Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
27 lines (22 loc) · 4.61 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

27 lines (22 loc) · 4.61 KB

Threat Model Analysis for facebookarchive/kvocontroller

Threat: Threat 1: Retain Cycle Leading to Memory Exhaustion (DoS)

  • Description: An attacker triggers a denial-of-service (DoS) condition by exploiting a retain cycle caused by improper use of KVOController. The attacker might not directly cause the retain cycle (though repeated triggering of vulnerable code paths could exacerbate it), but the vulnerability lies in the failure to unregister observers. This leads to a gradual accumulation of leaked objects, eventually exhausting available memory and causing the application to crash. This is a direct consequence of misusing KVOController's API.
    • Impact: Application crash, rendering the service unavailable to legitimate users.
    • Affected KVOController Component: The observation and unregistration mechanisms. Specifically, the failure to call unobserve:keyPath:, unobserve:object:keyPath:, unobserveAll, or equivalent methods when the observer is no longer needed. The FBKVOController class itself and its internal management of observers are directly implicated.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Mandatory Unregistration: Enforce a strict policy that all observers registered with KVOController must be unregistered when they are no longer needed. This is the primary mitigation and is directly related to KVOController usage.
      • Automated Unregistration: Use techniques like associating the KVOController instance with the observer's lifecycle (e.g., storing it as a property and unregistering in dealloc or a similar lifecycle method). This directly addresses how KVOController is used.
      • Code Reviews: Code reviews should specifically check for proper unregistration of observers, focusing on the use of KVOController's API.
      • Memory Analysis Tools: Regularly use memory analysis tools (Instruments, Xcode's memory graph debugger) to detect and eliminate retain cycles, directly related to how KVOController manages memory.
      • Weak References: Consider using weak references to the observed object within the observer to prevent strong reference cycles, but be absolutely sure this is appropriate for the observation logic. This is a technique directly applicable to KVOController usage.

Threat: Threat 2: Unintentional Sensitive Data Exposure (via Direct Observation)

  • Description: An attacker gains access to sensitive information because KVOController is directly observing a property that contains sensitive data. This differs from the previous, broader version of this threat, as we're now focusing only on cases where the observed keyPath itself directly points to sensitive data, not indirect exposure through derived properties or complex logic. The attacker might exploit this by inspecting memory or using other vulnerabilities to access the observed object. The core issue is the direct misuse of KVOController to observe a sensitive keyPath.
    • Impact: Leakage of confidential data, such as user credentials, session tokens, or API keys. This could lead to account compromise or unauthorized access.
    • Affected KVOController Component: The core observation mechanism – specifically, the observe:keyPath:options:context: and related methods (and their Swift equivalents) when used with an insecure keyPath. The vulnerability is the direct application of KVOController's observation functionality to a sensitive property.
    • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the sensitivity of the data).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Code Review: Conduct thorough code reviews, focusing specifically on the keyPath arguments passed to KVOController's observation methods. Ensure that no keyPath directly points to a sensitive property.
      • Data Minimization: Avoid observing properties that contain sensitive data at all. If observation is absolutely necessary, refactor the code to avoid exposing the sensitive data directly through the observed property.
      • Avoid KVO for Sensitive Data: For highly sensitive data, do not use KVO. Use alternative, more secure mechanisms for handling and communicating changes to sensitive data. This is a direct recommendation regarding KVOController usage.
      • Input Validation (Indirect): Ensure sensitive data never reaches properties that are observed by KVOController.