Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
55 lines (46 loc) · 6.96 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

55 lines (46 loc) · 6.96 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for nodemcu/nodemcu-firmware

Attack Surface: 1. Lua Code Injection

  • Description: Attackers inject malicious Lua code into the device, gaining full control. This is the primary attack vector against NodeMCU.
  • NodeMCU Contribution: NodeMCU's core functionality is executing Lua scripts. Any vulnerability that allows arbitrary code execution in the Lua interpreter is a direct attack on the firmware's design and purpose. The interpreter and its exposed APIs are the attack surface.
  • Example: A web configuration interface with a text field for entering a Wi-Fi SSID. If the input isn't sanitized, an attacker could enter: "; os.execute("rm -rf /") --. This would attempt to delete the entire filesystem because NodeMCU provides the os.execute function.
  • Impact: Complete device compromise, data loss, potential control of connected hardware (indirectly, through further Lua code execution).
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Input Validation: Implement rigorous input validation and sanitization everywhere user-supplied data is used, especially before passing it to dofile(), loadstring(), or any function that executes Lua code. Use whitelisting (allowing only known-good characters) instead of blacklisting.
    • Avoid loadstring(): Prefer dofile() for loading scripts from files. Avoid loadstring() if at all possible.
    • Sandboxing (Limited): Explore techniques like limiting global variable access or pre-compiling Lua code to bytecode.
    • Code Review: Thoroughly review all Lua scripts for potential injection vulnerabilities. Automated static analysis tools can help.

Attack Surface: 2. Unauthenticated/Weakly Authenticated OTA Updates

  • Description: Attackers upload malicious firmware to the device via the Over-the-Air (OTA) update mechanism, replacing the legitimate NodeMCU firmware.
  • NodeMCU Contribution: NodeMCU provides built-in OTA functionality (often using the node.flashreload() function or similar). The implementation of this functionality within NodeMCU, and how developers use it, creates the attack surface. If authentication and integrity checks are missing or weak, it's a direct vulnerability in the firmware's update process.
  • Example: An OTA update endpoint that accepts any firmware image without verifying a digital signature or requiring a strong password. The lack of these checks within the NodeMCU-based update handler is the vulnerability.
  • Impact: Complete device compromise, permanent bricking, potential for widespread compromise of multiple devices.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strong Authentication: Require strong authentication (e.g., a robust password, API key, or cryptographic challenge-response) before allowing an OTA update. This authentication must be handled within the NodeMCU code.
    • Digital Signatures: Digitally sign all firmware images. The NodeMCU firmware must verify the signature before installing the update.
    • HTTPS: Use HTTPS for all OTA update communication. The NodeMCU code must verify the server's certificate.
    • Version Control: The NodeMCU firmware must implement version control to prevent rollback attacks.
    • Rollback Protection: If a rollback is necessary, the NodeMCU firmware must ensure it's also authenticated and signed.

Attack Surface: 3. Filesystem Access (via Lua)

  • Description: Attackers use injected Lua code to read, write, or delete files on the device's flash filesystem, leveraging NodeMCU's file API.
  • NodeMCU Contribution: NodeMCU provides the file module, giving Lua scripts direct access to the filesystem. The existence of this module and its capabilities are the direct contribution to the attack surface.
  • Example: An attacker injects Lua code that uses file.open("init.lua", "w") to overwrite the main startup script, replacing it with malicious code. Or, reading Wi-Fi credentials stored in a plain text file using file.open() and file.read(). This is possible because NodeMCU exposes these functions.
  • Impact: Data theft (e.g., Wi-Fi credentials), device configuration modification, potential for persistent compromise (by modifying startup scripts).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Least Privilege: Store sensitive data as securely as possible. Avoid storing credentials in plain text files accessible to Lua.
    • Encryption: Encrypt sensitive data stored on the filesystem. This requires implementing encryption/decryption within the NodeMCU environment (likely using a custom C module or a Lua library).
    • Secure Configuration Storage: If possible, use alternative storage mechanisms that are less directly exposed to Lua scripts.
    • Code Review: Carefully review any Lua code that interacts with the filesystem, looking for potential misuse of the file module.

Attack Surface: 4. Network Service Vulnerabilities (in Lua Modules)

  • Description: Vulnerabilities in NodeMCU's network-related modules (e.g., net, http, mqtt) or custom modules written in Lua, specifically vulnerabilities within the Lua code itself or how it interacts with the underlying network stack.
  • NodeMCU Contribution: NodeMCU provides these modules as part of its standard library. The implementation of these modules in Lua, and the APIs they expose, are the direct contribution to the attack surface.
  • Example: A buffer overflow in the http module's handling of HTTP headers (written in Lua), allowing an attacker to crash the device or potentially inject code. Or, a custom MQTT client (written in Lua) that doesn't properly validate server certificates. The vulnerability lies within the Lua code of these modules.
  • Impact: Denial-of-service (DoS), potential code execution (if the vulnerability allows for it), data leakage, Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep Modules Updated: Use the latest version of NodeMCU and its modules. This is crucial as vulnerabilities are often patched in newer releases.
    • Secure Coding Practices: Follow secure coding practices within the Lua code of network modules. Validate all input, handle errors gracefully, and avoid common vulnerabilities like buffer overflows (even in Lua).
    • Use Secure Protocols: Use secure protocols (e.g., HTTPS, MQTTS) whenever possible. The Lua code must verify server certificates.
    • Input Validation (Again): Even within network modules, rigorously validate all data received from the network before processing it within the Lua environment.