Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
100 lines (72 loc) · 10.9 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

100 lines (72 loc) · 10.9 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for bradlarson/gpuimage

Objective: Compromise Application via GPUImage Exploitation

Attack Tree Visualization

  • [CRITICAL NODE] Root: Compromise Application via GPUImage Exploitation [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    • [CRITICAL NODE] 1. Exploit Vulnerabilities in GPUImage Library [HIGH-RISK PATH]
      • [CRITICAL NODE] 1.1. Memory Corruption Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]
        • [CRITICAL NODE] 1.1.1. Buffer Overflow in Image/Video Processing [HIGH-RISK PATH]
          • [CRITICAL NODE] 1.1.1.1. Trigger via Maliciously Crafted Image/Video Input [HIGH-RISK PATH]
      • [CRITICAL NODE] 1.3. Dependency Vulnerabilities (Indirectly via GPUImage) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
        • [CRITICAL NODE] 1.3.1. Vulnerabilities in Underlying Graphics Libraries (OpenGL ES, Metal, etc.) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
        • [CRITICAL NODE] 1.3.2. Vulnerabilities in Image/Video Decoding Libraries used by GPUImage (or OS) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    • 2. Exploit Misuse or Misconfiguration of GPUImage in Application [HIGH-RISK PATH]
      • 2.2. [CRITICAL NODE] Lack of Input Validation Before GPUImage Processing [HIGH-RISK PATH]
        • 2.2.1. [CRITICAL NODE] Passing Unvalidated User Input Directly to GPUImage Filters [HIGH-RISK PATH]
        • 2.2.2. [CRITICAL NODE] Processing Untrusted Image/Video Sources Without Validation [HIGH-RISK PATH]

Attack Tree Path: 1. [CRITICAL NODE] Root: Compromise Application via GPUImage Exploitation

  • Attack Vector: This is the overarching goal. Attackers aim to leverage weaknesses related to GPUImage to gain unauthorized access, control, or cause harm to the application and potentially the underlying system.

Attack Tree Path: 2. [CRITICAL NODE] 1. Exploit Vulnerabilities in GPUImage Library

  • Attack Vector: Directly targeting vulnerabilities within the GPUImage library code itself. This involves finding and exploiting bugs in GPUImage's implementation.
    • Impact: If successful, this can lead to critical vulnerabilities like code execution, allowing the attacker to completely compromise the application and potentially the system.
    • Mitigation: Thorough code review of GPUImage (if contributing), static and dynamic analysis, fuzzing, and staying updated with any reported vulnerabilities in GPUImage or similar libraries.

Attack Tree Path: 3. [CRITICAL NODE] 1.1. Memory Corruption Vulnerabilities

  • Attack Vector: Exploiting memory management errors within GPUImage. These vulnerabilities arise from incorrect handling of memory allocation, deallocation, and access.
    • Types: Buffer overflows, heap overflows, use-after-free vulnerabilities.
    • Impact: Code execution, denial of service, information leakage.
    • Mitigation: Memory-safe programming practices, use of memory sanitizers during development, robust input validation to prevent triggering memory corruption, and regular security audits.

Attack Tree Path: 4. [CRITICAL NODE] 1.1.1. Buffer Overflow in Image/Video Processing

  • Attack Vector: Causing GPUImage to write beyond the allocated buffer when processing image or video data. This often happens when handling malformed or excessively large input.
    • Trigger: Providing maliciously crafted image or video files as input to the application that are then processed by GPUImage.
    • Impact: Code execution, denial of service.
    • Mitigation: Strict input validation and sanitization of image and video data, using secure decoding libraries, fuzzing GPUImage with malformed media files, and memory safety checks in GPUImage code.

Attack Tree Path: 5. [CRITICAL NODE] 1.1.1.1. Trigger via Maliciously Crafted Image/Video Input

  • Attack Vector: Specifically crafting malicious image or video files designed to exploit buffer overflow vulnerabilities in GPUImage's image/video processing routines.
    • Crafting Techniques: Manipulating file headers, color palettes, image dimensions, or video codecs to trigger buffer overflows during decoding or processing.
    • Delivery Methods: User uploads, embedding in web pages, malicious links, or any method where the application processes external image/video data.
    • Impact: Code execution, denial of service.
    • Mitigation: Robust input validation, secure decoding libraries, content security policies, and sandboxing of image/video processing.

Attack Tree Path: 6. [CRITICAL NODE] 1.3. Dependency Vulnerabilities (Indirectly via GPUImage)

  • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in libraries that GPUImage depends on, such as graphics libraries (OpenGL ES, Metal) or image/video decoding libraries.
    • Indirect Exploitation: Attackers don't directly target GPUImage code, but rather vulnerabilities in its dependencies, which can still compromise applications using GPUImage.
    • Impact: Code execution, system compromise, denial of service, depending on the vulnerability in the dependency.
    • Mitigation: Regularly update system libraries and GPU drivers, monitor security advisories for dependencies, and consider using containerization or sandboxing to isolate the application and its dependencies.

Attack Tree Path: 7. [CRITICAL NODE] 1.3.1. Vulnerabilities in Underlying Graphics Libraries (OpenGL ES, Metal, etc.)

  • Attack Vector: Exploiting known or zero-day vulnerabilities in the graphics libraries (OpenGL ES, Metal, Vulkan, etc.) used by GPUImage to interact with the GPU.
    • Graphics Library as Attack Surface: Graphics libraries are complex and interact directly with hardware, making them potential targets for vulnerabilities.
    • Impact: Code execution at a lower level, potentially GPU takeover, system instability, denial of service.
    • Mitigation: Keep system libraries and GPU drivers updated, monitor security advisories for graphics libraries, and consider platform-specific security hardening.

Attack Tree Path: 8. [CRITICAL NODE] 1.3.2. Vulnerabilities in Image/Video Decoding Libraries used by GPUImage (or OS)

  • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in image and video decoding libraries used by the operating system or directly by GPUImage to handle different media formats (PNG, JPEG, MP4, etc.).
    • Decoding Libraries as Attack Vector: Decoding libraries are complex and handle untrusted data, making them prone to vulnerabilities like buffer overflows and format string bugs.
    • Impact: Code execution, denial of service, information leakage.
    • Mitigation: Ensure the operating system and relevant decoding libraries are updated, use secure and well-maintained decoding libraries, implement file format validation, and consider sandboxing decoding processes.

Attack Tree Path: 9. 2. Exploit Misuse or Misconfiguration of GPUImage in Application

  • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities arising from how developers use or configure GPUImage within their application, rather than flaws in GPUImage itself.
    • Developer Responsibility: Even a secure library can be misused to create vulnerabilities in an application.
    • Impact: Range from information disclosure and denial of service to potentially triggering underlying GPUImage vulnerabilities due to improper usage.
    • Mitigation: Secure coding practices, thorough testing, input validation, secure data handling, and following security guidelines for using third-party libraries.

Attack Tree Path: 10. 2.2. [CRITICAL NODE] Lack of Input Validation Before GPUImage Processing

  • Attack Vector: Failing to properly validate and sanitize user-provided or external data before passing it to GPUImage for processing.
    • Input as Attack Surface: Untrusted input can be crafted to exploit vulnerabilities in GPUImage or cause unexpected behavior.
    • Impact: Denial of service, potentially triggering memory corruption vulnerabilities in GPUImage if malicious input leads to unexpected processing paths or resource exhaustion.
    • Mitigation: Implement robust input validation routines to check data types, ranges, formats, and integrity before using them with GPUImage.

Attack Tree Path: 11. 2.2.1. [CRITICAL NODE] Passing Unvalidated User Input Directly to GPUImage Filters

  • Attack Vector: Directly using user-provided data (e.g., filter parameters, image paths) without validation as arguments to GPUImage filters or processing functions.
    • Direct Injection: Attackers can manipulate user inputs to control filter behavior in unintended ways or potentially trigger vulnerabilities if filter parameters are not handled securely by GPUImage.
    • Impact: Denial of service, unexpected application behavior, potentially triggering underlying GPUImage vulnerabilities.
    • Mitigation: Validate and sanitize all user inputs before using them as parameters for GPUImage filters. Use whitelisting and input sanitization techniques.

Attack Tree Path: 12. 2.2.2. [CRITICAL NODE] Processing Untrusted Image/Video Sources Without Validation

  • Attack Vector: Processing image or video data from untrusted sources (user uploads, external URLs, etc.) without proper validation of file format, integrity, and content before passing it to GPUImage.
    • Malicious Media Files: Untrusted media files can be crafted to exploit vulnerabilities in decoding libraries or GPUImage itself.
    • Impact: Denial of service, code execution if malicious media triggers vulnerabilities, information leakage if processing sensitive data from malicious sources.
    • Mitigation: Validate file format and integrity, use secure decoding libraries, consider sandboxing decoding processes for untrusted sources, and implement content security policies.