Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
123 lines (92 loc) · 8.87 KB

File metadata and controls

123 lines (92 loc) · 8.87 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for bradlarson/gpuimage

Objective: Arbitrary Code Execution or DoS via GPUImage Exploitation

Attack Tree Visualization

Goal: Arbitrary Code Execution or DoS via GPUImage Exploitation ├── 1. Shader Manipulation (Arbitrary Code Execution) [HIGH RISK] │ ├── 1.1 Input Validation Bypass (Shader Source) [CRITICAL] (Medium/Very High) │ │ ├── 1.1.1 Craft Malicious Shader Source (Medium/Very High) │ │ │ ├── 1.1.1.1 Exploit insufficient sanitization of user-provided shader code. [CRITICAL] (Medium/Very High) │ │ │ ├── 1.1.1.2 Bypass length restrictions on shader source. (Low/Very High) │ │ │ └── 1.1.1.3 Inject control characters or escape sequences to alter shader parsing. (Low/Very High) │ └── 1.3 Shader Parameter Manipulation (Medium/High) │ └── 1.3.3 Manipulate texture coordinates or other parameters to cause out-of-bounds reads/writes. [CRITICAL] (Medium/High) ├── 2. Resource Exhaustion (Denial of Service) [HIGH RISK] │ ├── 2.1 Excessive Memory Allocation [CRITICAL] (High/Medium) │ │ ├── 2.1.1 Create a large number of GPUImage contexts/filters. (High/Medium) │ │ ├── 2.1.2 Process extremely large images. [CRITICAL] (High/Medium) │ │ └── 2.1.3 Chain a large number of filters together. (Medium/Medium)

  • Description: This attack path focuses on the attacker's ability to inject and execute malicious code within the GPU shaders processed by GPUImage. Successful exploitation can lead to complete system compromise.
  • Description: This is the crucial first step. The attacker needs to bypass any input validation mechanisms that are supposed to prevent malicious shader code from being processed.
    • Likelihood: Medium - Input validation is often implemented, but frequently contains flaws or oversights.
    • Impact: Very High - Successful bypass allows for arbitrary code execution.
    • Effort: Medium - Requires understanding of shader syntax and common validation weaknesses.
    • Skill Level: Intermediate
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Description: The attacker constructs a shader that contains malicious code, designed to exploit vulnerabilities in the GPU driver, shader compiler, or the application's handling of shader output. * Likelihood: Medium - Depends on the effectiveness of input validation. * Impact: Very High - Arbitrary code execution. * Effort: Medium - Requires knowledge of shader programming and potential exploits. * Skill Level: Intermediate * Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Description: The most common vulnerability. The application fails to properly sanitize user-provided shader code, allowing the attacker to inject malicious instructions. This might involve using an allowlist that is too permissive, failing to handle edge cases, or relying on ineffective blacklisting. * Likelihood: Medium - Sanitization is often incomplete or flawed. * Impact: Very High - Leads to arbitrary code execution. * Effort: Low - Exploiting common sanitization flaws is relatively easy. * Skill Level: Intermediate * Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Description: The application imposes a length limit on shader code, but the attacker finds a way to bypass this restriction, potentially allowing for more complex and malicious shaders. * Likelihood: Low - Length restrictions are usually easier to enforce. * Impact: Very High * Effort: Medium * Skill Level: Intermediate * Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Description: The attacker uses special characters or escape sequences to manipulate how the shader code is parsed, potentially bypassing validation checks or causing unexpected behavior. * Likelihood: Low - Requires a deeper understanding of the shader parser. * Impact: Very High * Effort: High * Skill Level: Advanced * Detection Difficulty: Hard
  • Description: The attacker provides carefully crafted texture coordinates or other shader parameters that cause the shader to access memory outside of the intended bounds. This can lead to data leaks, crashes, or potentially code execution. * Likelihood: Medium - Requires understanding of how texture coordinates are used and how to trigger out-of-bounds access. * Impact: High - Can lead to data leakage or potentially code execution. * Effort: Medium * Skill Level: Intermediate * Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Description: This attack path focuses on overwhelming the system's resources (CPU, GPU, memory) by exploiting how GPUImage handles resource allocation and processing.
  • Description: The attacker attempts to consume excessive amounts of memory by creating a large number of GPUImage objects, processing very large images, or chaining together many filters.
    • Likelihood: High - This is a common and relatively easy attack to attempt.
    • Impact: Medium - Causes denial of service, but doesn't necessarily lead to data breaches or code execution.
    • Effort: Low
    • Skill Level: Novice
    • Detection Difficulty: Easy
  • Description: The attacker repeatedly creates GPUImage contexts or filters without properly releasing them, leading to memory exhaustion. * Likelihood: High * Impact: Medium * Effort: Low * Skill Level: Novice * Detection Difficulty: Easy
  • Description: The attacker submits very large images to be processed by GPUImage, consuming excessive memory and potentially causing the application to crash. * Likelihood: High - This is a very common attack vector if image size limits aren't enforced. * Impact: Medium * Effort: Low * Skill Level: Novice * Detection Difficulty: Easy
  • Description: The attacker creates a long chain of GPUImage filters, increasing the memory and processing requirements. * Likelihood: Medium * Impact: Medium * Effort: Low * Skill Level: Novice * Detection Difficulty: Easy