Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
38 lines (31 loc) · 5.9 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

38 lines (31 loc) · 5.9 KB

Threat Model Analysis for zhanghai/materialfiles

Threat: Path Traversal via Crafted Filename (in materialfiles)

  • Description: materialfiles itself contains a vulnerability in its path handling logic. Even if the embedding application attempts to sanitize input, a flaw in how materialfiles internally processes filenames (e.g., insufficient validation, incorrect normalization, or a bypass of existing checks) allows an attacker to craft a filename that causes materialfiles to access files outside the intended directory. This is a vulnerability within the library.
    • Impact: Unauthorized access to sensitive files, potential data leakage, system compromise (if the attacker can access and execute system files).
    • Affected Component: PathUtils (or similar module) within materialfiles; functions like resolvePath(), normalizePath(), or any function that takes a user-provided string and uses it to construct a filesystem path without proper, independent validation.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Patch materialfiles: The primary mitigation is to update to a patched version of materialfiles that fixes the vulnerability. This is the responsibility of the materialfiles maintainers.
      • Contribute a Fix: If a patch is not available, and you have the expertise, consider contributing a fix to the materialfiles project.
      • Temporary Workaround (If Possible): As a temporary workaround, you might be able to intercept calls to the vulnerable materialfiles functions and implement your own robust path validation before passing the data to materialfiles. This is risky and should only be done as a last resort. It requires a deep understanding of the vulnerability and the materialfiles API. It is not a substitute for patching the library.
      • Limit Exposure: Reduce the attack surface by limiting the ways in which user-provided input can influence file paths used by materialfiles.

Threat: Symlink Attack (due to materialfiles vulnerability)

  • Description: materialfiles has a vulnerability in how it handles symbolic links. It might follow symlinks without properly checking the target, or it might have a flaw in its symlink checking logic that allows an attacker to bypass the checks. This is a vulnerability within the library's handling of symlinks.
    • Impact: Unauthorized access to sensitive files, potential data leakage, or system compromise.
    • Affected Component: The file I/O module within materialfiles, specifically functions that handle file operations (reading, writing, deleting) and interact with the filesystem. Functions like openFile(), readFile(), writeFile(), etc., if they don't correctly handle symlinks.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Patch materialfiles: Update to a patched version of the library that addresses the symlink handling vulnerability.
      • Contribute a Fix: If no patch is available, consider contributing a fix to the materialfiles project.
      • Temporary Workaround (Difficult): A temporary workaround is very difficult and risky in this case. You would need to essentially re-implement the file I/O logic of materialfiles to safely handle symlinks, which is highly error-prone. It's generally not recommended.
      • Disable Symlink Support (If Possible): If the application using materialfiles does not require symlink support, and if materialfiles provides a way to disable it completely, do so. This eliminates the vulnerability. This is the best workaround if feasible.

Threat: File Content Injection via Upload (due to materialfiles vulnerability)

  • Description: materialfiles's built-in file upload handling has a vulnerability that allows bypassing file type checks or other security measures. This is not about the embedding application's misuse, but a flaw within the library's upload mechanism. For example, materialfiles might rely solely on the file extension, or have a flawed implementation of its content-based type detection.
    • Impact: Code execution on the server (if the uploaded file is a script that gets executed), cross-site scripting (XSS) if the uploaded file is an HTML file served by the web server, or exploitation of vulnerabilities in other applications.
    • Affected Component: The file upload component within materialfiles, including functions related to handling file uploads, storing files, and potentially setting file permissions.
    • Risk Severity: High (potentially Critical, depending on how materialfiles is used)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Patch materialfiles: The primary mitigation is to update to a patched version of materialfiles that fixes the vulnerability in its upload handling.
      • Contribute a Fix: If a patch is not available, consider contributing a fix to the materialfiles project.
      • Temporary Workaround (If Possible): If materialfiles exposes the upload handling functions, you might be able to intercept the calls and implement your own file type validation and sanitization before the data is processed by materialfiles. This is risky and requires careful implementation. It's not a replacement for patching the library.
      • Disable Uploads (If Possible): If the application using materialfiles does not require the upload functionality provided by materialfiles, disable that feature within materialfiles if possible. If the application needs upload functionality, implement it separately from materialfiles, using secure practices.