Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
118 lines (93 loc) · 7.27 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

118 lines (93 loc) · 7.27 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for facebookarchive/shimmer

Mitigation Strategy: 1. Mitigation Strategy: Library Replacement

  • Description:

    1. Research: Identify actively maintained alternative libraries providing similar shimmer/loading effects. Prioritize those specific to your UI framework (React, Angular, Vue, etc.) or well-regarded general-purpose shimmer libraries.
    2. Evaluation: Create a proof-of-concept to test candidate libraries. Evaluate functionality, performance, ease of integration, and API stability.
    3. Selection: Choose the best replacement based on the evaluation.
    4. Implementation: Directly replace all instances of import statements, component usages, and function calls related to Shimmer with the new library's equivalent code. This is a direct code modification.
    5. Testing: Thoroughly test the application, focusing on areas where Shimmer was previously used.
    6. Removal: Completely remove the Shimmer library and all its related code files from the project. This is a direct removal of the Shimmer dependency.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Known Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Eliminates the risk.
    • Zero-Day Vulnerabilities (Unknown Severity, Potentially High): Significantly reduces the risk.
    • Future Vulnerabilities (Unknown Severity, Potentially High): Protects against future vulnerabilities.

  • Impact:

    • Known Vulnerabilities: Risk reduction: Complete.
    • Zero-Day Vulnerabilities: Risk reduction: High.
    • Future Vulnerabilities: Risk reduction: High.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Not implemented.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • The entire process.

Mitigation Strategy: 2. Mitigation Strategy: Code Isolation and Sandboxing (Focus on Shimmer-Specific Aspects)

  • Description:

    1. Identify Usage: Create a list of all locations where Shimmer code is directly used (imports, function calls, component instantiations).
    2. Component-Level Isolation:
      • Refactor the code to ensure Shimmer is only used within dedicated UI components. This involves direct modification of how Shimmer is imported and used.
      • Ensure these components receive no sensitive data. This is a direct constraint on how data flows to Shimmer components.
    3. Minimal API Surface:
      • Review the Shimmer API and use only the absolute minimum functions and configuration options needed. This involves directly changing the code that interacts with the Shimmer API.
      • Avoid any unnecessary features.
    4. Input Sanitization (Directly within Shimmer Usage):
      • If Shimmer accepts any input (even seemingly harmless parameters), directly add sanitization and validation logic before passing that input to Shimmer functions. This is a direct code modification at the point of interaction with Shimmer.
      • Use a whitelist approach.
    5. Web Workers (If applicable):
      • If feasible, move the Shimmer-related code (including the library itself) to a Web Worker. This involves directly changing how Shimmer is loaded and executed.
    6. Documentation: Document the isolation measures.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (Medium Severity): Reduces impact.
    • Remote Code Execution (RCE) (High Severity): Reduces impact.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): May limit impact.

  • Impact:

    • XSS: Risk reduction: Moderate.
    • RCE: Risk reduction: Moderate to High.
    • DoS: Risk reduction: Moderate.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Partially implemented. Shimmer is mostly in dedicated components, but a review and formal documentation are needed. Input sanitization needs verification and explicit implementation if applicable.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Formal documentation.
    • Verification and implementation of input sanitization (if applicable).
    • Feasibility assessment and potential implementation of Web Workers.
    • Code review for complete isolation.

Mitigation Strategy: 3. Mitigation Strategy: Forking and Patching (Last Resort)

  • Description:

    1. Vulnerability Identification: Identify the specific vulnerability.
    2. Forking: Create a fork of the Shimmer repository.
    3. Patch Development: Directly modify the Shimmer source code in your fork to fix the vulnerability. This is a direct code change to Shimmer itself.
    4. Testing: Thoroughly test the patched code.
    5. Deployment: Replace the original Shimmer library in your project with your directly modified fork. This involves changing build configurations to point to your fork.
    6. Maintenance: You are now responsible for maintaining the forked library.
    7. Documentation: Thoroughly document the forking and patching.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Specific Known Vulnerability (High Severity): Addresses the patched vulnerability.

  • Impact:

    • Specific Known Vulnerability: Risk reduction: High (if the patch is correct).
    • Other Vulnerabilities: Risk reduction: None.
    • New Vulnerabilities (Introduced by Patch): Risk increase.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Not implemented.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • The entire process.

Mitigation Strategy: 4. Mitigation Strategy: Thorough Code Review (Focus on Shimmer Integration)

  • Description:

    1. Scope Definition: Focus the review specifically on the code that directly interacts with Shimmer (imports, function calls, component usage, data passed to Shimmer).
    2. Checklist Creation: Create a checklist focusing on:
      • Initialization and configuration of Shimmer.
      • Data passed directly to Shimmer.
      • Direct interactions between Shimmer and other application components.
      • Any custom modifications to Shimmer.
      • Error handling directly related to Shimmer usage.
    3. Review Execution: Conduct the review, examining the code against the checklist.
    4. Issue Tracking: Document any potential weaknesses.
    5. Remediation: Implement code changes to address issues, directly modifying how Shimmer is used or how data flows to it.
    6. Verification: Re-review the code after remediation.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Implementation Errors (Variable Severity): Identifies vulnerabilities in how Shimmer is used.
    • Logic Flaws (Variable Severity): Uncovers logic errors related to Shimmer usage.

  • Impact:

    • Implementation Errors: Risk reduction: Moderate to High.
    • Logic Flaws: Risk reduction: Moderate.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Not specifically implemented for Shimmer.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • A dedicated code review focused on Shimmer integration.