling of user-supplied arguments could potentially lead to command injection if the CLI were to execute external commands based on user input (which is not indicated in the design, but worth considering as a general principle).
    • Argument Injection/Abuse: Maliciously crafted arguments could be used to manipulate the tool's behavior in unintended ways. For example, excessively long arguments could lead to buffer overflows (less likely in Go, but still a concern in general programming).
    • Path Traversal via Command Arguments: If the CLI doesn't properly validate file paths provided as arguments, attackers could use ".." sequences to access files outside of the intended directories, leading to unauthorized file access or manipulation.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) via Input: Providing extremely long or malformed input strings as arguments could potentially cause the CLI to consume excessive resources (CPU, memory) leading to a denial of service.
    • Algorithm Selection Vulnerabilities: If the CLI allows users to specify compression algorithms by name, and these names are not strictly validated against a whitelist, there could be potential for injection of unexpected or unsupported algorithm names, potentially leading to errors or unexpected behavior.

2.2. File Handler

  • Responsibilities:

    • Opens, reads, and writes files to the file system.
    • Handles file paths received from the CLI.
    • Interacts with Compression Libraries to perform compression/decompression.

  • Security Implications:

    • Path Traversal Vulnerabilities: This is a critical area. If the File Handler doesn't rigorously validate and sanitize file paths received from the CLI, it becomes highly susceptible to path traversal attacks. An attacker could provide crafted paths to read or write files outside of the intended working directory, potentially accessing sensitive system files or overwriting critical data.
    • Insecure File Permissions: When creating output files (compressed or decompressed), the File Handler must ensure appropriate file permissions are set. Overly permissive permissions could expose sensitive data to unauthorized users.
    • Race Conditions in File Access: If the tool is designed or could be extended to handle concurrent file operations (not evident in the current design, but a future consideration), race conditions in file access could lead to data corruption or unauthorized access.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) via Large Files: If the File Handler doesn't implement proper resource management when handling very large files, it could consume excessive memory or disk space, leading to a denial of service. This is especially relevant during decompression of highly compressed files, which could expand to significantly larger sizes.
    • Temporary File Handling: If the File Handler uses temporary files during processing, insecure handling of these files (e.g., storing them in predictable locations with weak permissions, not deleting them properly) could lead to information leakage or other vulnerabilities.

2.3. Compression Libraries

  • Responsibilities:

    • Provides the core compression and decompression algorithms (gzip, zstd, brotli, etc.).
    • Performs the actual data processing for compression and decompression.

  • Security Implications:

    • Vulnerabilities in Libraries: The chosen compression libraries themselves might contain security vulnerabilities (e.g., buffer overflows, memory corruption issues, algorithmic weaknesses). Exploiting these vulnerabilities could lead to crashes, arbitrary code execution, or denial of service. This is an accepted risk, but needs active management.
    • Incorrect Usage of Libraries: Even if the libraries are secure, incorrect usage within the "compressor" tool's code can introduce vulnerabilities. For example, improper buffer management when interacting with library functions could lead to buffer overflows.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) via Decompression Bombs (Zip Bombs/Billion Laughs Attack): Maliciously crafted compressed files (especially zip bombs or similar constructs) can exploit vulnerabilities in decompression algorithms or resource handling to cause extreme resource consumption (CPU, memory, disk I/O) during decompression, leading to a denial of service. This is a significant risk for decompression tools.
    • Data Integrity Issues: Bugs in the compression or decompression logic, either in the libraries or in the tool's usage of them, could lead to data corruption during compression or decompression. While not strictly a security vulnerability in the traditional sense, data integrity is a critical security concern.

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow Inference

Based on the C4 diagrams and descriptions, we can infer the following architecture and data flow:

Architecture:

The "compressor" tool follows a layered architecture:

  1. User Interaction Layer (CLI): Handles user input through the command-line interface. Parses commands and arguments, acting as the entry point for user interaction.
  2. Application Logic Layer (File Handler): Manages file operations, including reading input files and writing output files. Acts as an intermediary between the CLI and the Compression Libraries. Orchestrates the compression/decompression process.
  3. Core Functionality Layer (Compression Libraries): Provides the actual compression and decompression algorithms. These are external libraries integrated into the tool.
  4. Data Storage Layer (File System): The local file system where input and output files are stored.

Data Flow (Compression):

  1. User Input: The user executes the "compressor" tool from the command line, providing commands and arguments, including input file path, output file path, and compression algorithm.
  2. CLI Parsing: The CLI component parses the user's command and arguments.
  3. File Handler Invocation: The CLI invokes the File Handler, passing the parsed file paths and compression algorithm choice.
  4. File Reading: The File Handler reads the input file from the File System.
  5. Compression: The File Handler utilizes the selected Compression Library to compress the data read from the input file.
  6. File Writing: The File Handler writes the compressed data to the output file in the File System.
  7. User Output: The tool may provide feedback to the user via the CLI, indicating success or errors.

Data Flow (Decompression):

The decompression data flow is similar, but in reverse:

  1. User Input: User executes the tool with decompression command and arguments (input compressed file, output decompressed file, decompression algorithm - often inferred from file extension or metadata).
  2. CLI Parsing: CLI parses the command and arguments.
  3. File Handler Invocation: CLI invokes the File Handler.
  4. File Reading: File Handler reads the compressed input file from the File System.
  5. Decompression: File Handler uses the appropriate Compression Library to decompress the data.
  6. File Writing: File Handler writes the decompressed data to the output file in the File System.
  7. User Output: Tool provides feedback to the user.

4. Tailored Security Considerations and Specific Recommendations

Based on the analysis above, here are specific security considerations and tailored recommendations for the "compressor" project:

4.1. Input Validation and Sanitization (CLI & File Handler):

  • Consideration: Path traversal vulnerabilities are a significant risk.
  • Recommendation 1 (CLI): Strictly validate and sanitize file paths provided as command-line arguments in the CLI component. Implement checks to prevent ".." sequences and ensure paths are within expected boundaries. Use canonicalization techniques to resolve symbolic links and ensure consistent path representation.
  • Recommendation 2 (File Handler): Re-validate file paths within the File Handler before performing any file system operations. Do not rely solely on validation in the CLI, as there might be internal paths constructed within the File Handler.
  • Recommendation 3 (CLI): Whitelist supported compression algorithms. Instead of accepting arbitrary algorithm names, provide a predefined list of supported algorithms and validate user input against this whitelist. This prevents injection of unexpected or potentially malicious algorithm names.
  • Recommendation 4 (CLI): Implement argument length limits. Set reasonable limits on the length of command-line arguments to prevent potential buffer overflow issues or DoS attacks via excessively long inputs.
  • Recommendation 5 (File Handler): Implement file type validation (if applicable). If the tool is intended to handle specific file types, validate the input file type to prevent processing of unexpected or potentially malicious file formats.

4.2. Secure File Handling (File Handler):

  • Consideration: Insecure file permissions and temporary file handling can lead to vulnerabilities.
  • Recommendation 6 (File Handler): Set restrictive file permissions for output files. When creating output files, ensure they are created with appropriate permissions (e.g., read/write for the user only) to prevent unauthorized access.
  • Recommendation 7 (File Handler): Securely handle temporary files. If temporary files are used, ensure they are created in secure directories with restrictive permissions, are deleted after use, and are not created in predictable locations. Consider using OS-provided functions for creating temporary files securely.
  • Recommendation 8 (File Handler): Implement robust error handling for file system operations. Gracefully handle file I/O errors (e.g., file not found, permission denied) and avoid exposing sensitive error information to the user.

4.3. Dependency Management and Library Security (Compression Libraries & Build Process):

  • Consideration: Vulnerabilities in compression libraries are an accepted risk, but need active management.
  • Recommendation 9 (Build Process): Implement dependency vulnerability scanning in the CI/CD pipeline. Integrate tools like govulncheck (for Go) or similar dependency scanning tools to automatically identify and report known vulnerabilities in used compression libraries and other dependencies.
  • Recommendation 10 (Build Process & Development): Regularly update dependencies. Establish a process for regularly updating the compression libraries and other dependencies to incorporate security patches. Monitor security advisories for the libraries used.
  • Recommendation 11 (Development): Follow secure coding practices when using compression libraries. Carefully review the documentation and best practices for each compression library to ensure they are used correctly and securely. Pay attention to buffer management, error handling, and any security-specific recommendations from the library developers.

4.4. Denial of Service Prevention (CLI, File Handler, Compression Libraries):

  • Consideration: DoS attacks via large files or decompression bombs are potential threats.
  • Recommendation 12 (File Handler): Implement resource limits for file operations. Consider setting limits on the maximum file size that the tool will process to prevent excessive resource consumption.
  • Recommendation 13 (Compression Libraries & File Handler): Implement decompression bomb protection. Explore techniques to detect and mitigate decompression bombs. This might involve setting limits on the output size during decompression, monitoring resource consumption during decompression, or using libraries with built-in decompression bomb protection (if available).
  • Recommendation 14 (CLI): Implement rate limiting (if deployed as a service in the future). If the tool is ever deployed as a service, implement rate limiting to prevent abuse and DoS attacks from excessive requests.

4.5. Build Process Security (Build Process):

  • Consideration: Supply chain attacks and compromised build artifacts are risks.
  • Recommendation 15 (Build Process): Implement SAST (Static Application Security Testing) in the CI/CD pipeline. Integrate a SAST tool to automatically scan the source code for potential security vulnerabilities during the build process.
  • Recommendation 16 (Build Process): Consider code signing for releases. Implement code signing for the released binaries to ensure integrity and authenticity. This helps users verify that the downloaded executable is genuine and hasn't been tampered with.
  • Recommendation 17 (Build Process): Secure the build environment. Ensure the CI/CD pipeline and build server are securely configured and hardened to prevent unauthorized access and tampering. Follow best practices for CI/CD security.

5. Actionable and Tailored Mitigation Strategies

Here's a summary of actionable and tailored mitigation strategies, categorized for easier implementation:

Category: Input Validation & Sanitization

  • Action 1 (CLI): Implement path validation in the CLI using a dedicated function that checks for ".." and ensures paths are within allowed directories. Use filepath.Clean and filepath.Abs in Go for path canonicalization.
  • Action 2 (File Handler): Re-validate paths in the File Handler using the same path validation function as the CLI.
  • Action 3 (CLI): Create a Go map or slice of allowed algorithm names and validate user input against this list.
  • Action 4 (CLI): Use Go's flag package which provides built-in mechanisms for argument parsing and can help limit argument lengths implicitly. Explicitly check argument lengths if needed.
  • Action 5 (File Handler): If file type validation is relevant, use Go's mime package or file magic number checks to validate input file types.

Category: Secure File Handling

  • Action 6 (File Handler): Use os.FileMode constants in Go (e.g., 0600 for user read/write only) when creating output files using os.OpenFile.
  • Action 7 (File Handler): Use os.CreateTemp in Go to create temporary files securely. Ensure temporary files are deleted using os.Remove or os.RemoveAll after use, potentially using defer for cleanup.
  • Action 8 (File Handler): Implement error handling using Go's error handling mechanisms. Log errors appropriately (without exposing sensitive information to users in production) and return user-friendly error messages.

Category: Dependency Management & Library Security

  • Action 9 (Build Process): Integrate govulncheck into the GitHub Actions workflow. Add a step to run govulncheck ./... and fail the build if vulnerabilities are found above a certain severity level.
  • Action 10 (Build Process & Development): Use go get -u all to update dependencies regularly. Subscribe to security mailing lists or vulnerability databases related to Go and the used compression libraries.
  • Action 11 (Development): Carefully review the documentation of libraries like compress/gzip, github.com/klauspost/compress/zstd, github.com/andybalholm/brotli in Go. Pay attention to any security considerations or best practices mentioned.

Category: Denial of Service Prevention

  • Action 12 (File Handler): Implement a configuration option or hardcoded limit for maximum input file size. Check file size using os.Stat before processing large files.
  • Action 13 (Compression Libraries & File Handler): Research and implement decompression bomb detection techniques. For example, track the decompressed size and abort if it exceeds a certain threshold relative to the compressed size. Explore if libraries offer any built-in protection mechanisms.
  • Action 14 (CLI): (For future service deployment) Implement rate limiting using middleware or libraries suitable for the chosen service framework.

Category: Build Process Security

  • Action 15 (Build Process): Integrate a SAST tool like golangci-lint with security linters enabled into the GitHub Actions workflow.
  • Action 16 (Build Process): Implement code signing using tools like cosign or goreleaser in the GitHub Actions workflow to sign release artifacts.
  • Action 17 (Build Process): Follow GitHub Actions security best practices. Use dedicated runners if possible, minimize permissions granted to workflows, and use secrets management features securely.

By implementing these tailored mitigation strategies, the "compressor" project can significantly enhance its security posture and address the identified potential vulnerabilities, making it a more robust and secure tool for users. Remember to prioritize these recommendations based on risk and feasibility, and continuously review and update security measures as the project evolves.