Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
125 lines (102 loc) · 9.58 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

125 lines (102 loc) · 9.58 KB

Threat Model Analysis for nodemcu/nodemcu-firmware

Threat: Outdated Firmware Version

  • Description: Attackers exploit known vulnerabilities present in older versions of NodeMCU firmware. They can use publicly available exploits to gain unauthorized access, execute arbitrary code, or cause denial of service.
  • Impact: Device compromise, data breaches, denial of service, potentially leading to full control of the device and connected network.
  • Affected NodeMCU Component: Core Firmware, ESP8266 SDK, Underlying Libraries
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regularly update NodeMCU firmware to the latest stable version.
    • Subscribe to security advisories and update promptly upon vulnerability disclosure.
    • Implement an automated firmware update mechanism if feasible.

Threat: Firmware Backdoors or Malicious Modifications

  • Description: Attackers introduce backdoors or malicious code into the NodeMCU firmware, either during development, build process, or distribution. This allows them to remotely access and control devices, exfiltrate data, or disrupt operations.
  • Impact: Complete device compromise, data exfiltration, remote control, potentially large-scale botnet creation if widespread.
  • Affected NodeMCU Component: Core Firmware, Build System, Distribution Channels
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Use official NodeMCU firmware builds from trusted sources (nodemcu.com, GitHub releases).
    • Verify firmware integrity using checksums or digital signatures provided by official sources.
    • Implement secure boot mechanisms if available and feasible.
    • Harden the build process and secure development environment.

Threat: Buffer Overflows and Memory Corruption

  • Description: Attackers send specially crafted network packets or inputs that trigger buffer overflows or memory corruption vulnerabilities in the firmware code. This can lead to arbitrary code execution, device crashes, or denial of service.
  • Impact: Device crashes, arbitrary code execution, denial of service, potentially allowing attackers to take control of the device.
  • Affected NodeMCU Component: Network Stack (lwIP), Core Firmware, Input Handling Functions
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Use latest stable firmware versions with bug fixes and security patches.
    • Implement input validation and sanitization in Lua scripts and firmware modules.
    • Utilize memory safety features and coding practices during firmware development.

Threat: Insecure Default Configurations

  • Description: Attackers exploit insecure default settings in the firmware, such as weak default passwords for access points or enabled debugging interfaces like Telnet or Serial. They can use these defaults to gain unauthorized access to the device.
  • Impact: Unauthorized access, device compromise, data exposure, potentially allowing attackers to reconfigure or control the device.
  • Affected NodeMCU Component: Configuration Modules, Network Modules, Debugging Interfaces
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Change all default passwords and configurations immediately upon device setup.
    • Disable unnecessary debugging interfaces (Telnet, Serial) in production environments.
    • Implement strong authentication mechanisms and access control policies.

Threat: Lua Injection Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Attackers inject malicious Lua code into the application by exploiting vulnerabilities in how user inputs or external data are processed in Lua scripts. This can lead to arbitrary code execution within the Lua environment.
  • Impact: Arbitrary code execution within Lua, data manipulation, access to sensitive information, potentially leading to device compromise.
  • Affected NodeMCU Component: Lua Interpreter, Lua Scripting Environment, dofile(), loadstring() functions
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Avoid using dofile() and loadstring() with untrusted input.
    • Sanitize and validate all user inputs and external data before using them in Lua scripts.
    • Implement secure coding practices in Lua, minimizing dynamic code execution.

Threat: Insecure Lua Libraries and Modules

  • Description: Attackers exploit vulnerabilities present in third-party Lua libraries or modules used by the application. These vulnerabilities can be introduced through outdated or poorly maintained libraries, potentially leading to remote code execution.
  • Impact: Introduction of vulnerabilities into the application, potentially leading to device compromise, data breaches, or remote code execution.
  • Affected NodeMCU Component: Lua Modules, Third-party Libraries
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Carefully vet and select Lua libraries from trusted sources.
    • Keep Lua libraries and modules updated to the latest versions with security patches.
    • Regularly scan Lua code and libraries for known vulnerabilities.

Threat: Exposure of Sensitive Information in Lua Scripts

  • Description: Attackers gain access to sensitive information like API keys, passwords, or cryptographic keys that are hardcoded or stored insecurely within Lua scripts. This can happen through firmware extraction, physical access, or code leaks.
  • Impact: Exposure of sensitive data, unauthorized access to backend systems, compromise of user accounts, and potential financial loss.
  • Affected NodeMCU Component: Lua Scripts, File System
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Avoid hardcoding sensitive information in Lua scripts.
    • Use secure storage mechanisms for sensitive data (e.g., encrypted storage, external secure elements if available).
    • Implement proper access control to Lua scripts and firmware.

Threat: Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks

  • Description: Attackers intercept network communication between the NodeMCU device and backend servers if encryption (TLS/SSL) is not properly implemented or used. They can eavesdrop on data, modify traffic, or inject malicious content.
  • Impact: Data interception, data manipulation, credential theft, unauthorized access to backend systems, and potential compromise of the entire communication channel.
  • Affected NodeMCU Component: Network Modules, TLS/SSL Implementation (if used), HTTP Client/Server
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Always use HTTPS for communication with backend servers.
    • Properly implement and configure TLS/SSL, including certificate validation.
    • Avoid using unencrypted protocols like HTTP for sensitive data transmission.

Threat: Insecure Firmware Distribution Channels

  • Description: Attackers intercept firmware updates distributed through insecure channels (e.g., unencrypted HTTP) and replace them with malicious firmware. This can compromise devices during the update process.
  • Impact: Installation of malicious firmware on devices, leading to device compromise and potential large-scale attacks.
  • Affected NodeMCU Component: Firmware Update Mechanism, Distribution Channels
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Always use secure channels (HTTPS) for firmware updates.
    • Implement firmware signature verification to ensure authenticity and integrity.
    • Use trusted and secure firmware update servers.

Threat: Lack of Firmware Integrity Verification

  • Description: The firmware update process does not verify the integrity or authenticity of the firmware image, allowing attackers to install tampered or malicious firmware.
  • Impact: Installation of malicious or corrupted firmware, leading to device compromise or malfunction.
  • Affected NodeMCU Component: Firmware Update Mechanism, Bootloader
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement firmware signature verification using cryptographic signatures.
    • Use checksums or hash functions to verify firmware integrity.
    • Ensure the bootloader verifies firmware integrity before flashing.

Threat: Compromised Toolchains and Dependencies

  • Description: Attackers compromise the toolchains, SDKs, or libraries used to build the NodeMCU firmware. This can lead to the introduction of malware or vulnerabilities into the compiled firmware without the developer's knowledge.
  • Impact: Introduction of malware or vulnerabilities into the firmware, potentially leading to widespread device compromise and large-scale attacks.
  • Affected NodeMCU Component: Build System, Toolchain, SDK, Dependencies
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Use trusted and verified toolchains and SDKs from official sources.
    • Implement secure build pipelines with integrity checks for dependencies.
    • Regularly scan build environments for malware and vulnerabilities.
    • Use reproducible builds to ensure build integrity.