Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
193 lines (142 loc) · 19.4 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

193 lines (142 loc) · 19.4 KB

Deep Security Analysis: Material Files Application

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

This deep security analysis aims to comprehensively evaluate the security design of the Material Files application, an open-source Android file manager. The primary objective is to identify potential security vulnerabilities and weaknesses within the application's architecture, components, and data flow, based on the provided Security Design Review and inferred codebase characteristics. A key focus will be on ensuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of user data, particularly concerning local and cloud file management functionalities. The analysis will provide specific, actionable, and tailored security recommendations to enhance the security posture of Material Files.

Scope:

The scope of this analysis encompasses the following:

  • Application Components: Analysis of the Material Files UI, File Manager Logic, Storage Manager, Network Manager, and Cryptography Module as defined in the C4 Container diagram.
  • Data Flow: Examination of data flow between components, including user input, file access operations, network communication with cloud services, and credential management.
  • Security Controls: Review of existing and recommended security controls outlined in the Security Design Review, and assessment of their effectiveness.
  • Deployment and Build Processes: Consideration of security aspects within the application's build and deployment pipelines, including potential risks introduced during these phases.
  • Security Requirements: Evaluation of the application's design against the defined security requirements (Authentication, Authorization, Input Validation, Cryptography).

The analysis will not cover:

  • In-depth source code audit (without access to the actual codebase, analysis is based on design review and general Android security principles).
  • Penetration testing or dynamic analysis.
  • Security of third-party cloud storage services themselves.
  • User device security outside the application's direct control.

Methodology:

This analysis will employ a risk-based approach, utilizing the following steps:

  1. Architecture Decomposition: Deconstruct the Material Files application into its key components based on the C4 Container diagram and descriptions provided in the Security Design Review.
  2. Threat Modeling: For each component and data flow, identify potential security threats and vulnerabilities relevant to an Android file manager application. This will involve considering common Android security risks, file management specific vulnerabilities (e.g., path traversal), and cloud storage integration risks.
  3. Security Control Mapping: Map existing and recommended security controls to the identified threats to assess the current security posture and identify gaps.
  4. Risk Assessment: Evaluate the likelihood and potential impact of each identified threat, considering the business risks outlined in the Security Design Review (data breaches, loss of user trust, reputational damage, legal issues).
  5. Mitigation Strategy Formulation: Develop specific, actionable, and tailored mitigation strategies for identified high and medium risks. These strategies will be practical and applicable to the Material Files project, focusing on enhancing security controls and addressing vulnerabilities.
  6. Recommendation Prioritization: Prioritize recommendations based on risk level, feasibility of implementation, and alignment with business priorities.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Based on the C4 Container diagram and descriptions, we can analyze the security implications of each key component:

2.1. Material Files UI:

  • Functionality: User interaction point, displays file listings, handles user input (file names, paths, operations).
  • Security Implications:
    • Input Validation Vulnerabilities: If user input is not properly validated and sanitized before being passed to other components (especially File Manager Logic and Storage Manager), it can lead to vulnerabilities like:
      • Path Traversal: Maliciously crafted file paths could allow users to access files outside of intended directories.
      • Command Injection (less likely in UI but possible if UI interacts with shell commands indirectly): If user input is used to construct shell commands (highly discouraged but theoretically possible), injection attacks could occur.
      • UI Redress Attacks (Clickjacking): While less critical for a file manager, consider if the UI can be embedded in other contexts, potentially leading to clickjacking.
    • Data Leakage through UI: Sensitive information (e.g., file previews, metadata) displayed in the UI should be handled carefully to prevent accidental leakage (e.g., in screenshots, screen recordings).
    • Permissions Misuse: UI elements might inadvertently trigger actions requiring permissions that the user hasn't explicitly granted or understood.

2.2. File Manager Logic:

  • Functionality: Core application logic, orchestrates file operations, manages storage and network interactions, enforces authorization.
  • Security Implications:
    • Authorization Bypass: Flaws in the logic could allow users to bypass intended access controls and perform unauthorized file operations (e.g., accessing files they shouldn't, deleting system files).
    • Business Logic Vulnerabilities: Errors in the implementation of file operations (copy, move, delete, rename) could lead to data corruption, data loss, or unintended file modifications.
    • Insecure Handling of Intents: If the application interacts with Android Intents (e.g., for sharing files), improper handling could lead to vulnerabilities like intent spoofing or data leakage to malicious applications.
    • Race Conditions: Concurrent file operations, especially with cloud storage, could lead to race conditions resulting in data corruption or inconsistent state.
    • Logging and Error Handling: Insufficient or overly verbose logging could leak sensitive information. Poor error handling might expose internal application details to users or attackers.

2.3. Storage Manager:

  • Functionality: Handles interactions with local and potentially cloud storage, abstracts storage access.
  • Security Implications:
    • Path Traversal Vulnerabilities: If file paths are not properly validated and sanitized before being passed to Android OS APIs, path traversal attacks are a significant risk.
    • Permission Issues: Incorrectly requesting or handling Android storage permissions could lead to either insufficient access (limiting functionality) or excessive access (security risk).
    • Insecure Temporary File Handling: If temporary files are used for file operations (e.g., during copy/move), they must be created and deleted securely to prevent information leakage or TOCTOU (Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use) vulnerabilities.
    • Data Remnants: When deleting files, ensure data remnants are securely erased, especially for sensitive files on external storage.
    • Root Access Risks: If root access is supported, vulnerabilities in handling root privileges could lead to system-wide compromise.

2.4. Network Manager:

  • Functionality: Handles network communication for cloud storage access (FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, etc.).
  • Security Implications:
    • Insecure Network Protocols: Using insecure protocols like plain FTP or unencrypted WebDAV exposes credentials and data in transit to Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks.
    • Credential Management Vulnerabilities: Storing cloud storage credentials insecurely (e.g., in SharedPreferences without encryption, hardcoded keys) is a critical vulnerability.
    • MITM Attacks: Lack of proper TLS/SSL certificate validation or downgrade attacks could allow attackers to intercept and modify network traffic.
    • Injection Attacks in Network Requests: If user input is used to construct network requests (e.g., URLs, headers), injection vulnerabilities (e.g., command injection, header injection) could arise.
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Improper handling of network connections or resource limits could lead to DoS vulnerabilities.
    • Data Leakage in Network Communication: Accidental logging of sensitive data in network requests or responses.

2.5. Cryptography Module:

  • Functionality: Provides cryptographic functionalities for secure credential storage and potentially file encryption.
  • Security Implications:
    • Weak Cryptography: Using weak or outdated cryptographic algorithms or libraries.
    • Insecure Key Management: Storing cryptographic keys insecurely (e.g., hardcoded, in plaintext, easily accessible storage).
    • Improper Use of Cryptography: Incorrect implementation of encryption or decryption processes, leading to ineffective security.
    • Side-Channel Attacks: Vulnerabilities in cryptographic implementations that could leak information through timing or power analysis (less likely in this context but worth considering for highly sensitive operations).
    • Lack of Cryptographic Agility: Not being able to easily update or change cryptographic algorithms if vulnerabilities are discovered.

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow Inference

Based on the C4 diagrams and component descriptions, we can infer the following architecture and data flow:

  1. User Interaction: The user interacts with the Material Files UI to browse files, initiate file operations, and configure settings.
  2. Request Handling: The Material Files UI sends requests to the File Manager Logic component. These requests are based on user actions and include information about the desired file operation, file paths, and storage locations.
  3. Storage Access Orchestration: The File Manager Logic determines whether the operation is for local storage or cloud storage.
    • Local Storage: For local file operations, the File Manager Logic interacts with the Storage Manager. The Storage Manager uses Android OS APIs to access and manipulate files on the device's local storage.
    • Cloud Storage: For cloud storage operations, the File Manager Logic interacts with the Network Manager. The Network Manager handles network connections to cloud storage services (FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, etc.), including authentication and data transfer using appropriate protocols.
  4. Credential Management: When connecting to cloud storage services, the Network Manager likely utilizes the Cryptography Module to securely store and retrieve user credentials. Credentials might be encrypted using Android Keystore or similar secure storage mechanisms.
  5. Data Flow for File Operations:
    • Read Operation: Data flows from Storage Manager (local) or Network Manager (cloud) to File Manager Logic, and then to Material Files UI for display.
    • Write Operation: Data flows from Material Files UI to File Manager Logic, and then to Storage Manager (local) or Network Manager (cloud) for writing to storage.
  6. Android OS Interaction: Both Storage Manager and Network Manager rely on the Android OS for underlying file system access, network stack, and security features like permissions and sandboxing.

Data Flow Diagram (Simplified):

User (UI) <--> File Manager Logic <--> Storage Manager (Local Files) <--> Android OS
                                  <--> Network Manager (Cloud Files) <--> Cryptography Module (Credentials) <--> Android OS
                                                                    <--> Cloud Storage Services

4. Tailored and Specific Security Recommendations for Material Files

Based on the analysis, here are specific security recommendations tailored to Material Files:

4.1. Input Validation and Sanitization (UI, File Manager Logic, Storage Manager, Network Manager):

  • Recommendation MF-R1: Implement robust input validation and sanitization for all user-provided file paths and names in the Material Files UI, File Manager Logic, and Storage Manager. Specifically:
    • Path Traversal Prevention: Use canonicalization and strict allow-listing of allowed characters in file paths. Sanitize paths to remove or escape potentially malicious characters (e.g., "..", "/", "").
    • Filename Validation: Validate filenames to prevent injection attacks and ensure compatibility with different file systems.
    • URL Validation: When handling cloud storage URLs, validate the format and scheme to prevent malicious URLs.
  • Recommendation MF-R2: Sanitize data received from external sources (cloud storage APIs) in the Network Manager before processing and displaying it in the UI or using it in file operations. This prevents potential injection attacks from compromised cloud storage services.

4.2. Secure Credential Management (Network Manager, Cryptography Module):

  • Recommendation MF-R3: Mandatory use of Android Keystore for secure storage of cloud storage credentials. Avoid storing credentials in SharedPreferences or internal storage without strong encryption.
  • Recommendation MF-R4: Implement proper key management practices for cryptographic keys used for credential encryption. Ensure keys are generated securely, protected from unauthorized access, and rotated periodically if necessary.
  • Recommendation MF-R5: When prompting for cloud storage credentials, clearly indicate the security of the connection (e.g., using TLS/SSL indicators). Educate users about the importance of strong passwords and secure cloud storage practices.

4.3. Secure Network Communication (Network Manager):

  • Recommendation MF-R6: Enforce TLS/SSL for all network communication with cloud storage services (SFTP, WebDAV, HTTPS for WebDAV). Disable fallback to insecure protocols like plain FTP or HTTP.
  • Recommendation MF-R7: Implement proper TLS/SSL certificate validation to prevent MITM attacks. Use Android's built-in TLS/SSL libraries and ensure certificates are verified against trusted Certificate Authorities.
  • Recommendation MF-R8: Review and harden network configurations to minimize attack surface. Disable unnecessary network features and protocols.

4.4. Authorization and Access Control (File Manager Logic, Storage Manager):

  • Recommendation MF-R9: Implement granular authorization checks within the File Manager Logic to ensure users can only perform operations they are authorized to perform based on Android permissions and application logic.
  • Recommendation MF-R10: Strictly adhere to Android's permission model. Request only necessary permissions and clearly explain to users why each permission is needed. Follow the principle of least privilege.
  • Recommendation MF-R11: If root access is supported, implement robust security checks and warnings for root-level operations. Clearly inform users about the risks associated with root access and ensure operations are performed securely.

4.5. Secure Coding Practices and Vulnerability Management (All Components, Build Process):

  • Recommendation MF-R12: Conduct regular security code reviews, especially for critical components (File Manager Logic, Storage Manager, Network Manager, Cryptography Module) and contributions from the community. Focus on identifying potential vulnerabilities like input validation flaws, authorization bypasses, and insecure cryptographic practices.
  • Recommendation MF-R13: Integrate automated security scanning (SAST and DAST) into the CI/CD pipeline. Tools like SonarQube (SAST), or cloud-based DAST scanners can help identify vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle.
  • Recommendation MF-R14: Implement dependency vulnerability scanning in the CI/CD pipeline. Tools like OWASP Dependency-Check or Snyk can identify vulnerable dependencies and alert developers to update them.
  • Recommendation MF-R15: Establish a vulnerability disclosure and incident response plan. Provide a clear process for users and security researchers to report vulnerabilities and define steps for responding to and patching security issues.
  • Recommendation MF-R16: Follow secure coding practices and guidelines for Android development. Refer to resources like OWASP Mobile Security Project and Android developer documentation for secure coding best practices.

5. Actionable and Tailored Mitigation Strategies

Here are actionable mitigation strategies for some of the key recommendations:

Mitigation for MF-R1 (Input Validation):

  • Action: Implement a dedicated input validation module within the File Manager Logic. This module will be responsible for validating all file paths and names received from the UI before they are passed to the Storage Manager or Network Manager.
  • Technical Implementation:
    • Use regular expressions or predefined allow-lists to validate file names and paths.
    • Utilize File.getCanonicalPath() in Java/Kotlin to canonicalize paths and detect path traversal attempts.
    • Create unit tests specifically for input validation logic to ensure its effectiveness.

Mitigation for MF-R3 (Secure Credential Management):

  • Action: Migrate credential storage to Android Keystore.
  • Technical Implementation:
    • Use the KeyStore class in Android SDK to generate and store encryption keys securely within the Android Keystore system.
    • Encrypt cloud storage credentials (passwords, API keys) before storing them using keys from the Keystore.
    • Implement secure retrieval of credentials from Keystore when needed for cloud storage connections.
    • Provide clear UI guidance to users about the security of credential storage.

Mitigation for MF-R6 (Enforce TLS/SSL):

  • Action: Configure Network Manager to strictly enforce TLS/SSL for all cloud storage connections.
  • Technical Implementation:
    • When using network libraries (e.g., HttpURLConnection, OkHttp), explicitly configure them to use HTTPS for WebDAV and SFTP for SFTP connections.
    • Disable support for plain FTP and HTTP protocols in the Network Manager.
    • Implement checks to ensure that connections are established over TLS/SSL before transmitting sensitive data.
    • Consider using Network Security Configuration in Android to further enforce TLS requirements at the application level.

Mitigation for MF-R13 (Automated Security Scanning):

  • Action: Integrate a SAST tool (e.g., SonarQube, Checkmarx) into the GitHub Actions CI/CD pipeline.
  • Technical Implementation:
    • Set up a SonarQube server (community edition is open-source).
    • Add a step in the GitHub Actions workflow to run SonarQube scanner on each code commit or pull request.
    • Configure SonarQube to analyze Java/Kotlin code and check for common Android vulnerabilities (e.g., SQL injection, path traversal, insecure crypto).
    • Set up quality gates in SonarQube to fail the build if critical security vulnerabilities are detected.

By implementing these tailored recommendations and mitigation strategies, the Material Files project can significantly enhance its security posture, protect user data privacy, and build user trust in the application. Continuous security efforts, including regular code reviews, automated scanning, and vulnerability management, are crucial for maintaining a secure open-source file manager.