Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
234 lines (194 loc) · 16.8 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

234 lines (194 loc) · 16.8 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for codermjlee/mjrefresh

Objective: Compromise application using mjrefresh by exploiting high-risk vulnerabilities within the library or its usage.

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Goal: Compromise Application Using mjrefresh

└───[OR]─> Exploit mjrefresh Vulnerabilities or Misuse

    ├───[OR]─> Exploit Logic/State Management Flaws in mjrefresh
    │   └───[AND]─> Bypass Rate Limiting/Throttling (if implemented by mjrefresh or app using it)
    │       └───> Flood refresh/load more requests to overwhelm resources or bypass rate limits
    │           **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
    │           **[CRITICAL NODE: Bypass Rate Limiting/Throttling]**

    ├───[OR]─> Exploit Data Handling Vulnerabilities via mjrefresh
    │   ├───[AND]─> Inject Malicious Data via Refresh/Load More Responses
    │   │   ├───> Server-Side Injection (Indirect via Backend)
    │   │   │   └───> Backend vulnerability allows injection of malicious data into API responses consumed by mjrefresh
    │   │   │       **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
    │   │   │       **[CRITICAL NODE: Server-Side Injection (Indirect via Backend)]**

    ├───[OR]─> Exploit Resource Exhaustion/Denial of Service (DoS) via mjrefresh
    │   ├───[AND]─> Trigger Excessive Refresh/Load More Cycles
    │   │   ├───> Automated Rapid Refresh/Load More Requests
    │   │   │   └───> Script to continuously trigger refresh/load more actions
    │   │   │       **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
    │   │   │       **[CRITICAL NODE: Automated Rapid Refresh/Load More Requests]**

    ├───[OR]─> Exploit Misconfiguration or Improper Usage of mjrefresh by Developers
    │   ├───[AND]─> Insecure Implementation of Data Fetching Logic
    │   │   └───> Application's refresh/load more handlers are vulnerable (e.g., SQL injection, insecure API calls) triggered by mjrefresh
    │   │       **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
    │   │       **[CRITICAL NODE: Insecure Implementation of Data Fetching Logic]**
    │   └───[AND]─> Lack of Input Validation in Data Displayed via mjrefresh
    │   │       └───> Application displays data fetched via mjrefresh without proper sanitization, leading to client-side injection vulnerabilities (XSS if web-based, UI injection if native)
    │   │           **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
    │   │           **[CRITICAL NODE: Lack of Input Validation in Data Displayed via mjrefresh]**

    └───[OR]─> Social Engineering Targeting Users via mjrefresh UI (Less Direct, but possible)
        └───[AND]─> Phishing or Deceptive Content via Refresh/Load More
            └───> Inject deceptive content into refresh/load more responses to trick users (e.g., fake login prompts, misleading information) displayed through mjrefresh UI elements.
                **[POTENTIAL HIGH-RISK PATH - DEPENDS ON CONTENT INJECTION]**
                **[CRITICAL NODE: Phishing or Deceptive Content via Refresh/Load More]** (If backend is compromised to inject content)

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path: Bypass Rate Limiting/Throttling

1. High-Risk Path: Bypass Rate Limiting/Throttling

  • Attack Vector Name: Flood refresh/load more requests to overwhelm resources or bypass rate limits
  • Estimations:
    • Likelihood: Medium
    • Impact: Medium to High
    • Effort: Low
    • Skill Level: Low
    • Detection Difficulty: Low
  • Detailed Attack Steps:
    • Attacker identifies the refresh/load more API endpoints used by the application.
    • Attacker uses readily available tools or scripts to send a high volume of requests to these endpoints in a short period.
    • The goal is to exceed any rate limits implemented by the application or the mjrefresh library (if any).
    • If rate limiting is bypassed or insufficient, the server or application resources become overwhelmed.
    • This can lead to Denial of Service (DoS), making the application unavailable or severely degraded for legitimate users.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement robust server-side rate limiting and throttling mechanisms.
    • Consider client-side rate limiting within the application using mjrefresh to reduce request frequency.
    • Monitor traffic patterns for anomalies and potential DoS attacks.
    • Use Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) to detect and block malicious traffic.

2. Critical Node: Bypass Rate Limiting/Throttling

  • Critical Node Name: Bypass Rate Limiting/Throttling
  • Why it's critical: This node represents the core vulnerability that enables the DoS attack path. If rate limiting is weak or non-existent, the application is highly susceptible to resource exhaustion attacks via excessive refresh/load more requests.
  • Mitigation Focus: Strengthening rate limiting mechanisms is the primary focus to mitigate this critical node.

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path: Server-Side Injection (Indirect via Backend)

3. High-Risk Path: Server-Side Injection (Indirect via Backend)

  • Attack Vector Name: Backend vulnerability allows injection of malicious data into API responses consumed by mjrefresh
  • Estimations:
    • Likelihood: Medium to High
    • Impact: High
    • Effort: Low to Medium
    • Skill Level: Low to Medium
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Detailed Attack Steps:
    • Attacker identifies a vulnerability in the backend API that provides data for refresh/load more (e.g., SQL injection, command injection, NoSQL injection).
    • Attacker crafts malicious input to exploit this backend vulnerability.
    • The backend vulnerability allows the attacker to inject malicious data into the API response.
    • The application using mjrefresh receives this malicious data as part of the refresh/load more response.
    • When the application processes and displays this data (potentially using UI elements managed by mjrefresh), it can lead to various impacts, including:
      • Data breach (if sensitive data is exposed).
      • Data manipulation (if data is altered).
      • Client-side injection vulnerabilities (e.g., XSS if malicious HTML/JavaScript is injected and rendered).
      • Account compromise (depending on the nature of the backend vulnerability and data manipulation).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement secure coding practices in backend API development to prevent injection vulnerabilities.
    • Perform regular security testing and vulnerability scanning of backend APIs.
    • Use parameterized queries or prepared statements to prevent SQL injection.
    • Sanitize and validate all user inputs on the backend.
    • Implement input and output encoding to prevent injection attacks.

4. Critical Node: Server-Side Injection (Indirect via Backend)

  • Critical Node Name: Server-Side Injection (Indirect via Backend)
  • Why it's critical: This node highlights the critical dependency on backend security. Vulnerabilities in the backend directly impact the security of the application using mjrefresh, even if mjrefresh itself is secure.
  • Mitigation Focus: Securing the backend APIs and preventing server-side injection vulnerabilities is the primary focus for this critical node.

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path: Automated Rapid Refresh/Load More Requests

5. High-Risk Path: Automated Rapid Refresh/Load More Requests

  • Attack Vector Name: Script to continuously trigger refresh/load more actions
  • Estimations:
    • Likelihood: Medium to High
    • Impact: Medium to High
    • Effort: Low
    • Skill Level: Low
    • Detection Difficulty: Low
  • Detailed Attack Steps:
    • Attacker identifies the refresh/load more trigger mechanism (e.g., pull-to-refresh gesture, button click).
    • Attacker uses a simple script or automated tool to simulate rapid and continuous triggering of refresh/load more actions.
    • This generates a high volume of requests from a single or multiple attacker clients.
    • Similar to bypassing rate limiting, the goal is to overwhelm server or application resources, leading to DoS.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement client-side rate limiting within the application to restrict the frequency of refresh/load more actions from a single user.
    • Combine client-side and server-side rate limiting for defense in depth.
    • Monitor for unusual patterns of rapid refresh/load more requests from individual users.
    • Implement CAPTCHA or similar challenges if excessive refresh/load more activity is detected from a user.

6. Critical Node: Automated Rapid Refresh/Load More Requests

  • Critical Node Name: Automated Rapid Refresh/Load More Requests
  • Why it's critical: This node represents a straightforward and easily executable DoS attack vector. The ease of automation makes it a significant threat if not properly mitigated.
  • Mitigation Focus: Implementing both client-side and server-side rate limiting, along with monitoring and potential CAPTCHA mechanisms, is crucial to mitigate this critical node.

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path: Insecure Implementation of Data Fetching Logic

7. High-Risk Path: Insecure Implementation of Data Fetching Logic

  • Attack Vector Name: Application's refresh/load more handlers are vulnerable (e.g., SQL injection, insecure API calls) triggered by mjrefresh
  • Estimations:
    • Likelihood: Medium to High
    • Impact: High
    • Effort: Low to Medium
    • Skill Level: Low to Medium
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Detailed Attack Steps:
    • Developers implement the application's refresh/load more handlers in a way that introduces vulnerabilities.
    • Common vulnerabilities include:
      • SQL injection in database queries executed during refresh/load more.
      • Insecure API calls to backend services, potentially exposing sensitive data or functionality.
      • Command injection if refresh/load more handlers execute system commands based on user input or external data.
    • Attackers exploit these vulnerabilities by crafting malicious inputs or manipulating data that is processed by the vulnerable refresh/load more handlers.
    • Successful exploitation can lead to data breaches, data manipulation, account compromise, or even remote code execution, depending on the specific vulnerability.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Educate developers on secure coding practices for implementing refresh/load more handlers.
    • Conduct thorough code reviews of refresh/load more handler implementations.
    • Perform static and dynamic code analysis to identify potential vulnerabilities.
    • Use secure coding libraries and frameworks to minimize the risk of common vulnerabilities.
    • Implement input validation and output encoding in refresh/load more handlers.

8. Critical Node: Insecure Implementation of Data Fetching Logic

  • Critical Node Name: Insecure Implementation of Data Fetching Logic
  • Why it's critical: This node highlights the risk of developer errors in implementing the application's core functionality related to refresh/load more. Vulnerabilities at this level can have severe security consequences.
  • Mitigation Focus: Secure coding practices, code reviews, security testing, and developer training are essential to mitigate this critical node.

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path: Lack of Input Validation in Data Displayed via mjrefresh

9. High-Risk Path: Lack of Input Validation in Data Displayed via mjrefresh

  • Attack Vector Name: Application displays data fetched via mjrefresh without proper sanitization, leading to client-side injection vulnerabilities (XSS if web-based, UI injection if native)
  • Estimations:
    • Likelihood: Medium to High
    • Impact: Medium
    • Effort: Low to Medium
    • Skill Level: Low to Medium
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Detailed Attack Steps:
    • The application fetches data via refresh/load more and displays it in the UI using elements potentially managed or influenced by mjrefresh.
    • The application fails to properly sanitize or encode this data before displaying it.
    • If the data contains malicious content (e.g., JavaScript code in a web application, UI manipulation code in a native app), it can be executed or rendered in the user's context.
    • This leads to client-side injection vulnerabilities, such as:
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in web applications, allowing attackers to execute malicious scripts in users' browsers.
      • UI injection in native applications, potentially manipulating the UI or performing actions on behalf of the user.
    • Impact can range from UI defacement and phishing to session hijacking and data theft.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement robust output encoding and sanitization for all data displayed in the UI, especially data fetched from external sources or user-controlled data.
    • Use context-aware output encoding techniques appropriate for the UI technology (e.g., HTML encoding for web, UI-specific sanitization for native).
    • Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) in web applications to mitigate XSS risks.
    • Regularly test for client-side injection vulnerabilities.

10. Critical Node: Lack of Input Validation in Data Displayed via mjrefresh

  • Critical Node Name: Lack of Input Validation in Data Displayed via mjrefresh
  • Why it's critical: This node represents a common and often overlooked vulnerability. Failure to sanitize output is a frequent cause of client-side injection attacks, which can compromise user security.
  • Mitigation Focus: Implementing robust output encoding and sanitization throughout the application, especially for data displayed via mjrefresh, is crucial to mitigate this critical node.

Attack Tree Path: Potential High-Risk Path: Phishing or Deceptive Content via Refresh/Load More

11. Potential High-Risk Path: Phishing or Deceptive Content via Refresh/Load More

  • Attack Vector Name: Inject deceptive content into refresh/load more responses to trick users (e.g., fake login prompts, misleading information) displayed through mjrefresh UI elements.
  • Estimations:
    • Likelihood: Low to Medium (Depends on backend compromise)
    • Impact: Medium to High
    • Effort: Low to Medium (Backend compromise effort dependent)
    • Skill Level: Low to Medium
    • Detection Difficulty: High
  • Detailed Attack Steps:
    • Attacker first needs to compromise the backend system that provides data for refresh/load more.
    • Once backend access is gained, the attacker injects deceptive content into the API responses.
    • This deceptive content is designed to trick users, examples include:
      • Fake login prompts embedded within refreshed content to steal credentials.
      • Misleading information or fake offers to manipulate user behavior.
      • Malicious links disguised as legitimate content.
    • The application using mjrefresh displays this deceptive content to users as part of the refresh/load more functionality.
    • Users, believing the content is legitimate, may fall victim to the social engineering attack, leading to account compromise, data theft, or malware infection.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strengthen backend security to prevent backend compromise and unauthorized content injection.
    • Implement content integrity checks to verify the authenticity and source of data displayed via refresh/load more.
    • Educate users about social engineering attacks and how to recognize deceptive content within the application.
    • Design UI/UX to clearly distinguish between application-generated UI elements and content fetched from external sources.

12. Critical Node: Phishing or Deceptive Content via Refresh/Load More

  • Critical Node Name: Phishing or Deceptive Content via Refresh/Load More
  • Why it's critical: While less direct than technical vulnerabilities, successful social engineering attacks can have significant impact. If backend security is weak, this path becomes a more realistic high-risk scenario.
  • Mitigation Focus: Strengthening backend security, implementing content integrity checks, and user education are key to mitigating this critical node.