Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
158 lines (128 loc) · 11.7 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

158 lines (128 loc) · 11.7 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for cocoanetics/dtcoretext

Objective: Compromise application using DTCoreText by exploiting vulnerabilities within DTCoreText itself.

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Goal: Compromise Application via DTCoreText [CRITICAL NODE] └───(OR)─ Exploit DTCoreText Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] ├───(OR)─ Parsing Vulnerabilities │ ├───(AND)─ Maliciously Crafted HTML/CSS Input [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ ├─── Buffer Overflow in Parser [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ ├─── Integer Overflow/Underflow in Parser Logic [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ ├─── Logic Errors in HTML/CSS Parsing [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ └───(AND)─ Insecure Handling of External Resources (If DTCoreText fetches external resources) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ ├─── Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via URL Attributes [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ ├─── Path Traversal via URL Attributes [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ ├─── Unvalidated Download of Malicious Resources [HIGH-RISK PATH] ├───(OR)─ Rendering Vulnerabilities │ ├───(AND)─ Maliciously Crafted HTML/CSS Input [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ ├─── Memory Corruption during Rendering [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ ├─── Logic Errors in Rendering Logic [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ ├─── Resource Exhaustion during Rendering (DoS) [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ └───(OR)─ Logic Vulnerabilities in DTCoreText API Usage (Application-side) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ ├─── Unsafe Handling of User-Provided HTML/CSS [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ ├─── Incorrect Configuration of DTCoreText [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ ├─── Lack of Input Validation Before DTCoreText Processing [HIGH-RISK PATH]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Attack Goal: Compromise Application via DTCoreText [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: The ultimate objective of the attacker is to successfully compromise the application that utilizes DTCoreText. This node represents the culmination of any successful attack path exploiting DTCoreText vulnerabilities.
  • Impact: Full compromise of the application, potentially leading to data breaches, service disruption, and reputational damage.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit DTCoreText Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: This is the overarching strategy. The attacker aims to find and exploit weaknesses within the DTCoreText library itself to achieve their goal.
  • Impact: Successful exploitation can lead to various forms of compromise depending on the specific vulnerability.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Maliciously Crafted HTML/CSS Input [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: This is the primary attack vector for many DTCoreText vulnerabilities. Attackers provide specially crafted HTML and CSS code designed to trigger vulnerabilities in DTCoreText's parsing or rendering processes.
  • Impact: Depending on the vulnerability triggered, impact can range from Denial of Service to Remote Code Execution.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Parsing Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Weaknesses in how DTCoreText parses HTML and CSS code.

  • Impact: Can lead to memory corruption, unexpected behavior, or denial of service.

    • 4.1. Buffer Overflow in Parser [HIGH-RISK PATH]

      • Attack Vector: Sending excessively long or deeply nested HTML/CSS input to overwhelm parser buffers.
      • Likelihood: Medium
      • Impact: High (Code Execution, System Compromise)
      • Effort: Medium
      • Skill Level: High (Vulnerability Research, Exploit Development)
      • Detection Difficulty: Hard (Subtle memory corruption)

    • 4.2. Integer Overflow/Underflow in Parser Logic [HIGH-RISK PATH]

      • Attack Vector: Providing input that triggers integer overflow or underflow during parsing calculations (e.g., length checks, memory allocation).
      • Likelihood: Medium
      • Impact: Medium (Memory Corruption, DoS, Unexpected Behavior)
      • Effort: Medium
      • Skill Level: Medium (Integer Overflow/Underflow understanding)
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Fuzzing, code review)

    • 4.3. Logic Errors in HTML/CSS Parsing [HIGH-RISK PATH]

      • Attack Vector: Crafting HTML/CSS that exploits unexpected parsing behavior, leading to crashes or incorrect state.
      • Likelihood: Medium-High
      • Impact: Low-Medium (DoS, Incorrect Rendering, potential for further exploitation)
      • Effort: Low-Medium
      • Skill Level: Low-Medium (HTML/CSS knowledge, parser understanding)
      • Detection Difficulty: Easy-Medium (Testing, visual inspection)

Attack Tree Path: 5. Insecure Handling of External Resources (If DTCoreText fetches external resources) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: Vulnerabilities arising from DTCoreText's potential ability to fetch external resources (like images, stylesheets) based on URLs in HTML/CSS. This becomes a critical risk if not handled securely.

  • Impact: Can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery, Path Traversal, or downloading and processing malicious resources.

    • 5.1. Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via URL Attributes [HIGH-RISK PATH]

      • Attack Vector: Injecting malicious URLs in HTML attributes (e.g., <img> src, <a> href) to target internal services or sensitive endpoints.
      • Likelihood: Medium-High (If external resources are enabled and URLs not validated)
      • Impact: High (Internal Network Access, Data Exfiltration, potentially RCE)
      • Effort: Low
      • Skill Level: Low (Basic URL manipulation)
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Network monitoring, egress filtering)

    • 5.2. Path Traversal via URL Attributes [HIGH-RISK PATH]

      • Attack Vector: Injecting URLs with path traversal sequences (e.g., ../) to access files on the server (if server-side rendering or processing is involved).
      • Likelihood: Medium (If server-side processing and path traversal not prevented)
      • Impact: Medium-High (Sensitive File Access)
      • Effort: Low
      • Skill Level: Low (Path traversal understanding)
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Input validation, path normalization)

    • 5.3. Unvalidated Download of Malicious Resources [HIGH-RISK PATH]

      • Attack Vector: DTCoreText downloads and processes malicious files (e.g., images, fonts) from attacker-controlled URLs.
      • Likelihood: Medium (If external resources are enabled and download validation is weak)
      • Impact: High (Code Execution if processing libraries are vulnerable)
      • Effort: Low
      • Skill Level: Low-Medium (Basic web hosting, understanding of file types)
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Sandboxing, file type validation, vulnerability scanning)

Attack Tree Path: 6. Rendering Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Weaknesses in the process of rendering the parsed HTML and CSS into visual output.

  • Impact: Can lead to memory corruption, logic errors, or resource exhaustion during rendering.

    • 6.1. Memory Corruption during Rendering [HIGH-RISK PATH]

      • Attack Vector: Crafting HTML/CSS that triggers memory corruption bugs in CoreText or DTCoreText rendering engine.
      • Likelihood: Medium
      • Impact: High (Code Execution, System Compromise)
      • Effort: Medium-High
      • Skill Level: High (Rendering engine internals, exploit development)
      • Detection Difficulty: Hard (Subtle memory corruption)

    • 6.2. Logic Errors in Rendering Logic [HIGH-RISK PATH]

      • Attack Vector: Exploiting bugs in how DTCoreText handles specific HTML/CSS features during rendering, leading to unexpected behavior or crashes.
      • Likelihood: Medium
      • Impact: Low-Medium (DoS, Incorrect Rendering, potential for further exploitation)
      • Effort: Low-Medium
      • Skill Level: Low-Medium (HTML/CSS knowledge, rendering principles)
      • Detection Difficulty: Easy-Medium (Testing, visual inspection)

    • 6.3. Resource Exhaustion during Rendering (DoS) [HIGH-RISK PATH]

      • Attack Vector: Injecting complex CSS or deeply nested elements (CPU Exhaustion) or large images/documents (Memory Exhaustion) that cause excessive resource consumption during rendering.
      • Likelihood: Medium-High
      • Impact: Medium (Denial of Service)
      • Effort: Low
      • Skill Level: Low (Basic HTML/CSS knowledge)
      • Detection Difficulty: Easy (Performance monitoring)

Attack Tree Path: 7. Logic Vulnerabilities in DTCoreText API Usage (Application-side) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: Vulnerabilities arising from how the application uses the DTCoreText API. This is often the weakest link, as even a secure library can be misused.

  • Impact: Can expose the application to all underlying DTCoreText vulnerabilities if not used correctly.

    • 7.1. Unsafe Handling of User-Provided HTML/CSS [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

      • Attack Vector: Application directly passes unsanitized user input to DTCoreText for rendering.
      • Likelihood: High (Common application vulnerability)
      • Impact: High (Exposes application to all DTCoreText vulnerabilities)
      • Effort: Low (No effort needed by attacker if vulnerability exists)
      • Skill Level: Low (No special skills needed to exploit)
      • Detection Difficulty: Easy (Code review, penetration testing)

    • 7.2. Incorrect Configuration of DTCoreText [HIGH-RISK PATH]

      • Attack Vector: Application uses DTCoreText in a way that exposes vulnerabilities due to misconfiguration (e.g., enabling external resource loading unnecessarily).
      • Likelihood: Medium (Configuration errors are common)
      • Impact: Medium-High (Depends on misconfiguration, could enable SSRF, resource loading issues)
      • Effort: Low (No effort needed by attacker if misconfiguration exists)
      • Skill Level: Low (No special skills needed to exploit)
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Security audits, configuration reviews)

    • 7.3. Lack of Input Validation Before DTCoreText Processing [HIGH-RISK PATH]

      • Attack Vector: Application doesn't validate or sanitize input before passing it to DTCoreText, relying solely on DTCoreText's parsing (which might be flawed).
      • Likelihood: Medium-High (Common application oversight)
      • Impact: High (Exposes application to DTCoreText parsing vulnerabilities)
      • Effort: Low (No effort needed by attacker if validation is missing)
      • Skill Level: Low (No special skills needed to exploit)
      • Detection Difficulty: Easy (Code review, penetration testing)