Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
114 lines (101 loc) · 12.8 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

114 lines (101 loc) · 12.8 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for bang590/jspatch

Mitigation Strategy: Eliminate JSPatch in Production Builds

  • Description:
    • Step 1: Identify all JSPatch code and dependencies within your project. This includes frameworks, libraries, and any code snippets that initialize or use JSPatch.
    • Step 2: Configure your build system (e.g., Xcode build schemes, Gradle build types) to exclude JSPatch from production builds. This typically involves using preprocessor directives, conditional compilation, or separate build configurations.
    • Step 3: Implement automated checks in your Continuous Integration/Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) pipeline to verify that JSPatch is not included in production builds. This could involve scripts that search for JSPatch-related keywords or frameworks in the built application package.
    • Step 4: Thoroughly test production builds on various devices and platforms to confirm the complete absence of JSPatch functionality and related code.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Remote Code Execution (High Severity): Eliminates the primary attack vector of injecting and executing arbitrary code through JSPatch.
    • Data Breaches (High Severity): Prevents malicious patches from being used to exfiltrate sensitive data via JSPatch.
    • Application Instability (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of application crashes or unexpected behavior caused by poorly written or malicious JSPatch patches.
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks (Medium Severity): While HTTPS mitigates network interception, removing JSPatch reduces the attack surface JSPatch introduces if a MITM attack were to succeed in delivering a malicious patch.
  • Impact:
    • Remote Code Execution: Significantly reduces risk.
    • Data Breaches: Significantly reduces risk.
    • Application Instability: Moderately reduces risk.
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks: Moderately reduces risk.
  • Currently Implemented: Yes, in production builds. Build configurations in Xcode are set to exclude the JSPatch framework and related initialization code for the "Release" scheme. Preprocessor directives are used to conditionally compile JSPatch-related features.
  • Missing Implementation: N/A - JSPatch is intended to be completely removed from production builds. However, continuous monitoring of build processes and dependency management is needed to ensure it doesn't inadvertently creep back in due to dependency updates or configuration changes.

Mitigation Strategy: Restrict JSPatch Usage to Development and Internal Testing Environments

  • Description:
    • Step 1: Clearly define and document the environments where JSPatch is permitted (e.g., development, staging, internal testing).
    • Step 2: Implement environment detection within the application code. Use build configurations or environment variables to determine the current environment at runtime.
    • Step 3: Conditionally initialize and enable JSPatch functionality only when the application is running in an allowed environment. Use conditional statements based on the environment detection mechanism.
    • Step 4: Implement visual indicators within the application (e.g., a watermark or debug menu) when JSPatch is enabled to clearly distinguish development/testing builds from production builds.
    • Step 5: Educate development and testing teams about the restricted usage of JSPatch and the importance of not enabling it in production-like environments.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Accidental Exposure in Production (Medium Severity): Prevents unintentional release of JSPatch-enabled builds to end-users.
    • Unauthorized Patch Deployment in Production (Medium Severity): Limits the attack surface introduced by JSPatch by confining its use to controlled environments.
  • Impact:
    • Accidental Exposure in Production: Moderately reduces risk.
    • Unauthorized Patch Deployment in Production: Moderately reduces risk.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Environment detection is in place using build configurations. JSPatch initialization is conditionally executed based on the detected environment.
  • Missing Implementation: Visual indicators to clearly differentiate JSPatch-enabled builds are not yet implemented. Further refinement of environment detection logic and more robust enforcement mechanisms (e.g., automated tests) are needed.

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Code Review Process for Patches

  • Description:
    • Step 1: Establish a mandatory code review process for all JSPatch patches, regardless of the environment they are intended for.
    • Step 2: Define clear code review guidelines specifically for JSPatch patches, focusing on security aspects such as:
      • Input validation and sanitization within patches.
      • Principle of least privilege - patches should only modify necessary functionality.
      • Avoidance of accessing or modifying sensitive data unless absolutely necessary and justified within patches.
      • Absence of malicious code or unintended side effects in patches.
    • Step 3: Train developers on secure coding practices for JSPatch patches and the importance of rigorous code reviews.
    • Step 4: Utilize code review tools and platforms to facilitate the review process and track patch reviews.
    • Step 5: Ensure that patches are reviewed by at least one other developer with security awareness before deployment, even in development environments.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Malicious Patch Injection by Insider Threat (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of malicious code being introduced through JSPatch patches by rogue developers or compromised accounts.
    • Accidental Introduction of Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity): Helps identify and prevent unintentional security flaws or bugs in JSPatch patches.
  • Impact:
    • Malicious Patch Injection by Insider Threat: Moderately reduces risk.
    • Accidental Introduction of Vulnerabilities: Moderately reduces risk.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Code reviews are generally practiced, but specific guidelines for JSPatch patches and mandatory reviews for all patches are not formally documented or enforced.
  • Missing Implementation: Formalized JSPatch patch code review guidelines need to be created and integrated into the development workflow. Enforcement mechanisms and tracking of patch reviews are also missing.

Mitigation Strategy: Centralized and Audited Patch Management System

  • Description:
    • Step 1: Implement a centralized system for storing, versioning, and managing JSPatch patches. This could be a dedicated server, a version control repository, or a cloud-based service.
    • Step 2: Implement access control mechanisms to restrict access to the patch management system to authorized personnel only. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to define different levels of access (e.g., patch creators, reviewers, deployers).
    • Step 3: Implement comprehensive audit logging within the patch management system. Log all patch uploads, modifications, deployments, access attempts, and user actions related to JSPatch patches.
    • Step 4: Integrate the patch management system with the application's patch download and application logic. Ensure the application only fetches patches from the authorized centralized system for JSPatch.
    • Step 5: Regularly review audit logs to detect any suspicious activity or unauthorized access to the patch management system related to JSPatch.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Patch Deployment (Medium Severity): Prevents unauthorized individuals from deploying or modifying JSPatch patches.
    • Compromised Patch Server (Medium Severity): Centralization allows for better security controls and monitoring of the patch delivery infrastructure specifically for JSPatch.
    • Lack of Accountability (Low Severity): Audit logs provide accountability and traceability for JSPatch patch-related actions.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized Patch Deployment: Moderately reduces risk.
    • Compromised Patch Server: Moderately reduces risk.
    • Lack of Accountability: Minimally reduces risk, but improves incident response and forensics.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Patches are currently stored in a version control repository, but access control is not strictly enforced, and audit logging is minimal specifically for JSPatch patch management.
  • Missing Implementation: A dedicated patch management system with robust access control, comprehensive audit logging, and integration with the application's patch fetching mechanism specifically for JSPatch is needed.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Patch Signing and Verification

  • Description:
    • Step 1: Generate a strong cryptographic key pair. Keep the private key securely stored and accessible only to authorized personnel responsible for signing JSPatch patches.
    • Step 2: Implement a patch signing process. Before deploying any JSPatch patch, use the private key to digitally sign the patch file. This generates a digital signature that is attached to the patch or stored separately.
    • Step 3: Implement patch signature verification within the application. Before applying a JSPatch patch, the application must verify the digital signature using the corresponding public key.
    • Step 4: If signature verification fails, the application should reject the JSPatch patch and log an error.
    • Step 5: Regularly rotate the cryptographic key pair and securely manage key storage and access.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Patch Tampering (High Severity): Ensures that JSPatch patches have not been modified in transit or by unauthorized parties.
    • Unauthorized Patch Injection (High Severity): Prevents the application from applying JSPatch patches that are not signed by a trusted source.
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks (Medium Severity): While HTTPS protects the transport layer, signing provides an additional layer of integrity verification at the application level specifically for JSPatch patches.
  • Impact:
    • Patch Tampering: Significantly reduces risk.
    • Unauthorized Patch Injection: Significantly reduces risk.
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks: Moderately reduces risk.
  • Currently Implemented: Not implemented. Patch signing and verification are not currently in place for JSPatch patches.
  • Missing Implementation: Patch signing infrastructure needs to be set up, including key generation, secure key storage, signing process implementation, and verification logic within the application specifically for JSPatch patches.

Mitigation Strategy: Restrict Patch Download Sources

  • Description:
    • Step 1: Identify the legitimate and authorized source(s) for JSPatch patches. This is typically your organization's patch server or a designated CDN.
    • Step 2: Configure the application to only download patches from these whitelisted sources. Implement checks in the application code to validate the patch download URL against the whitelist when downloading JSPatch patches.
    • Step 3: If a patch download is attempted from a non-whitelisted source, the application should reject the download and log an error for JSPatch patches.
    • Step 4: Regularly review and update the whitelist of allowed patch download sources as needed.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Patch Server (Medium Severity): Prevents the application from downloading JSPatch patches from compromised or malicious servers.
    • Domain Hijacking/Spoofing (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk if an attacker manages to hijack or spoof a domain that the application might mistakenly trust for JSPatch patch delivery.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized Patch Server: Moderately reduces risk.
    • Domain Hijacking/Spoofing: Moderately reduces risk.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. The application is configured to download patches from a specific domain, but explicit whitelisting and robust validation of the download source are not fully implemented specifically for JSPatch patch downloads.
  • Missing Implementation: Implement explicit whitelisting of patch download sources and robust validation logic within the application to ensure JSPatch patches are only fetched from authorized servers.